Have we been doing punting wrong all this time?

[anonyorks]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Am I an Escort?   A. Sorry people.. No I am not an escort, but catch me on cam and you will feel like your with me.

Maybe I need to webcam more if it is as good as a punt! 

[cueball]

Err.... I'll stick to my tried and trusted method... knocking on the door and podging em... I've no interest in watching on web cam.

[munterhunter]

In fairness to this lass she doesn't advertise as an escort unlike some on AW who do but don't offer escort meets or make it impossible to meet. I want to arrange a meet rock up get me rocks off pay the fee for the services advertised and jog on.

[martini2429]

With a body like that she will make e money selling it than showing it on Cam

 

[Type_O_Negative]

She makes 4K videos for upskirtjerk.com and wankitnow.com
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Lovely MILF  pity she doesn't escort...

[Marmalade]

Am I an Escort?   

No dear, of course you're not You are tout, a troll rather than a trollop. 

- Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but there is no tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers.

- Touting
No touting or advertising. You must disclose any link you have that may be seen as bias, even if you're just a past customer. Sharing info must be for the benefit of other punters and not to promote the business of others.

and so on and so forth.

The fact that you are an ageing, slightly overweight fanny with a dusty phone trying to drum up business as a sex worker does, I am guessing, probably fall under the same heading. How on earth did you think you could come here and get free advertising??? You are a 'service provider' are you not? And you are touting.

"We" are the punters, and I doubt very much if "we" have been doing it all wrong. Whereas "you" haven't even been "doing it" all. 

[Marmalade]

With a body like that she will make e money selling it than showing it on Cam

 

Bollocks to her advertising. The photos on her page are a lot more realistic and even those have probably knocked a few years off. No wonder she doesn't escort.

[twwb]

Marmalade, I think you've misunderstood the op here...

[Marmalade]

Marmalade, I think you've misunderstood the op here...

Have I? How?   

[mrfishyfoo]

Think you've got the wrong of the stick here MrM

MrAnonyorks and he definately is a MR was taking the piss out of the pro$$ies AWank profile.

[Marmalade]

ah fuck.... it was a punter! Mea Culpa! 

[Marmalade]

I'll try to read it properly next time. 

[twwb]

Have I? How?   

You're reacting as if it was her, trying to advertise here? unless the posts were a joke in which case it went over my head completely

[mrfishyfoo]

I'll try to read it properly next time. 

Twat   

We've all done it.  

[Marmalade]

You're reacting as if it was her, trying to advertise here? unless the posts were a joke in which case it went over my head completely

Yep. Have sent the OP an apology (in case he scans the thread as quickly as I did) 

[twwb]

Yep. Have sent the OP an apology (in case he scans the thread as quickly as I did) 

good man, no harm done!

[Marmalade]

Twat   

We've all done it.  

A momentary lapse, ye noble fuckers. 
Went and bloody reported it to Admin as well 

[anonyorks]

Ha ha this has made me laugh 

[The Vicar of Dibley]

Err.... I'll stick to my tried and trusted method... knocking on the door and podging em... I've no interest in watching on web cam.

+1

I admit I have cammed a few times in my early AW days. But would never dream of parting with £3.50 per minute that this SP charges for private cam. Just had a look at the British cam girls and to my surprise £3.50, although not cheap, is not as outrageous as I thought. Jemstone Pornstar £6.50 per min. !!!

[cueball]

+1

I admit I have cammed a few times in my early AW days. But would never dream of parting with £3.50 per minute that this SP charges for private cam. Just had a look at the British cam girls and to my surprise £3.50, although not cheap, is not as outrageous as I thought. Jemstone Pornstar £6.50 per min. !!!

They're scary prices, I'm reluctant to go over two quid per minute to podge em, let alone look at em on the computer.

[peter purves]

They're scary prices, I'm reluctant to go over two quid per minute to podge em, let alone look at em on the computer.

As for London AW cam prices (these are the ones I visit). I think the £2.50/min for public viewing is reasonable. Porn stars or cam performers with porn star
attributes seems to charge £3.50/min + . So although the latter is expensive, relatively speaking it is not in the scheme of things    

[cueball]

As for London AW cam prices (these are the ones I visit). I think the £2.50/min for public viewing is reasonable. Porn stars or cam performers with porn star
attributes seems to charge £3.50/min + . So although the latter is expensive, relatively speaking it is not in the scheme of things    

How long does your average cam session last then?

[peter purves]

How long does your average cam session last then?

It is easy to get carried away. 

I tend to use AW cam as a reconnaissance mission  . I will only look at cammers who work as escorts, or I suspect may do. It has helped me to save money in this respect

To answer your question no more than about 5 or 6 mins.

[cueball]

It is easy to get carried away. 

I tend to use AW cam as a reconnaissance mission. I will only look at cammers who work as escorts, or I suspect may do.

To answer your question no more than about 5 or 6 mins.

I suppose as a recon mission for 5 or 6 minutes it's not too shocking on the wallet.

[mikexxlong]

I'll try to read it properly next time. 

 



Hidden Image/Members Only

[Gordon Bennett]

As for London AW cam prices (these are the ones I visit). I think the £2.50/min for public viewing is reasonable. Porn stars or cam performers with porn star
attributes seems to charge £3.50/min + . So although the latter is expensive, relatively speaking it is not in the scheme of things    

I don't understand the reference to London prices? Surely it don't matter where she is...... Could be Scunthorpe or Mayfair - what difference would it make to viewer sat wanking like billy-ho in their lounge?

[peter purves]

I don't understand the reference to London prices? Surely it don't matter where she is...... Could be Scunthorpe or Mayfair - what difference would it make to viewer sat wanking like billy-ho in their lounge?

What I was trying to get across is that I only visit those performers in London, so I know their pricing from experience. Since I do not visit those outside of London I am not in a position to comment on their price structure(s).

Cheers!!

[Marmalade]

It is easy to get carried away. 

I tend to use AW cam as a reconnaissance mission  . I will only look at cammers who work as escorts, or I suspect may do. It has helped me to save money in this respect

To answer your question no more than about 5 or 6 mins.

I've certainly used inexpensive PGs to weed out horrors, but I mostly do half hour punts so anything more than a couple of quid seems like money down the drain. I'd be happy to be convinced but wonder how far a cam session would be indicative of time in the punt? Lots of prossies can be sexy until the cash is stashed.

[The Vicar of Dibley]

It is easy to get carried away. 

I tend to use AW cam as a reconnaissance mission  . I will only look at cammers who work as escorts, or I suspect may do. It has helped me to save money in this respect

To answer your question no more than about 5 or 6 mins.

Plus some cam girls spend a bit of time chatting and asking questions before "getting started." Such as:-
Hi I am...name....whats your name?
Where are you?
How old are you?
Nice to meet you.
Do you like big boobs, hairy girls ect..

If you are typing one handed or are a slow typer then a few mins has passed and she is still fully clothed.

[Marmalade]

Plus some cam girls spend a bit of time chatting and asking questions before "getting started." Such as:-
Hi I am...name....whats your name?
Where are you?
How old are you?
Nice to meet you.
Do you like big boobs, hairy girls ect..

If you are typing one handed or are a slow typer then a few mins has passed and she is still fully clothed.

Sounds believable, though I guess you could pre-negotiate to avoid that. They're still likely to twat about though, because it's not a one-off deal: the object is simply to get you to keep the session going.

You could go on something like Chaturbate and get everything except private sessions for free, skipping from one to the next. If Adultwork worked on the same principles, all SPs offering free chat at the same time, filterable by area, upgradeable to paid private and then an escort booking, would it at least be competitive?

It sounds a nice idea, but anyone who has been to Thailand (or a host of other countries) knows how a large proportion of prossies are good at putting on an act until they get their grubby hands on the cash. After that many just count sheep till you've finished.

[peter purves]

I've certainly used inexpensive PGs to weed out horrors, but I mostly do half hour punts so anything more than a couple of quid seems like money down the drain. I'd be happy to be convinced but wonder how far a cam session would be indicative of time in the punt? Lots of prossies can be sexy until the cash is stashed.

I use it more to see what the WG looks like, Is she a BBW? Is she that attractive? etc rather than judging on service per se. I guess it is possible to use it for service in some aspects like is she a squirter? However, it is not reflective of the quality of punt that a punter would receive.

I sometimes use the PG when there is no other source of information but this can sometimes be problematic - but it definitely has a role to play

My favourite medium is the AW webcam because it is in real time (the PG may not be) and it will represent who one will physically meet. The only problem is that not everybody is on cam 

Cheers!!

[peter purves]

Plus some cam girls spend a bit of time chatting and asking questions before "getting started." Such as:-
Hi I am...name....whats your name?
Where are you?
How old are you?
Nice to meet you.
Do you like big boobs, hairy girls ect..

If you are typing one handed or are a slow typer then a few mins has passed and she is still fully clothed.

 

It is definitely a rip-off in terms of VFM.

[peter purves]

It is definitely a rip-off in terms of VFM.

Just seen KellieOBrian's profile she is charging well above the average prices
5.00 credit(s) per minute in Group Mode
7.50 credit(s) per minute in Private Mode

 

[Marmalade]

Just seen KellieOBrian's profile she is charging well above the average prices
5.00 credit(s) per minute in Group Mode
7.50 credit(s) per minute in Private Mode

 

Hmmmmmmm...... but could it possibly be a cheaper option for your dear self.......?
Excuse me for pointing out what are undoubtedly rather upsetting memories, but of your three reviewed fucks (none of whom are unfortunately -- or fortunately traceable any more) --
1. You paid £120 p.h. for HALF AN HOUR (which is about twice what I normally pay, 'scuse caps)   
She was not only shite but tried to set you up.
2. The second one we no longer have any information on other than she was shite.   
3. The third one, you took the 'precaution' can we say, of camming with her first, she was already charging £200 a bloody hour, but she managed to con you out of a total of £810 and on top of that she was still shite!!! 

What gets me worried is
a) If as you said, you 'lurked' for quite a while here before toe-dipping, how the fuck did you manage not to observe some advice on 'better' prossies??
I don't punt in London much, but plenty of others do, and there is a mass of reviews that are positives and paid a boner of a site less than 120 a half hour or 200 smacker for 60 minutes AND on top of that, they enjoyed themselves, didn't get ripped off, and I think it is maybe fair to say got vfm without doing any pre-punt camming stuff. Yet you seem to think camming os both a good idea and negligible vfm.

Tentative conclusions: i) serious lapses of judgment can occur when not reading reviews; ii) too much camming can lead to cock-brain.

[Brazilian Martian]

Hmmmmmmm...... but could it possibly be a cheaper option for your dear self.......?
Excuse me for pointing out what are undoubtedly rather upsetting memories, but of your three reviewed fucks (none of whom are unfortunately -- or fortunately traceable any more) --
1. You paid £120 p.h. for HALF AN HOUR (which is about twice what I normally pay, 'scuse caps)   
She was not only shite but tried to set you up.
2. The second one we no longer have any information on other than she was shite.   
3. The third one, you took the 'precaution' can we say, of camming with her first, she was already charging £200 a bloody hour, but she managed to con you out of a total of £810 and on top of that she was still shite!!! 

What gets me worried is
a) If as you said, you 'lurked' for quite a while here before toe-dipping, how the fuck did you manage not to observe some advice on 'better' prossies??
I don't punt in London much, but plenty of others do, and there is a mass of reviews that are positives and paid a boner of a site less than 120 a half hour or 200 smacker for 60 minutes AND on top of that, they enjoyed themselves, didn't get ripped off, and I think it is maybe fair to say got vfm without doing any pre-punt camming stuff. Yet you seem to think camming os both a good idea and negligible vfm.

Tentative conclusions: i) serious lapses of judgment can occur when not reading reviews; ii) too much camming can lead to cock-brain.

Hehehe

Hidden Image/Members Only

[cueball]

Tentative conclusions: i) serious lapses of judgment can occur when not reading reviews; ii) too much camming can lead to cock-brain.

 

It's a good job he did his camming recon.... it could have turned out even worse otherwise 

[peter purves]

Hmmmmmmm...... but could it possibly be a cheaper option for your dear self.......?
Excuse me for pointing out what are undoubtedly rather upsetting memories, but of your three reviewed fucks (none of whom are unfortunately -- or fortunately traceable any more) --
1. You paid £120 p.h. for HALF AN HOUR (which is about twice what I normally pay, 'scuse caps)   
She was not only shite but tried to set you up.
2. The second one we no longer have any information on other than she was shite.   
3. The third one, you took the 'precaution' can we say, of camming with her first, she was already charging £200 a bloody hour, but she managed to con you out of a total of £810 and on top of that she was still shite!!! 

What gets me worried is
a) If as you said, you 'lurked' for quite a while here before toe-dipping, how the fuck did you manage not to observe some advice on 'better' prossies??
I don't punt in London much, but plenty of others do, and there is a mass of reviews that are positives and paid a boner of a site less than 120 a half hour or 200 smacker for 60 minutes AND on top of that, they enjoyed themselves, didn't get ripped off, and I think it is maybe fair to say got vfm without doing any pre-punt camming stuff. Yet you seem to think camming os both a good idea and negligible vfm.

Tentative conclusions: i) serious lapses of judgment can occur when not reading reviews; ii) too much camming can lead to cock-brain.

Sorry, apart from trying to have a dig? What has this got to do with anything? You asked me this question

I'd be happy to be convinced but wonder how far a cam session would be indicative of time in the punt? Lots of prossies can be sexy until the cash is stashed.

I answered with the fact that I agreed with you. But off you went again - not for the first time misinterpreting, failing to understand and/or follow logic 

You have this habit, and it's a very bad one of not being able to reason correctly.  .

Perhaps it may be better for you and others on the forum if you read people's posts twice, think on what has been said, and respond accordingly, instead of all your rash statements.

Finally, it may be best to not ask me questions in the hope to try and catch me out also (which is ultimately a waste of both of our times) and - because ultimately you are shooting yourself in the foot.

[Marmalade]

I'm sure you'll love the fact that I misread the OP's post forever more! 

Look if you knew me better you'd know I don't slag off people for the sake of it. And when anyone acts like a dudes it's quite appropriate to point it out - that way they might 'mend their ways', as I think I did when the guy with the ghoul avatar dropped a hint.

But according to your reviews you've got in a mess of a somewhat more serious nature. And by making beginners' mistakes. Not using the forum to get good prossie prospects, picking the most horrendous of specimens, possibly enflamed by using "cock brain" after camming.

Next time you screw up it might be even more serious. So the point is let us help you work out the antidote. 

[peter purves]

I'm sure you'll love the fact that I misread the OP's post forever more! 

Look if you knew me better you'd know I don't slag off people for the sake of it. And when anyone acts like a dudes it's quite appropriate to point it out - that way they might 'mend their ways', as I think I did when the guy with the ghoul avatar dropped a hint.

But according to your reviews you've got in a mess of a somewhat more serious nature. And by making beginners' mistakes. Not using the forum to get good prossie prospects, picking the most horrendous of specimens, possibly enflamed by using "cock brain" after camming.

Next time you screw up it might be even more serious. So the point is let us help you work out the antidote. 

Cheers, for looking out for my welfare, with friends like you who need enemies 

If you can use reason, use logic, deduction and understand statistics, it could be that my reviews reflect the bizzarre and the abnormal (ie they are the extremes of a very small sample). So in actuality, they are NOT representative of anything. To assume they are is the the type of learning skills that teenagers learn NOT to adopt when at college.

Furthermore, did you consider that any of these WGs were not on webcam? Something I did mention in answering your question. If you had considered this proposition you would not have even dared to start on your foolish line of reasoning.

I can understand your posts as an attack on me but as for anything else you have not been able to come up with a logically and consistent line of reasoning.

There is nothing in this post that has made me change my mind and I stand by everything that I said about you in my last post.

[Marmalade]

I'm sorry mate, I tried, I don't actually think you talk sense, just bounce phrases around and then in a huff. You could always fuck off and chat to your friend with his imaginary statistics though. 

[Brazilian Martian]

I'm sorry mate, I tried, I don't actually think you talk sense, just bounce phrases around and then in a huff. You could always fuck off and chat to your friend with his imaginary statistics though. 

 


Hidden Image/Members Only

[peter purves]

I'm sorry mate, I tried, I don't actually think you talk sense, just bounce phrases around and then in a huff. You could always fuck off and chat to your friend with his imaginary statistics though. 

The problem you (and the single BuM cohort that seems to appear from nowhere like a silly sausage who keeps following me around )
would not know sense even if you saw it. It was only a matter of time and it is the usual strategy from you when you come to a debate

1. Ignore what the other persons arguments are because you cannot argue against them
2. Attack the person but not the argument - due to a lack off reasoning skills
3. Use debased language due to a lack of command of English -
4. Go off on a rant as in igno-rant

And as an ass-ide there is another effect that your attitude helps to spoil and hi-jack threads. You've done it with the Romanian WGs and now this one




Hidden Image/Members Only

[Brazilian Martian]

The problem you (and the single BuM cohort that seems to appear from nowhere like a silly sausage who keeps following me around )
would not know sense even if you saw it. It was only a matter of time and it is the usual strategy from you when you come to a debate

1. Ignore what the other persons arguments are because you cannot argue against them
2. Attack the person but not the argument - due to a lack off reasoning skills
3. Use debased language due to a lack of command of English -
4. Go off on a rant as in igno-rant

And as an ass-ide there is another effect that your attitude helps to spoil and hi-jack threads. You've done it with the Romanian WGs and now this one




Hidden Image/Members Only

If that's how you feel then you can easily click report. Trust me I aint following you around, you're not that important if only you put as much effort into reviewing prossie's as you do with these long winded smarmy statements.
Also don't do subliminal jabs that's real feminine bitch move calling me a cohort

[peter purves]

If that's how you feel then you can easily click report. Trust me I aint following you around, you're not that important if only you put as much effort into reviewing prossie's as you do with these long winded smarmy statements.
Also don't do subliminal jabs that's real feminine bitch move calling me a cohort

You are not following me around but you are there on every post that has a put down of me (applauding and encouraging it). I am not the type to run to the moderators crying not my style but I've seen others here who like to dish it out and provoke others run there quicker than Jack Flash.

There are no smarmy statements - as you so call it - this is just your interpretation. Remember from what you have written someone thought what you considered to be ill of you. So it's just swings and roundabouts.

Finally with regard to it's just your interpretation, what's wrong with term cohort in the sense I used it?

Cheers!!