When you don't find her attractive and therefore can't get it up

[Dime]

I hate those punts were the girl looks really good in the photos with her face and tattoos blurred out, but when you get there you don't find her hot at all and with lots of  tattoos. Then she'll play with your dick and it just won't go up. Is it acceptable to walk when you go in and realize you don't fancy her? I know most guys walk because of bands, but if it is the girl in the photos and she hasn't done or said anything, BUT you just couldn't?

[hullad]

If she is a munter and this was not obvious when you booked .... WALK there and then don't cough up the cash then decide you are going to struggle getting never mind maintaining an erection.

Its your money after all and just like buying anything else if its not up to your requirements then you do not have to have it. Tatoos would not put me off but a face thats looks like its been run over by a London Taxi and you would find it hard to get it up then just do a 180 degree turn. I once arrived at a girls pad to be greeted by a right ugly bitch, with multi coloured teeth and it stunk, I had it away. I went the wrong way down the street to where my car was and had to get two buses to get back to my car to avoid passing the shit hole again.

[Malvolio]

There's no point paying for a WG you don't find attractive in some way - just make a polite excuse and leave.

[Wolverhampton1990]

It's for this reason I don't think I could ever book a girl that does not show face pictures on her profile. If I'm paying for a girl I want her to be attractive, and I think I'd find it much easier to walk away if I know what she's supposed to look like and can say "you're not the girl I booked".

I know I could miss out on some good punts because of this as there are a number of highly recommended girls in my area who do not show their face (sophiarose springs straight to mind), but it's personal preference I suppose and I'd rather move onto the next girl and book a girl I know I find attractive.

[maxxblue]

It's for this reason I don't think I could ever book a girl that does not show face pictures on her profile. If I'm paying for a girl I want her to be attractive, and I think I'd find it much easier to walk away if I know what she's supposed to look like and can say "you're not the girl I booked".

I know I could miss out on some good punts because of this as there are a number of highly recommended girls in my area who do not show their face (sophiarose springs straight to mind), but it's personal preference I suppose and I'd rather move onto the next girl and book a girl I know I find attractive.

You are right that you could miss out on some good punts, and I understand your reluctance to book a girl who doesn't show her face on her profile, but there is a way around this problem - use UKP reviews. If there are a number of positive reviews about how attractive a WG is, then I would suggest that thus is a fairly reliable indicator of her attractiveness.

[Steely Dan]

Is it acceptable to walk when you go in and realize you don't fancy her? I know most guys walk because of bands,

(bands = bait and switch.) My suggestion is to ignore us.  Of course you should walk when you want to walk.  It should not matter what we do (or what we say we would do...).  It is not our punt, nor our money it is yours.  If you booked a table in a restaurant, and you didn't like the look of it when you got there, would you stay? Does it matter if some guys out there would stay?

Two further thoughts.  *If her profile baits you in, but the girl you meet seems different, it is a form of B & S anyway.
*If this happens a lot, and you walk a lot, I guess you could be found out.  Oh well.  Plenty of Fish.  But if this does happen a lot, you should stick to well reviewed girls or in some other way change selection criteria so it happens rarely.

[MikeBWales]

Like other have said, you're paying for a service and an expensive one at that.  If the initial meet and greet is not to your liking, you have to walk, any sort of dodgy feeling, or if she looks like Sid James or something.

You have to have your wits about you though and make quick decisions as once you've handed over the cash, the likelihood of getting a refund because you changed your mind is slim to none. 

Reading the SAAFE forum, the escort community will take it as a personal affront that you dared to book an appointment with an escort who doesn't show her face in her profile only to find on arrival that there's a Les Dawson lookalike in a basque waiting to suck you off.  The fee or a large proportion of it is then most certainly retained for you wasting her time!! 

Quick decisions before handing over the cash are certainly the order of the day!

[Plan R]

Tatoos would not put me off but a face thats looks like its been run over by a London Taxi and you would find it hard to get it up then just do a 180 degree turn.

  driven by one of our learned colleagues? 

[Marmalade]

180 degree turn

driven by one of our learned colleagues? 

How unfair. London cabs are excellent at 180 degree turns. 

Though I would just tell her, get on your bus hen.

I've done it a couple of times (out of a few hundreds so not that bad). But at the point she's opened the door, not at the point where you've come in her eye and her arse and think you would like a third shot if the rosy specs had not somehow fallen into her chuff and she didn't now look like an ugly slapper instead of the hy-clas companniun offered by her website. I just say, sorry, but not what I was looking for. She can't complain if she's lied on her fucking profile or poses as sweet and welcoming when she's a scary-looking junkie in need of a fix (in which case a cab might offer better protection than a bus)

[bigmanbigman]

I have left my cash in the car normally ends a meeting pretty quickly.

[Sir Lance-a-lot]

I'm more interested in her physique rather than her face, so my equivalent would be a WG who turns out to be fatter or saggier than her body-pics or advertised dress size implied.

[mrfishyfoo]

I generally form an opinion in the first 60 seconds as any longer than that and the lass has every right IMHO to expect me to hand over the money.

Looks aren't everything so I work on the basis that if a lass is enthusiastic with her greeting/kissing when I first walk through the door then the "correct tone" is set. If the initial greeting/kissing is crap then I expect the punt also to be crap.

That initial 60 seconds also gives me chance to look the lass over as my dick will usually start twitching during that first 60 seconds, if it doesn't the alarm bells start to ring.

If I don't like what's on offer I walk, end of.

[smiths]

I hate those punts were the girl looks really good in the photos with her face and tattoos blurred out, but when you get there you don't find her hot at all and with lots of  tattoos. Then she'll play with your dick and it just won't go up. Is it acceptable to walk when you go in and realize you don't fancy her? I know most guys walk because of bands, but if it is the girl in the photos and she hasn't done or said anything, BUT you just couldn't?

I walk if I don't fancy the real in the flesh WG, I am not going to pay good money and stay anyway. I just ring my plan B option instead who I know I fancy.

[nigel4498]

I'm more interested in her physique rather than her face, so my equivalent would be a WG who turns out to be fatter or saggier than her body-pics or advertised dress size implied.

Same for me really.

[smiths]

You are right that you could miss out on some good punts, and I understand your reluctance to book a girl who doesn't show her face on her profile, but there is a way around this problem - use UKP reviews. If there are a number of positive reviews about how attractive a WG is, then I would suggest that thus is a fairly reliable indicator of her attractiveness.

Absolutely, looks are of course subjective but if you find a punters or punters credible on here and he says he found the WG attractive that is very useful info, you could still walk if you didn't find her attractive yourself obviously.

If I ruled out all WGs who didn't show their faces I would of passed on many excellent WGs over the years.

[HighlyMotivated]

If I'm horny enough to stay when I don't find her particularly attractive, then getting hard isn't an issue

[Juilius_Sneezer]

Body is frankly more important for me but if she is hacket than I agree that life suddenly becomes more difficult.

As they say you pay for what you are looking for and once there if she doesn't advertise the face and you dislike it then it is like an online order that doesn't match expectation, you can send it back as such.

[willie loman]

This is the great advantage of visiting a sauna/brothel, you have a selection of up to six girls, you can watch chat and listen. I have changed my mind in a sauna lounge when I realised a pretty girl had a very unschooled accent. It doesn't work for me, knocking on a complete strangers door, and minutes later trying to shag her. Best enjoy a bit of flirting and anticipation, before selecting a girl. As for these punters who have to use google translate in the room,,,, what is the appeal of that.

[Gordon Bennett]

I'm more interested in her physique rather than her face, so my equivalent would be a WG who turns out to be fatter or saggier than her body-pics or advertised dress size implied.

Yep. That's me too. Luckily the ladies I've seen thus far have matched up to their pics, dress size and advertising. Given they normally have some sort of gown on for my arrival it's hard to make an instant judgement if they're as slim and fit as they say though. Isn't there a boorish old saying: you don't look at the mantle piece when your stoking the fire? Spose that sums me up.

[glenmere]

I think from experience I will only meet a gal who has a face pic on her profile and if I get any twitching of 'this profile may not be right' (it usually isn't right!) Looks like a duck quacks like a duck etc....I don't book - based on ££££'s wasted on unsuitable ladies!

[Home Alone]

I think from experience I will only meet a gal who has a face pic on her profile and if I get any twitching of 'this profile may not be right' (it usually isn't right!) Looks like a duck quacks like a duck etc....I don't book - based on ££££'s wasted on unsuitable ladies!

As part of your selection process, what about checking out the reviews that colleagues on here provide, glenmere?

From another of your posts, I assume you punt in the East Midlands.  Mutinyonthecounty may be a bit far north in that neck of the woods for you; but his wonderful, elegaic style of FRs provide not just good reads in their own right, but helpful information, too.

They almost make me wish I lived and punted in that part of the world!

[NotoriousNot]

I've only failed to get hard once, with the abysmal Lexi Lou in Chester, a 'pornstar' with an awful attitude. I found myself in the incredible situation of having a very attractive girl with an amazing slim body laid out before me - and being totally unaroused. Couldn't do a thing and she just lay there like a sack of potatoes making me feel like an idiot.

[stevedave]

If I'm horny enough to stay when I don't find her particularly attractive, then getting hard isn't an issue

I'm the same. I've shagged some rotters (civvies) in my time, but never struggled to perform.

When it comes to WG's through, I make sure I've done my research beforehand, so am usually confident they'll be at least reasonably attractive.

[Marmalade]

I had one occasion. In Europe. She looked nice enough from the outside but her attitude was as much fun as a cyborg fresh out of crack on a bad hair day. She went through unoiled mechanical motions but I just kept thinking, what a disgusting specimen of a whore. I mean how hard is it to be reasonably pleasant instead of instead of acting like you crunch live cockroaches for something to do all day?

Her attitude stunk so remarkably to high heaven it was almost fascinating, like watching a train wreck in perpetual slow motion. I took my fuck-you-stick out and the phallus-brain in it must have thought obligingly I'd have the good sense to leave immediately, obediently reducing to inside-trousers size. But I didn't. She stops me, saying let me get you hard again. An offer of a cup of tea would have been far more welcome. But I just said, "good luck", and let her have a go to see how awful she'd be. Pretty awful. So lifted her head up. Told her (with feigned air of sadness), "You're not very good, are you."

It was a gross understatement: but why not be kind. My mind was already grabbing some dinner. The food in that area was not that good either, but sufficient; and the eye-candy was better.

[Anadin]

When I first started punting I'd take a chance on anyone remotely attractive. Now I tend to just stick to my regulars, finding new girls to see is just too stressful and I'm constantly surprised by how different someone can look in a good unmanipulated picture vs real life. That being said I care more about body than face but only up to a point.

[cueball]

I too have podged more than my fair share of civvie munters. Mostly I've no bother getting it up, if they get my trollies down then they'll get a podging.

With regards to paying... I like a wide variety of lasses in age, size, colour and looks.... if I've done my homework and I've decided on her and the punt is a go, if I drop my pants I'll be good to go.

I'll say this though, civvie or prossie.... it's the snogging that initially gets wood for me.

[Steely Dan]

I'll say this though, civvie or prossie.... it's the snogging that initially gets wood for me.

Good to know.  I think now I finally have a suggestions for you.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[cueball]

Good to know.  I think now I finally have a suggestions for you.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Avatar material there sd... Cheers for that 

[bigthickdick]

I'll say this though, civvie or prossie.... it's the snogging that initially gets wood for me.

Same here, I can get a stiffy by other activities too but nothing beats a good old passionate dfk...

[Lydden]

I am new to punting and I must admit I could not go with a girl I did not find attractive , I am going in sober no beer goggles   
I am happy with my choice so far as I keep returning to the same watering hole ! 

[Turtle Z]

Happened to me only last week to someone who is very well reviewed on here who I've seen before. However, the 12 months interim period since our last liaison has not been kind to her. I ended up cracking one off when I got home and had no problem getting hard there. If I don't find them attractive then it ain't happening.

[S.X. MacHine]

When I first started punting I'd take a chance on anyone remotely attractive. Now I tend to just stick to my regulars, finding new girls to see is just too stressful and I'm constantly surprised by how different someone can look in a good unmanipulated picture vs real life. That being said I care more about body than face but only up to a point.

Yes. Regulars are best. But even they retire and then you have to recruit new ones which, I agree, can be stressful.
That said, I've been with a couple of girls who, while not captivating me with their looks initially, proved to have innate talents eg, filthy, interesting genitalia, amusing personality etc. they ended up as good punts.
Ok, so while they weren't Miss. World, they weren't Shrek either. I tend to be picky in my selection criteria, so have avoided really horrible prossies.