Problems after seeing WGs that offer bareback?

[Wiltsboy01]

Someone said there's a much higher chance of a girl having something if she does bareback or even that she's probably already got something and doesn't give a fuck about herself, or anyone that goes with her.

Is that really true? I mean has anyone ever encountered or even heard of a WG with an sti, let alone anything mega-serious?

I agree its a question of risk but I tend to think the risk is overstated.  Just a thought.

[Berks Bloke 32]

the risk is by no means overstated, you have no idea what any of the guys she has seen have and neither does she. Worst case scenario you wind up being HIV+ and if you have a family then try explaining that to your other half. A lot of STIs remain symptom free for a very long time so unless you are tested regularly then how would you know if you have one? Is that risk really worth it?

[ParisB]

Someone said there's a much higher chance of a girl having something if she does bareback or even that she's probably already got something and doesn't give a fuck about herself, or anyone that goes with her.

Is that really true? I mean has anyone ever encountered or even heard of a WG with an sti, let alone anything mega-serious?

I agree its a question of risk but I tend to think the risk is overstated.  Just a thought.

To be honest i think that is how i have always looked at it.   In this day and age we all know the risk of std inc HIV+ect  So why would someone want to offer this unless they already have something  ( and yes i suppose that is a very simplistic way of looking at it ) 
I know that to some this might not make sense to some people   but thats just my way of thinking of it
i.e.  if someone has something like HIV  then catching another STD isn't exactly going to kill them is it so why should they care 

also i think the same way about clients that request it as well -  Im always amazed that when you look at the reverse bookings system on adultwork you get loads of guys wanting bb and lots of escorts bidding for it.

Its such a shame that with reverse bidding  it doesn't show which escorts are bidding for bareback then at least other punters would know

[pierrot]

Ive been punting for over 25 years and Im still waiting to be offered the chance to refuse BB. Ive often thought it was a myth.

[IluvPussy]

Any decent punter will treat any WG as a dirty bare-backer, and get regular GUM clinic check-ups.
Any decent WG will treat any punter as a dirty bare-backer, and get regular GUM clinic check-ups.

[kong]

i find it absolutely inconceivable that girls would offer BB regardless of the situation

[smiths]

Someone said there's a much higher chance of a girl having something if she does bareback or even that she's probably already got something and doesn't give a fuck about herself, or anyone that goes with her.

Is that really true? I mean has anyone ever encountered or even heard of a WG with an sti, let alone anything mega-serious?

I agree its a question of risk but I tend to think the risk is overstated.  Just a thought.

An infected WG is hardly likely to broadcast the fact as that wouldnt be good for business in general would it, although it might attract some of those creatures that apparently want to get infected. Its quite obvious and common sense that the risk of getting infected by offering BB to any Tom, Dick or Abdul is higher than not offering it, just ask a trained medical professional especially experts at a GUM. Fuck knows the exact risk but its not one i wish to take.

The argument that a punter could simply wear a condom when punting with WGs he knows offers BB to punters doesnt take account of those like me that dont wish to meet such idiots, and wouldnt enjoy punting with them being too worried about them being infected. Whether that worry is justified or not isnt the point to me, i punt for fun so choose to avoid those i know offer BB. If a WG offers it but doesnt advertise it which i have experienced myself although thankfully not for a long time then there isnt anything i can do about that obviously, apart from stopping punting.

IMO any WG that offers a punter BB either doesnt care about her health or that of others, or is as thick as two short planks or a mentalist, maybe even already infected and wishing to infect men back, who knows.

And of course some infections can damage your fertility and ruin your life, all for a BB shag. I wouldnt shag a civvie BB either personally that was a total or virtual stranger.

[Cactus]

i.e.  if someone has something like HIV  then catching another STD isn't exactly going to kill them is it so why should they care 

There is the small matter of possible criminal charges (convictions have been given of 2 years in jail) for knowingly spreading HIV.  So while, in your opinion, they may have nothing to lose in going bb when carrying HIV, there are other possible repercussions.

Punting is a risk/reward business, every punter/WG is different in what they deem to be an acceptable level of risk.  Personally, I add girls to my blacklist who offer bareback as that's a risk too far for me and I don't want to associate with prossies who deem this as a reasonable risk to take.  Others may think differently.

I get checked fairly regularly at the GUM clinic, even though I try to minimise my risk, it's still a nerve racking moment getting the results.

[Wiltsboy01]

If someone has something like HIV  then catching another STD isn't exactly going to kill them is it so why should they care

Sure that is a logical position - but there are 165 girls offering bareback on AW available today - how can that many 20s girls all have an sti?

I'm not anti-bareback or pro-bareback - I would look at the WG in the round and make a decision based on wanting to bang her.

[IluvPussy]

There is the small matter of possible criminal charges (convictions have been given of 2 years in jail) for knowingly spreading HIV.  So while, in your opinion, they may have nothing to lose in going bb when carrying HIV, there are other possible repercussions.

Honestly how many convictions you think? A "dirty punter with a filthy prossie", "had it coming". It's not a real crime, unlike insurance fraud!

Punting is a risk/reward business, every punter/WG is different in what they deem to be an acceptable level of risk.  Personally, I add girls to my blacklist who offer bareback as that's a risk too far for me.

I agree, WG's who openly offer BB are a major no-no. But just because they don't BB punters, doesn't mean they BB multiple boyfriends.

Read a report a while back that swingers were high risk STD/STI's or whatever the fuck it's called this week.

[Whore Of Babylon]

Any decent punter will treat any WG as a dirty bare-backer, and get regular GUM clinic check-ups.
Any decent WG will treat any punter as a dirty bare-backer, and get regular GUM clinic check-ups.

Hurrah! Someone is actually talking sense.
From an operational point of view, I consider all of my clients or casual sex partners to be HIV positive and take the acceptable (for me) precautions.
Condoms are extremely effective when used correctly to guard against HIV.

Both parties can still have satisfying sex and treat each other pleasantly and respectfully. If you don't get on with condoms you can experiment with different brands. I read recently that measuring your penis and getting the correctly sized condom can make a dramatic difference for sensation.

[Hetfield]

Pretty sure you were referencing me in your opening quote. Let me explain why I said that.

The risk of getting something for a barebacking WG is higher - by this I mean this; if a girl sleeps a guy without protection, there is a risk of getting something transmitted. Now, if a girl sleeps with 20 guys a week without protection, that risk is 20 times higher than a girl that sleeps with only 1 guy a week. You have to speculate to accumulate.

As for the second part, about offering bareback if you already have aids or whatever. The only way I can understand the mindset of a hooker that offers bareback to everyone she meets, and not be worried about aids/hiv/sti's is that she must already have one/all. No rational person would have unprotected sex with total strangers, multiple times a day/multiple days a week, and not worry about their own health, unless they knew their own health was fucked already. That's the only logical explanation I can think of. If you did worry about your health, you wouldn't offer BB to every punter you meet! And since there's no logical explanation, in my mind, as to why you wouldn't care about your won health, the only explanation must be your health is already gone and void.

So would I go and see a WG that offers BB and have sex with her? No thanks, not even with protection.

[rpg]

Pretty sure you were referencing me in your opening quote. Let me explain why I said that.

The risk of getting something for a barebacking WG is higher - by this I mean this; if a girl sleeps a guy without protection, there is a risk of getting something transmitted. Now, if a girl sleeps with 20 guys a week without protection, that risk is 20 times higher than a girl that sleeps with only 1 guy a week. You have to speculate to accumulate.

As for the second part, about offering bareback if you already have aids or whatever. The only way I can understand the mindset of a hooker that offers bareback to everyone she meets, and not be worried about aids/hiv/sti's is that she must already have one/all. No rational person would have unprotected sex with total strangers, multiple times a day/multiple days a week, and not worry about their own health, unless they knew their own health was fucked already. That's the only logical explanation I can think of. If you did worry about your health, you wouldn't offer BB to every punter you meet! And since there's no logical explanation, in my mind, as to why you wouldn't care about your won health, the only explanation must be your health is already gone and void.

So would I go and see a WG that offers BB and have sex with her? No thanks, not even with protection.

It's theoretically hugely more than 20 times the risk as each of those 20 guys could have been barebacking numerous girls, who, in turn could be doing likewise.

[ParisB]

There is the small matter of possible criminal charges (convictions have been given of 2 years in jail) for knowingly spreading HIV.  So while, in your opinion, they may have nothing to lose in going bb when carrying HIV, there are other possible repercussions.

Punting is a risk/reward business, every punter/WG is different in what they deem to be an acceptable level of risk.  Personally, I add girls to my blacklist who offer bareback as that's a risk too far for me and I don't want to associate with prossies who deem this as a reasonable risk to take.  Others may think differently.

I get checked fairly regularly at the GUM clinic, even though I try to minimise my risk, it's still a nerve racking moment getting the results.

I don't  really think that someone who has HIV is going to be massively bothered that they might be taken to court
 plus we're talking out clients shagging someone bb so obviously he knows the risk he is taking by shagging a prostitue that offer bare back   Cat really moan wen in six months e has tested positive for HIV or anything else

[Whore Of Babylon]

Personally I wouldn't see an escort who offered bb because she is either: 
1. off her rocker- not fun for me
2. Got HIV and wants to spread it - a complete disaster of a person and not someone I want to fuck.
3. Or just too fucking stupid to deal with (in my opinion)

But each to their own. You take your chances in this life and only you know which ones are worth the risk for you.

[ParisB]

Pretty sure you were referencing me in your opening quote. Let me explain why I said that.

The risk of getting something for a barebacking WG is higher - by this I mean this; if a girl sleeps a guy without protection, there is a risk of getting something transmitted. Now, if a girl sleeps with 20 guys a week without protection, that risk is 20 times higher than a girl that sleeps with only 1 guy a week. You have to speculate to accumulate.

As for the second part, about offering bareback if you already have aids or whatever. The only way I can understand the mindset of a hooker that offers bareback to everyone she meets, and not be worried about aids/hiv/sti's is that she must already have one/all. No rational person would have unprotected sex with total strangers, multiple times a day/multiple days a week, and not worry about their own health, unless they knew their own health was fucked already. That's the only logical explanation I can think of. If you did worry about your health, you wouldn't offer BB to every punter you meet! And since there's no logical explanation, in my mind, as to why you wouldn't care about your won health, the only explanation must be your health is already gone and void.

So would I go and see a WG that offers BB and have sex with her? No thanks, not even with protection.

You wrote what I was trying to only much better ( thanks) 

[smiths]

Pretty sure you were referencing me in your opening quote. Let me explain why I said that.

The risk of getting something for a barebacking WG is higher - by this I mean this; if a girl sleeps a guy without protection, there is a risk of getting something transmitted. Now, if a girl sleeps with 20 guys a week without protection, that risk is 20 times higher than a girl that sleeps with only 1 guy a week. You have to speculate to accumulate.

As for the second part, about offering bareback if you already have aids or whatever. The only way I can understand the mindset of a hooker that offers bareback to everyone she meets, and not be worried about aids/hiv/sti's is that she must already have one/all. No rational person would have unprotected sex with total strangers, multiple times a day/multiple days a week, and not worry about their own health, unless they knew their own health was fucked already. That's the only logical explanation I can think of. If you did worry about your health, you wouldn't offer BB to every punter you meet! And since there's no logical explanation, in my mind, as to why you wouldn't care about your won health, the only explanation must be your health is already gone and void.

So would I go and see a WG that offers BB and have sex with her? No thanks, not even with protection.

Well put.

[smiths]

It's theoretically hugely more than 20 times the risk as each of those 20 guys could have been barebacking numerous girls, who, in turn could be doing likewise.

Yep, also well said.

[Kram]

I wouldn't fuck a civvy girl BB... there's no way in hell I'd fuck a prossie bb

[smiths]

Personally I wouldn't see an escort who offered bb because she is either: 
1. off her rocker- not fun for me
2. Got HIV and wants to spread it - a complete disaster of a person and not someone I want to fuck.
3. Or just too fucking stupid to deal with (in my opinion)

But each to their own. You take your chances in this life and only you know which ones are worth the risk for you.

Yes, the same reasons i gave. Of course its to each their own if its consentual, complete fucking idiots though nevertheless in my view.

[Wiltsboy01]

Yep, also well said.

I accept all this but going back to my original post - has anyone ever encountered a WG with an sti at all? It's all speculation.

This all might just be like that "Don't die of ignorance" AIDS campaign in the 1980s - but few people did die - ignorant or otherwise.

[smiths]

You wrote what I was trying to only much better ( thanks)

I understood and agreed with the jist of your post Paris.

[pabulum]

The only thing that I'd add to Hetfield, smiths, rpg and other naysayers is that I tend to see adverts for a group of girls appearing on AW in the same city, all with similar profiles etc (and currently all Romanian), and I look at the 'likes' only to see that they all offer 'bareback', 'penetration (protected) and 'unprotected sex'. At this point I begin to wonder whether offering BB is actually the girls' free choice.

[IluvPussy]

I wouldn't fuck a civvy girl BB... there's no way in hell I'd fuck a prossie bb

Not sure of your age, etc, but most blokes happily BB a civvy on a Friday/Saturday night on the town.
I was *that* age once too!

[ParisB]

My friends stepfather has just come back from Thailand (just his ashes in a urn  ) He was early 60's had 4 kids plus 3 step kids and numerous grandkids

He died out there in Thailand recently of aids and he didnt have the money to be flown back home to die with his family

He spent many years visiting Thailand from around the  early 2001  far as I know when he separated from my friends mum

He  was quite open with his family  that had HIV once e knew  :rolleyes:and from what I know from chatting to him and my friend at family parties he initially used a condom on his first few trips, then he didn't a few times. Got checked out and was all clear so started playing russian roulette with his life .

He was ok I believe for around 8 years of doing this never got as much as a cold   He would spend to the winters out there and the  summers in the uk working to pay for his 6 month trip

Sadly he lost his game  of russian roulette and was diagnosed with HIV a few years ago

But having HIV didnt stop him going out to Thailand for the past few years  still shagging girls and of course he has fuck all to lose, so no condom so passing HIV around to others who sag the sae girls in all probability
Do I feel sorry for him   yes cos I remember him as my friends step dad and e was always a nice guy but I don't feel sorry for him cos he gambled and he lost

[Cactus]

I accept all this but going back to my original post - has anyone ever encountered a WG with an sti at all? It's all speculation.

This all might just be like that "Don't die of ignorance" AIDS campaign in the 1980s - but few people did die - ignorant or otherwise.

Yep, I've come across 2 (one literally).
I used to have an alert set up telling me of new escorts in the area and one day I was notified about a new girl called (and I paraphrase here as I cannot remember her actual name), "hornyslut69 gave me the clap" the guy who posted it up linked to his own aw profile with plenty of positive feedback from girls I'd seen, so I suspect he was telling the truth.
Another girl who I had seen, but is no longer active, text me saying that she had gonorrhea and that I should get myself checked out.

I got checked after both of these instances and luckily all was clear.  It does happen though.

[smiths]

I accept all this but going back to my original post - has anyone ever encountered a WG with an sti at all? It's all speculation.

This all might just be like that "Don't die of ignorance" AIDS campaign in the 1980s - but few people did die - ignorant or otherwise.

As i said they are hardly likely to say they are infected. Of course its speculation as those of us that dont punt with BB offering WGs dont meet them for coffee and a chat about whether they are infected or not, at least i dont. My and others logic and common sense kicks in along with in my case speaking to the GUM.

AIDS is but one of a whole number of STIs that you can catch of course, including Chlamydia (spelt wrong i think) for example which a person might not know they have but can destroy your fertility, so if you want kids you might not be able to have them.

[rpg]

Not sure of your age, etc, but most blokes happily BB a civvy on a Friday/Saturday night on the town.
I was *that* age once too!

Not sure of your age but certainly when I was a teenager BB was the norm. We had the odd scare story of the umbrella up your japs eye but not much else. Now with better education and STI's much more common protected sex has to be the way.

[smiths]

Not sure of your age, etc, but most blokes happily BB a civvy on a Friday/Saturday night on the town.
I was *that* age once too!

Thats a big claim to make, most blokes, some blokes is what i would think. And anyway we are talking about WGs who offer BB to punters they have no idea how many other WGs he has punted BB with. Even a village bike is unlikely to have had as much cock, although i daresay there are exceptions.

[sucky2dollar]

Someone said there's a much higher chance of a girl having something if she does bareback or even that she's probably already got something and doesn't give a fuck about herself, or anyone that goes with her.

Is that really true? I mean has anyone ever encountered or even heard of a WG with an sti, let alone anything mega-serious?

I agree its a question of risk but I tend to think the risk is overstated.  Just a thought.

Well of course there is a much higher chance.

This has been covered before on several forums but there are a bunch of bi guys from a HIV fetish site who seek out AW bb prossies:
[Removed by admin]

Bareback is a personal choice and people do it for whatever reason they find relevant to them. But if you do engage in it with a prostitute (who offers it to everyone - including those with HIV who haven't disclosed this) then you have to understand the risk is considerably higher that you could catch something. That's assuming of course that you are worried about catching a disease in the first place.

As always I think everyone should be allowed to make their own decisions and live by them.

[IluvPussy]

Thats a big claim to make, most blokes, some blokes is what i would think. And anyway we are talking about WGs who offer BB to punters they have no idea how many other WGs he has punted BB with. Even a village bike is unlikely to have had as much cock, although i daresay there are exceptions.

Pissed and horny and young, you think they wear a condom? And if they did and it slipped off?

I purport to be no expert, but pissed and young and horny, I HAVE been there.

Now say you're punting a WG aged 18-25....



My point is she may not BB clients, but what about her partners?

[smiths]

Pissed and horny and young, you think they wear a condom? And if they did and it slipped off?

I purport to be no expert, but pissed and young and horny, I HAVE been there.

Now say you're punting a WG aged 18-25....



My point is she may not BB clients, but what about her partners?

I am happy sticking to some rather than many.
 
Who knows what anyone does in their personal lives, as a punter i havent the insight to know.

[CatBBW]

{snips}but there are 165 girls offering bareback on AW available today{snips}

"Available Today" is just a (paid for) marketing tool, you should have searched the entire site for ALL active escorts who offer BB in their "Likes" - you'll see the number is far higher.

[Daffodil]

To be honest i think that is how i have always looked at it.   In this day and age we all know the risk of std inc HIV+ect  So why would someone want to offer this unless they already have something  ( and yes i suppose that is a very simplistic way of looking at it ) 
I know that to some this might not make sense to some people   but thats just my way of thinking of it
i.e.  if someone has something like HIV  then catching another STD isn't exactly going to kill them is it so why should they care 

also i think the same way about clients that request it as well -  Im always amazed that when you look at the reverse bookings system on adultwork you get loads of guys wanting bb and lots of escorts bidding for it.

Its such a shame that with reverse bidding  it doesn't show which escorts are bidding for bareback then at least other punters would know

But that's exactly the point of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). It weakens your immune system so that another STD might very well kill you 

[James999]

If a Pro$$ie offers bareback I always assume

A. She is already infected and as such doesn't care about any infection risks
B. She is being forced
C. She is an addict and desperate for the cash
D. She is mentally unstable

Or any combination of the above,

As such whateve it is they should be avoided 

[Hetfield]

But you don't punt James, so you avoid all WG's...

[mh]

But having HIV didnt stop him going out to Thailand for the past few years  still shagging girls and of course he has fuck all to lose, so no condom so passing HIV around to others who sag the sae girls in all probability
Do I feel sorry for him   yes cos I remember him as my friends step dad and e was always a nice guy but I don't feel sorry for him cos he gambled and he lost

I would not feel sorry for him, but for the reason that he clearly decided to be a cunt. He may have had nothing to lose but others did and he didn't give a toss about endangering their lives (girls and their future children and partners).

[Daffodil]

I would not feel sorry for him, but for the reason that he clearly decided to be a cunt. He may have had nothing to lose but others did and he didn't give a toss about endangering their lives (girls and their future children and partners).

Totally agree. What a cunt.

[ali123]

What can you do about a WG that offers bareback but you do not know about it.  Is there any risks involved? I am quite scared of the thought of fucking a prossie, with a condom of course, but she may be infected not just HIV but something else and how can we know? Some WG out there are seriously sick in the head for offering BB and I feel that the men asking for BB are total nutcases.

[rpg]

What can you do about a WG that offers bareback but you do not know about it.  Is there any risks involved? I am quite scared of the thought of fucking a prossie, with a condom of course, but she may be infected not just HIV but something else and how can we know? Some WG out there are seriously sick in the head for offering BB and I feel that the men asking for BB are total nutcases.

If you don't know about it that could be every woman you ever see. Give up punting.

[Daffodil]

If you don't know about it that could be every woman you ever see. Give up punting.

Yeh, if you're scared to fuck a woman then you probably don't belong here.

[ali123]

How can we tell or guess? Because a while back there was a girl who I went to see, who definatly didnt have BB on her AW profile, after some misunderstanding of me asking for OWO as she didnt speak english, I said oral no condom, she said its £50 extra no condom.

I thought what is she talking about and then the penny dropped that she was talking about no condom for sex, when she insisted £50 extra when I handed over £10 as I had already given her £40 thinking she was saying £50 for OWO .  I left by making excuse saying I had a meeting to get to.  Her AW profile dissappeared after that.  Also I hadn't discovered UKP yet in order to tell my story.

[rpg]

How can we tell or guess? Because a while back there was a girl who I went to see, who definatly didnt have BB on her AW profile, after some misunderstanding of me asking for OWO as she didnt speak english, I said oral no condom, she said its £50 extra no condom.

I thought what is she talking about and then the penny dropped that she was talking about no condom for sex, when she insisted £50 extra when I handed over £10 as I had already given her £40 thinking she was saying £50 for OWO .  I left by making excuse saying I had a meeting to get to.  Her AW profile dissappeared after that.  Also I hadn't discovered UKP yet in order to tell my story.

You can't. unless by accident which happened to you. So, forget about it.

[ali123]

We really cant forget about it can we.  When you have a wife and children the last thing you want is to end up dead! However risky punting may be, there may be others that feel like me, that enjoying a nice fucking session with someone different, exotic, tall or short, busty or slim appeals to us men.

[rpg]

We really cant forget about it can we.  When you have a wife and children the last thing you want is to end up dead! However risky punting may be, there may be others that feel like me, that enjoying a nice fucking session with someone different, exotic, tall or short, busty or slim appeals to us men.

Let me come at this another way.. You asked the question

What can you do about a WG that offers bareback but you do not know about it.

Both myself and Daffodil have said nothing you can do as you don't know. What would your answer be?

[Daffodil]

We really cant forget about it can we.  When you have a wife and children the last thing you want is to end up dead! However risky punting may be, there may be others that feel like me, that enjoying a nice fucking session with someone different, exotic, tall or short, busty or slim appeals to us men.

For fuck sake, you might get hit by a bus crossing the road. It doesn't mean you won't cross the road.

Just minimise your risk and get on with it. If you can't get the risk to a level that you're happy with then don't punt.

In terms of avoiding bare backers, if they list it on their profile then avoid. If a reliable punter says they do it/offer it then avoid. If they offer it to you then avoid. Enquire subtlety about it and if they offer it then avoid.

Think about potential high risk groups and avoid those too.

At the end of the day every single girl you meet will have done bareback with somebody (punters, one night stands, boyfriends).

[smiths]

We really cant forget about it can we.  When you have a wife and children the last thing you want is to end up dead! However risky punting may be, there may be others that feel like me, that enjoying a nice fucking session with someone different, exotic, tall or short, busty or slim appeals to us men.

My advice is if your worries are so concerning that they are stopping you punting or enjoying punting best to give it up and stick to wanking and/or pulling. Otherwise take the risks you are prepared to take and go to the GUM on a regular basis.

There really is NOTHING that proves beyond doubt a WG isnt infected, even a certificate only shows they didnt test positive on the day the tests were done, so unless you have a WG in your company 24/7 you can never be definite what they might be doing and with whom, that is punting, as it is shagging around with civvies, its just that with civvies they are unlikely unless a real slapper to have had sex with as many guys, excluding the Swinging scene that is. As i always say punting isnt for the squeamish, WGs suck and fuck, its their job to do so, hopefully they look after their own health but i dont put my own health on that, i go to the GUM.

[potato]

When picking a WG I always check their feedback to see who they have seen before and check the feedback of those she has seen to see where they have been - just to rule out the blatant ones. I know this probably only covers a really small proportion of what actually goes on  but it makes me feel a little easier.

Of course some WG's insist on a condom as they are not using any other form of birth control - not for prevention of disease, would you believe !   I know of one escort from way back that only did protected sex but had one regular client that had had a vasectomy -  and she did BB with him !!  Luckily I never saw her but she wasn't bright enough to realise that he was doing the same with other WG's as well!

[Berks Bloke 32]

Wiltsboy, how about you do the field work on this one. Go punting BB for a year or two and see what you pick up then you can report back.

[lovelysofia92]

Pissed and horny and young, you think they wear a condom? And if they did and it slipped off?

I purport to be no expert, but pissed and young and horny, I HAVE been there.

Now say you're punting a WG aged 18-25....



My point is she may not BB clients, but what about her partners?

In my experience, almost ALL guys my age go BB 90% of the time and when I insist on wearing a condom they are seriously surprised.

Young adults in their early 20's rarely, if ever, use a condom on one night stands or casual sex. Even more so here where they all feel the need (girls and boys) to get absolutely hammered before even daring  of picking someone up.