Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: More bollocks on a parlour website.  (Read 1656 times)

Offline NIK

'Our girls, although independent and self employed, are vetted as fully as possible so that we provide the consistent service...'

This is a quote from a Derby parlour website.

I like the way they say 'vetted as fully as possible'.

However what really makes me laugh is the 'independent and self employed' statement.
What the fuck's all that about then?

Offline Marmalade

However what really makes me laugh is the 'independent and self employed' statement.
What the fuck's all that about then?

How about . . .

independent = "If anyone asks, you don't work for us - no way do we employ prostitutes, so do as you're told if you want your wages!"

self-employed = "Naturally we trust you to pay tax on all your earnings."


Offline softlad

   'vetted as fully as possible'.

Or the pimps been through 'em himself.....

I always thought that pimps, brother keepers, agency management had "auditions" for new girls but this seems to not be the case and in fact was marginally abhorrent to a few girls when I mentioned that assumption.

Why so negative?  I understand that continual solicitation for freebies would be annoying but surely not beyond the pale?  After all they do fuck total strangers for money?  Surely keeping the boss happy (getting scheduling preference, recommendations, etc)  in a way consistent with normal job duties is not asking for too much?

I guess if that I had an operation that depended on the quality of services I would at least want to see what is on offer before making a "hiring" decision?

Just a warped punter?  Am I missing something?  Is this another of those client relationship subtleties where the line must not be crossed?

AFoAF

AFoAF

Offline Jimmyredcab

'Our girls, although independent and self employed, are vetted as fully as possible so that we provide the consistent service...'

This is a quote from a Derby parlour website.

I like the way they say 'vetted as fully as possible'.

However what really makes me laugh is the 'independent and self employed' statement. What the fuck's all that about then?

Independant -------------- we don't pay their wages, sick pay or holiday pay.

Self Employed ------------- we are not responsible if the girls are claiming benefits.

Offline softlad

I always thought that pimps, brother keepers, agency management had "auditions" for new girls but this seems to not be the case and in fact was marginally abhorrent to a few girls when I mentioned that assumption.

Why so negative?  I understand that continual solicitation for freebies would be annoying but surely not beyond the pale?  After all they do fuck total strangers for money?  Surely keeping the boss happy (getting scheduling preference, recommendations, etc)  in a way consistent with normal job duties is not asking for too much?

I guess if that I had an operation that depended on the quality of services I would at least want to see what is on offer before making a "hiring" decision?

Just a warped punter?  Am I missing something?  Is this another of those client relationship subtleties where the line must not be crossed?

AFoAF

AFoAF

Not warped at all mate.
It must go on, I guess they will all close ranks and say it doesn't but, come on.....
Put in the same position what would we do ?  ;)
 


Not warped at all mate.
It must go on, I guess they will all close ranks and say it doesn't but, come on.....
Put in the same position what would we do ?  ;)
 

Pay em the going rate minus house commission?  Then make the "hiring" decision?   Delegate to a known and trusted third party punter (I'd apply for that job!)

Might be good to hear the sisterhood hereabouts enlighten us...

AFoAF

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
I hear it does go on, but not something I'd go with at all. Good job I'm an indie.

By the way a lot of scammers work on the above principles, and some agents return for more. On the principle that girls should be allowed to refuse to service clients they don't want to, it kind of puts them in a corner they can't get out of.


Offline Marmalade

I've heard good reports and bad on that 'vetting.' One girl said that as she was totally new to the game it put her at her ease and helped her get her head round the idea of services for payment. (she told me this some years after she left the parlour in question so no sense that she felt obliged to say it.) Most girls who have not been thru such an initiation scorn the procedure as an invasion. What is rather worse, is brothel owners who expect girls to take a turn at their private parties and for no pay. What is very much worse is the utter scam situation alluded to by Strawbs.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2011, 02:45:43 AM by Marmalade »

Offline softlad

I hear it does go on, but not something I'd go with at all. Good job I'm an indie.

By the way a lot of scammers work on the above principles, and some agents return for more. On the principle that girls should be allowed to refuse to service clients they don't want to, it kind of puts them in a corner they can't get out of.



This kind of scenario isn't just limited to this industry, we all know of 'the Hollywood casting couch'
Some people are always going to abuse thier position of power over desperate applicants, and use it to thier advantage.
I say 'people' because I've heard stories of women doing this aswell.
 

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
I've heard good reports and bad on that 'vetting.' One girl said that as she was totally new to the game it put her at her ease and helped her get her head round the idea of services for payment. (she told me this some years after she left the parlour in question so no sense that she felt obliged to say it.) Most girls who have not been thru such an initiation scorn the procedure as an invasion. What is rather worse, is brothel owners who expect girls to take a turn at their private parties and for no pay. What is very much worse is the utter scam situation alluded to by Strawbs.

You see some unscrupulous tyes would either once in the parlour or agency situation would start to knock the price down, or push for services the girl wasn't keen on saying he would promote her. Then of course you'd also get interviewers who would say "you must sleep with me to prove you can do the job". These could be genuine establishment owners who then say "sorry love we aren't taking any more girls on at the moment", or they could be simply pretending to set up such a business.

Offline KSG

I always thought that pimps, brother keepers, agency management had "auditions" for new girls but this seems to not be the case and in fact was marginally abhorrent to a few girls when I mentioned that assumption.

Why so negative?  I understand that continual solicitation for freebies would be annoying but surely not beyond the pale?  After all they do fuck total strangers for money?  Surely keeping the boss happy (getting scheduling preference, recommendations, etc)  in a way consistent with normal job duties is not asking for too much?

I guess if that I had an operation that depended on the quality of services I would at least want to see what is on offer before making a "hiring" decision?

Just a warped punter?  Am I missing something?  Is this another of those client relationship subtleties where the line must not be crossed?

AFoAF

AFoAF

Like everything in life, it all depends on the people involved. Some guys have no problems with trying it on like that (and see it as a prerogative to be enjoyed), while others won't consider it. I'm merely the webmaster, but as the only male in the outfit, it is a line which I feel should not be crossed, solely because it isn't what I feel comfortable with and because it blurs the lines of personal respect. Each to their own though, although I see it as being on the same level as giving the flatcapped scrounger a freebie when he comes knocking.

Rather than a "preview" with the boss, what often happens is that when a new lady starts at a parlour, her first day is seen as a working interview. This is where both sides see if they are comfortable with one another and their methods of working. Generally, several of the clients on that day are regulars, who will give their opinion as to whether they had an enjoyable encounter, and that forms the basis of how things move on.

As to how commonplace it it, I do know of a couple of parlour and agency owners in Manchester who used to try it on in the past (not naming names though). Some ladies would have no problem going through with it, while others would tell the owner to fuck right off.

odd thing really one parlour i visited gave a discount for a new girls first couple of days ,i suppose to see if she was ok i remember being asked if i was happy with the service when i left.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)