Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Bareback!!!  (Read 59827 times)

Offline marty

Thats it, try another Troll trick next, try to undermine me. Yet again your woeful. You posted you had evidence, prove it.

I posted I had an opinion based on evidence, not that I had proof of something which I had evidence for and was willing to share it. I am still of the same opinion and it is still based on the same evidence. But it is just my opinion, based on the evidence and my past experience.

I'm guessing this troll reference is an attempt to get me banned. The act of a coward.

There is nothing in my activity here which could be considered trolling indeed you have done more on that score.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2013, 03:40:02 PM by marty »

Offline smiths

Good, please don't believe me. 

You are not discussing you are arguing and have been from the outset where I stated that it was my opinion. Had you wanted to discuss the issue you would not try and lecture me on what you think I ought to post.  You are rude, arrogant, offensive and your attempt at speaking out for the collective that is UKP by referring to me as "your ilk"  "these people" "troll" and then rallying with your buddies to talk 'about me' as though I'm not here is classic.

You made a mistake when you read my first post, when I said "This is my opinion, based on evidence and experience" there is nothing to argue about because it is my opinion and it matters not what I based it on. You read "evidence" and decided you wanted to see it, well no, I'm just not going to qualify that with you.

My final word?  None of your business just like it's none of mine when you decide to post yours.

You later posted you had the evidence in emails you had, so as i just posted thats not your opinion if true, its a fact you have the emails according to you. You moved on to posting you had the emails as proof, you posted that off your own back. So is not opinion anymore if you have these emails, its fact. Its quite simple, you say you have email proof, so prove it.

As to not being my business, this is a forum, i can reply to any post i wish to, when posters say they have evidence i can ask to see it as i wish, and you can decline as you wish, as you have done. The point is it was you that said you had proof but have declined to prove it which to me undermines what you have posted as it relies on me just believing you which i wont be doing.

Offline marty

You later posted you had the evidence in emails you had, so as i just posted thats not your opinion if true, its a fact you have the emails according to you. You moved on to posting you had the emails as proof, you posted that off your own back. So is not opinion anymore if you have these emails, its fact. Its quite simple, you say you have email proof, so prove it.

As to not being my business, this is a forum, i can reply to any post i wish to, when posters say they have evidence i can ask to see it as i wish, and you can decline as you wish, as you have done. The point is it was you that said you had proof but have declined to prove it which to me undermines what you have posted as it relies on me just believing you which i wont be doing.

I mentioned the emails because it was suggested that my only evidence was AW feedback.

But enough, you are right I am wrong.  My apologies, I'll leave it there.

Offline smiths

I posted I had an opinion based on evidence, not that I had proof of something which I had evidence for and was willing to share it. I am still of the same opinion and it is still based on the same evidence. But it is just my opinion, based on the evidence and my past experience.

I'm guessing this troll reference is an attempt to get me banned. The act of a coward.

There is nothing in my activity here which could be considered trolling indeed you have done more on that score.

You have posted you have email proof, thats not opinion, its fact if it were true. But you have declined to produce that evidence leaving it that its a case of blindly taking your word for it.

As to trying to get you banned, your being paranoid there, admin decide such things in reality. All i have done is ask to see the proof you posted you had, saying you had emails, your clearly trying to wriggle around using whatever you can think of to divert attention off that central point, the point that interested me, i wont be moving from that point though. You posted you have emails as evidence, prove it.

Offline mh

And you think that highlighting a few words to alter the entire context of a sentence proves what?  Unbelievable.

The highlighting didn't change the meaning or context, it highlighted the ridiculous words you used. Let's break it down for you:

Quote
As it goes you can bet your bollocks

meaningless preamble, does not change the meaning of the remainder of the sentence. Especially since the summing up (see below) says it is based on evidence and experience, not just a theoretical bet on a whim.

Quote
most of the anti-bb brigade are lying

ludicrous claim number 1

Quote
and would like the'name and shame' just to get the girls' numbers. 

ludicrous claim number 2

Quote
This is my opinion, based on evidence and experience.

Given the two ludicrous claims preceding this summing up, you have to expect people to request the evidence to give it any credence.

By the way, Tony Blair had irrefutable evidence that Saddam had WMDs. But it was too secret to share with the unimportant people. You just had to trust him...

Offline marty

By the way, Tony Blair had irrefutable evidence that Saddam had WMDs. But it was too secret to share with the unimportant people. You just had to trust him...

Yes I see the similarity, thank you for pointing that out.  Again I apologise.

Offline smiths

I mentioned the emails because it was suggested that my only evidence was AW feedback.

But enough, you are right I am wrong.  My apologies, I'll leave it there.

Accepted if genuine.

Offline marty



Offline caeglas1

There are hundreds if not thousands of prozzies on aw advertising bb, so I'm not sure what the argument is here. If you want bb it's there for you , if you don't there are thousands who don't . I've probably had bb sex with 12-15 prozzies over the years , all independents except the 1 parlour (see earlier post). Of those at least 3 we just had bb on the spur of the moment they didnt advertise it. Having had relationships with working girls I know that even in a punter / escort situation if you turn them on enough sometimes things just happen .

Offline Marmalade

Q: What's good about a bb thread?

A: Like a condom, it keeps all the bb shit in one place.

Offline Ted Bear

All it takes is one encounter with the wrong person and you could pay the price...

For this guy if he is tested positive for HIV, hopefully that should teach the scum  a lesson - http://news.sky.com/story/1136523/rapist-discovers-his-victim-had-hiv

Catch-all advice is, of course, just that. You are your own authority people.  :cool:

Discuss yes, interrogate "you vill tell us evrysink ve haf vays of making you talk!" no. 

Lying about age, fake photos are all issues about one person, the girl. Bareback is an issue potentially about two people, punter and girl. The attitude towards bb by the few who genuinely would never do it along with the many more bandwagon riders who claim the same and shout about it even louder through their lying teeth, isn't conducive with sharing such information by those that do it.  Just imagine what would happen next with the WG and the punter, it's not worth the hassle which is why I think Horizontal Pleasures deserves respect for being honest.

If you think punting is accepted in society and only frowned upon you are deluded. First, if it's frowned upon by that definition it's not accepted and second, it most certainly is not accepted anyway. If you think it is why not post here with your real name, tell all your family and friends?  To even suggest it is accepted is either deluded or a naive comment. Given your claimed age I'll accept naive for the time being.

The subject of bareback would be much better served if punters would do one of two things, tell the truth or STFU and say nothing. That way there would be much less noise and what was said would be informative. As it goes you can bet your bollocks most of the anti-bb brigade are lying and would like the 'name and shame' just to get the girls' numbers.  This is my opinion, based on evidence and experience.

If you want to learn more, search Adultwork for girls who "like" bb, weed out the EE girls, fakes, find the genuine British ones. Look at their feedback all the punters who visit them. For every punter who books through the system there will be ten more that don't so what you see there is the tip of the iceberg.  Have a nice day.

You seem to have missed my point.

So it's perfectly fine to be discussing photos and services provided, and asking if a WG offers BB doesn't fall into this category of discussion? Isn't BB a service after all? How does the punter come into the BB discussion? Granted he and the WG may carry it out, however, it is the WG who will agree to do it, the punter simply cant just go ahead and bareback a girl!!

I am not deluded, you seem to sound patronising in your response due to my age, since when age had anything to do with this I will never know.

However, this is a forum to discuss wg's and if some offer BB then surely this should come out in the open.

I just read vinnyfx101 review of Sensual Violet (London Bridge) where he did the deed but was offered BB, which was declined as was OWO offered and declined. I checked out her profile (she does indeed offer BB in her likes, so vinnyfx101 obviously went in with a decision to handle the situation to his satisfaction) to find that she had 24 or so feedbacks.

Got me thinking, wouldn't it be a bummer if someone saw a totally different pro$$ie, straightforward, clean provider, no bb on offer; wrote a glowing review, only to find a few months later that the profile has been sold on to the most foul and filthy provider offering all sorts of bb options.

Another reason not to write AW feedbacks methinks, best to stick with UKP to air your views and experiences. At least if things change, regarding reported past experiences you can update via the forum. 
« Last Edit: September 04, 2013, 10:31:39 PM by Rickrabbit »

Offline CoolTiger

I just read vinnyfx101 review of Sensual Violet (London Bridge) where he did the deed but was offered BB, which was declined as was OWO offered and declined. I checked out her profile (she does indeed offer BB in her likes, so vinnyfx101 obviously went in with a decision to handle the situation to his satisfaction) to find that she had 24 or so feedbacks.

Got me thinking, wouldn't it be a bummer if someone saw a totally different pro$$ie, straightforward, clean provider, no bb on offer; wrote a glowing review, only to find a few months later that the profile has been sold on to the most foul and filthy provider offering all sorts of bb options.

Another reason not to write AW feedbacks methinks, best to stick with UKP to air your views and experiences. At least if things change, regarding reported past experiences you can update via the forum. 

AFAIK, majority of the "profile takeover" relate to EE girls.

Offline essexmat

Only had one 'sort of' BB experience and it was in my very early days of punting around 12 years ago. Arranged to meet a EE WG from AW at some flat in Aldgate - never thought to check about BB (I don't risk it) as I was a novice at the time.

Anyway, paperwork done, dfk, on to bed, owo, more dfk, me fingering her, both getting aroused as she was dfk me (she was on top) and giving me a hand job, next thing she guides my cock to her pussy and slips it in and starts to ride me, I stopped after about 10 seconds (could have carried on as was aroused) and asked for a condom, she asked why as she preferred BB, I just got changed and left an didn't even cum (only a 30 min punt and £60) so could have been worse.


Offline punk

Only had one 'sort of' BB experience and it was in my very early days of punting around 12 years ago. Arranged to meet a EE WG from AW at some flat in Aldgate - never thought to check about BB (I don't risk it) as I was a novice at the time.

Anyway, paperwork done, dfk, on to bed, owo, more dfk, me fingering her, both getting aroused as she was dfk me (she was on top) and giving me a hand job, next thing she guides my cock to her pussy and slips it in and starts to ride me, I stopped after about 10 seconds (could have carried on as was aroused) and asked for a condom, she asked why as she preferred BB, I just got changed and left an didn't even cum (only a 30 min punt and £60) so could have been worse.

did you get to the clinic?

Offline essexmat

did you get to the clinic?

No (although should have really) but since then had various blood tests and UTI tests and all fine

Offline punk

No (although should have really) but since then had various blood tests and UTI tests and all fine

yeah i know it can be a pain.you just have to watch some of these girls,opening their legs without a care for a rubber,some have look disappointed when i have gone a put a mac on.

Offline wristjob

I used to add girls with BB to my block list, although nowadays it's programmed in to excludes them on my usual searches.

In the past I saw 1 girl who was top draw but admitted she had done BB when she started - never saw her again. Also another one who gave me the line "you don't look like you have AIDS" - didn't plan on going down that path either, but she was amazing and I saw her a couple of times more. Booked her for my bday shag too - and got a phone call from her dad - he'd found out she was working after she collapsed and they rushed her to hospital cos she had gonorrhoea and he was warning ppl. That was a bit of a special day - only topped by how bad the replacement birthday shag was.

Offline overhead

Only had one 'sort of' BB experience and it was in my very early days of punting around 12 years ago. Arranged to meet a EE WG from AW at some flat in Aldgate - never thought to check about BB (I don't risk it) as I was a novice at the time.

Anyway, paperwork done, dfk, on to bed, owo, more dfk, me fingering her, both getting aroused as she was dfk me (she was on top) and giving me a hand job, next thing she guides my cock to her pussy and slips it in and starts to ride me, I stopped after about 10 seconds (could have carried on as was aroused) and asked for a condom, she asked why as she preferred BB, I just got changed and left an didn't even cum (only a 30 min punt and £60) so could have been worse.

The mistake you made was letting it go in at all. It's not when you cum that matters, its making contact with the fluids inside her. Ten seconds is a long time. I don't think you gained much by pulling out after as long as that.

I can't understand why there are girls that are keen to do BB. It seems like there are though. I wouldn't have believed this story, but the very same thing almost happened to me a while back. Always be careful when the girl goes on top because you lose control of the situation easily.

Offline Daffodil

The mistake you made was letting it go in at all. It's not when you cum that matters, its making contact with the fluids inside her. Ten seconds is a long time. I don't think you gained much by pulling out after as long as that.

I can't understand why there are girls that are keen to do BB. It seems like there are though. I wouldn't have believed this story, but the very same thing almost happened to me a while back. Always be careful when the girl goes on top because you lose control of the situation easily.

Not entirely accurate r.e. the ten second/no cum rule. True, he's possibly been exposed to a degree, but I'd imagine the longer the fuck the greater the exposure. In addition, he would not have known the contraceptive status of the prossie, so probably best not to cum inside.

With regards why girls are so keen on bareback, my belief is that they, like us guys, prefer it. The last few civvy girls I've fucked bareback all seem to have gotten off on the fact that I'm cumming inside them.

Offline punk

Not entirely accurate r.e. the ten second/no cum rule. True, he's possibly been exposed to a degree, but I'd imagine the longer the fuck the greater the exposure. In addition, he would not have known the contraceptive status of the prossie, so probably best not to cum inside.

With regards why girls are so keen on bareback, my belief is that they, like us guys, prefer it. The last few civvy girls I've fucked bareback all seem to have gotten off on the fact that I'm cumming inside them.

and can charge it as a extra. :dash: would not even bb a civvy expect long term relationship and we had both been tested.remember there are people with diseases who are spreading sti around knowing or unknowing

Offline overhead

Not entirely accurate r.e. the ten second/no cum rule. True, he's possibly been exposed to a degree, but I'd imagine the longer the fuck the greater the exposure. In addition, he would not have known the contraceptive status of the prossie, so probably best not to cum inside.

With regards why girls are so keen on bareback, my belief is that they, like us guys, prefer it. The last few civvy girls I've fucked bareback all seem to have gotten off on the fact that I'm cumming inside them.

I'm not aware of any ten second rule. I am sure that if any infective agent is present, then simple penetration is sufficient especially if it's deep, which if the girl forced it in from on top it would have been. After ten seconds of movement I doubt if any longer would make a blind bit of difference.

The contraceptive status is an issue for her. I think some girls have an urge to risk pregnancy which they normally suppress, but it does get the better of them sometimes. The legal situation is that you would be liable, but do you give your personal details every time you punt? The thought of a pregnancy to full term isn't at the forefront of ones mind during these escapades, but if it happened if could be one of the most significant things you do in your life. After all the band Abba wouldn't have existed if it wasn't for a brief liason not dissimilar.

Some girls do prefer without condom, but it's not anything like the huge difference it is for men. The coming inside relates to the unconscious pregnancy urge mentioned above.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)