Another idiot not to vote for.http://www.spf.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=325&Itemid=2909
Notice he complains about the letter of the law. Not whether there was a nuisance, not whether residents were feeling hassled, not whether the law was helpful, just that someone - that could be an activist - 'complained.' Complained that the law wasn't being prosecuted vigorously enough.
I could complain about someone not being prosecuted for dropping a piece of litter. But they would consider whether harm was being done or whether it was just a shop receipt or maybe even a shopping list. But with kerbcrawlers, the harm is assumed.
I am not defending street walking. But such simplistic pleasing of complainers on a sensitive topic shows someone is acting with an agenda rather than in the interests of justice or their constituents.
Chisholm is a long standing incumbent. A 'comfy' seat. Seems he's also a yes man.