ALICEINXWONDERLAND, Stevenage.

[Sparta Prada]

External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only

Seeing as the other reviews (thanks to you guys) in the East England section were overwhelmingly positive I finally took the plunge and saw Alice...

Looks 7/10 - Alice is around 5'4" tall, with a fantastic bosom, and a curvy size 12-14. Based on feedback from other guys on here and from the racy photos on her AW and UKE profiles I had it in my mind I was going to meet a stunning uber blonde but if I am being honest she didn't live up to the Marilyn Monroe type image I had in my mind beforehand. But Alice is an attractive lady, of that there is no doubt.

Service 8/10 - after a brief 'get to know you' chat Alice beckoned me to the bed and we started to kiss. Her kissing is very deep, just the way I like it! After we got naked it was time to give her a good licking and fingering, she responded spectacularly to what I did judging by how wet she became. My turn to lay on the bed so Alice could return the favour, and her BJ skills are top drawer, I liked how Alice would quicken or slow the pace depending on how she judged the moment. On with the condom and I fucked her from behind, Alice became quite vocal as her already sensitive pussy was now being pounded doggy style which tipped me over the edge as I came. After a respite it was time for more oral both ways, Alice again cumming with what appeared to be a few squirts. Then after a while it was my turn to cum in her hot willing mouth which she took very well and discreetly disposed of. A very sexy hour, what with Alice constantly deep french kissing me throughout our session.

Car parking 4/5 - nearest parking is in Tesco, spend a minimum of £5, collect the parking receipt, walk to one of the machines outside, follow the instructions and you have 3 hours free parking. One thing I should point out is the car park cameras are supposed to 'detect' your car from the number plate details given but mine wasn't located so I manually inputted this into the machine.

Premises 5/5 - Alice works from a very nice flat. The bedroom and bathroom are a good size, shower works well, and it is one of the cleanest places I have visited doing this hobby.

Value for money 8/10 - Alice has got her pricing right at £120 for the hour/£80 for 30 minutes. Not too cheap or expensive for the service she provides.

Total 32/40 - it was a pleasure to meet Alice and her performance lived up to the previous reviews. A slight disappointment that she didn't live up to the image I had prior to meeting but that was more down to me than anything else. But still a very enjoyable afternoon with a woman who knows how to keep a guy happy.

[nervous colin]

She is fantastic in my book,
did you have any trouble getting into the building.?
I had no luck with trying her flat number, in the end I called her and she gave me a code

[Hornydevil247]

Great review Sparta. 

Only seen her once so far but she is a great punt

HD

[Sparta Prada]

She is fantastic in my book,
did you have any trouble getting into the building.?
I had no luck with trying her flat number, in the end I called her and she gave me a code

I didn't have a problem getting into the building as she sent her apartment number once I parked up. I buzzed up and she released the door open.

[Sparta Prada]

Great review Sparta. 

Only seen her once so far but she is a great punt

HD

Cheers HD. To complete the holy trinity of top rated girls in the area I now need to see Girlfriend Jenny. Seeing as you have seen Girlfriend Jenny and Alice may I ask how they compare?

In fact, this question goes out to anyone who has seen both of them.

[PaleRider]

Cheers HD. To complete the holy trinity of top rated girls in the area I now need to see Girlfriend Jenny. Seeing as you have seen Girlfriend Jenny and Alice may I ask how they compare?

In fact, this question goes out to anyone who has seen both of them.

Both quality girls, both excellent GFE, depends how you click I guess.
For me Alice has the edge in bedroom antics and passion every time but I know many who would argue the other way. For me I need to see Classy Jenny to complete the trinity, how would you compare Alice to Classy Jenny?

[dubhcarr]

thanks for the review glad you enjoyed.......she is a top punt IMO.......and very orgasmic........

[Hornydevil247]

Cheers HD. To complete the holy trinity of top rated girls in the area I now need to see Girlfriend Jenny. Seeing as you have seen Girlfriend Jenny and Alice may I ask how they compare?

In fact, this question goes out to anyone who has seen both of them.

I would mind seeing the three of them together at the same time 

[Sparta Prada]

Both quality girls, both excellent GFE, depends how you click I guess.
For me Alice has the edge in bedroom antics and passion every time but I know many who would argue the other way. For me I need to see Classy Jenny to complete the trinity, how would you compare Alice to Classy Jenny?

Being honest with you I will back Classy Jenny all the way from my perspective for the following reasons:

1) CJ has a face and body that is more appealing to my taste than AIW, but I can see why others may prefer AIW.
2) I have not found anyone who does it for me like CJ does, whether it's their bedroom manner, physical attraction, or personality. AIW probably matches CJ when it comes to being passionate in bed though!
3) Probably the biggest thing is I have been seeing CJ for 3 years now, and I have come to realise it is not often you can meet a WG with her talents.

[Sparta Prada]

Since I posted the review I received an email from Alice asking if I was behind the review, and despite always wanting to remain anonymous I decided to reveal I wrote the review. Below is a screenshot of the messages we exchanged (apologies if it is a bit small to read):

External Link/Members Only

There are two inaccuracies I posted in my review. 1) That we fucked. We didn't, I came from 2 BJs. 2) We met in the morning not the afternoon as I mentioned at the end of the review. The reason for adding these 2 changes was so the girl doesn't identify the poster. The rest of my review is 100% accurate.

In my review, have I been in anyway negative about her looks? Not in anyway, and any misgivings I had were down to me building up a picture in my head ahead of the meet which I also say is my fault.

She also manages to put in a couple of digs about me personally, and claims to be a well mannered person. With that comment Alice has proven herself to be a twat of the highest order.

So I enjoyed the punt, but unfortunately Alice has showed her true colours afterwards which is why I have asked for the review to be changed from Positive to Negative.

[PaleRider]

By readily revealing that you post complete inaccuracies in your reviews I would say that you are hardly beyond reproach here yourself. Sure beauty is in the eye of the beholder and one man's opinion of a perfect 10 may only be a 7 for others so I would have no issue with that. Equally I can see every reason why an SP may feel a bit aggrieved if SSs start posting about things that simply didn't happen. Personally I find the whole thing a bit bizarre, why the hell would anyone feel the need to say they fucked when they came away perfectly happy from two BJs?
No winners here.

[James999]

Well Alice, you managed to turn a positive into a negative, how fucking stupid do you feel now 

[James999]

By readily revealing that you post complete inaccuracies in your reviews I would say that you are hardly beyond reproach here yourself.

Bollocks, This site is about putting punters first, and if they want to change a few things so that the girl can't identify them then no problem, if he fucked her on a Tuesday or a Friday what difference does it make (apart from to the pro$$ie)

[James999]

I've just looked at her profile, and can now see the problem she has... she's Old... one of those fast approaching 50 and bitter that the younger fitter girls are around, she also looks like she's not been out in daylight for a few years 

And from her message to you it's clear her real issus is  she's pissed off that you've seen some young and pretty girls 

[Happyjose]

By readily revealing that you post complete inaccuracies in your reviews I would say that you are hardly beyond reproach here yourself. Sure beauty is in the eye of the beholder and one man's opinion of a perfect 10 may only be a 7 for others so I would have no issue with that. Equally I can see every reason why an SP may feel a bit aggrieved if SSs start posting about things that simply didn't happen. Personally I find the whole thing a bit bizarre, why the hell would anyone feel the need to say they fucked when they came away perfectly happy from two BJs?
No winners here.

Disagree. The changes make no fundamental difference to how the review might help fellow punters. Can totally understand the OP's thinking behind these.

The prossies overreaction to his review, just shows why subtle changes to a review to hinder identification can be a good idea.

The change from pos to neg is well deserved

[PaleRider]

I've just looked at her profile, and can now see the problem she has... she's Old... one of those fast approaching 50 and bitter that the younger fitter girls are around, she also looks like she's not been out in daylight for a few years 

And from her message to you it's clear her real issus is  she's pissed off that you've seen some young and pretty girls 

James - everyone is entitled to an opinion and this site is indeed useful, personally I am greatful to guys on here who's positive reviews led me to start meeting the likes of Alice and Jenny and Alina etc who are all extremely good SPs
Personally I don't feel the need to change the detail of a punt - I believe that we are here to tell other punters about services received, so saying you had a great fuck in a certain position could be misleading if it's not actually the case when the next punter turns up. Personally I just wait a couple of weeks before posting, if the girls are good and therefore busy they are unlikely to remember me and my specifics.
What's not useful is members with 10,000 posts and no reviews chucking out abuse about people they've either not met or not bothered to review. How about making a useful contribution?

[Happyjose]

What's not useful is members with 10,000 posts and no reviews chucking out abuse about people they've either not met or not bothered to review.

So members should only comment if they've met the prossie in question? Who are you to decide what's useful on this forum, I'm pretty sure that's admins remit

I note you have reviewed the girl in question. Sure you're being impartial here, particularly as you describe yourself as a regular?

[PaleRider]

I have no problem when active members comment, in the last few weeks I've seen a couple of absolutely A+++ girls on here get slagged off by guys with no reviews contributed at all.
One of these girls has packed up and given up escorting altogether and I wouldn't be surprised if Alice goes the same bloody way.

This forum is for genuine punters to highlight good SPs so we don't waste our cash.
It is not designed to drive bloody good providers out of the business. So pardon me if I get pissed off at some non-contributing twat potentially costing me another top class punt!!!

 

[nervous colin]

Cannot see the logic of changing it from a positive to am negative it must misleads people.
whts been said on emails between you afterwards should have no bearing on it. It was either a good punt at the time or it wasnt.
also, she is not approaching 50 just for the record

[PaleRider]

Cannot see the logic of changing it from a positive to am negative it must misleads people.
whts been said on emails between you afterwards should have no bearing on it. It was either a good punt at the time or it wasnt.
also, she is not approaching 50 just for the record

+1

[Happyjose]

I have no problem when active members comment, in the last few weeks I've seen a couple of absolutely A+++ girls on here get slagged off by guys with no reviews contributed at all.
One of these girls has packed up and given up escorting altogether and I wouldn't be surprised if Alice goes the same bloody way.

This forum is for genuine punters to highlight good SPs so we don't waste our cash.
It is not designed to drive bloody good providers out of the business. So pardon me if I get pissed off at some non-contributing twat potentially costing me another top class punt!!!

 

As has been said here recently, prossying isn't for the mentally fragile. And this site is for punters.

If SP's don't like what is written here, either don't visit and read it, or they should up their game. You seem to be arguing against the ethos of this site

[hendrix]

I don't understand why there's such a fuss about the original Positive review?

7/10 on looks is hardly terrible and completely subjective the OP even states that it was just because he had a particular image in mind.

Complaining to the punter about that aspect of the review seems ultra sensitive to me, and he's well within his rights to change details in order to protect his anonymity if he chooses. They're not material to the review really.

[PaleRider]

This forum is for genuine punters to highlight good SPs so we don't waste our cash.
It is not designed to drive bloody good providers out of the business.

In what way is this arguing against the ethos of this site?

[Happyjose]

In what way is this arguing against the ethos of this site?

You seem to be arguing to suppress the truth, or at least robust comments, in order to avoid upsetting your favourite prossies.

[James999]

One of these girls has packed up and given up escorting altogether and I wouldn't be surprised if Alice goes the same bloody way.

As for whinging about her retiring, with her age it's kinda fucking inevitable, and you seem to be overlooking the fact that the review was a positive till the stupid cow started complaining 

Here we go

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Brazilian Martian]

There should be a banner on the main page white knight/fluffy free zone. 

[James999]

There should be a banner on the main page white knight/fluffy free zone. 

I think it's fucking hilarious, it was a positive review, she got it changed and then her "fanboy" comes on and bumps it to the top of the forum by fighting for her honour, She had the arse with a positive review so fuck knows what she's going to think of her fanboy boosting her negative review 

[Brazilian Martian]

I think it's fucking hilarious, it was a positive review, she got it changed and then her "fanboy" comes on and bumps it to the top of the forum by fighting for her honour, She had the arse with a positive review so fuck knows what she's going to think of her fanboy boosting her negative review 

Looks like he will not be getting a Valentines free punt 

[James999]

She's Polish, they wouldn't give you the steam off their piss 

[vw]

Cannot see the logic of changing it from a positive to am negative it must misleads people.
whts been said on emails between you afterwards should have no bearing on it. It was either a good punt at the time or it wasnt.
also, she is not approaching 50 just for the record

How does it mislead people?

She comes across a right egotistical bitch with a sense of entitlement mixed in with a bit of fruitcake, wonder is she is related to RRR.


Maybe you are such an obsessed fluffy you would have welcomed the attention from her mails others don't.

[Brazilian Martian]

I have no problem when active members comment, in the last few weeks I've seen a couple of absolutely A+++ girls on here get slagged off by guys with no reviews contributed at all.
One of these girls has packed up and given up escorting altogether and I wouldn't be surprised if Alice goes the same bloody way.

This forum is for genuine punters to highlight good SPs so we don't waste our cash.
It is not designed to drive bloody good providers out of the business. So pardon me if I get pissed off at some non-contributing twat potentially costing me another top class punt!!!

 

I would read this thread  that i am posting carefully, as this is what normally happens to white knights
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=128813.0

[socks]

...and that's what seems to separate blokes form birds. Hyper sensitivity, I fucking hate that. Stupid stupid cow, take the positive review for what it is and get over yourself.

That said I do agree amongst the fog of white knighting that it's not helpful to make things up about services that matter. Implying she was a good fuck if you didn't actually fuck her, reduces the value and reliability of the review. Nothing wrong with changing details that don't matter, like where, when etc to preserve anonymity.

[nervous colin]

How does it mislead people?

She comes across a right egotistical bitch with a sense of entitlement mixed in with a bit of fruitcake, wonder is she is related to RRR.


Maybe you are such an obsessed fluffy you would have welcomed the attention from her mails others don't.

because when they search for her, and see a negative, they may read it and then see its actually a positive review, get confused and read the whole thread to see the reason for the negative, which in no way relates to service she gave.
Not sure how I can be a fluffy, when in fact i have only seen her once, and It was based on reading the positive reviews on here. We just need to seperate fact from fiction for interests of others.

[vw]

because when they search for her, and see a negative, they may read it and then see its actually a positive review, get confused and read the whole thread to see the reason for the negative, which in no way relates to service she gave.
Not sure how I can be a fluffy, when in fact i have only seen her once, and It was based on reading the positive reviews on here. We just need to seperate fact from fiction for interests of others.

his review his rating and your queens fault for being a dick about it.

Will teach punters to read the comments to figure things out, comments are much more enlightening than reviews.

If people are that easily confused maybe they are doing the wrong hobby.

Maybe to help the simple and easily confused people admin should post Prada's comment in the review.

[smiths]

I don't understand why there's such a fuss about the original Positive review?

7/10 on looks is hardly terrible and completely subjective the OP even states that it was just because he had a particular image in mind.

Complaining to the punter about that aspect of the review seems ultra sensitive to me, and he's well within his rights to change details in order to protect his anonymity if he chooses. They're not material to the review really.

She didn't only complain to the punter, she complained about this initially positive review on UKE firstly stating it was "totally made up", I replied saying I found the reviewer credible, so she moaned on their as well. These exchanges have been deleted by admin and the thread locked since.

IMO Sparta was right to change this review from a positive to a negative in my view.

[vw]

She didn't only complain to the punter, she complained about this initially positive review on UKE firstly stating it was "totally made up", I replied saying I found the reviewer credible, so she moaned on their as well. These exchanges have been deleted by admin and the thread locked since.

IMO Sparta was right to change this review from a positive to a negative in my view.

Its all a symptom of the excessive arse licking on there, seems trying to garner sympathy and arse licks at every turn.

Glad admin deleted that nonsense anyway.

Give her her due her white night fluffy arse lickers probably advised her not to post on here.

[Roth]

Fair enough positive changes to negative based on her crazy messaging.  Fair enough to change a few punt details such as time/date etc.   Though the bit about fucking her and her moaning is stretching it a bit when it turns out not to be true IMHO. Specially if future punters are gonna think about picking her cos she's vocal and got a sensitive cludge that makes em cum quick.

On with the condom and I fucked her from behind, Alice became quite vocal as her already sensitive pussy was now being pounded doggy style which tipped me over the edge as I came

[smiths]

Its all a symptom of the excessive arse licking on there, seems trying to garner sympathy and arse licks at every turn.

Glad admin deleted that nonsense anyway.

Give her her due her white night fluffy arse lickers probably advised her not to post on here.

She cant post on here as Alice as she is banned for being a triple nicker and being previously banned.

[James999]

She didn't only complain to the punter, she complained about this initially positive review on UKE firstly stating it was "totally made up", I replied saying I found the reviewer credible, so she moaned on their as well.

She seems to like complaining and blaming others, next she will claim to be a Holocaust survivor 

[Brazilian Martian]

She seems to like complaining and blaming others, next she will claim to be a Holocaust survivor 

Tread carefully the PC brigade may report you for offensive remarks 

[Punchdrunk]

By readily revealing that you post complete inaccuracies in your reviews I would say that you are hardly beyond reproach here yourself. Sure beauty is in the eye of the beholder and one man's opinion of a perfect 10 may only be a 7 for others so I would have no issue with that. Equally I can see every reason why an SP may feel a bit aggrieved if SSs start posting about things that simply didn't happen. Personally I find the whole thing a bit bizarre, why the hell would anyone feel the need to say they fucked when they came away perfectly happy from two BJs?
No winners here.

Mr fluffy wind your neck in nothing wrong with changing a few little bits if you want to try and keep your self incognito. This site is for the punters white knights not needed.

[vw]

Tread carefully the PC brigade may report you for offensive remarks 

Seems she is moaning on the darkside, about an increasing amount of cunts supposedly.  Think it was an attempt of touting though on brook knights wall t5o try and pick up her scraps.

Clearly she has been moaning to that WK palerider threatening unless he saves her she will quit.

[Punchdrunk]

I think it's fucking hilarious, it was a positive review, she got it changed and then her "fanboy" comes on and bumps it to the top of the forum by fighting for her honour, She had the arse with a positive review so fuck knows what she's going to think of her fanboy boosting her negative review 

How can you speak of reviews you leach.

[James999]

Clearly she has been moaning to that WK palerider threatening unless he saves her she will quit.

Perhaps her pension plans are paying out 

[tesla]

How can you speak of reviews you leach.

before you call people a leach, you should understand that some people on this forum are allowed by admin to have two profiles for privacy reasons. I do not know who they are, so just don't jump to conclusions

[smiths]

before you call people a leach, you should understand that some people on this forum are allowed by admin to have two profiles for privacy reasons. I do not know who they are, so just don't jump to conclusions

Absolutely right, and he isn't a leach as I know.

[Sparta Prada]

Time for me to reply to some of the points on here.

That said I do agree amongst the fog of white knighting that it's not helpful to make things up about services that matter. Implying she was a good fuck if you didn't actually fuck her, reduces the value and reliability of the review. Nothing wrong with changing details that don't matter, like where, when etc to preserve anonymity.

Unless there's something you are aware of, I'm fairly certain that Alice does fucking/vaginal intercourse as part of her service? So I'm not exactly stretching the boundaries of what she does and doesn't do here am I? If I claimed she did something extreme like scat, watersports, bareback (when she doesn't offer these services according to her profile) then yes I would expect to be lambasted and rightfully so.

By readily revealing that you post complete inaccuracies in your reviews I would say that you are hardly beyond reproach here yourself.

I'm not quite sure if you went to the same school as Alice as I said there were only 2 inaccuracies: no vaginal intercourse and the date that's all. The rest of the review is 100% correct, including the moaning and squirting. Talking of inaccuracies...

Looks 7/10 - Alice is around 5'4" tall, with a fantastic bosom, and a curvy size 12-14. Based on feedback from other guys on here and from the racy photos on her AW and UKE profiles I had it in my mind I was going to meet a stunning uber blonde but if I am being honest she didn't live up to the Marilyn Monroe type image I had in my mind beforehand. But Alice is an attractive lady, of that there is no doubt.

I am sure I am not the only guy who - prior to meeting Alice and seeing the photos on her profile - was expecting a bleach blonde girl like Marilyn Monroe. Unless she had dyed her hair that morning, she hasn't got bleach blonde hair. I can only think that she's either using photographs from another time in her life, or they are filtered to fuck so her hair is bleach blonde. So should she be equally criticised for having photos that are unrepresentative of her true hair colour?

I don't understand why there's such a fuss about the original Positive review?

7/10 on looks is hardly terrible and completely subjective the OP even states that it was just because he had a particular image in mind.

It's an excellent point Hendrix. Leaving aside her service - and I still maintain that for the duration you are paying for her time she's a fine SP - would anyone who has met her really rate Alice as a 10/10 in terms of looks? Are you really rating her on a par with Emily Ratajkowski (25 years old)? Margot Robbie (26)? Scarlett Johansson (32)?

Cannot see the logic of changing it from a positive to am negative it must misleads people.
whts been said on emails between you afterwards should have no bearing on it.

I totally disagree with you. Not sure about you Colin but I go to see escorts for wonderful experiences with girls. The experience is the whole thing: finding the girl whether on here, AW, your local rag; the anticipation of going to see her; the actual meet; the post-punt feeling; whether I will see them again. After that AW message from Alice, my entire experience has been sullied and why? Because she couldn't accept that a 7/10 rating on her looks was acceptable? Really?!!

Finally I would like to thank nervous colin for this little gem which is a contender for the 'You mad, bro?!!' award:

although she says she is 37, I would say not a day older than 30.

Colin, don't ever change!

[nervous colin]

Happy to help where I can

[Punchdrunk]

before you call people a leach, you should understand that some people on this forum are allowed by admin to have two profiles for privacy reasons. I do not know who they are, so just don't jump to conclusions

If that is the case with this fella I will retract my statement, I didn't no that on an  anonymous forum people were allowed 2 accounts to keep there anonymity up.

[vw]

She seems to like complaining and blaming others, next she will claim to be a Holocaust survivor 

Seems palerider white knight twat reported this, what a cry baby.

Seems he didn't read this memo

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=80943.0

or read the site rules

- Gender / Race / Nationality
Anti-immigration and bashing of religion / culture / nationality is not censored, however extreme racial comments and racial slurs are not tolerated. Complaining about the lack of 'political correctness', attacking site moderation or throwing accusations of racism / xenophobia or similar will equally not be tolerated.