Author Topic: Ms Meglio / Serendipity / Butter Wouldn’t Melt – Notting Hill  (Read 4687 times)


7 review(s) for Ms_Meglio (3 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by FCB]

Offline SamLP

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She’s gone through many name changes that I’ve listed the ones I know.
Just a quick background detail. I first contacted Lou in late 2015 after she posted her number up on UKE. She was then working from Victoria and I was close by and gave her a call. There was no answer, so I dropped her a text and her immediate reply was to ask who I was and how I got her number. I explained she had posted it on UKE and gave her my punting name. She replied that the booking I was asking for was too short notice as she works part time and wouldn’t be able to accommodate me. She then asked me to reveal my membership name and I kindly refused her telling her I wish to remain anonymous. She understood and told me I could contact her through UKE or even AW the next time I wanted to see her. Well since I had only operated by phone at the time, I thanked her and thought nothing of it.

Fast forward 12 months later. I was checking AW for a punt over and Lou’s profile came up, and decided to contact her via AW and make a booking. This was the first time I had done that and it’s something I don’t intend to repeat. I’ll stick to my tried and tested phone calls. Her comms were good and efficient. She wasn’t as good looking as her reviews paint her to be, but she’s not ugly either. Her teeth are slightly crooked but apart from that I was attracted to her. She’s a small girl with big breasts.

Her services were generally quite good. I found her French kissing very light and didn’t involve much tongue which would be one of two complaints. The other one is her not going near my balls which I thought she would do given her services also include rimming. Her oral was good and the sex was also good. She put the effort in and in general it was a good punt, although one I thought I wouldn’t repeat as it wasn’t anything special.
I was offered a shower at the end which I took, and as I was getting dressed I casually remarked that I had tried to book her a year earlier but it didn’t happen then as it was short notice. She queried it and asked how I tried to book her and I explained it was over the phone. She denied giving her number out to anyone, and so I reluctantly told her she had posted it on UKE. She then tried every question to get me to reveal who I was on there. It was done in a fun way and I refused to tell her explaining I wanted to remain anonymous. She went on to explain how she had trouble with nutjobs harassing her and mentioned how she is paranoid about being found out and had moved 3 times in the past 2 years. I sympathised with her. I was dressed and ready to leave and at the door she mentioned that she will find out who I am with a smile and I smiled back and replied maybe she will. Of course now I’ve posted this review she has now.

Now the reason for the negative is her actions afterwards. I had left her feedback an AW and she hadn’t reciprocated. I emailed her asking whether it was the norm or if I had done something wrong. She replied back citing the conversation we had. I linked her UKE ad that she had posted a year earlier to prove she had posted up her number but she still wanted to push her agenda that I was some nutcase. We then agreed to forget this matter and move on. I already had the impression she was paranoid and didn’t want to waste my time on a pathetic subject. I was just confused at the level of paranoia that would make someone behave like that even though I had explained the contact was 12 months prior and had shown her the proof of her posting her number.
Lou however didn’t respect the conversation where we agreed to forget this matter. She decided to post our email conversation on a thread on UKE. She had left out our verbal conversation and twisted the matter to show that I had unnerved her and she had once refused to see me and I found another way to book her. She lied and said she ushered me out of the door when in fact this conversation took place when I was getting dressed and readying myself to leave. She received several comments from punters who without knowing both sides immediately decided to call me names and judge my actions. I did email her after she posted that and explained that I thought we had agreed to forget the matter, and this was a breach of confidence and out of order from her. She had decided to block me and never read the email.

Ironically we once had a brief conversation by email through UKE, and I also told me I had tried booking her once and mentioned the same details I had done at the top of this review. She couldn't remember, and said I could book again if I wanted as I came across as OK. If she ever disables her account, she can check the conversation at the end of June last year.

This would have been a positive review and I would have posted it under my actual profile. However Lou’s paranoia and breach of trust in publishing our emails and failing to provide the whole truthful matter has made this an undoubted negative. There’s always two sides to the story and other punters need to learn not to pile in when an escort decides to badmouth a client. Her reason I believe is because she couldn’t find out my identity on UKE and instead of respecting that, she decided to act in an undignified and paranoid manner. I didn't appreciate her insinuations and paranoia and how she breached the level of trust by publishing those emails for her own selfish benefits. IMO, that’s a very poor attitude and potentially dangerous. That's not the correct way to treat punters who she admitted had gone through the punt with no problems whatsoever.

Offline pumps

some people just aren't right in the head.....


Thanks for the warning.

 :hi:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She’s gone through many name changes that I’ve listed the ones I know.
Just a quick background detail. I first contacted Lou in late 2015 after she posted her number up on UKE. She was then working from Victoria and I was close by and gave her a call. There was no answer, so I dropped her a text and her immediate reply was to ask who I was and how I got her number. I explained she had posted it on UKE and gave her my punting name. She replied that the booking I was asking for was too short notice as she works part time and wouldn’t be able to accommodate me. She then asked me to reveal my membership name and I kindly refused her telling her I wish to remain anonymous. She understood and told me I could contact her through UKE or even AW the next time I wanted to see her. Well since I had only operated by phone at the time, I thanked her and thought nothing of it.

Fast forward 12 months later. I was checking AW for a punt over and Lou’s profile came up, and decided to contact her via AW and make a booking. This was the first time I had done that and it’s something I don’t intend to repeat. I’ll stick to my tried and tested phone calls. Her comms were good and efficient. She wasn’t as good looking as her reviews paint her to be, but she’s not ugly either. Her teeth are slightly crooked but apart from that I was attracted to her. She’s a small girl with big breasts.

Her services were generally quite good. I found her French kissing very light and didn’t involve much tongue which would be one of two complaints. The other one is her not going near my balls which I thought she would do given her services also include rimming. Her oral was good and the sex was also good. She put the effort in and in general it was a good punt, although one I thought I wouldn’t repeat as it wasn’t anything special.
I was offered a shower at the end which I took, and as I was getting dressed I casually remarked that I had tried to book her a year earlier but it didn’t happen then as it was short notice. She queried it and asked how I tried to book her and I explained it was over the phone. She denied giving her number out to anyone, and so I reluctantly told her she had posted it on UKE. She then tried every question to get me to reveal who I was on there. It was done in a fun way and I refused to tell her explaining I wanted to remain anonymous. She went on to explain how she had trouble with nutjobs harassing her and mentioned how she is paranoid about being found out and had moved 3 times in the past 2 years. I sympathised with her. I was dressed and ready to leave and at the door she mentioned that she will find out who I am with a smile and I smiled back and replied maybe she will. Of course now I’ve posted this review she has now.

Now the reason for the negative is her actions afterwards. I had left her feedback an AW and she hadn’t reciprocated. I emailed her asking whether it was the norm or if I had done something wrong. She replied back citing the conversation we had. I linked her UKE ad that she had posted a year earlier to prove she had posted up her number but she still wanted to push her agenda that I was some nutcase. We then agreed to forget this matter and move on. I already had the impression she was paranoid and didn’t want to waste my time on a pathetic subject. I was just confused at the level of paranoia that would make someone behave like that even though I had explained the contact was 12 months prior and had shown her the proof of her posting her number.
Lou however didn’t respect the conversation where we agreed to forget this matter. She decided to post our email conversation on a thread on UKE. She had left out our verbal conversation and twisted the matter to show that I had unnerved her and she had once refused to see me and I found another way to book her. She lied and said she ushered me out of the door when in fact this conversation took place when I was getting dressed and readying myself to leave. She received several comments from punters who without knowing both sides immediately decided to call me names and judge my actions. I did email her after she posted that and explained that I thought we had agreed to forget the matter, and this was a breach of confidence and out of order from her. She had decided to block me and never read the email.

Ironically we once had a brief conversation by email through UKE, and I also told me I had tried booking her once and mentioned the same details I had done at the top of this review. She couldn't remember, and said I could book again if I wanted as I came across as OK. If she ever disables her account, she can check the conversation at the end of June last year.

This would have been a positive review and I would have posted it under my actual profile. However Lou’s paranoia and breach of trust in publishing our emails and failing to provide the whole truthful matter has made this an undoubted negative. There’s always two sides to the story and other punters need to learn not to pile in when an escort decides to badmouth a client. Her reason I believe is because she couldn’t find out my identity on UKE and instead of respecting that, she decided to act in an undignified and paranoid manner. I didn't appreciate her insinuations and paranoia and how she breached the level of trust by publishing those emails for her own selfish benefits. IMO, that’s a very poor attitude and potentially dangerous. That's not the correct way to treat punters who she admitted had gone through the punt with no problems whatsoever.

Thanks for the info Sam. :thumbsup: I haven't seen the comments you mention on UKE that I can recall, but I would also have given a negative for this behaviour. I only book by phone and that's not something I intend to change, for me booking through A/W is of zero benefit to me, I think it works against the best interests of punters due to how easy feedback can be manipulated and the fact some punters wont give honest bad FB on a bad WG in case she does the same back in revenge. Thankfully some of us know about UKP.

Offline Steve2

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,510
  • Likes: 35
  •  
  • Reviews: 95



Offline SamLP

Not sure why you would highlight those links given its the reason for your negative.
You've also disabled your account so those links must have been supllied by an existing member. :rolleyes:

When we spoke, you couldn't remember me trying to book you previously. I still have your texts btw. I also mentioned it when I pm'd you last year. I've challenged you to read them should you disable your account. Again I mentioned it there and you didn't remember.

Furthermore I only ever tried to book you once before our actual punt and it was 12 months prior. I showed you the proof of how I got your number, which I told you verbally and is also shown in the messages. You chose to lie and mention that I had been declined a booking previously. You also failed to mention it was a year earlier. You let your paranoia get the best of you and posted, and ironically reposted the links for everyone to see. Own up to your mistake Lou and own up to making a deal out of nothing and own up to omitting certain details and ignoring the proof I sent. Why the hell would I even be what your paranoid mind thinks I am. I've punted with hundreds of wg's. I've never had a problem like this before. I've mentioned to countless as a way of conversation that I had tried to book them before but they were busy or it just never happened for one reason or another. All took it with good will except for you, and you immediately started to assume the worst. I have no time for that as I punt for fun and not for any drama. I've posted the warning.

Offline pumps

Own up to your mistake Lou and own up to making a deal out of nothing


Just reading through her previous posts on UKP shows she has paranoia issues.

You'd think if she really did have to move house several times due to stalkers an whatever else....she'd stop being a hooker lol  :rolleyes:

prossie logic.

Offline SamLP

Just to prove her level of paranoia. I don't think I'll be expecting an apology anytime soon but she made it clear she wasn't free and invited me to book again which I did a year later. She also had no objection with me on UKE, although I made it clear I punt anonymously.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline sonyvaio

Thanks for the review, its a shame as based on what I saw of her on uke I quite wanted to meet her, oh well nevermind, I will put that idea down my list a few places

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 27
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
I was already put off by the fact she was a 50-year-old granny with a load of tattoos.

Now it seems she's a paranoid, vindictive and unstable 50-year-old granny with a load of tattoos. :thumbsdown:

And her service wasn't that good anyway.

Thanks for the warning. One to give a wide berth.

As you say, punting shouldn't be this complicated or come with so much aggro.

Escorts either want your custom or they don't - and she doesn't seem to want it.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 11:59:48 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline pumps


Offline SamLP

Well I found out yesterday she had another account on UKE, so as soon as she disabled her account, she signed up again. That makes it her 3rd one since the site started.
I'm sure she'll be pestering admin again to disable it so she can sign up with a new nick. There's a pattern there, and it translates to paranoia. Normally I would sympathise, but not after her actions.

Offline Curious

Tried to see her last summer without success: She seemed a bit suspicious of me, had various rules for her protection, asked for a booking but didn't accept it because she took offence at something I'd written. One rule was not giving out a phone number, which I think is a bit silly really if you're trying to protect yourself since it's best way of weeding out the fakes both ways.
Strangely enough I felt a bit guilty at the time, but can see from this that it's a pattern and probably lucky it didn't go ahead.

Offline addick

I saw her about a month ago. She was very pleasant but didn't really do it for me, maybe we just didn't click. She mentioned she was about to move.

Offline Brazilian Martian

I saw her about a month ago. She was very pleasant but didn't really do it for me, maybe we just didn't click. She mentioned she was about to move.

So you have been a member since 2012 and you say that you saw her a month ago, why not at least contribute a review to help others out  :hi:

Offline pumps

I saw her about a month ago. She was very pleasant but didn't really do it for me, maybe we just didn't click. She mentioned she was about to move.

/Paranoid punters are stalking her, tells stranger she's about to move house  :sarcastic:

you couldn't make this shit up

Offline Cuntminion

Well I know I'm going to get called the cippety clop brigade but here goes

I've seen butter a couple times and she is actually quite a level headed, sound individual

Sam it's your review and your interaction and your experience but as said nothing I've ever experienced

I find it slightly odd though you felt the need to question or email because you didn't get reciprocal feedback

To your own original post you yourself ruined your own good time in essence by wondering why you didn't get a pat on the back on aw

Now the reason for the negative is her actions afterwards. I had left her feedback an AW and she hadn’t reciprocated. I emailed her asking whether it was the norm or if I had done something wrong.

Your quite a seasoned punter more so than me and shit like feedback bothers you?

Offline Cuntminion

Well I found out yesterday she had another account on UKE, so as soon as she disabled her account, she signed up again. That makes it her 3rd one since the site started.
I'm sure she'll be pestering admin again to disable it so she can sign up with a new nick. There's a pattern there, and it translates to paranoia. Normally I would sympathise, but not after her actions.

Will also add to this she has never tried to be anyone else or trick anyone by having three different accounts (not at the same time or immediately after) at separate periods

The first two were directly linked to one another in terms of profile correlating to adult work and the third one was to maintain rapport with regulars and just general forum use

She said she made admin aware, I have no reason to disbelieve that and that's the only person that deserves to know

You want your privacy booking by phone so you cant deny others there's and rightly everyone is entitled to privacy

Do I feel you should be pushed to reveal your forum id? Absolutely not but it's not inconceivable that might be a deal breaker to some sp's if they have had bad experiences and you tell them you tried to book them before

She's not the first sp to step away and come back whether under a new user name or not and won't be the last as long your not trying to mislead people what's the issue  :unknown:


Offline Brazilian Martian

Will also add to this she has never tried to be anyone else or trick anyone by having three different accounts (not at the same time or immediately after) at separate periods

The first two were directly linked to one another in terms of profile correlating to adult work and the third one was to maintain rapport with regulars and just general forum use

She said she made admin aware, I have no reason to disbelieve that and that's the only person that deserves to know

You want your privacy booking by phone so you cant deny others there's and rightly everyone is entitled to privacy

Do I feel you should be pushed to reveal your forum id? Absolutely not but it's not inconceivable that might be a deal breaker to some sp's if they have had bad experiences and you tell them you tried to book them before

She's not the first sp to step away and come back whether under a new user name or not and won't be the last as long your not trying to mislead people what's the issue  :unknown:

Shot yourself in the foot for a prossie that could not give a shit about you. Why on earth do guys jump so fast to defend a maidens honour :thumbsdown:

Offline SamLP

Oh dear. It seems some people can't help themselves and haven't read the posts properly.
Is it my fault she's paranoid? Not really my fault she can't handle a simple and innocent phrase as I once tried to book you but it never happened. In her own words the booking on its own was absolutely fine until then, so why didn't she use common sense or her judgement on what she'd seen to act in a civil manner. You booked her off UKE, of course she hadn't exhibited any of her paranoid behaviour. If she didn't want anyone contacting her by phone she should never have posted it on UKE. She wasn't even gracious or big enough to concede she made a mistake and judged wrong. I may be a kind person, but I don't accept being wronged and having private messages posted publicly with deliberate lies and omissions designed to justify her actions. Something of course you've overlooked.

As for your cheap dig re feedback. Kindly fuck off. I couldn't give a toss about it, but had realised she hadn't reciprocated and checked that she had with every single other punter before and after. I wanted to find out what was wrong. I didn't realise at the time that she was paranoid. I did find her grilling uncomfortable but it was then she exposed herself and I'm glad I asked. I see a few others have also experienced slightly tense bookings with her. If she's so paranoid, then maybe she shouldn't be in this job. She should join tinder instead because she's proved herself to be a lowlife by treating punters who've done no wrong with contempt. I can see how she attracts the nutters and it's all her own doing.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well I know I'm going to get called the cippety clop brigade but here goes

Didn't get a chance, you got banned, kinda dumb that you got banned for a pro$$ie thats going to be seriously pissed that you bumped her negative review  :sarcastic:

Offline pumps

Well I know I'm going to get called the cippety clop brigade but here goes


You knew it, and you know they are always banned

but thought to yourself "what the hell, I love this prossie so much and I think she loves me back because she gives me such a gooood service for all that hard earn money I pay her...  so it'll be worth earning white-knight status for when I next visit her"

muppet  :sarcastic:

Offline Hobbit

You knew it, and you know they are always banned

but thought to yourself "what the hell, I love this prossie so much and I think she loves me back because she gives me such a gooood service for all that hard earn money I pay her...  so it'll be worth earning white-knight status for when I next visit her"

muppet  :sarcastic:

+1
These girls don't give a shit about punters, it's just a job to them and nothing else! Whiteknights thinking that the girl likes them or is a friend are fools.

Offline cueball

Well I know I'm going to get called the cippety clop brigade but here goes

Oh the irony  :sarcastic:

What a plonker  :dash: especially after reading some of his dumb gun slinger posts  :lol: criticising others then loses his head over a prossie

Offline shagbambi

Surprised he fell on his sword for Lou.  Was always expecting it to be Khloe of Colindale at some point....

Offline PLeisure

Surprised he fell on his sword for Lou.  Was always expecting it to be Khloe of Colindale at some point....
ahh,,,, But she grew bored of his custom and started texting mid-punt  :sarcastic:
Best thing that happened to his punting life, however - it prompted him to seek elsewhere

Offline punk

Cat man got banned!!!!!

Another one bites the dust.

What is it with some punters and prossies.  :unknown:

Offline pumps

Cat man got banned!!!!!

Another one bites the dust.

What is it with some punters and prossies.  :unknown:

I think he thought he was above the system, because he had a few posts and a few years membership under his belt


Another one bites the dust.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Type_O_Negative

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Fuck me i can't believe he got a ban. White-knighting is a strange thing...

I bet sooner or later he will ask Admin for another chance.

Offline Brazilian Martian

Fuck me i can't believe he got a ban. White-knighting is a strange thing...

I bet sooner or later he will ask Admin for another chance.

He's probably still on UKE so he has a chance to redeem himself, but white knighting is the lowest of lows in my opinion so if he does come back it would be interesting how he does try to fit back in.

Offline punk

He's probably still on UKE so he has a chance to redeem himself, but white knighting is the lowest of lows in my opinion so if he does come back it would be interesting how he does try to fit back in.

May be he can take a leaf out of your book.

Offline nigel4498


Offline SamLP

Remember when getting an ASBO was all the storm and fashion a while back. If you didn't have one, you were looked down on within your gang.
It seems like a similar thing with white knight. Getting banned for white knighting is like a badge to be proud of with some.
The funny thing is, they still pay for sex with prostitutes like we all do.
Sad people, sad cases, sad lives.

One wg pm'd me agreeing that the wg is question does come across as paranoid and then questioned why some punters feel the need to white knight.
I gave a simple example that some sad people feel the need to please their favourite wg's, so imagine a dog owner throwing a stick. The dog will fetch it and bring it back to the owner and be chuffed when the owner pats the dog on the head and says there's a good boy. A classic case of the mind turning to jelly to please their favourites, even if it means ignoring all the facts, twisting words and finding excuses. All that does is encourage more paranoid beahviour, which isn't in the interest of punters, nor does it give other wg's a good name.

The funny thing is, admin banned him asap without anyone reporting him. I know it won't happen, but if these white knights were also banned off UKE too, it would serve as a lesson to anyone wishing to white knight. That ASBO tag wouldn't be so attractive anymore.

Offline pumps

Remember when getting an ASBO was all the storm and fashion a while back. If you didn't have one, you were looked down on within your gang.
It seems like a similar thing with white knight. Getting banned for white knighting is like a badge to be proud of with some.
The funny thing is, they still pay for sex with prostitutes like we all do.
Sad people, sad cases, sad lives.

One wg pm'd me agreeing that the wg is question does come across as paranoid and then questioned why some punters feel the need to white knight.
I gave a simple example that some sad people feel the need to please their favourite wg's, so imagine a dog owner throwing a stick. The dog will fetch it and bring it back to the owner and be chuffed when the owner pats the dog on the head and says there's a good boy. A classic case of the mind turning to jelly to please their favourites, even if it means ignoring all the facts, twisting words and finding excuses. All that does is encourage more paranoid beahviour, which isn't in the interest of punters, nor does it give other wg's a good name.

The funny thing is, admin banned him asap without anyone reporting him.
I know it won't happen, but if these white knights were also banned off UKE too, it would serve as a lesson to anyone wishing to white knight. That ASBO tag wouldn't be so attractive anymore.

I noticed that, I searched high and low for the reported post  :sarcastic:


Offline pumps

May be he can take a leaf out of your book.

that one was left wide open  :sarcastic:



Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 27
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
if these white knights were also banned off UKE too, it would serve as a lesson to anyone wishing to white knight.

The other site is a totally different set-up and MO.

What many of us would call whiteknighting is commonplace among posters there.

Offline SamLP

The other site is a totally different set-up and MO.

What many of us would call whiteknighting is commonplace among posters there.

I know. My point is some don't care if they get banned off UKP as they still have UKE to post on.
If they were to be banned off both sites for white knighting on UKP, then it would serve as a lesson not to white knight on here. They're free to do so there of course.
However, I doubt that would ever happen. Only serious cases get banned off both sites, not white knighting.

Offline punk

The other site is a totally different set-up and MO.

What many of us would call whiteknighting is commonplace among posters there.

UKE looks a good site,unfortunately spoilt by WK's.