Author Topic: Vicky Sexy Babe - Bromley By Bow  (Read 2677 times)


21 review(s) for VICKY SEXY BABE (19 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by FCB]

Offline leatherlover

External Link/Members Only

This one took place a couple of months ago but seeing the positive that has just come up has prompted me to add some balance to the debate. I first saw her back in December 2015 and gave her a positive. It was a pretty decent punt. Saw her again a few months later. However, at the back end of 2016, it proved not to be third time lucky.

I called in the morning and arranged with her whoever for a 1pm meet for 1 hour at the now increased price of £120. When I got there, I was told where to go (same place as I had been before) except Vicki opened the door and told me that I could not have the whole hour. She instead offered 30 mins. I asked how much and it was at the full price of £80.

I asked for a discount as I'd been fucked around and she said no. For me, Vicky's USP is her ability to make me cum twice in an hour, and not feel as though my cock is on fire. Her USP certainly is not her looks (dodgy teeth and acne, from recollection). However, cumming twice only happens in an hour session. So I walked and gave my business to Independet Lena instead and had a great 30 min OWO session for £60. 

Shame - she's now on the black list.

Offline boomting_

External Link/Members Only

This one took place a couple of months ago but seeing the positive that has just come up has prompted me to add some balance to the debate.


Thanks for the out of date Negative review, after you've just seen a positive review of her, now only then you decide to review.

If you look at it like this, So many more punters could of had a bad punt in between these reviews, and could of avoided a bad one had you posted your review promptly after your bad experience. Now that you've only just posted your review almost 1month later many people could of saved time, effort and money avoiding this one.

This is why I keep saying its very important to post your reviews as soon as possible, to help others with the most upto date and information at the time. This will help us punters avoid a bad punt, or to help us punters create a broader idea of this girl, and then we can  form a decision for ourselves based on the information at hand.

So in future if you could kindly post up a little early it would help everyone. Thanks

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
Thanks for the out of date Negative review, after you've just seen a positive review of her, now only then you decide to review.

If you look at it like this, So many more punters could of had a bad punt in between these reviews, and could of avoided a bad one had you posted your review promptly after your bad experience. Now that you've only just posted your review almost 1month later many people could of saved time, effort and money avoiding this one.

This is why I keep saying its very important to post your reviews as soon as possible, to help others with the most upto date and information at the time. This will help us punters avoid a bad punt, or to help us punters create a broader idea of this girl, and then we can  form a decision for ourselves based on the information at hand.

So in future if you could kindly post up a little early it would help everyone. Thanks


Agreed. Excellently put.

Better late than never, but it should be a negative, not a neutral.

She was previously well reviewed and many would be tempted to make a long trip.

I would be extremely pissed off if I had embarked on a 4hr round-trip to the other side of London only to be told I could only have a 30mins meet.
And she refused you a discount.  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 09:42:17 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline leatherlover

Thanks for the out of date Negative review, after you've just seen a positive review of her, now only then you decide to review.



At least I did one!


Offline leatherlover

You're missing the point  :dash:

No - I take your point. But the fact I did one means that punters can take it into account into the future. The review is only worthless if she has retired or gone home permanently.

Offline pumps

Definitely isn't an out of date review -

boomting your talking of saving other punters from bad experiences.....but where are all their negative/neutral reviews warning us?

As usual your focusing too hard in the wrong places.


There are valid reasons for allowing time to pass by before reviewing, also most just say months went by so it was less obvious to the prossie and her white knights who they were when really the punt took place the same day.

Offline boomting_

Definitely isn't an out of date review -

boomting your talking of saving other punters from bad experiences.....but where are all their negative/neutral reviews warning us?

As usual your focusing too hard in the wrong places.

There are valid reasons for allowing time to pass by before reviewing, also most just say months went by so it was less obvious to the prossie and her white knights who they were when really the punt took place the same day.

You're obviously missing the point also  :dash: GOD GIVE ME STRENGTH!

Way out of date.

So what valid reasons for allowing time to pass before reviewing? The reason you already said about the prossie, and her white knights, is pathetic. Do you really think they give a crap about what get posted on here? If it was a negative review which it should of been, i hardly think the punter who gave the negative review would go back so whats he to worry about? and if it was positive the punter has no fear to go back, oh wait he might be presented with a big prick from the 'Thank You' badge from the guardian angels for the postive feedback  :dance:




Offline pumps

You're obviously missing the point also  :dash: GOD GIVE ME STRENGTH!

Way out of date.

So what valid reasons for allowing time to pass before reviewing? The reason you already said about the prossie, and her white knights, is pathetic. Do you really think they give a crap about what get posted on here? If it was a negative review which it should of been, i hardly think the punter who gave the negative review would go back so whats he to worry about? and if it was positive the punter has no fear to go back, oh wait he might be presented with a big prick from the 'Thank You' badge from the guardian angels for the postive feedback  :dance:

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

haha not the first time you've got your panties in a twist like this - I haven't got time for you.




mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Definitely isn't an out of date review -

boomting your talking of saving other punters from bad experiences.....but where are all their negative/neutral reviews warning us?

As usual your focusing too hard in the wrong places.


There are valid reasons for allowing time to pass by before reviewing, also most just say months went by so it was less obvious to the prossie and her white knights who they were when really the punt took place the same day.

+1

Boomting,

Focus on outcomes.  It is in the interest of the board to encouage the OP to write more reviews.  Berrating him because you think his review is late does not do any of us any good.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2017, 09:56:24 am by mrhappypants »


Offline pumps

« Last Edit: February 13, 2017, 11:50:01 pm by pumps »

Offline pumps

Also if he tries to claim it was a positive review so it doesn't count....

here's a positive review he got a bit over excited on, he just has these strange outbursts from time to time  :unknown:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=107820.0


Offline leatherlover

Also if he tries to claim it was a positive review so it doesn't count....


Then he'd be missing his own point....