Welsh Annabellex/Ashliee / Cardiff. No DFK, very poor incall venue.

[punisher]

aw there,s a shame i was enjoying that

[mrdiamond77]

Bizarre! All other issues aside, I can't understand why someone so concerned about privacy (name changes, no face pics on AW) would put a face pic on here that she'll now never be able to delete 

Agree.  I have seen her myself and I was a bit surprised that she had a face pic as her avatar.

[The_Don]

And for goat to have the audacity  to comment on a women's body who's 3 times younger than yourself is beyond a joke ...

 


Hidden Image/Members Only

[dhunt7984]

She looks quite hot think I could put up with stinky fingers and I knackered toilet seat

[Gatchaman]

Agree.  I have seen her myself and I was a bit surprised that she had a face pic as her avatar.

I think it only changed in the last day or two.  Marketing tactic maybe?

[Melfort212]

I can't help looking at her face and then her pics (esp the black and white one) and think I wanna see her.

Then I see £200 min booking fee. 

But those titties and that face... 

[mrdiamond77]

I think it only changed in the last day or two.  Marketing tactic maybe?

Possibly yes.  She charges a lot of money so her face will probably bring in some punters who would be unsure of whether to pay all that money.

[np500]

Yes , she changed it yesterday some time, shame , she's on my h l , I was rolling with it until her comments about the goat having to shag younger woman because his o h would't shag him, ( words to that effect ) well that's a slap down to most that walk through her door, most no Doubt think it  ( most of us know it ) but we're paying you for a service and the fantasy, she's a beautiful woman, but she's fucked the illusion for me where she's concerned sadly , now I know what she's thinking and her attitude toward us.

[np500]

See her pictures gone now, I'd imagine  admin removed it, the right thing to do .

[theGOAT]

So she did exercise her right of reply to this thread by posting quite a lot on here.

I had 2 key complaints 1. No DFK, and 2. very poor incall venue.  What did she tell us about these?

1. DFK

Maybe have you also considered shoving your tounge down a woman's throats is far from attractive  enough to put any female off

Pretty clear she doesn't like DFK.

2. Incall Venue

...as for the 'venue' the booking was last minute inwas in Cardiff an my friend offered me to use her place ... I use 3 different appartments in an around Cardiff...

So she didn't acknowledge that the venue was sub-standard, or say she would avoid using that venue again.  She also didn't say if the other 2 venues she uses are any better  .  The venue I met her at was clearly lived in by someone else - she is renting it while the occupant is at work or Uni.  It was awful.

Cheers! 

[DylanPerry]

Thanks for sharing and warning via this review.

I know YMMV, with any W/G.



A profile manager, can change a name as many time as they wish. The ID number never changes on that 1 account.
Some profile managers don't understand this basic principle. Others try and use it, because they believe some punters don't understand it. 

I learned to take A/W feed back with a pinch of salt but it can have some uses:


Another UKP reviewer reported DFK

But paid £800 for 1 punt (each to their own).

I would use that money (£800) and could punt 5 to 10 times, with it. Which IMO is better, VFM.


Sound External Link/Members Only




She got



Hidden Image/Members Only

The_Don ...please can you explain why we should take aw reviews lightly? I always followed the rule, more through been told it...but why exactly???

[The_Don]

The_Don ...please can you explain why we should take aw reviews lightly? I always followed the rule, more through been told it...but why exactly???

I learned to take W/G, feed back on A/W with a pinch of salt. A system that's to open to abuse and misuse IMO.

Currently I have 0 feed back on my A/W account (and its going to stay that way of some time). That alone states how much faith I have, in that system.

[Steelworker]

The Don, your system works magnificently for you. 

While I know feedback on AW isn't very reliable as it tends to be almost all positive, I do find it a guide to improve my chances of a good experience. If a girl has a high number of positives, with virtually no negatives, I'll consider but check UKP first now. Haven't had a bad one since using this approach. All good to excellent. If she only has 5 to 10, I'll check if some of the feedback is from experienced punters. Would check UKP but know they may not have much there. That way allows early visits to newer ladies.

I agree extreme caution is needed but I do find it somewhat helpful. Having said that, this forum is by far and away more reliable for me.

[The_Don]

I agree extreme caution is needed but I do find it somewhat helpful. Having said that, this forum is by far and away more reliable for me.

Research is key IMO

[Steelworker]

+1