Okay, in the interests of fairness, I have looked over my own reviews to provide my own summary, so that virtual waster can free up some of his time
Here is the breakdown:
1 - large and heavy
2 - says I have a fullish figure and if you like size 8 then not for you
3 - doesnt mention anything, more interested in services provided
4 - bbw, fuller figure
5 - doesnt mention figure, concentrates on services provided
6 - states I am as I describe and mentions I have curves.
7. Doesnt mention size apart from my breasts,.more interested in services provided
8. Mentions that I am honest about my stats.
9. Says I am a larger lady and that my profile states I am around size 18 (I am a size 16-18 on my profile, but I am a straight up 16 atm)
Also states that size wise I might not be to everyones tastes.
10. Says photos in my gallery are spot on.
11. Actively says at the beginning of the review that they don't believe in commenting on bodies or dirty details, so their writing style is a conscious decision.
12. Mentions I am size 16.
13. Mentions I am no waif and mentions twice that I am a larger lady.
So 5 out of 13 directly reference that I am larger/am plus sized, however nuanced that might be. A further 3 state something along the lines that I am as advertised, obviously aware that forum members can read. 3 reviews are more interested in describing the services I provide. 1 mentions my dress size as way of explanation and 1 actively states that they do not believe in providing that information, so it is a conscious decision not to across all their reviews.
Considering I have 13 positive reviews in 6 months, I would say that discussion of my size and services provided have been reasonably well covered in that time. I doubt that if I were size 8-10 that VW would think I needed a disclaimer about my size on every review. I am a bigger girl yes, and as VW has conceded to me, I do not hide the fact either. I advertise as a small BBW, for the reason being that in terms of body type, that's where I would sit as dress sizes are only an indicator and different girls carry it differently.
If Mr Shins had been the only reviewer to mention my size, then VW would have made an incredibly valid point. But Mr Shins was not and VW was aware of that. Mr Shins post is still useful because of the fact that he describes BDSM activities, which plenty of punters go and see escorts for and therefore this review might be helpful for those punters in future.
Maybe here VW believes he does have a point given that in his previous reviews he seemingly goes and checks girls clothing labels during a punt so it clearly really matters to him, but how it has been presented has been a bit inflammatory, whether intentional or not.
I hope this is okay to post, I think everyone is up to speed now that I am a plus size girl and I think possibly the OP was less interested in my size and more interested in the non standard services I provided, so I hope that people take away from this review what he intended from it.
