Hmm, my last reply I posted without seeing the "pimped" comments. I am not so sure about visiting this girl now. I understand, I think, where Alex is coming from - there is bad pimping and there is "better" pimping (for want of a positive word); Bad being trafficked, coersed girls, being made to be prostitutes against their will, and doing it through fear of punishment/violence if they don't comply, and "better" as in they are here by choice, are doing the work by choice, and the pimp is more of a manager than anything else; someone who is providing them with a place to work from, and the facility to carry out their work, who take a cut of the money in return for their services. Which is actually quite common, so I believe, for foreign girls who don't speak the language, don't have references, bank accounts, employment history etc needed to get accommodation etc in this country. I think there is a difference between then the two, and whether you choose to boycott these girls, and thus their pimps/managers, is a moral choice. Personally, I choose to boycott the trafficked and coerced girls, on both a legal and moral choice. The other type ("better" as I've put it), I decide on a "case by case" approach. So far, I'm fairly sure (apart from one time, early on in my punting, when I was [more] naive and ignorant than I am now) I've only seen girls that are either completely independent, or at the worst, have the "better" pimped arrangement, and after sussing those out, I've been happy with the situation.