Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: How many guys on this site have punted with a wg from this site  (Read 10786 times)

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,226

Offline Uglybugball

Don't go to all that trouble just buy yourself one of these... http://www.lastnightoffreedom.co.uk/stag-night-shop/masks/george-clooney-mask/

Three quid well  spent on saving your punting fee, ParisB happy cos you look like George, everyone a winner.  :D

Good call.  :drinks:

Might get the real G.C lined up for Paris, with a G.C mask on...that would be a little weird.   :hi:


Offline Uglybugball

good news all i should be home by end of the week
so hopefully back into playtime in the next 3 weeks or so  :yahoo:

That's good to hear.  :hi:

Offline anjin

My first ever punt was Sarahs Back, and she provided everything I could have wanted from a first punt, especially as I was so nervous. I'm not aware of any other WG's that are near to me, but then I've not been on here too long.

Offline Acer

Lads, get to the back of the queue, I'm seeing Rebecca first.

Babe, when you're ready!  ;)  :rose:



at least some of their posts drew me to book them.

It's all part of passive advertising. Just hanging out on a punting forum, flirting a bit, putting up provocative avatars will get additional appointments. Even the ones that don't use their working name I expect have been nagged for it.

It's the familiarity and interaction that eventually does it. A forum is a small virtual space and I guess the day in day out interaction will inevitably lead to forum members suddenly pointing their penises towards the forum WG's. Posts do count for a lot as you say because despite no one having seen a picture of for example cassielane or WOB people still want to meet them. Rebecca who started off very unpopular now seems to have a waiting list and Paris..well...that avatar is not playing fair.

Without inflating too many ego's sarahjayneleeds, sarah's back and mystique have all posted enough sensible stuff to reassure they will always put the punter first and I believe a couple of them already have positive reviews on here. Fair play to them if their presence here has led to more £££'s especially without them having to tout.

For the WG members it's an easy and free way to get new clients. The major advantage for them is they are getting clients they already know a lot about. So for them it's very much the case of 'better the devil you know than the devil you don't' and also if they know what you like then that's half the battle won.

I just hope everyone can stay objective enough to give a negative review if one is ever warranted.

Offline Marmalade

I just hope everyone can stay objective enough to give a negative review if one is ever warranted.

A spot-on post. I've simply highlighted the last sentence to emphasise it.  Any glowing UKP reports of sessions with women contacted through the prossie's active presence on here are clearly biassed. With thousands of prossies to choose from, selecting from the one or two that get away with gloating on UKP is suspect. Prossies that say they participate just for the banter are generally lying. If it is done sufficiently subtly and they contribute substantially to the punters' viewpoints, fair enough. But if UKP gets a rep for being a place to contact these egregious specimens, then its objective status could fly out of the window.

Offline Uglybugball

It's all part of passive advertising. Just hanging out on a punting forum, flirting a bit, putting up provocative avatars will get additional appointments. Even the ones that don't use their working name I expect have been nagged for it.

It's the familiarity and interaction that eventually does it. A forum is a small virtual space and I guess the day in day out interaction will inevitably lead to forum members suddenly pointing their penises towards the forum WG's. Posts do count for a lot as you say because despite no one having seen a picture of for example cassielane or WOB people still want to meet them. Rebecca who started off very unpopular now seems to have a waiting list and Paris..well...that avatar is not playing fair.

Without inflating too many ego's sarahjayneleeds, sarah's back and mystique have all posted enough sensible stuff to reassure they will always put the punter first and I believe a couple of them already have positive reviews on here. Fair play to them if their presence here has led to more £££'s especially without them having to tout.

For the WG members it's an easy and free way to get new clients. The major advantage for them is they are getting clients they already know a lot about. So for them it's very much the case of 'better the devil you know than the devil you don't' and also if they know what you like then that's half the battle won.

I just hope everyone can stay objective enough to give a negative review if one is ever warranted.

Good points well made.

The ones so far identified are well established and essentially, the background/research has already been carried out. Their characters are now well known, it's now an individuals choice if they want to meet up and shag. It's just a question of when.

This is the trick that Saafe have missed. Imagine if they had opened their doors/legs and let the punters post. They wouldn't be moaning about dusty phones that's for sure.  :hi:

I'd be surprised if there was a negative posted, however we're all capable of being objective.

Offline smiths

It's all part of passive advertising. Just hanging out on a punting forum, flirting a bit, putting up provocative avatars will get additional appointments. Even the ones that don't use their working name I expect have been nagged for it.

It's the familiarity and interaction that eventually does it. A forum is a small virtual space and I guess the day in day out interaction will inevitably lead to forum members suddenly pointing their penises towards the forum WG's. Posts do count for a lot as you say because despite no one having seen a picture of for example cassielane or WOB people still want to meet them. Rebecca who started off very unpopular now seems to have a waiting list and Paris..well...that avatar is not playing fair.

Without inflating too many ego's sarahjayneleeds, sarah's back and mystique have all posted enough sensible stuff to reassure they will always put the punter first and I believe a couple of them already have positive reviews on here. Fair play to them if their presence here has led to more £££'s especially without them having to tout.

For the WG members it's an easy and free way to get new clients. The major advantage for them is they are getting clients they already know a lot about. So for them it's very much the case of 'better the devil you know than the devil you don't' and also if they know what you like then that's half the battle won.

I just hope everyone can stay objective enough to give a negative review if one is ever warranted.

Indeed, good post. ;) In my case i only had good or better punts with the 14 forum WGs i knew posted on the same forum as me, if i had had bad i would of posted about it/them irrespective of the WG/s being on the same forum. Obviously that relies on people believing me as it never happened in practice.

Any glowing UKP reports of sessions with women contacted through the prossie's active presence on here are clearly biassed. With thousands of prossies to choose from, selecting from the one or two that get away with gloating on UKP is suspect. Prossies that say they participate just for the banter are generally lying. If it is done sufficiently subtly and they contribute substantially to the punters' viewpoints, fair enough. But if UKP gets a rep for being a place to contact these egregious specimens, then its objective status could fly out of the window.

Prossies come and go but what we have built here on this site particularly the principles and stances need to stay. A lot of painful and very expensive experiences have gone into teaching fellow punters the common pitfalls and how to keep their guard up. Despite how sweet UKP WG's appear we must never forget the basic ethos of the site nor why we are here.

Don't get me wrong I think some of the WG's we have here are lovely but I wouldn't hesitate for a second to pull out my proverbial club on even my favourites should they not be practising what they preach or especially on another punter who was so infactuated that he was putting up false reviews.

I'm pretty sure there are a few members left that will not let UKP turn into a fluff factory. Lets hope it never comes to that.  :drinks:

Offline Tailpipe

Indeed, good post. ;) In my case i only had good or better punts with the 14 forum WGs i knew posted on the same forum as me, if i had had bad i would of posted about it/them irrespective of the WG/s being on the same forum. Obviously that relies on people believing me as it never happened in practice.


Of the 14 punts you had with forum members were they awhere that you were posting on the same forum.

Guessing that they did is that the reason they were good or better as if that is anyway the case
Then then punter did benefit from the engagement with a forum WG.

So you could say that the forum did its job and help the punter.


There are 3 in my area (South West) I aim to meet up with this year.   :hi:

1. Rebecca
2. Louise
3. ParisB

Others, (if I knew their AW name),  Cassie Lane, Whore of Babylon.

I'd like to be the first in the queue to see Rebecca when she's ready again, reckon that would be a hot session...for me anyway.. :rolleyes:


For me, even though she seems wind people up on this forum, it would be LovelySofia92 ..... mmmmmm .......  :rose:

I like her style.

She's in my "hot hot hot" list ..... but I am rather put off by the idea of sending a photo ...... then she'd never see me  :crazy:

Hmmmmm ..... wonder if she'd fall for the old bait and switch? ;)

Offline Tailpipe


For me, even though she seems wind people up on this forum, it would be LovelySofia92 ..... mmmmmm .......  :rose:

I like her style.

She's in my "hot hot hot" list ..... but I am rather put off by the idea of sending a photo ...... then she'd never see me  :crazy:

Hmmmmm ..... wonder if she'd fall for the old bait and switch? ;)

Plus she has the worst feedback I have ever seen and she is only 20 on balance I think she is
Sweet and that for some reason she has attracted a troll or two .

Very pretty lady for sure , has taken a lot of stick on the forum over the picture issue.

Someone from the forum needs to go punt and right full report , may be get a discount
As I think she is £200 an hour .


Offline James999


For me, even though she seems wind people up on this forum, it would be LovelySofia92 ..... mmmmmm .......  :rose:

I like her style.

She's in my "hot hot hot" list ..... but I am rather put off by the idea of sending a photo ...... then she'd never see me  :crazy:

Hmmmmm ..... wonder if she'd fall for the old bait and switch? ;)

Borrow the oe I use


Oh, and if she asks for proof of nationality send her this:


Italian flag


Offline Uglybugball


Hmmmmm ..... wonder if she'd fall for the old bait and switch? ;)

Okay, I'll let you borrow my picture of 10 years ago..


Borrow the oe I use



Yup, that's me all right.

Well, ok not me exactly but there is a definite likeness ......

I have the same jacket as he does .....

The clothes maketh the man, right?
« Last Edit: April 16, 2013, 10:28:09 PM by Cruel_Toby_Kind »


Offline lovelysofia92

Or the "Italian flag" as she knows it



When you've got nothing clever to say, play the Romanian card. It never fails, does it? :)

They sure weren't joking about English humour  :D

Offline Matium

Sofia, can I have a booking?

Here's my photo:



Offline lovelysofia92

Sofia, can I have a booking?

Here's my photo:



 :rolleyes:

Ironically, I'm not that into super bulky guys.

Offline Matium

Ooh, there's just no pleasing some women!

 :angry:


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)