Author Topic: Vicky18 - Stratford  (Read 3750 times)


7 review(s) for Vicky18 (2 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by ]

txitxi

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

Face: 8/10
Body: 8/10
Comms: 3/10
Service: 7/10
Hygiene: 9/10
Location: 4/10

Time: 1 Hour
Damage: £80

Requested low makeup, dress up and a few bits. Did it without issue
Face is a lot better than photos. Body is slim. Boobs are big for the body but starting to sag. But it has not sagged yet. Fun to play with.
Comms; initially she tried to converse, but she struggled and later probably got tired as I talking a lot. So wont get much GFE here.
Service was good. I told her to slow down and take everything slow. And she followed. Asked me to put condom and get going after 20 mins. First pop after 40 mins and could not have a second one even though we both tried
Hygenie; no issues here
Location: Easy for me to get to BUT there is like a hairstylist and some other shop right under her flat. They can see punters waiting outside. Wonder if they know whats happening upstairs. Not discrete at all

Regards to mixed reviews for this girl; I dont know why others got shit service from this girl. I had a good serve. She even smiled, laughed a few times when bumping into each other during the service etc. Could it be she provides different service based on who the punter is? I am mid 20s, slim to athletic body for reference. Or could it be based on her mood? Or has she improved based on negative feedback? I am curious why i managed to get a good service while most people got shit service from her.

Anyway I will visit again, not sure about recommending due to other negative reviews.

I will feedback again on next service to see if her service was different.





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Very interesting.................................................................................... :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,631
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 197
Thanks for this, but perhaps you could give a bit more detail about the service you did get, because it seems to vary on her reviews.

ie Did you get FK or OWO/OW? Any RO/fingering? Or did you just shag her?

Thanks.

txitxi

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks for this, but perhaps you could give a bit more detail about the service you did get, because it seems to vary on her reviews.

ie Did you get FK or OWO/OW? Any RO/fingering? Or did you just shag her?

Thanks.

Got FK, OWO, did RO and fingering as well. The FK was slightly better than I got from Nicole@19 (See previous review). Although note, this was not DFK. I did not ask to film her though or CIM. I forgot she had filiming in her service list.

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,631
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 197
Got FK, OWO, did RO and fingering as well. The FK was slightly better than I got from Nicole@19 (See previous review). Although note, this was not DFK. I did not ask to film her though or CIM. I forgot she had filiming in her service list.

That detailed info is worth knowing - thanks. Back on the HL, might be worth a gamble after all!

Offline Nosser2

As someone who very recently gave a less than flattering review of Vicky, I can think of a few possible reasons why your experience was clearly better than mine.

First of all, mine was a short notice booking, whilst it appears from your review that yours was at least a bit more pre-planned. It might be that she needs a bit of time to get herself in the mood, so to speak.

Next, you describe yourself as in your 20's and slim. I am in my 50's and, whilst not particularly overweight, I do have enough middle age spread to be dieting to try and get rid of it. I would also be the first to admit I'm far from the best looking bloke around - hence my making use of WG's over the years to live out various fantasies and be with girls that I could never hope to achieve, or be with otherwise. Maybe she just can't pretend that much when with an older, ugly git like myself. I suppose that's understandable, but she should make it clear in her profile about the age range if that's the case, or accept that not everyone that visits her is going to be your, fit and attractive!

I am also very well endowed. That has actually cost me a relationship or two in the past, and has led to more than one WG to refuse sex with me as they claim to be too small to cope. That's something that also happened with Vicky, although that may just have been an excuse for her, but as I said, not the first time something like that has happened to me.

Finally, I may just have caught her in an off moment, or it might just be that she just didn't really like me, but something clicked when she met you.

I know when I have been abroad and been on holiday with a group of like minded guys in a "specialist" resort where girls are included, whilst someone telling you that a particular girl was great (or terrible) is always a good starting point, your own experience can seem to be at odds with theirs. Maybe you and her were just better suited than me and her were.

Anyway, anyone else reading this will clearly make their own minds up, and remember that my review (just as anyone else's) was all about my personal experience and, whilst I tried to be as honest as possible, that doesn't mean that anyone else meeting Vicky will have the same experience as I did.

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
As someone who very recently gave a less than flattering review of Vicky, I can think of a few possible reasons why your experience was clearly better than mine.

First of all, mine was a short notice booking, whilst it appears from your review that yours was at least a bit more pre-planned. It might be that she needs a bit of time to get herself in the mood, so to speak.

Next, you describe yourself as in your 20's and slim. I am in my 50's and, whilst not particularly overweight, I do have enough middle age spread to be dieting to try and get rid of it. I would also be the first to admit I'm far from the best looking bloke around - hence my making use of WG's over the years to live out various fantasies and be with girls that I could never hope to achieve, or be with otherwise. Maybe she just can't pretend that much when with an older, ugly git like myself. I suppose that's understandable, but she should make it clear in her profile about the age range if that's the case, or accept that not everyone that visits her is going to be your, fit and attractive!

I am also very well endowed. That has actually cost me a relationship or two in the past, and has led to more than one WG to refuse sex with me as they claim to be too small to cope. That's something that also happened with Vicky, although that may just have been an excuse for her, but as I said, not the first time something like that has happened to me.

Finally, I may just have caught her in an off moment, or it might just be that she just didn't really like me, but something clicked when she met you.

I know when I have been abroad and been on holiday with a group of like minded guys in a "specialist" resort where girls are included, whilst someone telling you that a particular girl was great (or terrible) is always a good starting point, your own experience can seem to be at odds with theirs. Maybe you and her were just better suited than me and her were.

Anyway, anyone else reading this will clearly make their own minds up, and remember that my review (just as anyone else's) was all about my personal experience and, whilst I tried to be as honest as possible, that doesn't mean that anyone else meeting Vicky will have the same experience as I did.

Or as The Don particularly likes to quote YMMV with any WG  ;) :thumbsup: :drinks:
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac