Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Forgiving a prossie ?  (Read 12617 times)

I very rarely post these days - preferring to lurk in the background - but Cornish Sub's tragic tale has tugged away at my heartstrings.

I reckon now would be an ideal time for the UK Punting community to show a modicum of compassion, solidarity and support for the unfortunate Cornish Patsy as it's the sort of situation that could easily happen to each and everyone one of us (albeit probably not on the same scale...nor set of circumstances)

May I suggest we dig deep into our pockets and have a whip-round to restore Cornish Sub's faith in the World's Oldest Profession. Think of it as a form of Punter-Aid for those less fortunate than ourselves. Given the number of members, figuratively speaking, on the forum, it shouldn't take too long to reach the £500 target.

 :angelgirl:

Offline Cornish sub

Then what have you learnt from it?
That pointing out what happened to me and naming the escorts involved might, instead of proving helpful as a warning to others about said escorts as was intended, lead to ridicule and a thread like this one.

Offline Melb

If you're a genuine sub, you should love it.

That pointing out what happened to me and naming the escorts involved might, instead of proving helpful as a warning to others about said escorts as was intended, lead to ridicule and a thread like this one.

Please explain why you want/wanted to rearrange this meet with a escort your warning other punters to avoid, cos she's a thief  :dash:


Offline Cornish sub

If you're a genuine sub, you should love it.
Oh, I see, all subs love all forms of bdsm do they? And there was me thinking we all had our individual 'thing'. Thank you for putting me right.

Offline Cornish sub

Please explain why you want/wanted to rearrange this meet with a escort your warning other punters to avoid, cos she's a thief  :dash:
Because I've paid for it.


Cornish Pasty, surely?

I'm sure I'm not the only one on here who's having difficulty in understanding your point of view, C s; and who thinks that B & M didn't make a typographical error.

Offline jackdaw

I'm sure I'm not the only one on here who's having difficulty in understanding your point of view, C s; and who thinks that B & M didn't make a typographical error.

Is it really all that difficult to understand CS's point of view??

Here's one possible case for the defence. Forget all this stereo-typing of WG's and subs. (Implicit in a lot of comments on this thread are the stereotype notions that WG's always cheat, and subs just want bad things to happen to themselves.)

Imagine the following happened:-
Somebody employs somebody who they have reason to trust to do a job. (i.e had employed person before, they had done job before, and seemed trustworthy.) This time... perhaps influenced by a third party... the previously good worker just did a bunk with the money.

Then imagine the employer said something like "I'm really disappointed with that. I think the worker concerned let themselves down, quite possibly under influence of third party. In right circumstances I'd give him (or her) a chance to make it good to me."

That would be quite understandable wouldn't it? (Although... it wouldn't be my own thoughts in situation.)

That... I think... is all Cornish Sub has done. (I don't agree with the interpretation by Closet Freak that ALL he wanted was to meet WG again so he could forgive her.)

Is it really all that difficult to understand CS's point of view??

Here's one possible case for the defence. Forget all this stereo-typing of WG's and subs. (Implicit in a lot of comments on this thread are the stereotype notions that WG's always cheat, and subs just want bad things to happen to themselves.)

Imagine the following happened:-
Somebody employs somebody who they have reason to trust to do a job. (i.e had employed person before, they had done job before, and seemed trustworthy.) This time... perhaps influenced by a third party... the previously good worker just did a bunk with the money.

Then imagine the employer said something like "I'm really disappointed with that. I think the worker concerned let themselves down, quite possibly under influence of third party. In right circumstances I'd give him (or her) a chance to make it good to me."

That would be quite understandable wouldn't it? (Although... it wouldn't be my own thoughts in situation.)

That... I think... is all Cornish Sub has done. (I don't agree with the interpretation by Closet Freak that ALL he wanted was to meet WG again so he could forgive her.)

Lets say a friend recomend them saying they'ed done hundreds of jobs for them & there 100% reliable,
On the second day you employ them they run off with the cash before they even start day 2 , I'd be fucked if I give them another chance


Because I've paid for it.

Would a refund be preferable to having your dick anywhere near this prostitute?

(Not that you're going to get a refund, just trying to understand.)

Offline Cornish sub

I'm sure I'm not the only one on here who's having difficulty in understanding your point of view
Oh well, shit happens. I'm sure you not understanding my point of view won't have a negative impact on your day to day life.

Oh well, shit happens. I'm sure you not understanding my point of view won't have a negative impact on your day to day life.

we are concerned that your not getting the care, you so obviously need  :dash:

Offline Cornish sub

Is it really all that difficult to understand CS's point of view??

Here's one possible case for the defence. Forget all this stereo-typing of WG's and subs. (Implicit in a lot of comments on this thread are the stereotype notions that WG's always cheat, and subs just want bad things to happen to themselves.)

Imagine the following happened:-
Somebody employs somebody who they have reason to trust to do a job. (i.e had employed person before, they had done job before, and seemed trustworthy.) This time... perhaps influenced by a third party... the previously good worker just did a bunk with the money.

Then imagine the employer said something like "I'm really disappointed with that. I think the worker concerned let themselves down, quite possibly under influence of third party. In right circumstances I'd give him (or her) a chance to make it good to me."

That would be quite understandable wouldn't it? (Although... it wouldn't be my own thoughts in situation.)

That... I think... is all Cornish Sub has done. (I don't agree with the interpretation by Closet Freak that ALL he wanted was to meet WG again so he could forgive her.)

Offline Cornish sub

Lets say a friend recomend them saying they'ed done hundreds of jobs for them & there 100% reliable,
On the second day you employ them they run off with the cash before they even start day 2 , I'd be fucked if I give them another chance
So you WOULDN'T give them another chance, I WOULD. Glad we've got that one sorted. Let's now have your next piece of bile and vitriol please.

Offline Cornish sub

Would a refund be preferable to having your dick anywhere near this prostitute?

(Not that you're going to get a refund, just trying to understand.)
A refund or reorganised session would both be acceptable to me (not that I'm going to get either, just can't be arsed to hope you'll understand.)

So you WOULDN'T give them another chance, I WOULD. Glad we've got that one sorted. Let's now have your next piece of bile and vitriol please

I am not going to give you bile and vitriol, but you surely must understand that you would get negative reactions. Being shafted/ robbed/ scammed is probably the cardinal sin of punting. We all fear that every time we hand over our hard earned.

Offline Cornish sub

we are concerned that your not getting the care, you so obviously need  :dash:
Hmm, some people might think you're genuinely concerned for my welfare, others may come to the conclusion you're just a sarcastic twat. So, which is it?

Offline AnthG

Hmm, some people might think you're genuinely concerned for my welfare, others may come to the conclusion you're just a sarcastic twat. So, which is it?
I am genuinely concerned for your welfare. You are wasting your time arguing anymore, everyone gets what you side of the point is.

Having the topic spiral to just name calling is just risking you getting in trouble with Adam/Nik, and that would top off a great week, getting robbed then getting banned from a forum due to a petty dispute over getting robbed.

Seriously just drop the argument.

With regards to the question of the topic, If I were robbed I would want to try and forgive the girl but I would know I couldn't, but like you I would or at least may try to. Its the same thing with anything, not just being robbed.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2013, 07:03:52 PM by AnthG »

definitely the later but with a heathly amount of concern for you sanity

Offline Cornish sub


I am not going to give you bile and vitriol, but you surely must understand that you would get negative reactions. Being shafted/ robbed/ scammed is probably the cardinal sin of punting. We all fear that every time we hand over our hard earned.
Baz, there's a difference between negative reaction and personal derision from some twat who's never met me before. And no, that's not aimed at you.

Offline Jimmyredcab

So you WOULDN'T give them another chance, I WOULD.

You my friend, are a fool, pure and simple.    :crazy:

Offline Cornish sub

I am genuinely concerned for your welfare. You are wasting your time arguing anymore, everyone gets what you side of the point is.

Having the topic spiral to just name calling is just risking you getting in trouble with Adam/Nik, and that would top off a great week, getting robbed then getting banned from a forum due to a petty dispute over getting robbed.

Seriously just drop the argument.

With regards to the question of the topic, If I were robbed I would want to try and forgive the girl but I would know I couldn't, but like you I would or at least may try to. Its the same thing with anything, not just being robbed.
Right, firstly you don't me, so my welfare's of no concern to you. Secondly, if petty name calling gets me banned then so be it. But I'm fucked if I'm letting these posts attacking me go up unanswered.

Offline AnthG

Right, firstly you don't me, so my welfare's of no concern to you. Secondly, if petty name calling gets me banned then so be it. But I'm fucked if I'm letting these posts attacking me go up unanswered.
Nobody is attacking you, they are attacking the notion that you seem to think its ok to let this girl get away with it.

And you are right I do not know you, but I personally hate it when punters get banned.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)