Amazing Annna - Peterborough (on tour)

[sweetsoo]

Link: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I recently had the distinct pleasure of an appointment with Anna.

This was only my second time ever with an escort, and I was nervous as hell.
I had chosen Anna as I thought she looked phenomenal in her pictures, she had great feedback, and I had enjoyed reading her profile.
Something about the way it was written spoke to me, and made me feel I would be comfortable with her.

Communications were good. Everything was arranged via SMS, then the booking was confirmed through AdultWork.
On the day, I was directed to a local chain hotel. A nice, big place where I could enter and leave without really being noticed.
On arrival, I was given her room number and clear directions.

I can confirm that Anna is indeed the lovely lady in the profile pics. The pics seem to have been taken very recently. Her hair was the same, and she wore the outfit from her current, main profile pic. She looked fantastic!

Anna's description of herself is accurate. She has a great personality, and the way she spoke matched the way the profile was written, which I was very pleased about.
I felt comfortable in her company, and genuinely enjoyed the time we spent together, quite apart from the sexy stuff.

Her services are as advertised, and she is very good at what she does. We began with a chat about what I would like to do, which also served to put me at my ease.
I'd prefer not to go into detail about what we did together, but suffice to say I got everything I asked for and had a very enjoyable time.

I highly recommend you visit Anna. Treat her like a princess, and she'll make you feel like a king.

[socks]

Reviews that don't go into detail belong on her AW profile. Here you can and should go into detail otherwise this review site becomes as pointless and useless as AW's.

[PLeisure]

Cheers for the review, sweetsoo 

Couple of queries, pls...
"she is very good at what she does" - can you elaborate on this
"I got everything I asked for" - which was.. ?
"Treat her like a princess, and she'll make you feel like a king" - I realise this is your first, but, having established that you've been reading this forum carefully to gather valuable intel, you must surely be aware of how comments such as this often generate suspicion and, often, ridicule. This is not a girlfriend situation and you need to understand that asap 
You paid money for the experience. You may not like the glaring reality, but this was a business transaction.

[Badvicar]

As my esteemed colleagues are playing nice, I will try also. Thanks for the AW review, can we now have the UKP one? Looking at past reviews, her services seem to vary, so your input is important for punters to make an informed decision. For now the fluffy AW "treat her like to queen" bollox has me on the sceptical side. As it was in your words, your second punt, she could have given a crap service because you would be gratefull, and you obviously were.

[SaneOnes]

Another useless review. Thanks anyway.

[madmania]

I think everyone is being pretty brutal.

Info on comms, location, vfm, no B&S, up to date photos and that he left happy after having his desires met are all very useful bits of information.

Sure there is fluffy language and lack of specifics on services offered/refused but don't lynch this first time reviewer for not having the clinical rhetoric of a seasoned pro. Plus it's probably advantageous in the long run to not be too specific because of the WG can't identify you from your review there is less potential fall out of you ever want to post a negative one.

Thank you so much sweetsoo for contributing, every review is helpful

In future try to tone down on language like "treat her like a princess" I know you said it to mean be a gentleman but it can come across like you're a fluffy in love and might have others think the rest of your review can't be trusted, even when you provide useful objective information.

Other than that glad you had a good time and hope your punting career, and reviews that follow, flourish

[socks]

I think everyone is being pretty brutal.

Brutal?!!! I thought I was remarkably restrained, What I wanted to say was something along the lines of "what the fuck was the point of that? Your review is a load of gushing bollocks. All any of us care about is how did it feel to have your cock in her mouth, when you fucked her how good was it and did she spit, swallow or try some shitty tactic to dodge your liquid tribute?"

Whilst hugely suspicious and sceptical I applied the rule of be kind to first time reviewers and give them the benefit of the doubt. Blown that apart now innit!

[Big Bad R]

Brutal?!!! I thought I was remarkably restrained, What I wanted to say was something along the lines of "what the fuck was the point of that? Your review is a load of gushing bollocks. All any of us care about is how did it feel to have your cock in her mouth, when you fucked her how good was it and did she spit, swallow or try some shitty tactic to dodge your liquid tribute?"

Whilst hugely suspicious and sceptical I applied the rule of be kind to first time reviewers and give them the benefit of the doubt. Blown that apart now innit!

That's more like it   

[Badvicar]

I think everyone is being pretty brutal.

Plus it's probably advantageous in the long run to not be too specific because of the WG can't identify you from your review there is less potential fall out of you ever want to post a negative one.

Don't think you have seen brutal,yet. Why would you want to hide your i'd from a WG that gave you a shit service?

[wizzo9]

When I read this review the first time, I thought that Sergei's  knowledge of the English language  is improving !!

But , on reflection perhaps I would agree with the other posters advice that some of the fluffiness should be constrained, and more detail given. I know it can be a bit daunting posting a first review, especially with the amount of suspicion and scepticism that abounds, details are the important part.

[madmania]

Don't think you have seen brutal,yet. Why would you want to hide your i'd from a WG that gave you a shit service?

You've never heard the stories of bat shit crazy prossies harassing them for weeks with texts calls emails everything, bad mouthing them to everyone, making it hard for the guy to see any other so falsely claiming the guy was dangerous/dirty/violent whatever?

You can say it was negative and say why without saying the exact specifics of the guy chooses not to.

And to everyone, do you genuinely think there wasn't a single bit of useful info here? I fully agree that I would have liked to see more but that doesn't invalidate the rest of what he said and you guys in the main saying why bother posting useless shit, go back to AW, another trash review etc. Don't think that will be just a little bit off putting? The idea is to encourage people to review, even those new to the game.

Just saying you don't have to go fucking nuclear on the guy for not posting the greatest review ever written holy shit...

[sweetsoo]

Noted. Thanks for the feedback chaps.

I'd had a good time and, while I wasn't comfortable talking about my experience in detail, I wanted to post a review which would let you guys know she was genuine.
I now realise that isn't entirely in the spirit of this forum.

Regarding my choice of words and phrases, I think that's just down to me and my writing style. I'm never one to use two words where twenty will do, and I do like to come up with little phrases so I can give myself a little pat on the back for having mastered the language so well! 
I'd seen other reviews say things like "treat this girl right", but may have gone a little overboard in my embellishment of that sentiment...

I think, perhaps, I'm just not capable of writing the kind of reviews you chaps are looking for so maybe contributing in that way isn't for me.

Regards

SS

[Badvicar]

Ok, now calling WG. Or pimp.

[Badvicar]

You've never heard the stories of bat shit crazy prossies harassing them for weeks with texts calls emails everything, bad mouthing them to everyone, making it hard for the guy to see any other so falsely claiming the guy was dangerous/dirty/violent whatever?

You can say it was negative and say why without saying the exact specifics of the guy chooses not to.

And to everyone, do you genuinely think there wasn't a single bit of useful info here? I fully agree that I would have liked to see more but that doesn't invalidate the rest of what he said and you guys in the main saying why bother posting useless shit, go back to AW, another trash review etc. Don't think that will be just a little bit off putting? The idea is to encourage people to review, even those new to the game.

Just saying you don't have to go fucking nuclear on the guy for not posting the greatest review ever written holy shit...

No one  has gone gone firecracker yet, let alone nuclear. You have though made both of you suspect.

[socks]

Ok, now calling WG. Or pimp.

Or smitten white knight who believes he's his courtesan's special one...

[madmania]

No one  has gone gone firecracker yet, let alone nuclear. You have though made both of you suspect.

Suspect me of what?

Since when is saying give a newbie some slack a source of suspicion?

[Badvicar]

With one review, and a six week old member.... are you not the newbie? Unless you have been around before?

[webpunter]

The burds FB is pretty extensive - too varied & too wide for it all to be faked.  Importantly those providing FB also have OK FB themselves.  So have taken the review as being from someone who is stepping over the line into getting his wallet out & is out of his comfort zone.  Hence a fairly rigid type of review.  There's a 1st time for everyone.  The acid test is what happens with subsequent reviews, with burds that have been reviewed by known pukka UKP'ers

[madmania]

With one review, and a six week old member.... are you not the newbie? Unless you have been around before?

New to UKP but have been punting for 5 years now on and off. I still vividly remember how daunting it is going for that first booking though.

The burds FB is pretty extensive - too varied & too wide for it all to be faked.  Importantly those providing FB also have OK FB themselves.  So have taken the review as being from someone who is stepping over the line into getting his wallet out & is out of his comfort zone.  Hence a fairly rigid type of review.  There's a 1st time for everyone.  The acid test is what happens with subsequent reviews, with burds that have been reviewed by known pukka UKP'ers

Exact stance I took to OP, thank you

[Norfolkfuntimes]

Amazing Anna has been reviewed before. I have been punting for 27 years and have seen it all. Anna is a bit skinny but I have seen her about five times. She is very clever, great english, very very professional. Doesn't take it up the arse but does pretty much everything else, especially when you've seen her a couple of times.
Always uses really nice flats. Not sure she always does her own comms, and I say this because they are so bloody efficient. My name isn't Sergei.
Leave the poor reviewer alone, he is in love.

[SaneOnes]

Even the Sergei isn't named Sergei of course. Sometimes he is called Piotr. Sometimes Milos.

[yessss]

Even the Sergei isn't named Sergei of course. Sometimes he is called Piotr. Sometimes Milos.

Don't forget the EE mamasans like Maria or Fortuna..