Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: SKYLERMCKAY4U - Central Manchester (on tour)  (Read 985 times)


35 review(s) for Sloane Taylor XXX (29 positive, 0 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline NigelF

Link: External Link/Members Only

Price: £80 for 30 mins (including FK, OWO and sex)

This is girl is currently on tour in Manchester - she started today and is here for another two days. I don't usually post reviews so soon after the meet but in this case it would probably be most helpful if posted now.

She's a pornstar but frankly I don't care. I booked her because she looked good in her photos and subsequent porn I looked up, she offered the services I like and wasn't extortionately priced (for someone on tour). I booked her more for the novelty factor of being on tour than I did for her being a minor pornstar.

Location: Decent apartment in central Manchester. Close to Deansgate train station.

Looks: Here is a recent video (shot in March/April according the original source of the video - the porn site Wank It Now): External Link/Members Only

On that site it also suggests her real age is 33 - as opposed to the 28 on her profile. 33 seems accurate and I wouldn't put her over mid 30s. Her photos are at least "airbrushed". Realistically I'm too old to know what that actually means but basically I think her main profile photos make her look better and younger than she actually is. There are a couple of more "realistic" photos in her public gallery (although not all of them). Still, I actually think she looked a bit better than she does in the video linked above. I also expected her not to look as good as her photos due to previous reviews. My expectations therefore were already lowered so I probably shouldn't give her too much credit but still, I thought she looked good. She has a great body, a decent arse and OK fake tits (not that big and not my preferred style but not too firm). Facially i thought she was good (definitely not top drawer though).

Service: Unlike in the video above, in real life she sounded less Scottish (which was a good thing in my book - not that I particularly mind). She was friendly and down to earth and I actually quite enjoyed talking to her. But I'm not there for chat and it's only because I'm such a dithering old idiot that I take a while to get my clothes off that I manage to fit in a conversation. FK started fairly quickly but it wasn't deep however it was fairly passionate and I did enjoy it. It probably wasn't as prolonged as I'd have liked but it was fine. Good OWO not deepthroating but good technique and good depth. Didn't neglect the balls either. She did do the whole spitting on cock pornstar thing. I don't really have strong feeling about that either way. Sex was enthusiastic, it was a bit pornstar-like with a little too much "fake" encouragement for my taste but it wasn't too OTT. Good effort in CG and she periodically went in for some FK without being prompted. Enjoyable doggy, she positions herself well and her arse is enough of a handful to appreciate in this position. Good in missionary, she clearly wasn't too keen on prolonged FK but I didn't mind too much and there was no issue going in for it repeatedly. Only a little eye contact but I didn't ask for more (I rarely do as it's a bit much and of course I know it's forced which reduces it's allure).

Overall, it was an enthusiastic and enjoyable shag with a good looking girl.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2017, 11:12:12 pm by NigelF »

Offline claretandblue

Good review and mirrors my experience  ,just dont follow what you mean by this bit - "Shes a pornstar but frankly i dont care " ??

Offline NigelF

Good review and mirrors my experience  ,just dont follow what you mean by this bit - "Shes a pornstar but frankly i dont care " ??

Technically I do somewhat but basically I mean that I am reviewing her as if she was a random girl on AW (on tour). She doesn't get extra "marks" for being a pornstar or having her prices relatively low compared to most of them. When watching porn she's generally not the type I go for, if she was then it might well be different and possibly I would pay inflated prices to see them as a one off, e.g. Victoria Summers (although her prices are very hard to justify).

Offline claretandblue

Technically I do somewhat but basically I mean that I am reviewing her as if she was a random girl on AW (on tour). She doesn't get extra "marks" for being a pornstar or having her prices relatively low compared to most of them. When watching porn she's generally not the type I go for, if she was then it might well be different and possibly I would pay inflated prices to see them as a one off, e.g. Victoria Summers (although her prices are very hard to justify).
Ah ok,agreed I wouldnt break the bank to see her but she is a good option at those rates as you say  :hi:

Offline OakTree

Good review there Nigel.

She's someone I'm definitely going look out for if she tours up here again.

Not a bad hourly rate too when you compare what some are charging these days.