Elise Illicit Lasions Cardiff

[Cardiffguy96]

Well it's now may and the last punt I did was December so it's been some time now but that's because I've been busy with girls outside of the punting industry so I'm probably going to start back my monthly punting again well that's my aim anyway!

So as a late kickstart to the year I booked Elise from Ellicit Liaisons Cardiff for 1 hour down the bay and as you can see from my rating wasn't bad but certainly wasn't good or the best by far! Why? Let's get started then!

Well I usually only go with Illicit liaisons when I book escorts nowadays and I asked who was available yesterday evening and I was told only Elise, so I thought ok why not haven't had her before give her a go. So I booked her for 5 o clock!

So I got there just before 5 rung the buzzer got let up, as she opened the door well I wasn't very impressed at all! Unlike her photos where she's Bright blonde she was dark brunette looked almost like a different girl! And also she was very small and skinny! I knew she wasn't tall but I thought she'd have some meat on her she was just skin and bone  like a childs body! I like my women to be women not skinny like a little teenage girl! Plus she was wearing a very thin dressing gown with only black knickers on but I guess she don't need a bra as she had no tits literally 

So we went into the bedroom I gave her the money 150 for 1 hour (kind of feel like I wasted 150 pound really) she got me a glass of water sat on the bed we were chatting for a couple of minutes started kissing both got undressed I started fingering her she started wanking me then started giving me a blowjob then I got the condom managed to get it on after a little fiddle she bent over doggy style and I just went soft and couldn't get it in   

So we started kissing she started giving me a blowjob gradually got hard again  condom back on she straddled me cowgirl style I started pounding her then we did missionary then we did missionary where she was lying on her side and then that was it time up I got dressed quick sip on my water and off I went!

By the way just thought I'd mention she thought I went soft because I don't like condoms? No darling girl I went soft because she just didn't turn me on wasn't feminine and girly enough and had a skin and bone body 

And that was basically it in a nutshell really i certainly wouldn't book her again because she's just not my cup of tea physical appearance wise and she wasn't the most feminine of girls and as I previously said I like my women to be all round women from physical appearance to personality, long silk hair, makeup foundation on nails done curvy all the curves in all the right places nice breasts nice meaty legs and calves nice round peachy ass nice feminine dress heels on girly girl personality   

So I'll leave this review as neutral wasn't good wasn't bad just wasn't for me!

[Steelworker]

Sorry it went badly. Your description of what you like matches mine so she won't make my HL 

[Cardiffguy96]

Aww it's ok mate no worries I've had worse punts but I've certainly had a lot better too and anybody who likes the woman I like like yourself ... yeah don't put her on your hit list deffo not lol  charlise from illicit lasions was good though , I've seen her twice! 

[Steelworker]

Blondes Like Fun, Farrah from Portfolio sound more like your bag. They are both lovely. I like Sienna too. And a nice HL of some more like that 

[Asian Hunter]

So I got there just before 5 rung the buzzer got let up, as she opened the door well I wasn't very impressed at all! Unlike her photos where she's Bright blonde she was dark brunette looked almost like a different girl! And also she was very small and skinny! I knew she wasn't tall but I thought she'd have some meat on her she was just skin and bone  like a childs body! I like my women to be women not skinny like a little teenage girl! Plus she was wearing a very thin dressing gown with only black knickers on but I guess she don't need a bra as she had no tits literally 

Apart from the obvious hair colour change, you are describing a totally different girl from the photo below  . Are you sure it was Elise? Sounds like she must have lost some weight from when these photos were taken. She doesn't look thin bone here or have a flat chest at all.

Hidden Image/Members Only

By the way just thought I'd mention she thought I went soft because I don't like condoms? No darling girl I went soft because she just didn't turn me on wasn't feminine and girly enough and had a skin and bone body 

And that was basically it in a nutshell really i certainly wouldn't book her again because she's just not my cup of tea physical appearance wise and she wasn't the most feminine of girls and as I previously said I like my women to be all round women from physical appearance to personality, long silk hair, makeup foundation on nails done curvy all the curves in all the right places nice breasts nice meaty legs and calves nice round peachy ass nice feminine dress heels on girly girl personality   

So I'll leave this review as neutral wasn't good wasn't bad just wasn't for me!

Too bad she's not your cup of tea. We all like different things in women. But thanks for writing your review  .

[mrdiamond77]

Sorry it did not go too well for you mate.  Thanks for the review. 

[np500]

She looks hot as, in that photo, so she's either lost weight or could it have been a B & S as thay were obviously short of girls and sent the sub on , so to speak ? Not thinking a review would pop up on  popular interweb punting site ? What's the chances !

[Cardiffguy96]

Actually I'm beginning to think they must of sent another girl because as it's been pointed out she looks quite fucking hot in her photos on the site she looks nothing like that in person and that's usually meaning the photos done her no justice as if in she's a lot hotter in person than the photos or in this particular situation the photos done her way too much justice because she don't look nowhere near that hot in person !

[Melfort212]

I enquired with IL last week about making a booking, Elise was the only available in advance, apparently most of the girls only tell them their availability on the day unless you ask them to ask a specific girl in advance.

The lady texting me said she had changed to brunette from blonde, so really they should update the website even if they just put 'please note she is now brunette' alongside the photos.

Cardiffguy96, from what you are describing Cariad would suit you.

[roger987123]

having seen a elise a few times myself (and reviewed),  id say it was her in those pics but a bit of photoshopping going on with her tits,   they are fairly small in reality.   

[Gatchaman]

Sorry, it didn't work out for you CG96.  I've seen her a few times and she has always delivered an enthusiastic service, but I'd agree her tits are tiny and definitely smaller than they look in the photos (mentioned it in my review). 

Illicit's photos generally look a bit "polished" to me.

[Rocco74]

If you wanted a curvy girl why book a size 6 iv seen elise a few times she's fantastic  always has her nails done (white tips) she went brunette to give her hair a brake frome bleaching she's now back blonde I saw her tonight she was amazing I don't know why you would give her a nutral review but know she has some beef with the owner of port folio so weather Laurence put you up to this or not as it's happened before with a few other girls it's not a fair review imo I think she's top of her game I booked her first in April 2016 as Brandi for portfolio I know she's now Elise illicit leiaisons 96? I guess your around 20 yo so not really expirenced enough to know a fantastic escort when you see one if you didn't fancy the girl why go through with the booking why not just say not for me and cancell? Just at doesn't make sense to me at all

[jammy]

This site isnt about criticising other ppls reviews. The admins are pretty spot on with identifying frauds so leave them to make judgement. The sites is about punters being able to post a subjective review on their experience. So their view of what is good or bad can differ from someone elses without the need of turning into white knights. I have seen wgs who I thought were neutrals but other reputable members put as a positive which i accept. Wgs arent robots so they may connect with others better than some resulting in a possible positive experience.

[James999]

This site isnt about criticising other ppls reviews. The admins are pretty spot on with identifying frauds so leave them to make judgement. The sites is about punters being able to post a subjective review on their experience. So their view of what is good or bad can differ from someone elses without the need of turning into white knights. I have seen wgs who I thought were neutrals but other reputable members put as a positive which i accept. Wgs arent robots so they may connect with others better than some resulting in a possible positive experience.

Thanks for telling us that (Even if it's a load of bollocks) when were you appointed a moderator BTW ?

[James999]

If you wanted a curvy girl why book a size 6 iv seen elise a few times she's fantastic  always has her nails done (white tips) she went brunette to give her hair a brake frome bleaching she's now back blonde I saw her tonight she was amazing I don't know why you would give her a nutral review but know she has some beef with the owner of port folio so weather Laurence put you up to this or not as it's happened before with a few other girls it's not a fair review imo I think she's top of her game I booked her first in April 2016 as Brandi for portfolio I know she's now Elise illicit leiaisons 96? I guess your around 20 yo so not really expirenced enough to know a fantastic escort when you see one if you didn't fancy the girl why go through with the booking why not just say not for me and cancell? Just at doesn't make sense to me at all

When you say you've seen her, do you mean in the mirror 

[James999]

She looks like she's constipated in the second picture and trying to coax a shit out 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[jammy]

Thanks for telling us that (Even if it's a load of bollocks) when were you appointed a moderator BTW ?

Nice to see you have a positive impact on the site from viewing your previous posts but no reviews    Very subjective views but thats free speech for you 

[James999]

Nice to see you have a positive impact on the site

Make your mind up, a moment ago you were telling us people shouldn't criticise others  So you swerved the question, when were you appointed as a moderator on here 

[Mikeh38]

This agency's a bit shit ain't it.

[Husqvarna360]

Hi James,
Just an observation and there are lots of comments on this fantastic forum but one thing that would be great to see is some reviews from you, your comments at the moment is circa 11.3k comments and zero reviews and the only reason I mention this is to comment in such a way about the ladies I would have thought you would have offered your reviews for the benefit of all others on this forum.. Life is about getting out what you put in so would be great to see your reviews 

[Steelworker]

James, I agree with Husq. I've benefited from reading his reviews and met a couple of lovely ladies as a result. If you have experiences, we can all benefit.

[Asian Hunter]

James, I agree with Husq. I've benefited from reading his reviews and met a couple of lovely ladies as a result. If you have experiences, we can all benefit.

+1 

[SeekingtheTruth]

This whole James should do reviews thing has been done to death elsewhere on the forum, lets not start that crap in the Wales section as well.

He may not have reviews but he has provided plenty of useful information to go along with his unique brand of humour.

As long as information is shared it doesn't really matter how it's done IMO.

[vw]

This whole James should do reviews thing has been done to death elsewhere on the forum, lets not start that crap in the Wales section as well.

He may not have reviews but he has provided plenty of useful information to go along with his unique brand of humour.

As long as information is shared it doesn't really matter how it's done IMO.

Agree, some of the wales board want independence.

Blondes Like Fun, Farrah from Portfolio sound more like your bag. They are both lovely. I like Sienna too. And a nice HL of some more like that 

cheers for the uneccesary portfolio plug.

Blondes Like Fun, Farrah from Portfolio sound more like your bag. They are both lovely. I like Sienna too. And a nice HL of some more like that 

Anyone know if this is the Elise that turned up on UKE?

[Steelworker]

Hey, VW. Actually I can see looking back this was phrased ambiguously and could have implied they all were from the agency. What I was actually saying was 'I've seen these 2 independents and an 'agency name' girl and they sound like they fit your bill'

In your opinion, would this be more appropriate or are you suggesting that no one should name an agency at all in any posts?

I'm keen to know what constitutes an 'unnecessary plug for agency x' looks like in your mind?

[np500]

If it is this Elise girl on U.K. E , it apears it was not the girl he met, hence the neutral for an agency girl ! Other agency's have taken a battering in the past and was my main reason for not using them, there was the one a few months ago where the o p got his money back, no shower etc , so it does happen.

[scutty brown]

FWIW the past trends suggest there may be a similar issue with Illicit as we've recently discussed about Portfolio.
Nothing I can point a firm finger at, just a suspicion from skim reading the reviews.
I THINK this is the first non-positive review for them, certainly its the first I've seen. If so its a welcome return to factuality


(and no that's not a dig at any individual, its a general comment)

[Husqvarna360]

Steel, I would go your own view, the reason why contributors include the name is generally agency girls are not on Adultwork so if so when is reading a comment or review on here they would normally look up the girls name on Adultwork if they were thinking of booking but with the agency name linked to the girls name they would have no idea who was being referred to so I would let ant agency dictate how people contribute on this excellent forum and it's important all reviews are added to this forum with fact which will benefit all reviewers with indi, agency, parlour, positive, neutral, negative etc..

You contribution is very helpful and don't let the anti agency negative few try to change your contribution on here... 

[np500]

FWIW the past trends suggest there may be a similar issue with Illicit as we've recently discussed about Portfolio.
Nothing I can point a firm finger at, just a suspicion from skim reading the reviews.
I THINK this is the first non-positive review for them, certainly its the first I've seen. If so its a welcome return to factuality


(and no that's not a dig at any individual, its a general comment)

Definitely not the only one, I have no time to look back , but it was a negative review for a girl working for another girl who runs an agency, the o p reviewed and eventually got his money back, it does happen, I can assure you, as these issues are why I hadn't visited until couple of weeks ago .

[SeekingtheTruth]

FWIW the past trends suggest there may be a similar issue with Illicit as we've recently discussed about Portfolio.
Nothing I can point a firm finger at, just a suspicion from skim reading the reviews.
I THINK this is the first non-positive review for them, certainly its the first I've seen. If so its a welcome return to factuality


(and no that's not a dig at any individual, its a general comment)

You could well be right, can't say it's something I've noticed myself as historically I used to skim straight past agency reviews, it's only recently I've started to pay attention to them. And that was only because there were quite a few positives popping up in a short space of time so wanted to see what all the fuss was about.

[Steelworker]

Steel, I would go your own view, the reason why contributors include the name is generally agency girls are not on Adultwork so if so when is reading a comment or review on here they would normally look up the girls name on Adultwork if they were thinking of booking but with the agency name linked to the girls name they would have no idea who was being referred to so I would let ant agency dictate how people contribute on this excellent forum and it's important all reviews are added to this forum with fact which will benefit all reviewers with indi, agency, parlour, positive, neutral, negative etc..

You contribution is very helpful and don't let the anti agency negative few try to change your contribution on here... 

Thanks Husq. I will do my own thing but actually could see I'd written it in a clumsy fashion! 

[np500]

You could well be right, can't say it's something I've noticed myself as historically I used to skim straight past agency reviews, it's only recently I've started to pay attention to them. And that was only because there were quite a few positives popping up in a short space of time so wanted to see what all the fuss was about.

Me too, ( the fuss ) and she was excellent, the way I see it, is you/we/ me have to decide if the girl is worth the hassle of seeing an agency girl with the apparent suspicion and / or stigma this site brings, one problem now is guys will go, but not report back at all as don't want to be questioned, well, Chloe is my next portfolio booking, ( not sure when yet ) and I'll let you know what befell me. So not to be shady ! You understand. Fuck, I'm getting fuck all done again .

[vw]

Hey, VW. Actually I can see looking back this was phrased ambiguously and could have implied they all were from the agency. What I was actually saying was 'I've seen these 2 independents and an 'agency name' girl and they sound like they fit your bill'

In your opinion, would this be more appropriate or are you suggesting that no one should name an agency at all in any posts?

I'm keen to know what constitutes an 'unnecessary plug for agency x' looks like in your mind?

Im suggesting you purposely name dropped the rival agency for purpose of promoting them.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Im suggesting you purposely name dropped the rival agency for purpose of promoting them.

To be fair to SW you quoted a comment from May before this all kicked off and certain trends were identified. To me it looked like he was just making a general recommendation.

[vw]

To be fair to SW you quoted a comment from May before this all kicked off and certain trends were identified. To me it looked like he was just making a general recommendation.

Proves historically he touted for them since he joined, yes a long term trend

[Steelworker]

Indeed, STT. At that point I'd reviewed several ladies in the month since I'd joined and was merely pointing out 3 I'd found to be more in keeping with the apparent tastes of the OP. I'd had great punts with them all and that's all it was. 

[Steelworker]

Proves historically he touted for them since he joined, yes a long term trend

Actually (and maybe this kind of works both ways in the ongoing discussion), I'd never heard of the agency before UKP. And the girl, Farrah had been well reviewed so I went to see her. Then have seen a few more from there.

[vw]

Actually (and maybe this kind of works both ways in the ongoing discussion), I'd never heard of the agency before UKP. And the girl, Farrah had been well reviewed so I went to see her. Then have seen a few more from there.

 

Really?

I hadn't noticed you being smitten with them.

How do you feel about their lowlife practices?

[Steelworker]

VW, I don't condone any low life practices. And, if they've offered inducements in the past to review here, I disapprove strongly and I appreciate the diligence of others. I review new punts here once (unless I've done a duo with one which I think is different). I try to help describe my experience with each individual as best as I can to help others. I can honestly say I haven't had a bad punt since April when I joined. I base this mainly on the information I've gleaned from people I've grown to trust on here. I've done a couple of toffts in this period which worked but mainly gone where others have. I'll continue to choose my punts based on this and report. What I do take from all this is a heightened awareness of nefarious practices for which I'll be more watchful. But I'll continue to report where I tread new ground for my UKP forum members. 

[vw]

VW, I don't condone any low life practices. And, if they've offered inducements in the past to review here, I disapprove strongly and I appreciate the diligence of others.

Diligence is only being done by the hated outsiders it seems.

Nobody except for STT seems to report anything and he is quite forgiving about the point less fluffies like lewisj and the nightwolf both who deserved the ban but were never reported by any inhabitant of this board.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Diligence is only being done by the hated outsiders it seems.

Nobody except for STT seems to report anything and he is quite forgiving about the point less fluffies like lewisj and the nightwolf both who deserved the ban but were never reported by any inhabitant of this board.

I tend to treat the fluffies the same way I treat annoying clients in work, a necessary evil, I read/listen to what they say but read between the lines to get to the actual truth and remove the crap.

It is getting harder and harder to do though 

[vw]

I tend to treat the fluffies the same way I treat annoying clients in work, a necessary evil, I read/listen to what they say but read between the lines to get to the actual truth and remove the crap.

It is getting harder and harder to do though 

Many of us don't like the fluffies and they are not welcome and net necessary at all.

As you say best they are gone rather than polluting the site.   

I do wonder why the whole board elected to turn blind eye to them?

[SeekingtheTruth]

As you say best they are gone rather than polluting the site.   

To a certain extent I do agree but everyone is different. Who am I, or anyone apart from Admin (his site, his rules) really, to dictate how someone expresses themselves?

WK's and touts need to fuck off, and sooner rather than later, but if someone is just soft and a bit fluffy I will tolerate them as long as they share relevant information. They may be fluffy because they are just starved of any kind of affection and project it onto the forum.

[vw]

To a certain extent I do agree but everyone is different. Who am I, or anyone apart from Admin (his site, his rules) really, to dictate how someone expresses themselves?

WK's and touts need to fuck off, and sooner rather than later, but if someone is just soft and a bit fluffy I will tolerate them as long as they share relevant information. They may be fluffy because they are just starved of any kind of affection and project it onto the forum.

Members need to report them not turn a blind eye, how will admin know is nobody complains, as is currently the stance on this board.  PM if you are scared of backlash from the fluffies and those that cuddle them.

[SeekingtheTruth]

Members need to report them not turn a blind eye, how will admin know is nobody complains, as is currently the stance on this board.  PM if you are scared of backlash from the fluffies and those that cuddle them.

Why would anyone be scared of backlash from anonymous strangers on the interent? What a strange concept.

But I do agree that more reporting needs to be done on the whole, I know HughJardon reports as well.

[vw]

But I do agree that more reporting needs to be done on the whole, I know HughJardon reports as well.

Some never do and mock those that do report.  Usually pricks with something to hide in my experience.

Why would anyone be scared of backlash from anonymous strangers on the interent? What a strange concept.

It's as bizarre as the cry babies threatening to leave on pm to aardvark, unless he was lying which is possible.

[DevilD]

Make your mind up, a moment ago you were telling us people shouldn't criticise others  So you swerved the question, when were you appointed as a moderator on here 

How many posts/ criticisms, and how many reviews, James? Seems a hell of a lot of posts. Surely we should be able to profit from your considerable experiences? Just asking in passing. No other interest whatsoever.....

[Melfort212]

Illicit Liaisons don't have that many reviews on here really so doubt they are posting fake reviews.

[Mikeh38]

Illicit Liaisons don't have that many reviews on here really so doubt they are posting fake reviews.

Didn't they rip you off for £50 ?

[np500]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=138185.0

This was the negative agency review I was on about .