Kirby allure

[Robbouk]

Booked via text to see Kirby at her Gateshead location via what's app to allure.
All going well given address minus the door number. Told to ring when arrived for apartment number.
Arrived around 5 mins before booking so rang allure no answer on phone.
Rang up till 15 mins after booking due to start no joy so I left.
Get home to find an abusive what's app message calling me a time wasting cunt.
I have included screen shots of the missed calls i afe to allure.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Robbouk]

Other image as would only let me post one on original post.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[AmyBbw]

Just a little mention ref Wattsap calls - If the other end is on a 'proper call' that connects through the network then Wattsapp calls dont go through, you don't even get a call waiting tone so I'd strongly advise against using it for anything important

[Looking4fun]

Apart from it's upside down I couldn't see a message just call times,unless I'm missing something?

[the game]

Sounds possibly like a whats app issue never used the app myself so don't know the ins and outs of how it works. Did you not try calling or texting?

Or a whats app text message? Again I've never used the app so am happy to be corrected but would assume that if a call is not logged through the app if busy on the other end a message would still go through?

If it is a case of miscommunication because of the app it is bad form from the agency to send abusive messages but you have not screen shot those only the whats app call logs. Your time had been wasted as you had a confirmed booking and you said that all comms up to that point were through whats app so being that you had travelled as advised then I think a negative is justified although it does sound like it could have been avoided if you tried to contact the agency through other routes when you could not get through via whats app calls. 

[Robbouk]

There normal calls the address was sent via what's app.

[The Outsider]

Seems odd that the agency didn't ring you when you were "late".  A quick "Are you lost?" text or call from them would have sorted this out. 

[Robbouk]

Think I will stick with my usual agency now as to be sent abusive messages is not acceptable and granted I was there and they didn't answer their phones is noty problem.

[Darlobloke]

Surely they know what bookings they have. If advised to call for more details on arrival the phones should be manned. Without speaking out of turn, this is quite simple isn't it.  Sp gets a bad review because of agency fuck up. The abuse is bang out of order especially when punter had been trying to get through. Even then abuse shouldn't be dished out by either party.

[@Allure]

To start with you were already banned from my agency for time wasting and booking and not showing and constantly texting and texting.
I had you blocked on phone but I must not of on watsapp.
When you asked Ronnie for a booking it already came up as time waster banned but he decided to give you one more chance and this wouldn't of been the case if I had of been on the phone.
He warned you that this is your last chance and when you didn't show he was pissed off more of himself for giving you another chance.
He received no missed calls, like someone says watsapp may ring on your side but not that doesn't mean it would of rang on the Allure phone.
If the calls were made on a normal call you are blocked so wouldn't of rang anyway.
I'm sorry for the outcome bit of you weren't a time waster to start with you wouldn't of been blocked.
I'm not the only agency that has banned you and most of the independents have as well.

[Robbouk]

Only one agency banned me but regardless of that does it give u the right to call someone a time wasting cunt when as I have shown I tried to contact the agency when I got to the location. Also you say majority of independent girls have banned me I would like to know who as I have seen a few independents who are a lot more reliable that what allure ever was in the time I did use you.
 
Also if I was a time waster then would I have turned up to a booking yesterday with premium.

All I can say then if you want to throw insults about is allure are a bunch of cunts aswell.

[maxxblue]

Only one agency banned me but regardless of that does it give u the right to call someone a time wasting cunt ...

Are you saying that someone from Allure called you a 'time wasting cunt'?

[Robbouk]

Are you saying that someone from Allure called you a 'time wasting cunt'?

Yes I am. I think allure fail to remember when I used them to see sindy they cancelled the booking about 5-10 mins before I got to location bit that seems to be fine if they waste your time so by definition they are also time wasting cunts.
Knowing them the place would have been a shit tip anyways as most of their locations I have been to have been.

[Davya_147]

Ill defo second that one about the condition of the incall flats!!!!

[Tiger63]

Why use an agency that you are banned from?

[Kev3773]

Why use an agency that you are banned from?

I was thinking the same 

[stanleyjohn]

I was thinking the same 

+1

[AnthG]

Get home to find an abusive what's app message calling me a time wasting cunt.
I have included screen shots of the missed calls i afe to allure.

You should have posted a snapshot of this chat as opposed to the missed calls.

I think allure fail to remember when I used them to see sindy they cancelled the booking about 5-10 mins before I got to location bit that seems to be fine if they waste your time so by definition they are also time wasting cunts.

But you never posted a review of that. Or any review of Allure previously?

Booked via text to see Kirby at her Gateshead location via what's app to allure.

Booking via whatsapp seems a bit odd. Especially given Allure are saying they blocked you on the regular phone. Did you know they had previously banned you? As booking via this suggests you did. When you were phoning was the phone engaged, or just ringing off and no answer.

Plus it seems a bit harsh putting this as a review about Kirby when it seems it was all about Allure's handling of the booking process and you never even seen her.

[daviemac]

Plus it seems a bit harsh putting this as a review about Kirby when it seems it was all about Allure's handling of the booking process and you never even seen her.

All seems a bit strange, especially when according to Allure he knew he was banned.       

He warned you that this is your last chance and when you didn't show he was pissed off more of himself for giving you another chance.

As others have said why use an agency that's banned you.   

[Upper Brunei]

Sound like the OP was desperately trying to get round his banning to me.

[Mansell]

I was thinking the same 

+3  God we do seem to get them these days  or is it school holidays 

[Looking4fun]

I take it he's double banned with allure & one other agency now,plus the indies that read this will be wondering why he's banned.
Silly sod if they've banned you why didn't you just stay away?

[AnthG]

I take it he's double banned with allure & one other agency now,plus the indies that read this will be wondering why he's banned.
Silly sod if they've banned you why didn't you just stay away?

I would say it depends if the OP thought this ban was justified to himself or not.

As if he did think it was justified, you'd think he would have just used a different sim card if he still wanted to use them? They would have never known it was him until he put in the review afterwards.

From the looks of it, it seems he has been banned for making bookings with them and not going through with it.

[Upper Brunei]

I would say it depends if the OP thought this ban was justified to himself or not.

As if he did think it was justified, you'd think he would have just used a different sim card if he still wanted to use them? They would have never known it was him until he put in the review afterwards.

From the looks of it, it seems he has been banned for making bookings with them and not going through with it.

I don't think a banning has to be justified?
If any agency  or SP no longer wants your custom they are within their rights to refuse it without explanation.
I think the OP should have taken the hint instead if making a prick out of himself.

[Third Man]

I would say it depends if the OP thought this ban was justified to himself or not.

As if he did think it was justified, you'd think he would have just used a different sim card if he still wanted to use them? They would have never known it was him until he put in the review afterwards.

From the looks of it, it seems he has been banned for making bookings with them and not going through with it.

this different sim cards has been discussed before. punters saying to other punters just use a different sim is in my mind totally wrong. if someone is banned they are banned for a reason, so if its some creep , weirdo, dangerous fuker its ok to use a different sim? i dont think so.

[Kev3773]

this different sim cards has been discussed before. punters saying to other punters just use a different sim is in my mind totally wrong. if someone is banned they are banned for a reason, so if its some creep , weirdo, dangerous fuker its ok to use a different sim? i dont think so.

I agree if you're banned rightly or wrongly stay away 

[Looking4fun]

I think we're maybe speculating on why he was banned but did he know he was banned?if he knew he was banned then he would know the reason,so why try to use the agency again,is he trying to get one over on the agency by posting a negative review or is he desperate to see that young lady?

[AmyBbw]

Robbouk is banned with a fair few of us to be fair, notorious for no shows after continuous, laborious periods of pestering texts, a proper donut! Gives genuine clients on here a bad name.

[Looking4fun]

Robbouk is banned with a fair few of us to be fair, notorious for no shows after continuous, laborious periods of pestering texts, a proper donut! Gives genuine clients on here a bad name.

Oh well that answered my question,thank you

[Kev3773]

Well the Op was on here this evening and no doubt read what has been said, I would have thought he would have defended himself if he could 

[AnthG]

I don't think a banning has to be justified?
If any agency  or SP no longer wants your custom they are within their rights to refuse it without explanation.

Sorry but I do not agree. I mean fine girls themselves, as its their body and whatnot. But agencies, nope noway, they cannot just say to someone "we just don't want your custom" for no good reason. And the punter would have good rights to kick off big style if they ever did do this.

[Upper Brunei]

Sorry but I do not agree. I mean fine girls themselves, as its their body and whatnot. But agencies, nope noway, they cannot just say to someone "we just don't want your custom" for no good reason. And the punter would have good rights to kick off big style if they ever did do this.

Any business can refuse anyone's custom whenever they want.
No one has a divine right to punt.

[Kev3773]

Sorry but I do not agree. I mean fine girls themselves, as its their body and whatnot. But agencies, nope noway, they cannot just say to someone "we just don't want your custom" for no good reason. And the punter would have good rights to kick off big style if they ever did do this.

Have to disagree and why would you want to go somewhere that you're not welcome anyway 

[Upper Brunei]

Sorry but I do not agree. I mean fine girls themselves, as its their body and whatnot. But agencies, nope noway, they cannot just say to someone "we just don't want your custom" for no good reason. And the punter would have good rights to kick off big style if they ever did do this.

Surely 'kicking off' with an agency who has banned you is only going to further serve to convince them that you are a nutter who deserves to be banned??

[Upper Brunei]

Have to disagree and why would you want to go somewhere that you're not welcome anyway 

In all fairness I don't think I'm particularly welcome between our lasses legs but I occasionally try to go there.....

[AnthG]

So I am not misunderstood. I will give an example of what I think is a good one to prove what I am thinking. I still remember this small scandal back in 2006 in the console gaming scene. Hence why I am quoting it now. At the time there was a large online store called MrModchips. If you wanted to customise your games consoles this would be the first website you'd look at. Here is the story copied and pasted. This made the press and all sorts this.

____________

July 27, 2006; UK Company Mr Modchips Takes The Terrorist Side

An Israeli customer had ordered some computer chips from a company in the UK called MrModChips.........the following is the true story...................

Asaf Linden decided to order some computer chips for his games console from a company with a UK website. He put in his credit card number, got a confirmation e-mail and waited. Little did he know that he was now marked as a war criminal.

After a few days he checked in with the site and found that his transaction was now "VOID". So he wrote a perfectly reasonable e-mail to ask why.

I've ordered a Qoobchip Pro and the order's status is currently VOID, why is that? Imagine his surprise to get the following reply:

"You are viewed as a fraud risk and it is company policy not to support people whos government kill innocent civilians and children. Thank You"

Asaf didn't pull his punches with his reply:

1. I never killed anyone in my life. 2. I am a British passport holder (and would be happy to send you a photocopy of my passport). 3. If we are being political, I seem to remember a few children dying in Iraq and the United Kingdom fighting there. Right? 4. Israel was attacked first by Lebanon but I don't seem to recall when the UK was last attacked by Iraq or am I forgetting something?
Mixing your business with politics is not a good idea, I presume you made a mistake and regret that but if not, tell me about it and I will pass your comments to the British Department of Trade and Industry.

Ma'ariv have tried to contact the company, which is actually in Thailand but to no avail.
________________

A load of people swore off using them after this person posted this story. In my eyes he was totally right for kicking off publicly about this and not just taking it and keeping quiet. And in my eyes if an agency said. Nope sorry. We don't want your custom. And couldn't come up with a legitimate reason why. I will definitely post something about it.

[Upper Brunei]

I don't think the OP has been banned due to the complex geo political situation in the Middle East. I think it's because they think he's a time wasting cunt???

[Kev3773]

Anth, I Think you should have took that time out that many suggested recently 

[daviemac]

I don't think the OP has been banned due to the complex geo political situation in the Middle East. I think it's because they think he's a time wasting cunt???

+ 1

Also there's very few service providers, of any sort, who have a legal or moral obligation to provide the service just because someone's willing to pay. Far example a pub can refuse you without a reason. 

If you're barred from anywhere just accept it and go somewhere you'd be welcome.

[AnthG]

I don't think the OP has been banned due to the complex geo political situation in the Middle East. I think it's because they think he's a time wasting cunt???

I know this. This is getting very cross purposes this now. I was the one that even suggested this was the reason the guy had likely been banned. But what I also said was agencies shouldn't just ban someone for no reason whatsoever.

Which a whole series of people were then saying "why not, of course they can". And then 'any company can refuse someone service for any reason they want'.

So I gave this as an example showing, nope they cannot. As this company doing this lost a lot of service from other people.

My point is, agencies shouldn't just ban people for no good reason. And if a punter is on the receiving end of that. He rightly should post about it on the forums kicking off.

[daviemac]

I know this. This is getting very cross purposes this now. I was the one that even suggested this was the reason the guy had likely been banned. But what I also said was agencies shouldn't just ban someone for no reason whatsoever.

Which a whole series of people were then saying "why not, of course they can". And then 'any company can refuse someone service for any reason they want'.

So I gave this as an example showing, nope they cannot. As this company doing this lost a lot of service from other people.

My point is, agencies shouldn't just ban people for no good reason. And if a punter is on the receiving end of that. He rightly should post about it on the forums kicking off.

Anth, they've posted the reason he's been banned, they say he's a timewaster. 

To start with you were already banned from my agency for time wasting and booking and not showing and constantly texting and texting.
I had you blocked on phone but I must not of on watsapp.
When you asked Ronnie for a booking it already came up as time waster banned but he decided to give you one more chance and this wouldn't of been the case if I had of been on the phone.
He warned you that this is your last chance and when you didn't show he was pissed off more of himself for giving you another chance.
He received no missed calls, like someone says watsapp may ring on your side but not that doesn't mean it would of rang on the Allure phone.
If the calls were made on a normal call you are blocked so wouldn't of rang anyway.
I'm sorry for the outcome bit of you weren't a time waster to start with you wouldn't of been blocked.
I'm not the only agency that has banned you and most of the independents have as well.

Whether that's true or not I don't know, but that's their reason.

Right or wrong, in English law service providers are not legally required to supply that service, you may not agree with it but that's just how it is.

[Robbouk]

Robbouk is banned with a fair few of us to be fair, notorious for no shows after continuous, laborious periods of pestering texts, a proper donut! Gives genuine clients on here a bad name.

Banned from bonds after confirmation a lady was coming to see me at a hotel I had specifically booked in order to see her.
Rang up just before I booked into hotel and yes lady is on way let me know when booked in room number.
Got booked in gave them room number and few minutes later they rang me on hotel room phone to say she could now not make it but they had another lady available. I declined saying I had wanted to see the specific lady I had booked and if had wanted to see another lady then I would have booked her instead.

Bonds then seen I posted this on another person's negative review so banned me.

Seems agencies can do and say as they want but punters can't soon as u say anything negative about an agency bang they ban you.

[Tiger63]

Banned from bonds after confirmation a lady was coming to see me at a hotel I had specifically booked in order to see her.
Rang up just before I booked into hotel and yes lady is on way let me know when booked in room number.
Got booked in gave them room number and few minutes later they rang me on hotel room phone to say she could now not make it but they had another lady available. I declined saying I had wanted to see the specific lady I had booked and if had wanted to see another lady then I would have booked her instead.

Bonds then seen I posted this on another person's negative review so banned me.

Seems agencies can do and say as they want but punters can't soon as u say anything negative about an agency bang they ban you.

What about the alegations of you being a consistant no show?.....be honest

[Kev3773]

Robbo, while you're online can you tell us why you tried to book with Agency when you knew you were banned ? Also you said earlier you were only banned from one agency but it appears now it is 2 Bonds + Allure 

[Robbouk]

You can't b a constant no show if the agency does not inform you that you are banned until after u have sent some messages asking to see ladies with no replies and then when you send another message asking why they are not replying they then tell you what you are banned as you can't be a no show if you don't even get a booking confirmation or address. Also an agency can cancel a booking 10 mins before appoinent and that is seen on in their eyes even when they know you have travelled quite a distance to see the lady in question.

In all honesty I had forgotten than allure had banned me and was only reminded of this when I booked Kirby and when they said woukd give me one more chance I thought champion.
I got to the location and rang them from my phone on a normal phone call not what's app. I would have thought the person on the other end would have unblocked my number in order to be able to get in touch with me so on that hand they have to accept that part was an error on their behalf.

[Mansell]

Anth, they've posted the reason he's been banned, they say he's a timewaster. 

Whether that's true or not I don't know, but that's their reason.

Right or wrong, in English law service providers are not legally required to supply that service, you may not agree with it but that's just how it is.

+1  Anth, Davie and the others are absolutely right. One of the best things about having your own business is being able to tell the aresholes of this world to Fuck Right Off, unlike when you work for someone and have to take the shit Your talking absolute bollocks and the law backs that up. Have a break m8.

Robbouk, you can say all you like, but if more than one agency has banned you sorry but I for one don;t have much sympathy. You give the rest of us decent punters a bad name. Either sort yourself out or punting aint for you.

[Moresomes]

In all honesty I had forgotten than allure had banned me

You must have a helluva bad memory. If an agency had banned me, I can't see it slipping my mind.
I'd be well pissed off about it.

[daviemac]

 Robbouk

So you're not complaining about the original ban, therefore that must have been justified, you just forgot about it.     

Personally I find it hard to believe anyone would forget about being banned from somewhere, unless you've been banned from so many places you can't keep track. (starting to look likely)   Still puzzles me why you went ahead when they told you about the ban, the last thing I would do was give a place my custom after they'd banned me.

All very strange.

[Mansell]

Robbouk

So you're not complaining about the original ban, therefore that must have been justified, you just forgot about it.     

Personally I find it hard to believe anyone would forget about being banned from somewhere, unless you've been banned from so many places you can't keep track. (starting to look likely)   Still puzzles me why you went ahead when they told you about the ban, the last thing I would do was give a place my custom after they'd banned me.

All very strange.

It does make his first review about another Amour problem look suspicious, especially as he said he wouldn't use them again ??

As you say very strange  unbeleivably so ??

[LydiaAmour]

Robbouk is banned from amour for being a serious text pest, incessant texting when he did and didn't have a booking with a girl, we are talking 100 texts a day. He also abused the amour forum private messaging system, bombarding girls with messages then never actually making booking. He then got obsessed with one girl in particular and began harassing her to the point where she threatened to get the police involved, he then came onto the amour forum to say he was quitting punting due to receiving nasty threatening messages. When stacey looked into it, the messages he was talking about were from the above girl in question telling him to leave her alone or she would get the police involved. So he's been banned from amour for quite a while.

I've never met Robbouk, but seeing as Stacey is banned from here I thought I would inform you all why he is banned from amour too. Bonds can clarify as she was working with amour at the time.