Gemma - HOD West Kensington (Sick of HOD Lying about Services)

[SlamBoy]

Place: HOD West Kensington
Time: 30 minutes
Cost: £70
Nationality: Romanian

External Link/Members Only

Coms and Location:

Coms with HOD maid good. Location decent and well reviewed.

Preface:

This is more of a negative for HOD than it is the girl. But I am paying HOD for the girl's services and their description of them so it is a negative.

Gemma:

Nice and friendly. Attractive. Slim, bordering on skinny. Facially a 5/10. Her profile pictures on HOD make her seem both fuller in the figure and more attractive than she is. The photos I will post are from the twitter feed which are more representative.

She was dressed in black heels and a leopard bodysuit which she removed.

The first thing I asked was if I could kiss her. She gave a resounding "no". She said she doesn't do that. I asked her why it was on the services listed on her profile (all services since removed at the date of this review). Her response was simply: I don't write the profile. I couldn't argue with that, and clearly it is not her fault. I do, however, blame HOD.

I am sick to death of HOD lying about services, nationalities, ages and posting photos that are not representative. It is a joke. They get away with it because £70 to shag a semi-attractive girl is a good deal. But I just want to give a "FUCK YOU HOD" for being a bunch of lying twats. And I shall continue to give every girl whose services do not match the profile a negative from now on in an attempt to perhaps stimulate a change in policy.

I was offered OWO or OW. I asked for OW. She said she was relieved as she preferred to give OW for health reasons.

Her OW was quite good although a little mechanical. My favourite WGs are responsive to your cock rather than expecting your cock to be responsive to them. Gemma was the latter which is why I describe her as mechanical. She did get me hard though.

I had sex with her in missionary and doggy. Her eyes were closed the entire time with her head turned to the side. It was a very distant and isolating experience. There was no real engagement at all. We all know that WGs are doing a job. But if your job description states GFE then deliver GFE. It doesn't matter if you have to act, just deliver it.

An unremarkable punt.

I won't repeat.

And while I am on the Subject of HOD bullshit . . .

Have any of you noticed that they only post reviews of their girls on their Twitter feed from that other S(h)ite? I think a lot of those reviews are BS. It is so easy to tell. They are often only from people who review HOD girls (always positively). The tone is often the same. The reviews often contain no real info about the punt, and they are sometimes orphan reviews. Such a joke.

Representative photos:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[BootsnBunches]

I have a lot of sympathy with what you've said, although thankfully I've always had good experiences at HOD in London. I've also been a little suspicious of some of the reviews on the other site and notice that only the positive reviews are attached to the girls profile page, so it's always worth a check.

It's a shame London HOD venues don't do walk-ups. That makes me suspicious. In MK I've been and been able to change my mind.

[revoltra]

Lucky escape for me! I was tempted to see Gemma in HOD London last week, and instead went to see Mia down in Chancery Lane instead.

HOD in London used to be really good down in London when they had that posh flat in South Kensington. The value was good and the girls were pretty. Since then the overall quality had really dropped. I think I had one good punt in the last two years at that place.

[raylondoner]

I haven't sampled the field but 50+ punts with Pixie have always been 10/10 

[Cunning Punt]

Thanks for the review.

Complaints by yourself and possibly other punters have no doubt led to the services being removed, so at least that's a step forward to punters not being misled. 

[yessss]

Gemma:

Nice and friendly. Attractive. Slim, bordering on skinny. Facially a 5/10. Her profile pictures on HOD make her seem both fuller in the figure and more attractive than she is. The photos I will post are from the twitter feed which are more representative.

Well, I love skinny and I would be really encouraged by the twitter pics which look stunning to me were it not for your description of her services! Well done for the factual review.

[bombadill]

I wanted to try Gemma. Now not gonna do it after reading your review. For me no DFK is a deal-breaker.

[vt]

Shame about Gemma. I met her a few times in 2013/14 at LMP when she first started in this business, she was an awesome provider. I've been to see her since at one of the HoD places in MK and detected that she had started to become jaded and tired of giving.

It sounds like the process is now complete and she despises the job despite it giving her a handsome reward. She gets over a week's Romanian wages for an hour's work. Granted, costs are higher in the UK, but it's still good going!!

[SirCharles]

I wanted to try Gemma. Now not gonna do it after reading your review. For me no DFK is a deal-breaker.

I had DFK with her but....she is jaded, and i had the feeling, after chatting with her, that she has enough of it...however, i had a good GFE experience with her

[SirCharles]

Well, I love skinny and I would be really encouraged by the twitter pics which look stunning to me were it not for your description of her services! Well done for the factual review.

Body is stunning, i like her...but she needs work at her teeth!

[mrx007]

Thanks for the review.

Complaints by yourself and possibly other punters have no doubt led to the services being removed, so at least that's a step forward to punters not being misled. 

I like Pixie but last time I punted her she had facials listed and she refused saying "I don't do that". Well she had previously. So even an established Girl can't be relied on then?

[mrx007]

Meant to ad I have no faith on HOD or Annabellas completely made up reviews on their sites. They all go on about what a 10/10girl they've seen , etc.

[rage666]

Multiple times I was excited about few HOD girls, mostly Jai and Apple. But considering recent negative feedback I'd distant myself from trying new girls, it's like shooting in pierced condom, a gamble.

[Spacecowb0y]

Apple was pretty good and I received a warm welcome/service, but overall HOD has let standards slip. Gone are the days when 80% of the girls were a sure fire hit.

[king tarzan]

Place: HOD West Kensington
Time: 30 minutes
Cost: £70
Nationality: Romanian

External Link/Members Only

Coms and Location:

Coms with HOD maid good. Location decent and well reviewed.

Preface:

This is more of a negative for HOD than it is the girl. But I am paying HOD for the girl's services and their description of them so it is a negative.

Gemma:

Nice and friendly. Attractive. Slim, bordering on skinny. Facially a 5/10. Her profile pictures on HOD make her seem both fuller in the figure and more attractive than she is. The photos I will post are from the twitter feed which are more representative.

She was dressed in black heels and a leopard bodysuit which she removed.

The first thing I asked was if I could kiss her. She gave a resounding "no". She said she doesn't do that. I asked her why it was on the services listed on her profile (all services since removed at the date of this review). Her response was simply: I don't write the profile. I couldn't argue with that, and clearly it is not her fault. I do, however, blame HOD.

I am sick to death of HOD lying about services, nationalities, ages and posting photos that are not representative. It is a joke. They get away with it because £70 to shag a semi-attractive girl is a good deal. But I just want to give a "FUCK YOU HOD" for being a bunch of lying twats. And I shall continue to give every girl whose services do not match the profile a negative from now on in an attempt to perhaps stimulate a change in policy.

I was offered OWO or OW. I asked for OW. She said she was relieved as she preferred to give OW for health reasons.

Her OW was quite good although a little mechanical. My favourite WGs are responsive to your cock rather than expecting your cock to be responsive to them. Gemma was the latter which is why I describe her as mechanical. She did get me hard though.

I had sex with her in missionary and doggy. Her eyes were closed the entire time with her head turned to the side. It was a very distant and isolating experience. There was no real engagement at all. We all know that WGs are doing a job. But if your job description states GFE then deliver GFE. It doesn't matter if you have to act, just deliver it.

An unremarkable punt.

I won't repeat.

And while I am on the Subject of HOD bullshit . . .

Have any of you noticed that they only post reviews of their girls on their Twitter feed from that other S(h)ite? I think a lot of those reviews are BS. It is so easy to tell. They are often only from people who review HOD girls (always positively). The tone is often the same. The reviews often contain no real info about the punt, and they are sometimes orphan reviews. Such a joke.

Representative photos:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

DFK is extremely important for me..
See my positive reviews on the honeys/super honeys...

I rate a positive on good dfk very passionately on the unlimited help yourself basis..
Great attitude to go with it is the automatic...
Owo (or ow) luckily mainly I do get owo
Good sex
Mango licking unlimited...

But always respect the ladies boundaries too... for example she says no fingering then no fingering.. no cim then no cim...


Not having dfk kissing is the 100% deal breaker for me...

In my experience they dfk passionately the entire time goes extremely smoothly... everything automatically about the encounter falls into place.. dfk leads to good owo and so forth..

If the kissing to start with is shit then the rest of the encounter is shit.

[Skeleton]

Pretty much mirrors my experience with Gemma, jaded sums it up perfectly.

[smiths]

Place: HOD West Kensington
Time: 30 minutes
Cost: £70
Nationality: Romanian

External Link/Members Only

Coms and Location:

Coms with HOD maid good. Location decent and well reviewed.

Preface:

This is more of a negative for HOD than it is the girl. But I am paying HOD for the girl's services and their description of them so it is a negative.

Gemma:

Nice and friendly. Attractive. Slim, bordering on skinny. Facially a 5/10. Her profile pictures on HOD make her seem both fuller in the figure and more attractive than she is. The photos I will post are from the twitter feed which are more representative.

She was dressed in black heels and a leopard bodysuit which she removed.

The first thing I asked was if I could kiss her. She gave a resounding "no". She said she doesn't do that. I asked her why it was on the services listed on her profile (all services since removed at the date of this review). Her response was simply: I don't write the profile. I couldn't argue with that, and clearly it is not her fault. I do, however, blame HOD.

I am sick to death of HOD lying about services, nationalities, ages and posting photos that are not representative. It is a joke. They get away with it because £70 to shag a semi-attractive girl is a good deal. But I just want to give a "FUCK YOU HOD" for being a bunch of lying twats. And I shall continue to give every girl whose services do not match the profile a negative from now on in an attempt to perhaps stimulate a change in policy.

I was offered OWO or OW. I asked for OW. She said she was relieved as she preferred to give OW for health reasons.

Her OW was quite good although a little mechanical. My favourite WGs are responsive to your cock rather than expecting your cock to be responsive to them. Gemma was the latter which is why I describe her as mechanical. She did get me hard though.

I had sex with her in missionary and doggy. Her eyes were closed the entire time with her head turned to the side. It was a very distant and isolating experience. There was no real engagement at all. We all know that WGs are doing a job. But if your job description states GFE then deliver GFE. It doesn't matter if you have to act, just deliver it.

An unremarkable punt.

I won't repeat.

And while I am on the Subject of HOD bullshit . . .

Have any of you noticed that they only post reviews of their girls on their Twitter feed from that other S(h)ite? I think a lot of those reviews are BS. It is so easy to tell. They are often only from people who review HOD girls (always positively). The tone is often the same. The reviews often contain no real info about the punt, and they are sometimes orphan reviews. Such a joke.

Representative photos:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

They have been linking their reviews from that site for many years and yes many aren't genuine reviews and some if not many done by the pimps themselves. The pimps were banned off here years ago as admin wont allow such pimps to tout on here, on that site the owner was making money from the pimps advertising on it.

This is the same with many agency reviews on that site, and the HOD pimps and their other brothels in Milton Keynes along with agency reviews make up a lot of the reviews on that site.

[smiths]

Meant to ad I have no faith on HOD or Annabellas completely made up reviews on their sites. They all go on about what a 10/10girl they've seen , etc.

I view EVERY review on a pimps own site as made up unless I know and/or trust the punter who has left it. UKP is the only reviews site that can be trusted nowadays in my opinion.