Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: WGs and their prices  (Read 42658 times)

Tony Montana

150 out of London is a lot of money. Don't most girls in Bristol charge 100?

No, the three I've recently added to my hotlist are £150 (goddess karolina, rachel lovitt, lori webb)

I'd much rather they were £100.

Offline Matium

It does depend on which segment of the market they're targeting.

If they're targeting the banker wankers then those men won't think anything of a £1,000.

But they would expect her to wear Chanel and Aubade lingerie and have a chilled glass of champagne waiting for him.

Then there are are football players like Wayne Rooney who paid £1,500 just for an OWO or men Silvio Berlusconi who paid €10,000 for an overnight.

Everything has its own price and cost.

Offline Jimmyredcab

You seem stuck on the idea that they should all be legs apart for 8 hours a day. 

That is just the sort of stupid comment I would expect from you.     :crazy: :crazy:

You would be very popular posting on Saafe.      :thumbsdown:

Offline Jimmyredcab



Then there are are football players like Wayne Rooney who paid £1,500 just for an OWO or men Silvio Berlusconi who paid €10,000 for an overnight.

Everything has its own price and cost.

Yes but Silvio Berlusconi would have access to exclusive courtesan types, not the lowlife you find on Adultwork.   :hi:

No, the three I've recently added to my hotlist are £150 (goddess karolina, rachel lovitt, lori webb)

I'd much rather they were £100.

I wish there were more British girls of my type charging £100 to £130 but it's mostly EE's who aren't usually as good, there are notable exceptions of course.

Have noticed a trend recently where some are now asking for £160, so far I've refrained from paying this.

Offline foresight

That is just the sort of stupid comment I would expect from you.     :crazy: :crazy:

You would be very popular posting on Saafe.      :thumbsdown:

I have a regular who charges £200 in London. ( I have seen her for ages and do not pay that).  She wants just a few bookings a month to help with her student loan.  If she charged £100 she would get every Tom Dick and Harry contacting her all the time ( and even JRC).  She achieves her goal. She gets the clientele she wants. Is she stupid for charging that much?  Oh, and she doesn't show a phone number either.

Why do you dismiss everybody who doesn't hold your blinkered views?

Offline Cat Lady

If she charged £100 she would get every Tom Dick and Harry contacting her all the time ( and even JRC).
Good point - glad it came from a punter not a WG. I don't want 10 clients a day at £60/hr, I'd quickly tire of that, become frustrated and I doubt clients would like that. If I charged £200, I'd probably have two clients a week, if that, and that's not enough for me to live on.
At my rate, I have much less bookings, but I enjoy them much  more, still earn good £££ and my clients are happy too. Win-win.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Good point - glad it came from a punter not a WG. I don't want 10 clients a day at £60/hr.

I have stated quite a few times that I would never see WG's who charge £60 an hour.  :hi:

A fair price in today's financial environment would be £100-£120 an hour, there is no need to pay more.

HOD is a good guide, top quality girls in a Central London location, £100 for 45 minutes, that is excellent value.

Offline mh

Every time the subject of price crops up, there is a mistaken idea that the sex industry works like the market, with competition etc, it is in fact a virtual cartel, the only time you see realistic pricing is if you find some genuine amateurs off grid, wanting a bit of grocery money, ex parlour girls, wanting a bit of extra cash, then you see some realistic pricing, 20, 40. 50£. I suspect this is the way ahead, in ten years people will be gobsmacked at what girsl are charging at the moment. There is an army of students, young mothers ready to do it for realistic sums.

It's definitely a market and there is clearly competition. But because of the cloak and dagger nature of the industry it's a rather warped market with a lack of openness and some significant barriers to becoming a provider (e.g. stigmatisation, physical danger). It would be a cartel if there were a few providers actively working in concert. It's not a cartel just because all girls in an area charge the same price; other service providers could come in and charge less. Speaking of which if there is an army of students and young mothers willing to do it for less then why are they not doing so? What is stopping them? There must be something - most likely the barriers to market entry I mentioned or that they don't see the rewards as worth the effort and risk.

I also agree prices will come down over time but I think this will be due to the increasing acceptance of it as an activity either because legal barriers are removed (though that seems unlikely at the moment) or if it becomes a more normal and tolerated activity for both service providers and service seekers irrespective of the strict legalities.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,226
yes i agree with the point that not every wg lays on her back all day

i only choose to do about 3 punts a week as i like to keep it fun and fresh

its up to each wg what they charge if you dont like the rates dont book them simple really

Offline Jimmyredcab



its up to each wg what they charge

Yes, and it's up to each punter what they pay, luckily for you there are lots of mug punters out there.    :hi:

Online Marmalade

i dont think my 150 ph is awful
at the end of the day it maybe the higher end for the area but i dont escort full time due to my personal choice as i dont think id enjoy it if i was doing it every day

Yes dear, it's awful. But if you can get away with it no doubt you will and who is there to say no (except customers when you are past your sell-by date). The other stuff about how much you enjoy it personal choice part time is just so much hooey and not related to charging extortionate rates.

Offline Secondskin69

yes i agree with the point that not every wg lays on her back all day

i only choose to do about 3 punts a week as i like to keep it fun and fresh

its up to each wg what they charge if you dont like the rates dont book them simple really
Precisely, a WG can choose whatever damn rate she wants to. If, like you, they are happy with the number of clients they receive, all is well in the world, punter is happy, WG is happy, and even JRC is happy because he can keep banging on about overpriced WGs  :angry:
Banning reason: Making pedophile allegations

Online Marmalade

Precisely, a WG can choose whatever damn rate she wants to. If, like you, they are happy with the number of clients they receive, all is well in the world, punter is happy, WG is happy, and even JRC is happy because he can keep banging on about overpriced WGs  :angry:

Dear Skinny. I don't think our esteemed cab driver would deny that pro$$ies can charge what ever prices they can get away with - it's an unregulated industry after all. But it's like cigarettes and alcohol - most of what you pay goes into the government's gutter. To say those things are not overpriced is denial of reality. They are overpriced by choice. Unfortunately, if you're gasping for a fag you will pay anything, including the housekeeping money. It can only be offset by cheap (ie normal price) fags from abroad. The pro$$ies income is largely dependent on men who are starved of normal sex. The additional money doesn't even go to the government - just the gutter. Keeping prices high keeps men that are not getting enough sex hungry and so likely to pay extortionate prices. Women can often use sex as power. Especially down-and-out women whose only means of income is selling their twat. Having failed to realise her potential in life she vamps off others. Maybe not as much as footballers' wives, but she is still overcharging for a fairly paltry service. Why? Because she can get away with it.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2013, 02:45:20 PM by Marmalade »

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,226
wgs especially english ones will never drop  there rates to £60 im sorry but its true
at the end of the day its their body and mind there selling and every  wg has a different price that they feel suits them

honestly if you could charge £500 ph and have work would you drop it just becausr some people dont like that price??

this thread is going no where its just turning into a slagging match

if you have a regular wg that charges £60 great for you but there is no need to rip every other wgs prices apart :bomb:

Offline foresight

Yes dear, it's awful. But if you can get away with it no doubt you will and who is there to say no (except customers when you are past your sell-by date). The other stuff about how much you enjoy it personal choice part time is just so much hooey and not related to charging extortionate rates.

I'm beginning to think that some punters are jealous of the fact that wgs can set their own prices, work the hours they choose and see whom they choose, while most punters do not have that privilege in their own work.
At the risk of repeating myself, some wgs charge what the market will bear commensurate with their desired income and the clients they wish to attract.  That seems fair to me, nobody is forcing me to pay.

The miserabalist attitude to wgs that pervades some posts is frankly depressing.  There are girls out there from £60 (so I'm told) to £250 an hour.  Simply choose from the ones that suit your budget.


Offline Secondskin69

Dear Skinny. I don't think our esteemed cab driver would deny that pro$$ies can charge what ever prices they can get away with - it's an unregulated industry after all. But it's like cigarettes and alcohol - most of what you pay goes into the government's gutter. To say those things are not overpriced is denial of reality. They are overpriced by choice. Unfortunately, if you're gasping for a fag you will pay anything, including the housekeeping money. It can only be offset by cheap (ie normal price) fags from abroad. The pro$$ies income is largely dependent on men who are starved of normal sex. The additional money doesn't even go to the government - just the gutter. Keeping prices high keeps men that are not getting enough sex hungry and so likely to pay extortionate prices. Women can often use sex as power. Especially down-and-out women whose only means of income is selling their twat. Having failed to realise her potential in life she vamps off others. Maybe not as much as footballers' wives, but she is still overcharging for a fairly paltry service. Why? Because she can get away with it.
I never said anything was, or was not, overpriced!

I take it you are trying to compare fags to WGs. With western WGs being overpriced, or potentially overpriced, and the market being 'flooded' with cheaper johnny foreigners where the money is "lost" to overseas.

As an aside you also debate on artificial rate raising, a la energy traders. I daresay there is a underlying trend, and of course any supplier wants to make the most they can, and any customer wants to pay the least they can. JRC £100ph trend seems to be the norm at the moment, for the type of WG's this forum deals mainly with. But I don't see why such issues arise for a WG who charges £150ph. Will this lead to a flood of EEWGs? Perhaps if lots of WEWGs do, and EE's see a gap in the market, but then the westerners will have to put up with less demand, so would reduce their prices to the market rate. This may lead to a lack of demand for EE girls and the market is in a good place again.

I think to accuse any WG of over-charging would lead to a "piss off somewhere else then",  so why bother  :unknown:
Banning reason: Making pedophile allegations

Offline potato

Some interesting comments from both sides of the fence.

“I need to charge £100 an hour because I don’t like to see more than 2 clients a day and I could not afford to live on less than that”   I wonder how many hard working punters would like to work for only 2 hours a day ….

I remember one WG told me that her hairdresser charged £65 an hour so she should get more than that – I pointed out that her hairdresser had staff, premises, insurances, rates etc and probably needed to make £40 an hour to cover her overheads….

Another argued the point that they need to charge high rates because they took risks to their health as they might catch something off a punter – I reminded her that punters also shared that risk seeing WG’s so the risk is equal….

Personally, I have always found the “part time” girls that do it for a bit of extra income as a boost to their normal job are much more flexible than a full time WG.

WG’s will charge whatever rate they can get away with and for a skilled professional maybe the rate is worth it. The problem is that newcomers come along, see the rates on AW and automatically think they are worth it  (or sometimes even more), no matter what their level of service is.

In my view, one of the easiest ways to get rates down is by using the Reverse Booking system. If everyone put bookings on at reduced rates then maybe it would be a start.    The “default” search on AW is set to £75 per hour for WG’s to look at RB’s from Punters. You will get some dross using RB’s and you have to sift through the bids carefully but I have had some really good success with brilliant girls for less than the default level on a longer booking - and with repeats at the same price. If they aren’t busy then the rates come down surprisingly.  These are rarely WG’s with phone numbers that might get a booking at any minute though - they are less inclined to deal.  Oh, and these are all British girls too!

It is a "supply and demand" industry  but when the demand slows it's surprising how the "supply" price drops - like any other industry.  In proper industry and commerce, we deal all the time - sometimes very close to cost to keep the wheels turning -  ask any businessman how far down they will go to get the deal.


« Last Edit: April 09, 2013, 03:31:02 PM by ellwoodpdowd »

Offline finn5555

At the end of the day does it really matter what Pro$$ies charge? It is up to the punter to decide what he feels is value for money. If decent EE Pro$$ies charge as little as £60 hr then so be it and if the so called courtesan wants £250 an hour so be it......

Take Rebecca for instance, I am not sure what her hourly rate is but would I fuck her for circa £120 an hour.... Probably yes...... Would I for £150 an hour.... Then no. The reason is I refuse to pay over £120 an hour and nor do I need to with plenty of choice within the price bands I set myself.

Interestingly on AW reverse bookings you get the £250 an hour Pro$$ies coming down to circa £120 an hour which tells me they either have a dusty phone or need a cash boost  :hi:

To sum it up who gives a shit.....




Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,226
who gives a shit ?> er the men here making tis thread 4 pages long :dash:


No, the three I've recently added to my hotlist are £150 (goddess karolina, rachel lovitt, lori webb)

I'd much rather they were £100.

I stand corrected.  :hi:

So do I.  :dancegirl:

Offline toolboy55

who gives a shit ?> er the men here making tis thread 4 pages long :dash:

+1 lol

I think I said this earlier, but the theme on here seems to be to slag WG's off for the prices that they charge for services that guys are happy to pay. Sounds a bit paradoxical to me.

Also as I said before, like train commuters moaning about their season ticket prices, totally pointless. Unless one is going to become an MP and introduce a bill to make WG's legal/illegal/taxed or whatever and get enough support for said bill to become law with draconian penalties for those who transgress, this debate seems a bit of a waste of internet time.


 

Offline Acer

The bottom line is, WGs have come long way and the 10/20 pound rough punt is virtually non existent.
It's a big jump from that to the £100 average and punters have missed out on the gradual increase.

To be honest the EEs are keeping the prices down but would love to see more locals. However, when you have a market saturated with EEs, many indigenous English girls are not getting the help they need to break through.


Offline Daffodil

+1 lol

I think I said this earlier, but the theme on here seems to be to slag WG's off for the prices that they charge for services that guys are happy to pay. Sounds a bit paradoxical to me.

Also as I said before, like train commuters moaning about their season ticket prices, totally pointless. Unless one is going to become an MP and introduce a bill to make WG's legal/illegal/taxed or whatever and get enough support for said bill to become law with draconian penalties for those who transgress, this debate seems a bit of a waste of internet time.

I think it's a bit paradoxical that someone complains about a waste of Internet time whilst wasting their own Internet time on the very same thread   :hi:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)