Cathy the Famous One - Leeds

[tester101]

1hr outcall £120
External Link/Members Only

Unlike the majority of the posters, my experience with Cathy was not as fluffy or as memorable as some.  To begin with, the women I met was enthusiastic, eager and friendly.  However, she bore little to no resemblance to the pictures posted on her AW profile, as she had lost all her curves and was far to thin for me.  Further, she was not a the best looking women I have met either - but then thats a subjective view.  On previous reviews, I was drawn to her as she liked to kiss, and so do I, well she wasn't in the mood for that.  She was enthusiastic but all felt forced and insincere. 

So, in summary, she's a game women and I do not doubt that for some she will give an exceptional service.  For myself, she was too thin, didn't kiss, not too pretty on the eye and seemed to be performing an act as opposed to enjoying herself. 

[YorkshireLad]

The thing that has put me off seeing her is her price. If she is that good & attractive why are her prices so low..even lower than Romanians?

[Stretfordender]

I saw her a few days ago and she was great. Awesome BJ and I regretted not booking an hour. Will definitely be going back.

[Roth]

Where did you meet her tester?

[tester101]

Where did you meet her tester?

At my place

[cumtoplay]

Similar feelings from my visit to her place (Flat over a Takeaway) around Xmas time.....I posted a report and got questioned about it. Nevertheless, while she's certainly dirty/ decent Oral kind of girl & I just couldn't see where all the positive reports came from. Older & not really like the pics at all. At best Neutral for me but each to their own

[Babu]

Similar feelings from my visit to her place (Flat over a Takeaway) around Xmas time.....I posted a report and got questioned about it. Nevertheless, while she's certainly dirty/ decent Oral kind of girl & I just couldn't see where all the positive reports came from. Older & not really like the pics at all. At best Neutral for me but each to their own

She's obviously quite a bit older than stated and her pictures are well out of date.

I saw her years ago in a parlour in Bradford and she looked tired and worn out. Problem is fluffy punters who aren't honest and obscure these details from their reports.

[Roth]

At my place

Any chance we could put a rough location in the review title? Leeds Bradford etc  Being discreet mind.

[tester101]

Any chance we could put a rough location in the review title? Leeds Bradford etc  Being discreet mind.

It was the suburbs of Leeds 

[stevedave]

Similar feelings from my visit to her place (Flat over a Takeaway) around Xmas time.....I posted a report and got questioned about it. Nevertheless, while she's certainly dirty/ decent Oral kind of girl & I just couldn't see where all the positive reports came from. Older & not really like the pics at all. At best Neutral for me but each to their own

I can see where you're coming from. Thankfully due to UKP, I fully expected her to be older than advertised when I met her  so I wasn't too bothered!

It's a shame that she seems to create reports about herself which get swiftly deleted by admin for being fake. I can recall 3 or 4 in the past year or so. She's a decent lass that provides a decent and well priced service. Stick to what you're doing Cathy, and step away from the fake reviews 

[One Eyed Snake]

Always had a good punt with Cathy, 1st class and reasonably priced.

[Roth]

It was the suburbs of Leeds 

 

[One Eyed Snake]

She's obviously quite a bit older than stated and her pictures are well out of date.

I saw her years ago in a parlour in Bradford and she looked tired and worn out. Problem is fluffy punters who aren't honest and obscure these details from their reports.

Her pics , most of them are pretty recent, I'd say she's 35 ,

[lonewolf247]

I'm surprised to read this regarding kissing. My experiences with Cathy have been really good and enjoyable. Kissing has always been available and is something she gets really into. I will be seeing her tomorrow and will make sure to leave a review on here.

[redbillygibson]

Her prices reflect her looks, service and venue. If a girl describes herself as a £150 fuck but is charging £90. There is a reason behind that.

Saw Cathy a couple of years ago, and was overwhelmed by the shocking state of her place, put me right off can't remember what the service was like, I was too busy thinking how much is was going to hurt getting a shower in Dettol.

[tester101]

The consequence of this review and posting has been a sustained campaign of harrassment and abuse from this deranged women.  She has rang my number over 20 times to spout all kinds of vile drivel, she has also threatened and promised to:

- Out me as a paedophile
- Come to my place and shout to all my neighbours that I have been seeing a prostitute
- Post my picture any and everywhere to shame, humiliate and embarrass me
- Torrents of abuse about what a fat/ugly/vile pig of a man I am

I have blocked her number but she still come through as No Caller ID

I would be grateful if anyone can tell me what I can do in the circumstance - I am single so there is little come back other than the potential of her causing vandalism at my place or

[stevedave]

The consequence of this review and posting has been a sustained campaign of harrassment and abuse from this deranged women.  She has rang my number over 20 times to spout all kinds of vile drivel, she has also threatened and promised to:

- Out me as a paedophile
- Come to my place and shout to all my neighbours that I have been seeing a prostitute
- Post my picture any and everywhere to shame, humiliate and embarrass me
- Torrents of abuse about what a fat/ugly/vile pig of a man I am

I have blocked her number but she still come through as No Caller ID

I would be grateful if anyone can tell me what I can do in the circumstance - I am single so there is little come back other than the potential of her causing vandalism at my place or

Crikey.

First off, report her to admin, he may be able to post a warning and add her to the blacklist.

Secondly, make sure you keep all the threats she's making if via text, email or voicemail. If she does do anything against you or your property, you then have evidence to take to the police.

And, maybe don't have outcalls to your gaff any more.

[cumtoplay]

She sent me a couple of texts along those lines when I gave her a neutral report on here....needless to say, will never return. If she's 35 so am I lol

[tester101]

Crikey.

First off, report her to admin, he may be able to post a warning and add her to the blacklist.

Secondly, make sure you keep all the threats she's making if via text, email or voicemail. If she does do anything against you or your property, you then have evidence to take to the police.

And, maybe don't have outcalls to your gaff any more.

Yep, one to learn the hard way...

[tester101]

Crikey.

First off, report her to admin, he may be able to post a warning and add her to the blacklist.

Secondly, make sure you keep all the threats she's making if via text, email or voicemail. If she does do anything against you or your property, you then have evidence to take to the police.

And, maybe don't have outcalls to your gaff any more.

How do i report her to admin?

[stevedave]

How do i report her to admin?

I've reported to the post, so it should come to his attention.

[threechilliman]

Secondly, make sure you keep all the threats she's making if via text, email or voicemail. If she does do anything against you or your property, you then have evidence to take to the police.

Indeed, and I'd text her back telling her as much.

tcm

[twwb]

The consequence of this review and posting has been a sustained campaign of harrassment and abuse from this deranged women.  She has rang my number over 20 times to spout all kinds of vile drivel, she has also threatened and promised to:

- Out me as a paedophile
- Come to my place and shout to all my neighbours that I have been seeing a prostitute
- Post my picture any and everywhere to shame, humiliate and embarrass me
- Torrents of abuse about what a fat/ugly/vile pig of a man I am

I have blocked her number but she still come through as No Caller ID

I would be grateful if anyone can tell me what I can do in the circumstance - I am single so there is little come back other than the potential of her causing vandalism at my place or

Christ! The advice already given is sound. I assume it's all talk from her end though? Actually going through with any of this would be immensely stupid, though her response so far isn't very smart tbh.

[Nasxtra]

Thanks for the informative feedback I am glad I cancelled my meeting with her, sounds like a bit of a nut job to me, she can't take criticism for being smelly 

[agentsmith]

How did she connect the review with your meeting?

This is why you should compartmentalise information. Have different usernames on different sites. Use a disposable number that you can chuck at a moments notice. Let some time pass before reviewing, especially if it's a negative and leave out any details that can identify you to the prossie.

[cumtoplay]

for me it was a day after the meet & my immediate post on here...must have connected what I said here with the time of the meet as she had my number. I didn't bother too much about it until the 3rd text then I double checked the number. It was her number published on the profile. Didn't bother responding and they stopped at that point.

[agentsmith]

That's why you should always change little details like time and day of the meet.

[Kendrig]

Leave it a couple of days, don't put specifics; time, date.
Always use a punting (disposable) phone

[pumps]

She sounds like a right cunty cunt.

[Jibbi]

I think there needs to be balanced view when accusations of threats are directed. Too many people are quick to decide if an escort has in fact actually made these threats. I've not see the escort in question myself but from the outset she is well reviewed and seems popular. There hasn't been any history of threats towards punters so I don't see why that would change now for a neutral when she's had a negative in the past.

I'm not trying to take away anything from the poster but he's a little like me in that we haven't contributed much to the site in terms of comments and reviews so if I gave a neutral for someone like candice in Leeds and then said that I have been receiving threats, most people would rightly call for some sort of eveidence, whether that's texts, recorded calls or even screen shots of received calls. I think the same should be the case here. If the poster has any evidence of threats being made or constant calls then evidence should really be shown before the escort is tainted as someone who is  a nasty piece of work.

[twwb]

I think there needs to be balanced view when accusations of threats are directed. Too many people are quick to decide if an escort has in fact actually made these threats. I've not see the escort in question myself but from the outset she is well reviewed and seems popular. There hasn't been any history of threats towards punters so I don't see why that would change now for a neutral when she's had a negative in the past.

I'm not trying to take away anything from the poster but he's a little like me in that we haven't contributed much to the site in terms of comments and reviews so if I gave a neutral for someone like candice in Leeds and then said that I have been receiving threats, most people would rightly call for some sort of eveidence, whether that's texts, recorded calls or even screen shots of received calls. I think the same should be the case here. If the poster has any evidence of threats being made or constant calls then evidence should really be shown before the escort is tainted as someone who is  a nasty piece of work.

I think you have a point about evidence, but another user (cumtoplay) also said he received messages from her after his neutral review. Also take a look at the other thread on her atm where users more experienced than you or I are theorising that she's been in contact with him as well... All that together doesn't look good for her imo.

[Brazilian Martian]

I think there needs to be balanced view when accusations of threats are directed. Too many people are quick to decide if an escort has in fact actually made these threats. I've not see the escort in question myself but from the outset she is well reviewed and seems popular. There hasn't been any history of threats towards punters so I don't see why that would change now for a neutral when she's had a negative in the past.

I'm not trying to take away anything from the poster but he's a little like me in that we haven't contributed much to the site in terms of comments and reviews so if I gave a neutral for someone like candice in Leeds and then said that I have been receiving threats, most people would rightly call for some sort of eveidence, whether that's texts, recorded calls or even screen shots of received calls. I think the same should be the case here. If the poster has any evidence of threats being made or constant calls then evidence should really be shown before the escort is tainted as someone who is  a nasty piece of work.

I knew it would not take long for a white knight to jump out of the wood work

Hidden Image/Members Only

[tester101]

I think there needs to be balanced view when accusations of threats are directed. Too many people are quick to decide if an escort has in fact actually made these threats. I've not see the escort in question myself but from the outset she is well reviewed and seems popular. There hasn't been any history of threats towards punters so I don't see why that would change now for a neutral when she's had a negative in the past.

I'm not trying to take away anything from the poster but he's a little like me in that we haven't contributed much to the site in terms of comments and reviews so if I gave a neutral for someone like candice in Leeds and then said that I have been receiving threats, most people would rightly call for some sort of eveidence, whether that's texts, recorded calls or even screen shots of received calls. I think the same should be the case here. If the poster has any evidence of threats being made or constant calls then evidence should really be shown before the escort is tainted as someone who is  a nasty piece of work.

The events I have described did happen, if the stupid cow had read my review it was fair and I mentioned many positives.  When the 1st calls came, i felt bad for her and did entertain adding an addendum to the review.  However, she would not let it lie and things got very scary quite frankly. I have been punting for 20+ years and NOTHING like this has ever happened to me.  As for your requests for evidence WTF??  I would never had raised the issue if it had passed after a day or so, but this was 3 days straight of persistant and sustained harrasment.  Further, she was banking on my silence for fear of being further exposed and humiliated - well that didnt work and guess what...all the calls and texts have STOPPED!

[Jibbi]

I knew it would not take long for a white knight to jump out of the wood work

Hidden Image/Members Only

Lmao, where was I defending her. I've not even met this escort as I made clear. And I won't be seeing her because she's too far for me travel. Did you read what I wrote? What part was white knighting?

Just think it's important to be balanced before jumping the gun a little.

[Jibbi]

The events I have described did happen, if the stupid cow had read my review it was fair and I mentioned many positives.  When the 1st calls came, i felt bad for her and did entertain adding an addendum to the review.  However, she would not let it lie and things got very scary quite frankly. I have been punting for 20+ years and NOTHING like this has ever happened to me.  As for your requests for evidence WTF??  I would never had raised the issue if it had passed after a day or so, but this was 3 days straight of persistant and sustained harrasment.  Further, she was banking on my silence for fear of being further exposed and humiliated - well that didnt work and guess what...all the calls and texts have STOPPED!

I don't mean any offence at all or didn't mean to imply your new to punting. Sorry if it came across like that. I'm not saying it never happened but such threats made toward you are quite serious I think. If you received the amount of calls you say, it's easy to screen shot the call history or take a photo and send it to admin who can then take the necessary steps to warn others.

[tester101]

I don't mean any offence at all or didn't mean to imply your new to punting. Sorry if it came across like that. I'm not saying it never happened but such threats made toward you are quite serious I think. If you received the amount of calls you say, it's easy to screen shot the call history or take a photo and send it to admin who can then take the necessary steps to warn others.

In which case it would be a list of Unknown Caller and No Caller ID screenshots....very useful and indicative.  The point of this site was to provide feedback to others, at no time did I ever think it would descend into this bunny boiler syndrome - i assumed this crazy women knew the rules of the game and if she had the following she had (which I seriously question now) - then I could have been ignored as someone with whom it didnt click and move on.  Instead, it descended into this lunacy and having to field inane responses from; a fluffy follower of 'the famous one'

[Jibbi]

In which case it would be a list of Unknown Caller and No Caller ID screenshots....very useful and indicative.  The point of this site was to provide feedback to others, at no time did I ever think it would descend into this bunny boiler syndrome - i assumed this crazy women knew the rules of the game and if she had the following she had (which I seriously question now) - then I could have been ignored as someone with whom it didnt click and move on.  Instead, it descended into this lunacy and having to field inane responses from; a fluffy follower of 'the famous one'

When you first described it in the original post it came across like she was using her normal number before you blocked it hence she started using no caller ID. If you had a list of calls from a number or even no caller ID then yeah that would still be very useful. You wouldn't have got a list of withheld calls from anyone else would you.

You are right, this forum is for providing feedback and warning others of such things but people in the past have abused the site and people will do so in the future. It's not a bad thing to question things that have been posted, positive or negative.

And again, I've not seen the escort in question. I've not made any defence of the escort so how can I be a 'fluffy follower'. If this has happened show admin evidence of the calls and he can blacklist her to warn others. It's not a big thing to provide the evidence of this.

If I made an accusation at an escort, I would provide the proof. I would not just expect everyone to go along with what I said and anyone who questioned me is then called a fluffy follower or a white knight.

[cueball]

To be honest, I don't need to see any evidence posting. There's three members posting today.... all with issues around this lass.

one tried to back track with a bs story to try and get off her hook.

You can bet she's a lurker on here too.

[Jibbi]

To be honest, I don't need to see any evidence posting. There's three members posting today.... all with issues around this lass.

one tried to back track with a bs story to try and get off her hook.

You can bet she's a lurker on here too.

I'm only suggesting evidence to be provided to admin so then the escort can be put on the blacklist to warn others. Not everyone will see this thread but more people will have a look at the blacklist. Don't see the harm in that really as it will benefit the site and its users as a whole.

Who is the third person if you don't mind me asking? I only count this person on this thread and the person on the other thread who's back tracking. It's only this thread where accusations of threats have been made by the reviewer.

I'm staying away from that thread though lol, too many people playing detectives and coming to their own conclusions on hearsay. I'm a little unsure about that person anyway. He says it was his first punt having been a member for over a year but he certainly didn't write a review as a first time punter.

[James999]

The point of this site was to provide feedback to others

In light of your experience should your "neutral" be a "Negative" ?

[cueball]

Who is the third person if you don't mind me asking?

I.thought I'd read three posting along the same lines but you're right I think, only two.

But... I've seen enough to bin her.

Fwiw... I agree she belongs on the black list.

She were nearly in my radar but not a chance now. I've seen more than enough to put doubt in my mind and my policy with doubt is to bin.

[twwb]

Who is the third person if you don't mind me asking? I only count this person on this thread and the person on the other thread who's back tracking. It's only this thread where accusations of threats have been made by the reviewer.

This guy:

She sent me a couple of texts along those lines when I gave her a neutral report on here....needless to say, will never return. If she's 35 so am I lol

[cueball]

This guy:

Well reminded... I knew I'd seen three  cheers for that.

[Jibbi]

I.thought I'd read three posting along the same lines but you're right I think, only two.

But... I've seen enough to bin her.

Fwiw... I agree she belongs on the black list.

She were nearly in my radar but not a chance now. I've seen more than enough to put doubt in my mind and my policy with doubt is to bin.

I think she only belongs on the blacklist if the reviewer can show proof of these calls to admin, to be honest I'm starting to have my doubts. It's only this thread that have mentioned these threats, the other thread came through people linking this to that and putting two and two together.

I don't think it's fair for anyone to be put on the blacklist though because of one accusation. If there is proof then yes, fully stand behind that but if it's just an accusation then that sets a bad precedent. I could then suddenly say sweet candice or amazing Victoria threatened to out me etc it wouldn't be fair for them to be put on a blacklist if i dont have any proof.

Ive already been accused of being fluffy and a white knight but I really haven't defended anyone, I've just tried to take a balanced view and I hope others do too. I haven't even seen this escort and don't punt in Leeds so I can't really be fluffy.

[Brazilian Martian]

I think she only belongs on the blacklist if the reviewer can show proof of these calls to admin, to be honest I'm starting to have my doubts. It's only this thread that have mentioned these threats, the other thread came through people linking this to that and putting two and two together.

I don't think it's fair for anyone to be put on the blacklist though because of one accusation. If there is proof then yes, fully stand behind that but if it's just an accusation then that sets a bad precedent. I could then suddenly say sweet candice or amazing Victoria threatened to out me etc it wouldn't be fair for them to be put on a blacklist if i dont have any proof.

Ive already been accused of being fluffy and a white knight but I really haven't defended anyone, I've just tried to take a balanced view and I hope others do too. I haven't even seen this escort and don't punt in Leeds so I can't really be fluffy.

Keep on digging yourself into that hole 

[Jibbi]

This guy:

Ah thank you lol, that helps. If it was me, I would have posted on here like the reviewer has but I would have also shown the texts to admin.

[Jibbi]

Keep on digging yourself into that hole 

What hole exactly? You still haven't answered my previous question when you called me a white knight. What exactly have I said that is white knighting or defending the escort in question? Have i not in fact done the opposite and encouraged the reviewer to show evidence to admin to put the escort on the blacklist?

[James999]

white knighting or defending the escort in question?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[cueball]

I don't think it's fair for anyone to be put on the blacklist though because of one accusation.

That's as maybe and I could agree but there's three seperate members posting, two that have openly posted and another that has found himself painted into a corner.

Take a step back, look at both the threads... can you say that there's no issue here?

I'm seeing a big red flag.

Fwiw... she's got good reviews from trusted members on here which I believe. But, the latest chatter is the deciding factor for me.

[tester101]

I honestly wish that things had never descended to this craziness as I just didn't fancy her and that was all - I just wish she hadn't drank the Kool Aid and gone Fatal Attraction as I am sure that, were it not for this insanity, she'd be a top performer and my comments would have been acknowledged but ignored