Elite Woman - bournemouth / christchurch

[mikeg1600]

Well once again fell foul of the AW reviews again. After reading the reviews of this 'stunning' looking woman and looking at her profile pictures i thought i would give her a try. i had other options and now wish i had gone to see one of them. Initial comms ok a bit hit or miss but later found out later she she was on a course,or so she said. I was let into the bungalow by Lucy, who was nice enough but not stunning IMHO but did have a nice body, but another couple of OTT description by AW reviewers. The bungalow was being renovated and the room was lets be generous and say in a state of repair. Lucy informed me she had just got home so i handed over the £150 for the hour as agreed and Lucy took the money left the room and after sorting herself and the dog out returned with just an open shirt and panties (no real effort there then). Nice OWO, RO where she seemed to enjoy the attention i gave her and cowgirl sex, no DFK just a few pecks on the lips, but it all seemed very very rushed. Cleaned up after i cum and Lucy asked if she could dispose of the rubbish, she put her panties and top back on and off she went to dispose, i assumed she got dressed as she didn't want to walk around the house naked. I laid there waiting for round 2 but she walked in and asked if all ok and i could see that was it so i started to dress and off she went again. she then returned in her gym kit. i made it very obvious by looking at my watch that we had just ticked over 30 mins to see if she would be honest and offer me some cash back but no response. Again i had met someone who although agreed to an hour just wanted a quick turnaround. Her own description of 'i offer a true GFE,dress super sexily and seduce my men slowly' is IMHO utter rubbish. i think in future if it does not say that you can cum more than once then 30 mins max for me. Was going to put this as a neutral as services were ok but for failing to do as advertised and cheating me out of 30 mins of hard earned cash its a negative.

External Link/Members Only

[nigel4498]

Sorry you had a bad punt.
Never take any notice of AW reviews, most are total bollocks.

[buccdriver]

Her AW feedback contains a positive from southampton guy. Having known him for some time I would have trusted his remarks......so not quite sure what has gone wrong for you on this punt but quite right for you to be pissed off with her.

[mikeg1600]

like i said i thinks she was fitting me in so it was all a bit rushed and if she had said she could only do 30 mins it would have been ok and my expectations would have been set, although in my opinion she was nice but not stunning, i guess we all have our own views what we would class as that, it was just the take the money for an hour, knowing your only going to deliver 30 mins is wrong.

[southampton.guy]

I was one of the 4 AW reviewers she has - and thank you buccdriver for your comment re me. I disagree with Nigel that most Aw reviews are total bollocks - agreed some are (probably like here) and of course you have to pick and choose which ones you pay attention to and which ones to ignore, but its easy to do this. Its not hard on AW to get to recognise your local punters and particularly which ones likes the same type of girls as you do.

re Elte Woman - no i wouldn't discribe her as "stunning" but as fairly attractive, nice (size 10/12) body, nice tits and she gave me a good time. the house was a bit of a mess (being done up) but overall my experience with her justified a postive feedback. and thats why i gave one. Ive only seen her the once but would consider another visit (although not a "must seen again")

But it also raise the question ...what do you expect from feedback.........we all have our own likes and dislikes (eg small tits, big tits, enhanced or natural, GFE or PSE etc).........so all feedback has to be taken with some degree of reservation, personally i just want confirmation that they are a genuine escort and that i won.t get scammed. After that, its down to my personal taste, how I click with them (or not) and my overall experience with them.  Perhaps i have been lucky but i have had very few bad punts in 12 years of punting - i put this down to careful and selective use of AW reviews - and i have (on a couple of occasions)  walked away if i have felt wrong vibes on meeting them.

fair enough - if you didn.t enjoy meeting her then a less than positive review is justifed. However i did enjoy my visit, so in my case a feel a positive review is also justified.

[kamu]

Have to agree with Nigel. Pay little attention to AW feedback due to:

- Much of it being added by the wg's themselves
- Lack of space to provide useful information for those that are genuine
- Too many fluffies
- Most post positive regardless as they are affraid of receiving a negative in response.

In short as Nigel said "a load of bollocks".

[fairfield]

Have to agree with Nigel. Pay little attention to AW feedback due to:.......

- Most post positive regardless as they are affraid of receiving a negative in response.

In short as Nigel said "a load of bollocks".

+1
AW feedback is always suspect because of this. And anyone who sees reviews here as comparable to AW's is doubly suspect.

[fairfield]

......I disagree with Nigel that most Aw reviews are total bollocks - agreed some are (probably like here) and of course you have to pick and choose which ones you pay attention to and which ones to ignore, but its easy to do this. ....

So annoyed by this misleading post, had to come back. Visited a wg in the NW region. 700+ positive AW reviews, what could go wrong? Wasn't she a dead cert? - paid her more than have paid any pro$$ie, and travelled further.
Turns out she is too delicate and fragile for sex!!!! After a review, others come out of the woodwork and report the same thing.
So in my experience 700 AW reviews are not even worth a single one on here.

[southampton.guy]

sorry if you are annoyed Fairfield, that was not my intent and of course  i respect your view. 

But..... whilst i.m new on here, i have been punting for over 15 years  (the last 7 or 8 years probably punting at least once a week) and can honestly say that in all that time i have only had three bad punt and only a few  "so-so" punts. the majority have been good or very good. and i have relied on "selected" AW reviews and a local punting website which now sadly is virtually defunct. as i previously said, in my opinion you have to look at who has left feedback and who in turn has left them feedback. again, in my opinion you can build a bit of a picture about the person who left feedback and can make a judgement whether you take any notice of it or not. clearly some feedback is questionable and some is "a load of bollocks" but some is not and is useful.

But selective use of the feedback has helped me and served me well. (And in all 3 cases of poor punting experiences, i left negative feedfack. There are at least a few guys on here who know me and know that i am not one to pull my (verbal) punches (although hopefully always politely and respectfully) but i do agree that lots of guys are relunctant to put a negative review on AW.

I.m not saying AW is great - and i did not say or mean to imply that reviews here are comparable to those on AW. After only a few days of being a member here i am pleasantly surprised at the details of reviews here and the number of negative as well as positive reviews.

Hey, just my opinion. we are all different and in my book that's ok. its what makes the world go round. it would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything all the time.

[fairfield]

sorry if you are annoyed Fairfield, that was not my intent and of course  i respect your view...............

And i have to respect the longevity and success of your punting career - only 3 real negs in all that time! - have triple that number with still less than 12 months punting under my belt. Even in my short time, have found wgs notoriously capricious (like all women) and that a good time one week does not ensure the same the following week.

But after the 700 to 1 review fiasco i gave up on AW, for me it completely destroyed the credibility of AW feedback. Now regard them merely as an extension of the wgs often fanciful promises on her profile. Really glad you've corrected the idea that UKP is no different from AW.
Apologies to MikeG. I shouldn't be hijacking his review to express my disappointment at AW F/b.     

[lotuselise111]

Booked via AW for an hour, this after a couple of AW emails......looked forward to the meeting.....I have to travel for 1.5 hours and when I realized I was going to be 10 mins late txt to let Elite Woman know........she replyed that that was fine and thanks. arrived  to area and txt Elite Woman for details.....reply was '' just left hair dressers'' be back in 10 mins will txt you then......10 mins later txt to say someone just arrived at house......cant make it!!!!! .......what a time waster.

[buccdriver]

.......and you've a right to be pissed off !! With a booking through AW she knew what time was arranged - not a spur of the moment thing - so she should have arranged hairdressing appointment to suit. Who then arrived? another punter? relative/friend? She should have said 'Sorry, but I have another appointment'

Not good enough Definite Neg. review

[Jerboa]

OP you should of asked her directly for some cash back, you paid for a hour and the cheeky cow puts her clothes on, if she stopped the punt short she should refund, but hookers like her rely on punters being pussies, and not saying a word.

[XTC2]

- Much of it being added by the wg's themselves

I seriously doubt the average WG would know what proxies are or that they'd need to clear cookies, etc. There's a clear positive bias on AW (just as there's a clear negative bias here) but it has nothing to do with them "reviewing themselves".

@southampton.guy I agree 100%.

[kamu]

I seriously doubt the average WG would know what proxies are or that they'd need to clear cookies, etc. There's a clear positive bias on AW (just as there's a clear negative bias here) but it has nothing to do with them "reviewing themselves".

@southampton.guy I agree 100%.

The average working girl who would take part in this is likely part of a group with 100 punting phones or has a handful of sims themselves so wouldnt need to. If you think pro$$ies arent reviewing themselves then have a look at the reviews more carefully and you will notice names like "dan.man" or "big.one" flooding their feedback with the same generic phrases or text that was obviously written by someone who doesnt use english as a first language .

[tjsmiffy]

Was thinking about making a visit to Elite Woman soon but between Mikeg1600 & lotuselise111 bad experiences....I think I'll give this one a miss!

Yes Mikeg1600 if she had no intention of giving you your full time...she should have offered you money back!!

And as for lotuselise111....travelling all that way and then her giving you the run around!!   WTF    Hope you had a plan B!!