Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Laura Superstar  (Read 16819 times)

Offline baltar

But agency can advertise her properly which is the main point of joining the parlour.

Yes but maybe they were taking too much money  :unknown: I mean you dont leave an agency and put your prices up if you arent getting the clients.

She says she moves about in the 3 locations because she says its busier than if you just stay at one place.

Offline ghighi

She built up her clients base while working in HOD, then she became indie and the previous HOD clients follow her. She then put her price up.
The main point of "tours" or "move location" is to attract more new clients. Everyone knows that.

Offline baltar

She built up her clients base while working in HOD, then she became indie and the previous HOD clients follow her. She then put her price up.
The main point of "tours" or "move location" is to attract more new clients. Everyone knows that.

Oh ok I thought you were saying that she would have been better of there still.

Online mrhappypants


And how does the sound of a bear differ from the sound of another animal... like a pig say ? :D

Offline tightfoot69

I saw Laura 3 times when she worked in MK. There are very few WGs I have seen 3 times so that says how good I thought she was. Despite not being a total knockout I found her attractive. But it was her attitude that has probably has her a following as it is/was pretty much faultless.

Her sister worked in MK for a bit as well who was equally as good.

Even though she has put her prices up I may return one day.

Offline smiths

Yes but maybe they were taking too much money  :unknown: I mean you dont leave an agency and put your prices up if you arent getting the clients.

She says she moves about in the 3 locations because she says its busier than if you just stay at one place.

HOD is a Parlour not an Agency, they arent the same thing.

Many WGs go Indie from Parlours and charge more than they did at the Parlour, been the case for many years. HOD used to charge WGs a third, a punter recently said its now 40%, no idea if that is correct but i dont blame any WG for deciding to go Indie once ready.

Offline smiths

She built up her clients base while working in HOD, then she became indie and the previous HOD clients follow her. She then put her price up.
The main point of "tours" or "move location" is to attract more new clients. Everyone knows that.

Indeed, a very common occurence, Natasha and Kitty both did this to name but 2.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2013, 02:50:32 PM by smiths »

Offline smiths

But agency can advertise her properly which is the main point of joining the parlour.

There are two main reasons to work for a Parlour as opposed to an Agency which is a different thing. One is as you say they get the punters in for the WG, the other is a Parlour provides the premises for the WG to work out of, by far the biggest expense is renting a premises of course, and especially in London. Also some just want to arrive at the Parlour, do their shift and go, they dont want the hassle as they see it of getting punters, renting premises and making their own profiles/sites.

Offline ghighi

But smith, agency also provides the places for wg to work, isnt?. so, what is the main difference between parlour and agency?

Offline smiths

But smith, agency also provides the places for wg to work, isnt?. so, what is the main difference between parlour and agency?

Many dont, its the WGs own premises as in my own Agency punting experiences in the past. Basically a smart Agency shouldnt use premises they rent/own as that clearly makes it a brothel, by using the WGs own premises there is a chance they could get away with not being nicked. That obviously depends on how in-depth the police wish to investigate of course.

So many Agencies are charging the same or even up to 50% of a WGs fee yet dont provide the WG with the premises like a Parlour, thats why i always say an Agency especially in London is just putting punters prices up through greed.

Offline ghighi

Many dont, its the WGs own premises as in my own Agency punting experiences in the past. Basically a smart Agency shouldnt use premises they rent/own as that clearly makes it a brothel, by using the WGs own premises there is a chance they could get away with not being nicked. That obviously depends on how in-depth the police wish to investigate of course.

So many Agencies are charging the same or even up to 50% of a WGs fee yet dont provide the WG with the premises like a Parlour, thats why i always say an Agency especially in London is just putting punters prices up through greed.
What is the definition of brothel ? Its like there is no difference between brothel and parlour. As they both provides place for wgs to work and take commission from each wgs.

Offline smiths

What is the definition of brothel ? Its like there is no difference between brothel and parlour. As they both provides place for wgs to work and take commission from each wgs.

A Parlour IS a brothel. Any same premises one or more WGs work from even alone but on separate days is a brothel, with the staff running it breaking the law, even if a WG answers the phone to punters she is technically breaking the law.

Only where a Indie WG works alone at all times from her own premises is that not a brothel. Even then unless she owns the freehold there is a good chance she is breaking the terms of her Mortgage, Lease or Rental agreement which could see her get evicted dependent on the landlord. This is why some brothels get their premises through dodgy landlords who in exchange for renting the premises out as a brothel, take a higher than market rent, sometimes a much higher than market rent.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2013, 03:53:50 PM by smiths »

Offline vt

Quote
The above member is banned and has multiple accounts, all touting "laura superstar":

torro: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8089
vicky: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8701
ashdr: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8082
DT1: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8057
kinger: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8826
Daredevil: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=9004

Bizarre...I had torro & vickyv down as Laura, same foreign English...but all of them?...she must have a multiple personality disorder!

I had a pm conversation with DT1, he's definitely a native English speaker, but did seem to know a lot about Laura, mind you she always was pretty open about stuff.

I'm still of the same opinion about her...she's not a stunner but she is about as full-on as it gets, almost scarily so if you're not prepared, nevertheless £150 is probably too much when there are lots of nice attractive, sensual girls for a lot less. No doubt why she was touting herself on here to drum up a bit more interest.


Offline ghighi

What? so all of the people been banned above are Laura herself? :scare:

Offline andrei

i think all adam said was they shared the same ip address so could be her or could be the nutter punter someone mentioned she had following her
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)