Given that Largecock has the remarkable gift of channeling Barbara Cartland, and was able to convince at least 3 wily old punters that he is a delicate middle aged lady, I cannot, for the life of me, see what misdemeanour Dekka is meant to have committed.
If the conclusion of this toe curling fluff fest is that it is wrong to flag up suspicious reviews then I would suggest the "clique", in there hounding of Dekka, have forgotten the general ethos of this site and maybe Admin should be called upon for adjudication to put an end to the spat.
The story so far.
....LargeC, a reputable member, is good enough to post a review for the benefit of us all
....Another punter infers strongly that not only is this a fluffy review as it contains the 'yummy' word (fuck me he should have his bollocks chopped of for that) but also that the review is a fake, 'suspicious' review from the service provider
....2/3 regulars point out that LargeC has been around for sometime and that because of that his contributions should be taken in the spirit in which they are given and the overwhelming likely hood is that the review is indeed a genuine one.
....on the back of this we get accusations of there being a 'Clique' but no acknowledgement that the 'yummy' hater might, just might, have made a wrong appraisal of the situation.
....Benson then jumps in suggesting that Admin gets involved for reasons I can't quite comprehend.
A suggestion like that, for what really is a none issue, does seem a tad fluffy!!
