Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: If a Prostitute Finds a Man Ugly. Ok to Turn him Away  (Read 29702 times)

Offline AnthG

Given the disputes in this other thread. I was hoping for a definitive poll on the subject.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=12174.msg184654#msg184654

So a prostitute takes a booking. The guy turns up at the door and he is unattractive. He is clean, he has the cash. But he looks like Mick Jagger  :)  is she ok to turn him away and refuse to see him?

Yes or No.

For the record I am voting, no.

He looks like Mick Jagger? Maybe he IS Mick Jagger.

Offline smiths

Given the disputes in this other thread. I was hoping for a definitive poll on the subject.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=12174.msg184654#msg184654

So a prostitute takes a booking. The guy turns up at the door and he is unattractive. He is clean, he has the cash. But he looks like Mick Jagger  :)  is she ok to turn him away and refuse to see him?

Yes or No.

For the record I am voting, no.

I dont view it as being ok or not ok. Its down to the WG, assuming she has free choice so up to her who she punts with.

Being realistic a smart WG will know she will meet some ugly to her punters though so being picky might lead to a dusty phone.

If it happened to me i certainly wouldnt be too happy though as what i look like is irrelevant in my view and what my money is partly for. Its punting not dating so WGs shouldnt need to find a punter attractive to be able to suck and fuck him in my opinion. Being clean and having the agreed cash is the punters end of the deal as i see it.

Offline PompeyChap

It's perfectly fine for her to turn a customer away but he'll probably end up leaving her nasty feedback. We've all walked away from WGs who've looked nothing like their pictures or who haven't put pictures up so it's perfectly fine for them to do the same.

You'll get a few girls who's got a stick so far up their arse they won't see anyone who doesn't look like a movie star but these are the girls who sit at home wondering where all the cash is. The vast majority of girls know to button up bear through it and think of the money.

If a WG does turn a customer away what's he going to do? Call the police? It's her loss anyway, she's not getting the money.

Curious6705

It's OK for a WG to choose to turn a man away - it's her free choice IMO. Telling him it's because she finds him too ugly is not OK (even if that is the real reason) - that is just stupid and rude.

Online jackdaw

In the circumstances mentioned, (assuming punter had not led her on beforehand to expect Adonis) then it would be harsh in the extreme to turn the geezer away.

BUT I have no problems at all with WG's who make it clear beforehand that they will not see certain people, and who "enforce" that by refusing to see such an individual if he ignores that clear statement and turns up anyway.

What's point of WG seeing somebody if she knows in her heart that she cannot such a person good service?

Offline jasmine

Of course it's up to the escort if she wishes to turn a client down, but she won't last long in the job if she's got such a superficial attitude over appearance. I completely agree with sending smelly and rude clients away, because that borders on selling your sanity rather than selling sex services! If I turned every client I deemed as physically unattractive away I would've missed out on so many lovely kind clients, and also not have such a good regular client base. Sometimes the most physically attractive clients can be the dullest. As long as clients treat me with the respect they expect in return then we are likely to have a nice time together.

If I put myself in the clients shoes and imagined getting excited about seeing an attractive woman, getting ready and taking along a lot of money to give her, then to be turned away based on my looks I'd be devastated. It's cruel. Often the most unattractive clients are very grateful to have a woman be nice to them and make them feel desired. It's lovely when you see what a confidence boost you can give to someone by just doing what you're paid for.  :rose:

If a prostitute discriminates in any way she should state it upfront on her profile. That way she can be avoided by those who may/do not meet her requirements.

Win-Win.  :hi:

If I put myself in the clients shoes and imagined getting excited about seeing an attractive woman, getting ready and taking along a lot of money to give her, then to be turned away based on my looks I'd be devastated. It's cruel. Often the most unattractive clients are very grateful to have a woman be nice to them and make them feel desired. It's lovely when you see what a confidence boost you can give to someone by just doing what you're paid for.  :rose:

I would be more upset about having my time wasted.  :rose: :D

Offline crystaldenison

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 132
while its a tad stupid (in my eyes)  turning a guy away just for being ugly,  the WG has that "choice" its her body her choice simples

Offline Uglybugball

He looks like Mick Jagger? Maybe he IS Mick Jagger.

I've got a tongue like Mick Jagger....


Online Jimmyredcab

If a prostitute discriminates in any way she should state it upfront on her profile. That way she can be avoided by those who may/do not meet her requirements.

Win-Win.  :hi:

Total cobblers.   :hi:

A black man would know that he is a black man whereas an ugly man may not realise he is actually ugly.    :hi:

Offline portable

I'd say 'no' it's not right. Based purely on the idea that this hypothetical man is only 'ugly', and that he is otherwise a decent, intelligent man.

You'd be right to say it's her choice on who she sees, but if she's the sort to turn someone away purely because of looks, then I'd rather not meet them myself. Smacks of pure arrogance, and the type who just wants to look sexy with a sexy guy and then take his cash. A free choice, but a free choice that's judgmental, and even insecure. Ideally a WG would be someone with a passion for physical fun, and who would welcome someone else to it, who might not otherwise be getting the chance to.

I guess in reality it just takes a little confidence, honesty and communication for both parties, then they can relax and get on with what should be a good time together.





Offline Louise 100% British

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,032
It's hardly decent business sense to turn down clients you find physically unattractive.
If you cannot provide a good, realistic service unless you would fuck them in civvy life, then its pretty pointless being an escort.

I expect clients to be clean, polite and hand over the correct money :coolgirl:
Just like the majority of girls.

There is also the rule of discretion, How is a wg going to tell the man that he is to ugly for her?! Turn him away at the door?This could create an awkward and potentially dangerous situation. Not smart.
 I would be surprised if a wg could make decent cash from the guys willing to send photos.
I think any wg who thinks that it is ok to break the discretion side of things wont last very long in the business.

I also suppose that it would only apply to indies, because a parlour/agency would never turn away business, whether this is based on attractiveness, weight, disability, race etc...

I voted no.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2013, 03:47:49 PM by Louise »

Offline Louise 100% British

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,032
while its a tad stupid (in my eyes)  turning a guy away just for being ugly,  the WG has that "choice" its her body her choice simples

How can it be your body if you sell it  to strangers on a daily basis?
I bet half the time you don't know the blokes name, and if you do it's bound to be fake.
I only know a few of my clients real names.
Your body is yours when you quit selling it imo. :)
« Last Edit: April 13, 2013, 03:46:38 PM by Louise »

Offline smiths

If a prostitute discriminates in any way she should state it upfront on her profile. That way she can be avoided by those who may/do not meet her requirements.

Win-Win.  :hi:

In this scenario though one WGs ugly punter could well be anothers ok looking punter, it can be a matter of opinion as its subjective who is ugly and who is not to different WGs. When a WG says no blacks and/or Asians welcome their colour is obvious to see so its clear there wouldnt be any point in booking the WG.  On looks the punter themselves might think they look ok and as its not usual to send photos to WGs before a punt the WG wont know whether she finds the punter ok or ugly until she opens her door to him.

So if WGs stated "no ugly punters welcome" on their profiles they would risk losing out in my view, as they might alienate some punters, and still get ugly to them guys booking who think they look ok, and others who the WGs would think ok but think they are ugly so dont bother booking. Not smart business in my opinion.

while its a tad stupid (in my eyes)  turning a guy away just for being ugly,  the WG has that "choice" its her body her choice simples

Given that it's not a dating service, I think it's unprofessional to discriminate for any reason beyond basic hygiene and manners.

Unprofessional prostitutes are best avoided in my opinion.

To be clear, just because I see prostitution as a profession as opposed to a dating service, it does not mean that others are forced to see it the same way.

Offline smiths

Total cobblers.   :hi:

A black man would know that he is a black man whereas an ugly man may not realise he is actually ugly.    :hi:

Got there before me Jim, yes total cobblers which doesnt take any account that looks are subjective and people themselves might consider themselves ugly or ok looking but some others would think the opposite. ;)

Total cobblers.   :hi:

A black man would know that he is a black man whereas an ugly man may not realise he is actually ugly.    :hi:

If a prostitute states that she discriminates based on looks, why would anyone risk make a booking?

There is no telling what an individual prostitute finds attractive in her personal life.  :unknown:

Offline random

Difficult one this. If his looks really get to her but she accepts him anyway chances are her service will be poor so wasted money, on the other hand if she turns him away he's saved his money but could feel humiliated. If looks are a big issue there ought to be some sort of indication towards that on her profile to avoid this sort of situation. 

Offline smiths

I'd say 'no' it's not right. Based purely on the idea that this hypothetical man is only 'ugly', and that he is otherwise a decent, intelligent man.

You'd be right to say it's her choice on who she sees, but if she's the sort to turn someone away purely because of looks, then I'd rather not meet them myself. Smacks of pure arrogance, and the type who just wants to look sexy with a sexy guy and then take his cash. A free choice, but a free choice that's judgmental, and even insecure. Ideally a WG would be someone with a passion for physical fun, and who would welcome someone else to it, who might not otherwise be getting the chance to.

I guess in reality it just takes a little confidence, honesty and communication for both parties, then they can relax and get on with what should be a good time together.

What if he is as thick as two short planks and makes Forest Gump look like Einstein?

Online jackdaw



So if WGs stated "no ugly punters welcome" on their profiles they would risk losing out in my view, as they might alienate some punters, and still get ugly to them guys booking who think they look ok, and others who the WGs would think ok but think they are ugly so dont bother booking. Not smart business in my opinion.

I suspect WGs that go down this route ask for a photo in advance.

Of course, the net effect is to severely limit their WG income.

It is her choice. Ugly is a perception, not objective. We may not like being turned away but whether it is a pub or a working lady anyone has a choice to turn away business, whether we like it or not is immaterial. This is not about reason or reasons, it is free choice.

On the same basis we look at a lady opening the door and something puts us off so we turn around and walk.

Online Jimmyredcab

If a prostitute states that she discriminates based on looks, why would anyone risk make a booking?


I have never seen a profile that states you must be good looking, I have seen dozens that say no blacks or asians.

If a guy looked like Daniel Craig it is unlikely he would be searching Adultwork.    :hi:

Offline smiths

If a prostitute states that she discriminates based on looks, why would anyone risk make a booking?

There is no telling what an individual prostitute finds attractive in her personal life.  :unknown:

Which is why stating such a thing wouldnt be a smart thing to do in my view. In an earlier post you said they should state it, yet they cant know till they have actually seen the punter if he really is ugly to them or not, plus this would put off some punters who think they are ugly but the WG might not agree.

There is no telling what a WG finds attractive in both their work and personal lives in my opinion.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)