Author Topic: Cutest Lucy E1 near Liverpool Street station.  (Read 6746 times)


71 review(s) for LusciousLucy666 (60 positive, 3 neutral, 8 negative) [Indexed by Steely Dan]

Offline Hobbit

We're going round in circles here. I've already covered this: you prioritise looks, whereas many others prioritise service. People have different priorities- it's really not complicated.

So, would you pay £200,000 to look at a Ferrari and touch it without being able to drive it? I know I wouldn't.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
It's not an absolute fact is it? Where is your study? I'd suggest there probably is a correlation between price and service as well as one between  price and looks, otherwise WGs who charge more would go out of business. I gave you an example of how it works: Lucy used to charge less than 150 but obviously there are enough punters who are sufficiently enamoured by her service that they will pay more.

It is a fact as this punting forum and others over the years have proved, what you think is up to you. I don't require your example thanks.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Don't take this the wrong way but I get the feeling that some of you have never had REALLY good sex and I mean REALLY good. The kind where you're not thinking any more- you are just animal. Most people haven't, I suspect.

I have had brilliant sex thank you very much!!
I have satisfied the ladies with my banana beast fingers and lizard tongue thank you very much!!
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It is a fact as this punting forum and others over the years have proved, what you think is up to you. I don't require your example thanks.

So you're saying it's what I think, so it's subjective, and yet what you think is objective, despite not providing any evidence to support said fact. Anyway, each to their own. I'm glad that we have different tastes, otherwise I'd never get to see Lucy.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
So you're saying it's what I think, so it's subjective, and yet what you think is objective, despite not providing any evidence to support said fact. Anyway, each to their own. I'm glad that we have different tastes, otherwise I'd never get to see Lucy.

 Lucy was a good punt in my view at £150 an hour, she isn't VFM to me at £200 an hour, the fact she is to you is your business.

Offline Brazilian Martian

Don't take this the wrong way but I get the feeling that some of you have never had REALLY good sex and I mean REALLY good. The kind where you're not thinking any more- you are just animal. Most people haven't, I suspect.

Yep you guessed right it's only you, no one else has ever had good animalistic sex. You must be a modern day adonis, I bet sometimes the pro$$ies you pay to fuck give you back your money and say it's so good it's on the house.

Hidden Image/Members Only

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yep you guessed right it's only you, no one else has ever had good animalistic sex. You must be a modern day adonis, I bet sometimes the pro$$ies you pay to fuck give you back your money and say it's so good it's on the house.

Hidden Image/Members Only

I was talking more about the people who couldn't see the value in paying above average because they weren't a stunner, as if someone who is awesome at sex didn't exist. But then you knew that didn't you, you silly sausage?

Offline Bassman

I pay anywhere from £100 to £250 MAX single lady
Duo I paid arguably the most beautiful sexy duo in London of Angela escort london/ sophia lawrence at £400 for the hour


Miya baby and sophia lawrence have been the most expensive at £250 per hour
Gisselleblew I have paid £200 per hour
English playgirl £220 per hour
Jessica ann £200 per hour

Emily creme brulee  £160 per hour
Brazil abbelle  £150 per hour
Lovely dyana  £150 per hour

Stacy summer £100 per hour ( bagain of the century)


Just a few of many examples

Sex was obviously protected 2 shots

Deep tongue wrestling kissing
OWO
Mango licking
Fingering mango

All gave super fantastic girlfriend experience

All at the very high end of female physical beauty...

No regrets what so ever....


All beautiful memory tatoos in my mind forever..

Got links?

Some won't come up in a search.

Offline claretandblue

At 200 an hour you should get looks and service,she fails massively on the first part

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Got links?

Some won't come up in a search.


Jessica ann
Emily

Have gone

Rest would
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bassman


Jessica ann
Emily

Have gone

Rest would
I'm searching their names on here. Stacy summer has gone it seems and abbelle won't come up either nor dyana.

Offline Sonnylock

I saw Lucy a few times at 150/h and completely understand why people keep coming back, as she does provide a full on service that not many girls offer.

However, at 200/h I haven't even thought of coming back. She doesn't offer anything more of what I want than some cheaper girls, e.g. Veronica_a or Maggie21. They both offer great no holes barred service, arguably look better, and are much cheaper. And then these poor comms... not VFM for me.


Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I'm searching their names on here. Stacy summer has gone it seems and abbelle won't come up either nor dyana.


Stacy summer has long gone


Go to my review list and the links are there
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I saw Lucy a few times at 150/h and completely understand why people keep coming back, as she does provide a full on service that not many girls offer.

However, at 200/h I haven't even thought of coming back. She doesn't offer anything more of what I want than some cheaper girls, e.g. Veronica_a or Maggie21. They both offer great no holes barred service, arguably look better, and are much cheaper. And then these poor comms... not VFM for me.

No offence but Veronica_a looks like she has a flat ass and Maggie21 charges extras for everything and doesn't do CIM or swallow.

mcgee121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
At 200 an hour you should get looks and service,she fails massively on the first part

Her pics look great.  What story aren't they telling?

Online The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,398
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
Her pics look great.  What story aren't they telling?

Perhaps read claretandblue review  :unknown:   

Offline Sonnylock

No offence but Veronica_a looks like she has a flat ass and Maggie21 charges extras for everything and doesn't do CIM or swallow.

Fair enough about Maggie's lack of CIM/swallow, so that's a must then I understand, but otherwise Maggie is as dirty as any girl I've seen.

Veronica's ass is definitely not flat. If anything, I've seen all these girls and would say Lucy is no better looking than either of the other 2. Of course, YMMV.

Offline claretandblue

Fair enough about Maggie's lack of CIM/swallow, so that's a must then I understand, but otherwise Maggie is as dirty as any girl I've seen.

Veronica's ass is definitely not flat. If anything, I've seen all these girls and would say Lucy is no better looking than either of the other 2. Of course, YMMV.
Havent seen veronica ,would rate maggie as a 7.5 lookswise and lucy a 6

carlsen

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Havent seen veronica ,would rate maggie as a 7.5 lookswise and lucy a 6

Shows you how subjective it is. I find Lucy way more attractive than Maggie. I had a great time with Maggie, found her attractive and her service was excellent but Lucy is on another level for me.