Author Topic: Katia - hot collection  (Read 2281 times)

Offline robbie54321

External Link/Members Only


£200 hour visit
22 years old
No face photo shop on the profile pics but the body pics has had a bit of a touch up.

After wasting a good hour on AW trying to get anyone to answer there phone I resorted to using an agency.

Nice apartment near whitleys in Queensway.

Very pretty girl with a lovely arse and large tits. They may have been false but , for me. not to be sure, shows if the are false, it was a top job.

Very chatty, easy going girl.
As I was her first booking of the day, when  I got to her apartment she was still getting ready. Whilst she was finishing off I had a shower.
Owo, fingering and French kissing. No cim.
Blow job was nice but not to deep, but, she is a pretty girl so, generally, I prefer a average bj from a pretty girl to an outstanding bj from an average looking  girl.
Anyway, missionary then came inside.
I'm very rarely  a round two man so it was a chat and then I left

Overall a solid punt
Would I return?
Yes.

Offline realist

Thanks for the review. Can i ask was CIM refused or you didn't want, as she has it listed? Also what size girl was she approx?


Offline robbie54321

It is listed but She said I couldn't cum in her mouth :-(

Size wise, I would say 8-10. If there's a 9 then I think that would be it.

Offline realist

Thanks. Pity she didn't do cim.  will add her to my B list.

Offline boardyhell

if cim is on profile and its refused ,then it has to be a neutral at best and nearly always a negative in my opinion

Offline Londonpunter30

I've seen this girl on loads of websites and really like the pics.. saw a review on one site, can remember which, that said she didn't kiss.  Was it proper DFK ?

Offline tantric talents

if cim is on profile and its refused ,then it has to be a neutral at best and nearly always a negative in my opinion
I agree and have been arguing this point on another thread ( Owo on aw profile - but not in reality ) without much support! https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=133635.msg1495643#msg1495643
I thought there was already a forum consensus on this somewhere?
After all said and done , a neutral or negative made on ukp - even after a satisfactory punt- offers good leverage to persuade a girl or agency to modify the profile to reflect the correct services for those rates?
« Last Edit: March 04, 2017, 11:46:51 am by tantric talents »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Not very appealing for £200
£150 tops
Certainly  overpriced
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac