Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Malicious / revenge feedback (XJenni / JenniferBlack)  (Read 19441 times)

Offline James999

On the thread below the subject of Feedback came up, and xjenni discovered how to respond to feedback.

She then responded saying that a guy that gave her a neutral wanted Bareback that being the reason she refused to see him

Feedback
Went to the address made me wait ages. Then said cannot make it. On my way home texts me she is ready !!!!!!! Did not bother to meet after my time being waste.
Response:
Wanted BB, which I do not offer

However, Cassie checked and confirmed the client was not known to request bareback

And
the feedback left for him from your couples profile says

"Unfortunatley Booking never took place. Apologies for inconvinience. Issues with communication."


So it looks as if you simply labeled him as a barebacker as Revenge feedback  :mad: and when this was pointed out you simply said

I will leave it at that and take all your advice on board. Thank you anyway.

Sorry Xjenni that's not the way it works on here, you need to resolve this matter

Xjenni Feedback https://www.adultwork.com/dlgViewRatings.asp?UserID=1860850

Thread in question https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=12793.0

Offline Lz-129

This was the bit that stunned me!

but my stance on BB is always the same. Perhaps I have him confused with another (I've had a few instances) but I'm pretty positive that was the situation.

Sorry, you have to be 100% sure otherwise you old be labelling the wrong guy, its just wrong and unfair :(
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 08:59:27 AM by Lz-129 »

Offline Lori

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 136
This was the bit that stunned me!

Sorry, you have to be 100% sure otherwise you old be labelling the wrong guy, its just wrong and unfair :(

Surely jenni would be 100% positive if they asked for bareback? I would stay on your mind for sure.  I have a little red book I write down all the bad apples screen names and numbers in and exactly what they did/wanted so you always know incase they book again.

But if you are not sure really you shouldn't write it, it's better to be sure then jump the gun.

« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 09:15:16 AM by Lori »

Tony Montana

What is the point of this thread?  To demonstrate that WG's tell lies?

Next you'll be telling us they don't pay tax.

Offline Lori

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 136
Probably, but some of us its only white lies.  :lol:
Think point is sometimes feedback can really be used to harm someone. Which is wrong and nasty if your intention is to cover your own shortcomings. :thumbsdown:

I would be onto aw if I was unsure and getting that feedback removed. Though I wouldn't have written it in the first place!
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 09:21:56 AM by Lori »

Offline Festisio

It's painfully obvious to us (but sadly not to any prossie cross referencing all his feedback) that this is a complete lie done to try and disguise the fact that she has an unusually high number of no shows.

At least the comment does not appear directly on his own feedback, so the chances of xJenni's lie causing him to be refused a booking is slim.

Still absolutely disgusting behaviour though.  I'm sure whoever told her how to dispute feedback is regretting it now.

Offline Daffodil

What is the point of this thread?  To demonstrate that WG's tell lies?

Next you'll be telling us they don't pay tax.

Gosh, you really are a fluffy. Can prossies do no wrong in your eyes? It seems, even if they do, you'd rather turn a blind eye.

The point is that xjenni looks to have left false and malicious feedback against a punter just because he had the audacity to leave neutral and, judging by other feedback for xjenni, correct feedback.

One of the aims of this forum is to expose and discourage bad prossie practice. That is the point of this thread  :hi:

Offline Daffodil

On the initial thread somebody said that they couldn't find xjenni's couple's profile. That's because that profile has been removed.

However, if you click on TDH76's feedback you will see one there from poshcouplebham saying, 'Unfortunatley Booking never took place. Apologies for inconvinience. Issues with communication'.

Click on their feedback and you'll see one from TDH76 saying, 'Let me down. Made my way to their place but Jenni was not there. Wasted journey 20 mile trip'.

TDH76 left both feedback on the same day.

TDH76 otherwise has perfect feedback, xjenni has plenty for letting punters down.

Gosh, you really are a fluffy. Can prossies do no wrong in your eyes? It seems, even if they do, you'd rather turn a blind eye.

The point is that xjenni looks to have left false and malicious feedback against a punter just because he had the audacity to leave neutral and, judging by other feedback for xjenni, correct feedback.

One of the aims of this forum is to expose and discourage bad prossie practice. That is the point of this thread  :hi:

I love a bit of sarcasm & ironic humour me!  :wackogirl:

Tony Montana

Gosh, you really are a fluffy. Can prossies do no wrong in your eyes? It seems, even if they do, you'd rather turn a blind eye.

The point is that xjenni looks to have left false and malicious feedback against a punter just because he had the audacity to leave neutral and, judging by other feedback for xjenni, correct feedback.

One of the aims of this forum is to expose and discourage bad prossie practice. That is the point of this thread  :hi:

OK.  When xjenni posts on here to admit she left malicious feedback to get revenge for an pretty innocuous neutral rating, I will apologise and admit the thread was worth starting and has served its purpose.

Offline Tailpipe

A bit hard on Lex you may have read a little more into the post than was there.

WG lie its part of the Game

However are friend is trying to  mess with James, not a smart move who wants the issues sorted and rightly so
I suspect this end in the normal way.

Pointing the finger of BB to punter ,WG needs to be 100% sure of their facts before they do so.

Offline Matium

The probable reason why she's described as "unreliable" in her feedback is because she does what a lot of WGs do - double book.

So it doesn't matter to her that she's let one guy down when she's servicing, and getting paid by, another guy.

Offline Daffodil

OK.  When xjenni posts on here to admit she left malicious feedback to get revenge for an pretty innocuous neutral rating, I will apologise and admit the thread was worth starting and has served its purpose.

So until a prossie checks in and admits their wrongdoing on all of the negative reports threads do you not consider them to have served their purpose?

xjenni posted that TDH76 is a bare backer because he left neutral and accurate feedback. This is wrong and has been highlighted.

Whether she admits it or not, I'd imagine she'll think twice about doing it again and it also demonstrates to other punters how unreliable and malicious she can be.

Point served  :hi:

Offline ManBat

Quote from: Daffodil link=topic=12839.msg195380#msg195380
  it also demonstrates to other punters how unreliable and malicious she can be.

Point served  :hi:

nice tits though
Banning reason: Long suspected to be previously banned but now alleged to be posting fake positive reviews to pretend to be genuine


Offline smiths

This was the bit that stunned me!

Sorry, you have to be 100% sure otherwise you old be labelling the wrong guy, its just wrong and unfair :(

Yes, she must be 100% sure but confirms she wasnt in that comment. Very unprofessional and potentially damaging for a punter.

Offline Lori

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 136
The probable reason why she's described as "unreliable" in her feedback is because she does what a lot of WGs do - double book.

So it doesn't matter to her that she's let one guy down when she's servicing, and getting paid by, another guy.

If she has double booked, maybe she should get what a lot of escorts have....a diary! You should always do first come first served and if your a feather brain like me, write it down!

Still either way does no warrant such a feedback, if it genuinely is untrue, surely would be better to put sorry I messed up with timings in the response?
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 11:05:14 AM by Lori »

Offline smiths

If she has double booked, maybe she should get what a lot of escorts have....a diary! You should always do first come first served and if your a feather brain like me, write it down!

Still either way does no warrant such a feedback, if it genuinely is untrue, surely would be better to put sorry I messed up with timings in the response?

Its double booking on purpose thats being discussed here. The now banned Wife4Rent a real piece of scum admitted she double booked punters so if one didnt turn-up she had another. If both turned-up she would just fuck one about and either leave him hanging about or presumably he would go back home/work or try to arrange another punt with someone else. She was proud of doing this as her posts showed, real filth.

I havent found it a big problem myself though fortunately, most WGs stick to the arrangements made.

Offline Tailpipe

Its double booking on purpose thats being discussed here. The now banned Wife4Rent a real piece of scum admitted she double booked punters so if one didnt turn-up she had another. If both turned-up she would just fuck one about and either leave him hanging about or presumably he would go back home/work or try to arrange another punt with someone else. She was proud of doing this as her posts showed, real filth.

I havent found it a big problem myself though fortunately, most WGs stick to the arrangements made.
smiths
Just looked her up I think may be her may not be  :vomit:

"I will be available;e to be fucked bareback in Apsley on Monday 29th & Tuesday 30th April. two days of non stop cock will have my pussy oozing with spunk, great for you creampie addicts and those that love sloppy seconds.
 
Pure filthy sex with a dirty mature slut wife, I love being used as an escort, fucked bareback by complete strangers one after the other. I am a dirty slag, a cum dump for anybody to use, the thought of your hands all over me as you French kiss and grope me makes me wet and excites me."

Offline Daffodil

Its double booking on purpose thats being discussed here. The now banned Wife4Rent a real piece of scum admitted she double booked punters so if one didnt turn-up she had another. If both turned-up she would just fuck one about and either leave him hanging about or presumably he would go back home/work or try to arrange another punt with someone else. She was proud of doing this as her posts showed, real filth.

I havent found it a big problem myself though fortunately, most WGs stick to the arrangements made.

It's a real shitty practice and there are plenty who do it.

Wife4rent was definitely out of order for doing it.

Offline Daffodil

It should be mentioned, of course, that there isn't anything to say xjenni is definitely double booking.

Many prossies are simply disorganised. One of the reasons they can't hold down proper jobs.

The problem with xjenni is that she seems to be leaving malicious and fake feedback in revenge for accurate feedback left about herself  :thumbsdown:

Offline smiths

smiths
Just looked her up I think may be her may not be  :vomit:

"I will be available;e to be fucked bareback in Apsley on Monday 29th & Tuesday 30th April. two days of non stop cock will have my pussy oozing with spunk, great for you creampie addicts and those that love sloppy seconds.
 
Pure filthy sex with a dirty mature slut wife, I love being used as an escort, fucked bareback by complete strangers one after the other. I am a dirty slag, a cum dump for anybody to use, the thought of your hands all over me as you French kiss and grope me makes me wet and excites me."

Sounds like her, a real class act. :vomit: :vomit: :vomit: ;)

Offline Festisio

I remember finding out about wife4rent from a thread either on here or auto-censored where someone had discovered a website used by people who are into "pozzing up".

A community where people with HIV and those who want HIV talk about spreading HIV and there was a thread focused on BB prossies and some infected sicko was talking about booking her to spread the gift as they repulsively put it.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 12:03:10 PM by Festisio »

Offline Matium

I remember finding out about wife4rent from a thread either on here or auto-censored where someone had discovered a website used by people who are into "pozzing up".

A community where people with HIV and those who want HIV talk about spreading HIV and there was a thread focused on BB prossies and some infected sicko was talking about booking her to spread the gift as they repulsively put it.

Knowingly transmitting HIV through sex is a crime treated as reckless GBH.

Criminal transmission of HIV
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 12:09:59 PM by Matium »

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Guys please remember she is quite new to this business and although I will never condone leave that type of feedback especially as it is proven to be untrue by the feedback the dup profile left him, perhaps she genuinely did confuse him with someone else considering she did not know how to refute feedback until a month after this booking.
Or perhaps she just read lots of other girls profiles and thought it the norm to say he asked for bareback as an excuse to not look bad herself.
Whatever the reasons I am sure she now she knows it was wrong she will be onto AW to tell them she left the wrong statement on the response as it was meant for someone else and if she does AW will remove it immediately

How about giving her a chance to rectify it. 

As I said I am not standing up for her or what she did as I was the one who actually called her on it after speaking to a couple of the girls this guy had seen but we all make mistakes and hopefully we all learn from them. Why not wait and see if she recitifies hers in the next 24 hours before starting a whole new thread about her.

Perhaps she is not very good at arranging bookings and being on time and even I know how hard it can be when doing duos and arranging for the other girl to be on time so perhaps she did not have much notice to get there from her friend?  we don't know the ins and outs when it comes to that as my dup partner will sometimes book one in at hers and give me an hours notice and it takes 45 minutes to get to hers.  Perhaps she doesn't drive and relies on public transport. 
I am pretty sure that after all this she will realise you have to make sure you are there and ready well before the client is due.

She seems like this is the forum she needs to be on to learn what being a good prossie is all about so surely it is to the punters benefit if she stays here and learns, rather than feeling like she should leave.   In the end she will learn more here than any other forum and will hopefully turn it around so that has to be for the punters benefit in the long run


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)