Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: gorgeous_naomi adultwork  (Read 7221 times)


6 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 1908311) (5 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Jason

Escort name: Naomi (gorgeous_naomi)   
Adultwork Profile: https://www.adultwork.com/1908311
Phone number: +447596835302
Date of Visit: 09/04/2013, Time of Visit: 16:00,  Type of Visit: Incall 
Time Spent: 2 hours, Fee Paid: £180

Meeting arrangement:
I contacted Naomi the day before the meeting via text message asking her about her availability, a confirmation of her rates etc. She replied almost immediately and we agreed the meeting details. I then confirmed (via phone) two hours before the meeting took place but Naomi had to rearrange the meeting time for one hour later (she moved it from 15:00 to 16:00). As that was not an issue for me I decided to proceed with the booking. Naomi sent me her hotel name and once I was in the hotel lobby she texted me her room number.

About the venue:
I met Naomi directly in her hotel room. The hotel itself is a large 4 star hotel, very close to the High Street Kensington underground station (4 mins walk). Because the hotel is very large it is very discreet and unnoticeable to pass through the reception, go to the lifts and then to her room (nb you don’t need a card in order to use the lifts). The room itself is a standard double room which is decent-sized for the British standards (about 18-20 square metres), very clean, tidy and equipped with a comfortable double bed. Of course there is a bathroom which is clean with fresh towels and plenty of shower gels in case you need to take a shower (there is a bath tub actually). Please note here that Naomi currently stays in the hotel as a residence (nb she is paying around £3200-£3500 per month for her hotel accommodation).

About the escort’s physical appearance:
Naomi is a young (21 years old), Central European (Polish), really gorgeous girl. Her adultwork profile pictures are real and accurate (nb non-retouched) so I don’t need to go much through the appearance details. I will just say that actually she looks more beautiful in the flesh (and yes her face is very very beautiful). She is tall – around 1.75m (bare feet) - with a thrilling, slim body to die for - her breast is 34DD (all natural) and all her body curves are wonderful. Really very impressing and stunning appearance!

About the meeting:
Naomi welcomed me in her room with a beautiful smile and wearing a sexy satin robe. We then very quickly settled the paperwork. She offered me a drink and then I went for a shower. I will not go through the nitty-gritty details of our “fun time”. I will just say that during the time we spent together we went through almost all the services listed in her enjoy list: (i) French kissing (with tongue), (ii) amazing oral & 69, (iii) deep throating & mouth f*cking,  (iv) protected penetration s*x, (v) striptease & lap dancing, (vi) footjob & handjob (vii) tit f*cking, (viii) COB (ix) etc etc. Naomi provides ALL the services in her enjoy list with great willingness and passion (yes CIM is available by I personally chose not to take it as I wanted to enjoy more of the French Kissing). No clock watching and no rushing at all. She is very down to earth, very friendly and very polite. She is definitely a completely independent escort and she enjoys what she is doing. She is new to escorting (nb she started just 3 months before the time of this meeting) so she still needs some improvement in her fantasy role-play skills. Otherwise her s*x skills are truly perfect and magnificent and I can confidently say that she is much better than most of the more experienced escorts. Overall the entire meeting was an amazing girlfriend experience with a true angel coming directly from heaven.

Overall Scores:
Attractiveness: 9.6/10 (nb I reserve 10 for supermodel celebrities like Megan Fox!)
Patience & Politeness/Friendliness: 10/10
Willingness & Participation: 10/10
Hygiene & Cleanliness: 10/10 
Available services: 10/10 (nb she does everything mentioned in her enjoy list)
Quality of available services: 9.8/10
English level: 9.8/10 (nb her English is excellent - she is a university student)
Relative Cost/Quality ratio: Superb .

I really enjoyed the time I spent with this stunning young lady. Highly recommended – she is a rare gem. Thanks Naomi and I will definitely visit you again in the future.


6 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (5 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)



Quote
English level: 9.8/10 (nb her English is excellent - she is a university student)

Only 9.8? Did she fail to conjugate a verb correctly? Or mis-use a third declension noun?

Wow, conversation must have been awkward.  :scare:

Offline Jason

To oinki: I have read your review before visiting her so for precaution I booked her for a 1+1+1 hour meeting (i.e I booked her for 1h with the provision to extend for a further hour at the end of each hour). Because she rearranged the meeting time from 15:00 to 16:00 (because she was outside London), I stayed only for two hours (as I had other things to do afterwards). Anyway the fact that I extended the meeting clearly shows that I was personally pleased from what I was getting. I will agree with you that initially she didn’t seem very enthusiastic and she didn’t like to talk much. But with the right tactic you can get the best out of her. I should say though that even at the start (i.e. when she was not very enthusiastic) she was always very polite and very willing to please. Anyway I guess it also depends on the duration and the time of the visit. I was the first client she was seeing on the day so she was full of energy.

To RustyShackleford: Only 9.8 because of non-english pronunciation!!! I reserve 10 only for educated British or American escorts.

Further comments:
(a) I should also mention that 20 minutes after the end of our meeting she was expecting to see another punter. She didn’t rush me at all – she just told me about it at the very end (at 1 hour and 55 minutes after we started), after I asked her whether she was expecting to see any client afterwards. I don’t think she was lying as for her there was still a chance for me to extend for a third hour.
(b) The above is also related with the fact that her girlfriend (link on her profile - staying elsewhere) sometimes answers her (diverted) calls and arranges meetings for her while Naomi is with a punter. Personally I talked only with Naomi- I could recognise the voice.
(c) With her prices being so low she cannot be classified as a high class escort as she sees more than two clients per day. But that is anyway inevitable as she pays £110-£120 per day for her hotel room and she charges just £90 per hour.
(d) Overall I believe that given her very beautiful appearance and the non-rush, willing service she provides, and that with just £90 per hour, she can be considered a bargain.

Offline joshwinkers

That seems fair enough, you've defended yourself well there. Unfortunately it might not be enough for some, and you'll be accused of being a tout or the girl herself. Well, that's normally what happens. Just to avoid all that nonsense, any chance of mentioning other girls you've enjoyed punting with? And those you haven't?

Oh, and I'm glad you had a good punt! Once AW is back online I'll have to check her out.

Offline skittish

For the record I think the report is genuine enough. The fact that it has a phone number included and gets posted on the very day AW crashes raises just a small amount of suspicion of touting, it could be coincidence.

Offline oinki

All I said was balance, not sure why you have too have a "tactic" other than the fact that you are paying for her services, that by itself IMO reflects that she does not naturally give the effort to all her clients.

Don't get me wrong, happy you had a good punt, but given Bratpacks comments, she seems to be inconsistent?

Offline moondance

3 grand to stay in a hotel when she could rent for less than that?
Sounds like cash down the drain, sure she sounds great, but...not financially savvy.
3 grand a month?


Offline andrei

me personally this report triggers my spidey senses

why?

the report mentions no "nitty gritty" details but he sure managed to squeeze a lot of strange info out of her for public sharing, how much she pays for her hotel stay, her mate sometimes answers her phone, only been working 3 months, needs to improve her fantasy role play skills

then you got the standard fluff: more beautiful than pics, "thrilling slim body", curves are wonderful, stunning appearance, deffo completely independant, enjoys what she does, skills are perfect, better than experienced escorts, angel from heaven, a rare gem

just seems a little too informative and a little too over the top, plus the report format seems strange considering it was the guys first post

although i'd be interested to see if this guy left her feedback on aw as his punting history would help fill the picture a little, you'd think someone who wrote a report this detailed would have left some feedback and possibly an fr on aw - so patiently awaiting aw reopening  :)

imo of course
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

me personally this report triggers my spidey senses

why?

the report mentions no "nitty gritty" details but he sure managed to squeeze a lot of strange info out of her for public sharing, how much she pays for her hotel stay, her mate sometimes answers her phone, only been working 3 months, needs to improve her fantasy role play skills

then you got the standard fluff: more beautiful than pics, "thrilling slim body", curves are wonderful, stunning appearance, deffo completely independant, enjoys what she does, skills are perfect, better than experienced escorts, angel from heaven, a rare gem

just seems a little too informative and a little too over the top, plus the report format seems strange considering it was the guys first post

although i'd be interested to see if this guy left her feedback on aw as his punting history would help fill the picture a little, you'd think someone who wrote a report this detailed would have left some feedback and possibly an fr on aw - so patiently awaiting aw reopening  :)

imo of course

I'm with you on this one, Andrei. When I read "She is tall – around 1.75m (bare feet)" I wonder if this person is either a QS or a troll  :)

Offline andrei

just strange that members who have been here a while: oinki said she was so so and bratpack said she was poor but this guy who has just appeared (just as aw is down) can find no fault with her?
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Jason

Well I think that I owe a response here.

To all:
To those who dispute my review I will simply say that I really don’t care if you are convinced or not. To those who have been convinced and are willing to meet Naomi I would suggest not rushing to her. If this occurs it is very likely that she will soon raise her prices. So try to distribute your interest over the month uniformly or simply put her in your “future visit” list. Currently Naomi is an excellent bargain and I hope she stays so. Also I would suggest booking her on early afternoon time slots so that you are the first client she sees during the day (and hence you are more likely to get the maximum out of her as I did). I should mention here that my own philosophy when dealing with escorts is to treat them like women rather than like sex objects that I just purchased. Perhaps the above sounds a bit cheesy but with this approach I can almost always get the best out of most escorts. You can also apply the “capitalist trick” of booking her for 1+1 (or so) hours so that she has more motivation to deliver in order for the meeting to get extended.

To skittish:
In my review I followed a mixture of the formats of Adultwork and auto-censored. I believe that this format is nice as it encapsulates all the necessary information needed (yes including the phone number). At least this is how I would want the other reviews here to look like. The fact that my post occurred with the Adultwork being out of order is a pure coincidence. Also think about it. My review was posted last night at 22:22. So how was it supposed for Naomi to benefit from it given that most chances adultwork was to get repaired by today’s morning? Well Adultwork has not yet been restored but I think you got the point. 

To Andrei:
Please read more carefully what I wrote. I said: I will not go through the nitty-gritty details OF OUR “FUN TIME”. I don’t think that it is of anyone’s interest to describe in detail how exactly I f*cked her. But that doesn’t mean that I would not go through other details. Basically in my review I answered in sufficient detail all the questions that I usually have when I am about to book a certain escort for first time (i.e. (i) whether her pictures are authentic, (ii) what is her attitude during the meeting, (iii) whether her place is classy, safe, discreet , clean (iv) whether she clock-watches or not, (v) whether she is rushing you or not, (vi) whether she provides all the listed services or she tries to avoid them, etc).

To innoutburger:
Since when being able to estimate people’s heights, has become a bad thing? The reason I mentioned her height is because Naomi wrongly states in her profile that her height is 5 feet 6 inches (i.e 1.67m). Clearly she is not that short as I am 1.81m and she was just little shorter than me (when we were both standing barefeet). So I believe she is around 1.75m.

Offline tom269u001

Nice bit of touting - it's nothing but an advert for Naomi. ffs

Offline andrei

jason

this is not auto-censored so a review should actually review the fun times and not how nice the hotel was or how spacious the reception was or how expensive her room was

also, on your point on aw being down - seeing as you left the phone number in your report it would be perfect for a guy to pop along and see his girl by organising with her phone number, at least this way he cant check her pics or feedback first, so as a tactic it would actually be extremely clever

plus you dont need to answer any of these questions here to prove your authenticity, just tell us you left some feedback for hr and we can check the authenticity of your review ourselves through your aw feedback
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline andrei

and with adultwork back up we see you left her no feedback, seems strange not to leave feedback considering the meticulous nature of your report here

oh dear
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Jason

To Andrei: I would suggest you to always make an attempt to think neutrally before starting thinking negatively or suspiciously. If you read again the first paragraph of my review you will understand why I left her no feedback in adultwork.

Offline andrei

ok, so you dont leave feedback so have no credibility
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline Jason

To Andrei: Despite your self-belief that you are representing masses in fact you are representing just yourself only. Everyone else has his own mind and judges by himself to whether there is credibility or not to what I write.

Offline andrei

i never pretended to speak for anyone other than myself amigo
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline andrei

but what you will find jason is that theres a lot of people here with the same spidey senses as me so your touting will fall on deaf ears
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)

Offline tom269u001

Jason states the following in the 'Adultwork down again' thread:

"I think that those of us who were clever enough to store the phone numbers of the escorts that we have seen or we were planning to see we will benefit greatly (cost wise) if adultwork continues to be down."

Assuming you're clever, please provide reviews of other escorts you have seen.

Offline Jason

To Andrei: I am afraid that your personal “spidey senses” are malfunctioning. From the over 1000 viewers of this post only you and tom269u001 commented belief of potential touting.

And don’t contradict yourself. You say: “I never pretended to speak for anyone other than myself amigo” and at the very next instance you state with full arrogance your certainty that almost everyone else will share the same opinion as you. Haven’t you ever learned that when you want to express your own personal opinion it helps to add at the end the keyword “imo”?

3 out of 4 of gorgeous_naomi reviewers have 0 feedback themselves too  :bomb:

Offline andrei

ok, tell us who else you have seen and what feedback you left them
Banning reason: Multiple accounts (andrei, london_lad_2)




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)