FLH see my report on Naughty Angel as well
External Link/Members Only
I did find that report slightly more helpful even though I don't punt in Glasgow that often. Just to clarify, I am not getting at anyone, but if all of a person's reports are 10/10 there is no context, no yardstick as to say what they think is good or less than good or whether they are simply easy to please (I am not suggesting the posters are, simply stating that it is near impossible to tell).
It is one of my problems being the simple choice between the giving of a positive or a negative report. I try to give both the good and bad things about a punt. Not only does it make it more convincing and helpful, but it allows for different strokes for different folks. I've given several people tips by PM on Edinburgh prossies but always in teh context of what they are looking for. I can't think of any prostitute, out of many years and sampling several hundred, that didn't have a downside. You can give indications, but unless you personally rate some good and some less than good and give reasons then it means little more than "she was genuine and I had a shag I thought was great." This is helpful for someone off the starting blocks but I think it is only right when UKP encourages some discrimination in feedbacks and reviews on here. Otherwise we just would become another prossienet where every encounter with a whore is "wonderful ... ten out of ten ..." (and could have been written by the prossie herself.
It's difficult to keep the balance. New reports are always welcome. But a critical eye is helpful to experienced punters. They will look for reviewers who have a variety of reports, from great to shite, and so get an idea of where the person's judgement lies. That person may have exceedingly great judgement, but some visible demonstration beyond "believe me" is always helpful as well.
Happy punting.