Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Roxy Taylor Camborne. Ran away with my money.  (Read 25894 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 1074056) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Ludwig]


Offline Cornish sub

Sorry to drag up and restart this old thread of mine, but just want to add to it that Roxy's back on AW but now going under the name Miss B... and with a different id number - 2174452. Sorry, can't do links on mobile, but hopefully someone else can. She's on the Somerset Escorts page if that helps.

Offline yorkshire123

Sorry to drag up and restart this old thread of mine, but just want to add to it that Roxy's back on AW but now going under the name Miss B... and with a different id number - 2174452. Sorry, can't do links on mobile, but hopefully someone else can. She's on the Somerset Escorts page if that helps.

www.adultwork.com/2174452
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline ladyofthemansion

Then it's simple. Do what you did before. Make a booking and even if she doesn't respond you can still leave feedback to say she is a thief.

Offline SirFrank

Then it's simple. Do what you did before. Make a booking and even if she doesn't respond you can still leave feedback to say she is a thief.

+1. Did she ever offer an explanation as to why she ripped you off?
Banning reason: Shitstirring against admin on behalf of banned member

Then it's simple. Do what you did before. Make a booking and even if she doesn't respond you can still leave feedback to say she is a thief.

This whole story is a very sorry one. For you, Cornish Sub, it was your worst nightmare come true.  :(

I'd say there's little to zero chance of you getting your money back from this wg. But at least you can go some way towards getting even by pi$$ing all over her feedback in the way suggested here by ladyofthemansion. But do think carefully about what you post so that it comes across as factual and objective rather than anything else. Then others seeing it are more likely to take it seriously.

Offline ladyofthemansion


Offline Cornish sub

+1. Did she ever offer an explanation as to why she ripped you off?
No mate, all phone calls and texts to her at the time (when she was Roxy Taylor) were unanswered and not replied to respectively. I emailed her through AW the other day once I'd noticed she'd returned as Miss B, but that was read and not replied to either.

Offline Cornish sub

This whole story is a very sorry one. For you, Cornish Sub, it was your worst nightmare come true.  :(

I'd say there's little to zero chance of you getting your money back from this wg. But at least you can go some way towards getting even by pi$$ing all over her feedback in the way suggested here by ladyofthemansion. But do think carefully about what you post so that it comes across as factual and objective rather than anything else. Then others seeing it are more likely to take it seriously.
It's ok, Forrest, I know I'll never get my money back. The only reason I restarted this thread yesterday was to alert anyone thinking of seeing her that she's the subject of this thread, despite her name and AW id change. If she'd had the decency to reply to my email the other day, explain why she did it and apologise, I'd have come on here and told everyone, thereby painting her in a better light. As she ignored me, though, I'm going to do the feedback and I'll be factual. The only trouble is trying to cram all the necessary information into the limited wordage allowed by the feedback system. 

It's ok, Forrest, I know I'll never get my money back. The only reason I restarted this thread yesterday was to alert anyone thinking of seeing her that she's the subject of this thread, despite her name and AW id change. If she'd had the decency to reply to my email the other day, explain why she did it and apologise, I'd have come on here and told everyone, thereby painting her in a better light. As she ignored me, though, I'm going to do the feedback and I'll be factual. The only trouble is trying to cram all the necessary information into the limited wordage allowed by the feedback system.

Hmmm need to keep it short and sweet, then. Probably better that way tbh.  :)

Offline Cornish sub

ladyofthemansion, SirFrank and ForrestGump, I've just left a 'feedback only' on her AW page. Stand by for the inevitable dispute in the next day or two.

Offline vorian

ladyofthemansion, SirFrank and ForrestGump, I've just left a 'feedback only' on her AW page. Stand by for the inevitable dispute in the next day or two.


Just read it, good move, interested to see if AW remove the UKP reference.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Cornish sub


Just read it, good move, interested to see if AW remove the UKP reference.
Tbh I don't think they will. I also mentioned UKP in the feedback I left on her Roxy Taylor profile last year and that wasn't removed. Maybe that's why she changed her name and profile id, because short of hiding her feedback (which always looks suss), she was always going to be linked to this site and thread. With a bit of luck the same thing will now happen with her new profile.

Offline vorian

Tbh I don't think they will. I also mentioned UKP in the feedback I left on her Roxy Taylor profile last year and that wasn't removed. Maybe that's why she changed her name and profile id, because short of hiding her feedback (which always looks suss), she was always going to be linked to this site and thread. With a bit of luck the same thing will now happen with her new profile.

Odd how they let it stand in FB but remove a mention of UKP from blogs and main page information, well often they do.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Cornish sub

Odd how they let it stand in FB but remove a mention of UKP from blogs and main page information, well often they do.
Oh, right. Well yes, that is strange if that's the case. Will just have to keep an eye on the feedback I left her tonight for the next few days, see if it stays or gets removed. One thing I'm certain of, though, she'll dispute what I said. They always do when they get negative feedback. Makes a bit of a mockery of the whole feedback system really if the escort in question is allowed to have the last word and dispute any genuine and deserved negative feedback they're given.

Offline vorian

Oh, right. Well yes, that is strange if that's the case. Will just have to keep an eye on the feedback I left her tonight for the next few days, see if it stays or gets removed. One thing I'm certain of, though, she'll dispute what I said. They always do when they get negative feedback. Makes a bit of a mockery of the whole feedback system really if the escort in question is allowed to have the last word and dispute any genuine and deserved negative feedback they're given.

Just another reason why UKP is so important to balance out the game or everything would be stacked against the punter.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline ladyofthemansion

Am wondering if you should do a new report on here with her new name and phone number then those punters who google names and numbers will find the thread here.

Offline ladyofthemansion

Roxy. If you are reading this why don't you offer to pay Cornish Sub back his money rather than have black marks on every new profile you make?

If you can't afford to pay it all in one go I'm sure Cornish Sub will accept instalments then you can both move on.

Am sure it will cost you a lot more than 500 if you don't do the right thing.




Offline JV547845

Thanks for dragging this one up again Cornish.  I saw that profile before but always thought there was something weird about it.

Offline Cornish sub

Just another reason why UKP is so important to balance out the game or everything would be stacked against the punter.
Too true, Vorian. In a Utopian future, every single person who punts will have heard of and joined this site, so we can all leave proper and full negative reviews about those escorts deserving of them, without fear of said escorts simply disputing that feedback with the usual rubbish and making the punter out to be a liar, knowing full well he can't then come back with a reply, as currently happens with AW's feedback system.

Offline Cornish sub

Am wondering if you should do a new report on here with her new name and phone number then those punters who google names and numbers will find the thread here.
Have just done it, but in the Regional Punting section on here, rather than in this, the Reviews section, because it would be unfair for me to gain another review total when I've not actually seen her again. And couldn't post a phone number I'm afraid, as unfortunately she doesn't display it now, whereas as Roxy Taylor she did.

Offline Cornish sub

Thanks for dragging this one up again Cornish. I saw that profile before but always thought there was something weird about it.
Ooh, now you've piqued my curiosity. In what way weird?
« Last Edit: May 26, 2014, 10:40:10 AM by Cornish sub »

Offline JV547845

Mainly the three pane pictures in the gallery just do my head in.  How many punters really care how good a photographer she is?  Occasionally something subtle is very alluring and does it for me but if there's no clear body shot or face pic the a WG should just not bother messing around in photoshop or picasa or whatever.  I know a lady really might just be confident in her style and looks (after having had compliments from the tenth happy punter maybe), but she describes herself as a blonde bombshell but none of her photos show it.

Also I was struck by the similarity with about 2 or 3 other profiles of 19 year olds out in yeovil way who charge £140/hour too with no face pics.  This could just be coincidence though (but how many 18/19 year olds have their own flats and move from Somerset to Glasgow? - Carly could've started Uni I guess).
Carley https://www.adultwork.com/1727275
Ms Pink https://www.adultwork.com/1540281
Belle https://www.adultwork.com/1987323
Charlotte https://www.adultwork.com/1985913

I should point out most of them admit to knowing each other, have used the same phone number in the past, but could well be legitimate for all I know.  I just looked at some of their private galleries a while back and decided that at that price they weren't for me (especially because there weren't any good face pics). 

Offline Cornish sub

Mainly the three pane pictures in the gallery just do my head in.  How many punters really care how good a photographer she is?  Occasionally something subtle is very alluring and does it for me but if there's no clear body shot or face pic the a WG should just not bother messing around in photoshop or picasa or whatever.  I know a lady really might just be confident in her style and looks (after having had compliments from the tenth happy punter maybe), but she describes herself as a blonde bombshell but none of her photos show it.

Also I was struck by the similarity with about 2 or 3 other profiles of 19 year olds out in yeovil way who charge £140/hour too with no face pics.  This could just be coincidence though (but how many 18/19 year olds have their own flats and move from Somerset to Glasgow? - Carly could've started Uni I guess).
Carley https://www.adultwork.com/1727275
Ms Pink https://www.adultwork.com/1540281
Belle https://www.adultwork.com/1987323
Charlotte https://www.adultwork.com/1985913

I should point out most of them admit to knowing each other, have used the same phone number in the past, but could well be legitimate for all I know.  I just looked at some of their private galleries a while back and decided that at that price they weren't for me (especially because there weren't any good face pics).
Yeah, the photos that make up those 3 pane pictures are exactly the ones she had in her Roxy Taylor gallery, except then they weren't done in that 3 in 1 style, they were just full size single photos. That, combined with the exact same profile notes and locations, was how I realised it's Roxy Taylor. I have to say, though, (and it pains me to be positive about her in any way) that having seen her, the blonde bombshell description she gives herself is definitely justified.

Offline JV547845

the blonde bombshell description she gives herself is definitely justified.

Shame I'm not into being robbed.

Offline Cornish sub

Shame I'm not into being robbed.
Tbh, I was only robbed because I was a mug. I honestly think if I'd waited till they (Roxy and Cassie) were actually in my house before giving them the money, then this thread wouldn't exist, ie., they'd have gone ahead with my booking. Indeed, I'd had a brilliant booking with Roxy on her own only 3 months earlier. It's only because I gave them the money before they came into my place (something I'd also done without problem on my above mentioned meeting with Roxy), left them on their own with it and therefore allowed their greed to take over, ie., gave them the perfect opportunity to scarper with the cash for fuck all effort, that I got robbed. Taught me a massive lesson, though, that's for sure.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2014, 01:35:32 PM by Cornish sub »




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)