Author Topic: English Charissa  (Read 4839 times)


25 review(s) for Lauryn London (20 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]
25 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5817437) (20 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by The Owl]

Offline Belgarion

Background
Had some stupid o' clock meetings in the City so was booked up in a hotel and wanted to take full advantage of it. I had planned a couple of meets but one of the meets was cancelled as the cunts changed the meeting time  :mad:

Will rearrange the other meet but was free in the evening and made arrangements. Liked her photos on UKE and we were able to align schedules. Booking made through UKE.

Comms
Easy to speak to, responded to my queries efficiently and arrangements were made for the meet as reception was up front and centre. Rates as per her profile.

Appearance and Photos
Photos are indeed accurate especially her assets which are very impressive  :D

Shenanigans
Charissa was eager to get things going as for some reason I was a bit shy. Not sure why but she took the lead which was great and we helped each other out of our clothes. I did ask her to dress casually as that's what I like and it was easy to take off so I could introduce myself to her body.

Services offered and taken with gusto FK, OWO, RO and Sex. She was very responsive to my lips and tongue and came which was great to see. Suffice it to say, no lube required  :D

Had a chat and got to know ourselves a lot better. A truly interesting woman. No clockwatching whatsoever. Saw her off and slept off like a baby.

Will definitely see her again, shame she's outcall only.

Link;  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline threechilliman

She's an enjoyable shag, glad you enjoyed.

tcm

Offline Belgarion

She's an enjoyable shag, glad you enjoyed.

tcm

That she is indeed. She'll be getting a return visit.  :D

Offline Fully Sated

Thanks for the review Belgarion. Her assets do indeed look, 'very impressive'!

[Removed by admin - 22/10/2017]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Jimmyredcab

She now wants this pic removed  :unknown:

It depends where it came from I suppose, if it was from her private Facebook page then she has a point, if it was from Adultwork or similar then it is classed as being in the public domain.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She's posted her face pic on here a number of times, but now wanting them all removed  :unknown:

Offline mace-window

She now wants this pic removed  :unknown:

If you were a member of UKE, you would of know that she has been outed by someone. So I guess she want to keep her identity a secret which is understandable.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If you were a member of UKE, you would of know that she has been outed by someone. So I guess she want to keep her identity a secret which is understandable.

Fluffy shit that washes on UKE doesn't wash here, if she's been "outed" then removing the face pics she posted is a bit late, but the way she posted pics gave the impression she was open with what she did, so you can't out someone who is out, it's a bit like saying you're going to Out Elton John as Gay  :wacko:

Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
Fluffy shit that washes on UKE doesn't wash here, if she's been "outed" then removing the face pics she posted is a bit late, but the way she posted pics gave the impression she was open with what she did, so you can't out someone who is out, it's a bit like saying you're going to Out Elton John as Gay  :wacko:
No it's not too late, because I could still get outed to others in future.

Offline mace-window

Fluffy shit that washes on UKE doesn't wash here, if she's been "outed" then removing the face pics she posted is a bit late, but the way she posted pics gave the impression she was open with what she did, so you can't out someone who is out, it's a bit like saying you're going to Out Elton John as Gay  :wacko:

I was not trying to be fluffy. Just thought that the UKE thread she posted could of be the reason why. Just my two sense.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
But if you're "outed" then you're outed, you can't turn back time (Well you can on the internet with wayback) so you can't erase your past, that's the fipside of getting £100+ an hour as opposed to £7.50 an hour stacking shelves  :music:

TrevorN

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Silly girl . If These girls have a private life of escorting you NEVER show your face on the net . She thought she would get a few extra quid by showing it . She took the gamble . No point crying over it now .

Lesson learned for her .

Just another DQ ...Drama Queen
« Last Edit: October 22, 2017, 08:05:14 pm by TrevorN »

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I was not trying to be fluffy.

I didn't say you were fluffy, I pointed out that UKE is fluffy and full of fluffies sucking up to pro$$ies, I've thought about posting on there but I suspect my honesty would piss a few off over there, including admin  :sarcastic:

Offline mace-window

I didn't say you were fluffy, I pointed out that UKE is fluffy and full of fluffies sucking up to pro$$ies, I've thought about posting on there but I suspect my honesty would piss a few off over there, including admin  :sarcastic:

Fair enough. Probably read your replay wrong. Sorry about that James999.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I didn't say you were fluffy, I pointed out that UKE is fluffy and full of fluffies sucking up to pro$$ies, I've thought about posting on there but I suspect my honesty would piss a few off over there, including admin  :sarcastic:

Five reports in 10 minutes, tick tock.  :rolleyes:

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Fair enough. Probably read your replay wrong. Sorry about that James999.

No probs  :hi:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I didn't say you were fluffy, I pointed out that UKE is fluffy and full of fluffies sucking up to pro$$ies, I've thought about posting on there but I suspect my honesty would piss a few off over there, including admin  :sarcastic:

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Would be nice to see you over there.   :hi:

Need reinforcements. 

Offline NigelF

No it's not too late, because I could still get outed to others in future.

You surely know the risks. Why did you put them up (at least some of them were uploaded by you) in the first place if you weren't willing to accept the risks? Admin is not running your own personal online photo album, he's got better things to do.

Having said that, I do very much appreciate it when WGs put up face pics. It allows us to make a much more informed decision and I for one have definitely benefited from seeing yours. So your honesty/openness is definitely to be commended but your naivety isn't.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Would be nice to see you over there.   :hi:

Need reinforcements.

Not that you were talking to me or that I'd make the best back-up but I for one don't fancy pushing shit uphill. For me, too many of the people on there are idiots and are too far-gone to be helped. Many of the guys on there are so sycophantic towards the WGs it's genuinely disturbing.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2017, 08:40:43 pm by NigelF »

Offline dubhcarr

I didn't say you were fluffy, I pointed out that UKE is fluffy and full of fluffies sucking up to pro$$ies, I've thought about posting on there but I suspect my honesty would piss a few off over there, including admin  :sarcastic:

it might surprise you..........yes some sucking up....also some hard truths to the point....not always cosy but it has a different remit so not always brutal........

Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
You surely know the risks. Why did you put them up (at least some of them were uploaded by you) in the first place if you weren't willing to accept the risks? Admin is not running your own personal online photo album, he's got better things to do.

Having said that, I do very much appreciate it when WGs put up face pics. It allows us to make a much more informed decision and I for one have definitely benefited from seeing yours. So your honesty/openness is definitely to be commended but your naivety isn't.

Not that you were talking to me or that I'd make the best back-up but I for one don't fancy pushing shit uphill. For me, too many of the people on there are idiots and are too far-gone to be helped. Many of the guys on there are so sycophantic towards the WGs it's genuinely disturbing.
If he won't remove them then that's too bad for me. I can only ask.

Offline Brazilian Martian

She now wants this pic removed  :unknown:

She should know better than that, not even Rebecca would ask for a pic to be removed

Offline Bangers and Gash


Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
She should know better than that, not even Rebecca would ask for a pic to be removed
Don't see why it's such a thing that I asked. I can ask, I probably won't get the answer I want, but even for a .0001% chance, I can ask.

Offline Brazilian Martian

Don't see why it's such a thing that I asked. I can ask, I probably won't get the answer I want, but I can ask.

Well your a member here  so you should know better  :music: how many prossies join up and ask admin to remove their pictures. What generally happens ZILCH !!!

Your pics were from adultwork so its fair game that they stay up as they where on your profile before. Also it's sad that some lowlife is trying to out you, BUT THE RULES ARE THE RULES.

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,625
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
it might surprise you..........yes some sucking up....also some hard truths to the point....not always cosy but it has a different remit so not always brutal........

No, I don't think it will surprise him. Nige is absolutely spot on.
Different remit and great idea in principle but the balance is too much the other way because of the number of flufflies on there whiteknighting, talking rubbish and picking flawed and nonsensical arguments with ordinary punters when they make firm but polite and fair comments about WGs.

And because of that fluffiness, you get WGs with a heightened sense of their own importance, charging high prices and demanding pictures they themselves have made available are removed - this is the second request in a couple of days.

Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
Well your a member here  so you should know better  :music: how many prossies join up and ask admin to remove their pictures. What generally happens ZILCH !!!

Your pics were from adultwork so its fair game that they stay up as they where on your profile before. Also it's sad that some lowlife is trying to out you, BUT THE RULES ARE THE RULES.
I've only asked to remove one pic that was on adultwork. The others I posted here myself when I was disputing that review a few months ago. I know it's my fault and my problem.
Yes, many join up but they don't ask, they demand, and they're rude. I simply asked. I didn't hold out much hope, but it was worth taking a chance and asking.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2017, 09:47:38 pm by Rochelle »

Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
No, I don't think it will surprise him. Nige is absolutely spot on.
Different remit and great idea in principle but the balance is too much the other way because of the number of flufflies on there whiteknighting, talking rubbish and picking flawed and nonsensical arguments with ordinary punters when they make firm but polite and fair comments about WGs.

And because of that fluffiness, you get WGs with a heightened sense of their own importance, charging high prices and demanding pictures they themselves have made available are removed - this is the second request in a couple of days.
Difference is, I haven't demanded anything.

Offline Jimmyredcab


James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Perhaps offer to donate a weeks wages to a charity of Admins choice  :unknown:

Offline cueball

Perhaps offer to donate a weeks wages to a charity of Admins choice  :unknown:

That's a great idea, try here....
External Link/Members Only

Err, it might not be the bosses choice though  :D

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Perhaps offer to donate a weeks wages to a charity of Admins choice  :unknown:
Was mooted for doing that to get un-banned in the past.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
No, I don't think it will surprise him. Nige is absolutely spot on.
Different remit and great idea in principle but the balance is too much the other way because of the number of flufflies on there whiteknighting, talking rubbish and picking flawed and nonsensical arguments with ordinary punters when they make firm but polite and fair comments about WGs.

And because of that fluffiness, you get WGs with a heightened sense of their own importance, charging high prices and demanding pictures they themselves have made available are removed - this is the second request in a couple of days.

That's the idea of UKE, it isn't supposed to be UKP mark 2. UKE is where punters can slime up to and arselick WGs but it isn't compulsory, and WGs can tout away to their hearts content, the idea is better their than here and i think it works well. There are now a few of us who aren't arse lickers on their so there is certainly more balance than there was when it started and i have been a member since the start. Some of the sycophants are frankly vomit inducing though.

You are correct about some WGs, a number of the worst ones like Keira Hunter, Kylie and Annabella Crimson have been banned, and some cunts like Unclesnide, Finch, RandyF and Golfnut. Others like Chloe Kisses just keep within the rules while trying to undermine it and UKP on the sly, in her case recently targeting Tontober. She clearly resents the idea and worse still some WGs getting involved in it, her bitterness is very clear to see in my opinion and i have posted so on their or words to this effect. :thumbsdown:

Once a pic is up its up unless admin says otherwise. Charissa has asked for a pic to be removed, admin will decide of course.

Offline Rochelle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,539
  • Likes: 3
  •  
That's the idea of UKE, it isn't supposed to be UKP mark 2. UKE is where punters can slime up to and arselick WGs but it isn't compulsory, and WGs can tout away to their hearts content, the idea is better their than here and i think it works well. There are now a few of us who aren't arse lickers on their so there is certainly more balance than there was when it started and i have been a member since the start. Some of the sycophants are frankly vomit inducing though.

You are correct about some WGs, a number of the worst ones like Keira Hunter, Kylie and Annabella Crimson have been banned, and some cunts like Unclesnide, Finch, RandyF and Golfnut. Others like Chloe Kisses just keep within the rules while trying to undermine it and UKP on the sly, in her case recently targeting Tontober. She clearly resents the idea and worse still some WGs getting involved in it, her bitterness is very clear to see in my opinion and i have posted so on their or words to this effect. :thumbsdown:

Once a pic is up its up unless admin says otherwise. Charissa has asked for a pic to be removed, admin will decide of course.
Indeed, and admin has removed all the pics I reported, so I really appreciate that. The only face pic that remains is in this thread, the posts where two posters here quoted it.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2017, 11:08:22 pm by Rochelle »