Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: WGs not giving out phone number?  (Read 10506 times)

Offline zootie

Add all that up then take into consideration who is constantly selling and who is casually buying and you might get a little closer to the truth to where this 'power' actually lies.  :hi:

+1

The sheer arrogance of some wgs is astounding.

Offline pabulum

.....There are no doubt a few punters on this site that could confirm my findings if they weren't keeping quiet and smiling to themselves.  :)

So I will stick to emailing and RB's thanks and avoiding WG's with phone numbers displayed.

I think that I posted something similar a few days ago, but it could have been somewhere else. But I'm one of the smiling ones who know some crackers who have other full-time careers and don't see many clients (by choice, lads, by choice) and some others who have removed all their advertising (as far as is ever possible) but still see a few blokes they know well. And I wouldn't post links, names etc either. Geat value, and great times!

And just to head back to the topic, I don't care whether a number is shown, as I usually email first. If it's not read or not answered, I make unkind assumptions and leave well alone.

Offline foresight

Some WG's like to perpetuate this idea but it's false and an act of conditioning. It's actually something I particularly dislike because lies like these take a long time to prise out of a fluffy's head.

Just because you can turn people down doesn't mean you control anything other than who you will see. That's not power over clients that's power over yourself. On the grand scale of things nobody else loses out except you. The money that would have gone to you just goes to someone else and the punter still gets his jollies off regardless. With the greatest respect there is nothing special about any WG, there will always be younger\older, sexier, prettier, curvier or better skilled WG's for a punter to choose from.

The choice a punter has is absolutely staggering and you really can't appreciate this fact until you see punting through our eyes. The 'power' as you call it lies in the hands of those willing to part money for sex and there is A LOT of sex on offer. In reality if WG's had the 'power' then you wouldn't be in competition with each other. There would be no adverts, no profiles, no touring, no price wars, no undercutting. They'd be no agencies, no fake ratings, no bitching and definately no incessant whining about lack of work.

In fact if you truely had the power you wouldn't even need to advertise. Men would wait their turn patiently for an opportunity to be with you and when they finally got their chance they would lavishly spoil you with money and gifts in the hope of seeing you again...like true Courtesans. But it's not like that is it? Punters are not in competition with each other. There is no waiting list, no mad scramble to book someone and definately no fighting over WG's. There is plenty of sex to go round umpteen times and not for ridiculous amounts of money either..

Add all that up then take into consideration who is constantly selling and who is casually buying and you might get a little closer to the truth to where this 'power' actually lies.  :hi:

The above might have some validity as far as parlours and flats full of ever rotating EEs who are there to extract the maximum cash with the minimum of effort in the shortest time.  Of course they are going to compete and moan when they don't get the punt.  There are plenty of us who avoid such venues.

There are other wgs out there, hard though it may be for you to believe, who don't operate on a conveyor belt system, who have the privilege of filtering their clients via email and so have the power to choose.  If your email her "3pm, OWO, full sex, CIM, rimming" she probably won't bother to reply. You may think "well I'll take my money elsewhere, stupid bitch". To which she would reply " thank God".

Offline smiths


smiths, we don't stand for bollocks -------------- that is why we are different to some on here.   ;)

Yes, what kind of idiot leaves their work phone on and answers it while its inconvenient to them then tells the potential punter to eff off. Talk about diabolical business sense. Ok in Foresights case he still punted with her and it went well, i dont give my business to people who cant/dont want to be be civil though, they can go fuck themselves, another principle, which extends to all i do business with in anything. ;)

Offline smiths

SENSIBLE Pro$$ies who have a work phone simply switch it off when they don't want calls or at weekends etc, it's not rocket science, if a pro$$ie is so desperate / Stupid that she leaves her phone on and some drunk rings her at 2am for a wank its her own fault  :hi:

Indeed, yes i daresay it is annoying that some punters ring outside the hours a WG specifies, not all punters have much brain power and others as you say get pissed up and want a wank while on the phone to the WG. Again as you say its easily resolved by the WG turning her work phone off until the next day or whenever suits her. ;)

Offline foresight

Yes, what kind of idiot leaves their work phone on and answers it while its inconvenient to them then tells the potential punter to eff off. Talk about diabolical business sense. Ok in Foresights case he still punted with her and it went well, i dont give my business to people who cant/dont want to be be civil though, they can go fuck themselves, another principle, which extends to all i do business with in anything. ;)

Yes she was wrong, she should not have answered it, but as someone who can be extremely ratty on the phone myself ( hate the bloody thing - thank god for email) I didn't hold it against her (until later ... Boom boom)

Offline Jimmyredcab

Yes she was wrong, she should not have answered it, but as someone who can be extremely ratty on the phone myself ( hate the bloody thing - thank god for email) I didn't hold it against her.

Would you be ratty on the phone to someone who was about to pay you £100 or £150 an hour, no, I didn't think so.
I rest my case.  :hi:


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)