Mia: Hot Collection: comedy and fantasy in SW1

[hermanmunster]

FYI she's not your girlfriend

Are you not allowed to buy people gifts and in this case buy a bit of goodwill.  Despite being very attractive, I certainly wouldn't want her as a girlfriend - I am very choosy.

[hermanmunster]

Obviously you're allowed to write reviews, so yes please review her!

But your review should be about the £300 shag, not a long rant about her current prices or a booking which you cancelled yourself.

Actually I can't really be bothered to waste more time - I have given enough information, for some to gauge my experiences of my 2 bookings. Apologies.

[hermanmunster]

Obviously you're allowed to write reviews, so yes please review her!

But your review should be about the £300 shag, not a long rant about her current prices or a booking which you cancelled yourself.

[Brazilian Martian]

Why you bumped a 2 year old thread for this instead of writing it under New Review is beyond me. But the vets of UKP aren't gonna let you off easy, whoever sees it first.

Because he's trying to get attention, no doubt he's some undesirable cunt 

[hermanmunster]

I was simply sharing my experience - I really don't think it's worth the effort when I have to justify my own opinions and then get abuse for it.

[Brazilian Martian]

I was simply sharing my experience - I really don't think it's worth the effort when I have to justify my own opinions and then get abuse for it.

YAWN YAWN, you chose to do it on a review of a guy who is dodgy as hell

[hermanmunster]

You say he is dodgy, so surely my experience has some value to those who may be considering this lady.

[Brazilian Martian]

You say he is dodgy, so surely my experience has some value to those who may be considering this lady.

Then create a separate review thats a negative, if I can be honest your behaviour is really strange 

[vw]

Then create a separate review thats a negative, if I can be honest your behaviour is really strange 

Indeed, seems he is upset with you

[Brazilian Martian]

Indeed, seems he is upset with you

Another sensitive soul   

[webpunter]

IMO this makes the review look pretty accurate - ref the burd's looks etc.  Not entirely a complimentary review as:
A/ one half of the duo was a blowout &
B/ ANOther punter double booked disturbing proceedings

I booked her fairly recently at £300 per hour.  I didn't really finish what I had started (she is not very keen on penetration for anyone slightly above average size), but, as she was gorgeous booked to see her again.  Just before I was due to visit she put up her prices again, to £350 - and refused to accept my visit at the price at point of booking. 

Needless to say I cancelled the booking - the agency were very disappointed with her and very apologetic.  The implication was, that she was a bit overconfident about her sex appeal and a law unto herself.  Or use the extra cash as tips to reward exceptional

Conclusion : She is gorgeous, but with an attitude that stinks. The money grabbing approach is clearly not far below the surface.  It was quite simply not a way to conduct business and I hope she learns her lesson from it.  She lost out from the cancelled booking, not me.  I had just come back from overseas from where I had bought her quite an expensive gift - obviously she will not be getting this, I shall choose someone else to give it to.

I had booked her on the strength of her selfie photos - I was totally baffled why her professional photos make her less attractive than in real life.  She should forget them and take some more selfies!

She does look stunning on the selfies.  The photo shopped pics look iffy at best
Strange business logic as she will have spent an hour being pissed off, having a discussion with the agency & ranting on her smartphone
As against a cock in her gob for a while & legs spread wide for 45 mins tops
She's 300 sheets down & this will take 6 further bookings at the increased price to get this back
If she had half a brain she would have gone ahead @ 300 & said 350 for the next time.  Then deliver up a good session & get the punter coming back
I would sell the gift on eBay [if possible] & re-invest the proceeds punting elsewhere.  Maybe increasing the normal budget as a one-off / spread over a couple punts.  Or get an extra one in

[Swapmeister]

It is a business transaction where the WG is trying to maximise her income. You seem to think that because you consider the relationship special enough to warrant an expensive present that she should reciprocate. It does not work that way, bud.

[hermanmunster]

I think you misunderstood - how would she know that I had intended to give her a present?  I have no relationship with this lady, I was going to give her something just to make her feel good and because she seemed liked a nice lady.

The money is not an issue, it is the principle of how you treat clients (those that create your income).

[webpunter]

IMO its nowt to do with the 'relationship' which you refer to

Whilst gifts & tips are frowned upon / ridiculed on here, its a dead-cert that for high end fit hookers it will much more common.  Especially on extended bookings.  If a geezer is dropping a load of cash on the burd then when adding in other expenses [accomo if outcall / drinks / room service / going out etc] it becomes a big spend.  Adding a gift / tip isn't material in the grand scheme of things.  Tips work well in the service sector so no reason to think any differently in relation to punting.  The focus on here tends to be getting the max services with the fittest possible burd for the cheapest price.  So in the context of buying a gift this looks less out of the ordinary

The key thing is:   Just before I was due to visit she put up her prices again, to £350 - and refused to accept my visit at the price at point of booking
It just depends on the time gap between booking & when arranged for - if a week or so then i would expect the price to remain as previous. 
+1 to poster for binning the punt & communicating with the agency

It is a business transaction where the WG is trying to maximise her income. You seem to think that because you consider the relationship special enough to warrant an expensive present that she should reciprocate. It does not work that way, bud.

[hermanmunster]

Was 3 weeks - necessary because I was working abroad in between.

[webpunter]

Same price IMO

Was 3 weeks - necessary because I was working abroad in between.

[myothernameis]

Needless to say I cancelled the booking - the agency were very disappointed with her and very apologetic. 

So the booking never went ahead, so why bump this thread, twat   

[hw189]

Are you YLF? - Signed up around the same time YLF got the boot.

[myothernameis]

Are you YLF? - Signed up around the same time YLF got the boot.

wonder how he will explain this of

[hermanmunster]

Why did I bother...………………………… ?

[Swapmeister]

I think you misunderstood - how would she know that I had intended to give her a present?

That wasn't the point that I was going for.

I have drunk wine and ate chocolates provided by previous punters. The more expensive presents were no doubt sold on ebay rather than used to feed tight punters like me.

Such punters seem to think they have a connection with the WG and get a bit bitter when they get treated like just another punter. THAT is my point.

With regards to the comment about how it was a bad business move on her part, it doesn't sound as if there is shortage of men wanting to fcuk her at £350. So, I don't think that she is lamenting the lost business opportunity.

In any case, you was OK with buying her an expensive present which she would probably had sold on ebay but not OK with paying an extra £50 to fcuk her?

[Swapmeister]

Also, it wasn't as you turned up for the booking and was told of the new rate. You had enough notice to cancel, which you did. On top of this, the booking was three weeks prior to the meet. In the Legit World no restaurant or the like will guarantee prices unless you put down a deposit.

[SlamBoy]

the agency were very disappointed with her and very apologetic.

Why on earth did you bump a two year old thread for this? Are you attempting to boost the integrity of the agency? This sounds dodgy to me. This was the exact sort of thing YLF would do.

Instead of just coming on here and writing a review, you would search out this old review and resurrect it for only one reason . . .

I had just come back from overseas from where I had bought her quite an expensive gift - obviously she will not be getting this, I shall choose someone else to give it to.

 What a load of

[SlamBoy]

Are you YLF? - Signed up around the same time YLF got the boot.

 

[Heph]

Appending information about a bad experience of a failed booking to an existing review is a reasonable and useful thing to do. No need for tin-foil-hattery.

[vw]

Appending information about a bad experience of a failed booking to an existing review is a reasonable and useful thing to do. No need for tin-foil-hattery.

That's the sort of thing people hiding things say.   

[Heph]

That's the sort of thing people hiding things say.

Silly boy: that's the logic of trial by ordeal - and about as useful.

[hermanmunster]

Heph, you words restore faith that there are some intelligent users of this site.

[magnetico]

you was OK with buying her an expensive present which she would probably had sold on ebay but not OK with paying an extra £50 to fcuk her?

I didn't get his logic as well 

[Heph]

I didn't get his logic as well 

Now you mention it... 

… and further hindered by the misspellings; though in fairness to Swap, I'm guessing he's writing in his 2nd or 3rd language - so allowances to be made etc.

[stampjones]

That wasn't the point that I was going for.

I have drunk wine and ate chocolates provided by previous punters. The more expensive presents were no doubt sold on ebay rather than used to feed tight punters like me.

Such punters seem to think they have a connection with the WG and get a bit bitter when they get treated like just another punter. THAT is my point.

With regards to the comment about how it was a bad business move on her part, it doesn't sound as if there is shortage of men wanting to fcuk her at £350. So, I don't think that she is lamenting the lost business opportunity.

In any case, you was OK with buying her an expensive present which she would probably had sold on ebay but not OK with paying an extra £50 to fcuk her?

Have we turned into the daily mail? WTF is fcuk her? Do you want to know if he fucked her or bought some clothes?

[Swapmeister]

I thought that my logic was obvious. Apparently not. Why make such a big deal about £50 if you gone the route of buying her an expensive present that she was probably going to sell on ebay? Sorry fellow punters but I can't use smaller words.

[vw]

I thought that my logic was obvious. Apparently not. Why make such a big deal about £50 if you gone the route of buying her an expensive present that she was probably going to sell on ebay? Sorry fellow punters but I can't use smaller words.

What do you mean PAL   

[magnetico]

I thought that my logic was obvious.

I was talking about herman's logic, not yours.
Your logic is obviously obvious 

[Swapmeister]

Oops 

[Swapmeister]

Now you mention it...
… and further hindered by the misspellings; though in fairness to Swap, I'm guessing he's writing in his 2nd or 3rd language - so allowances to be made etc.

In my defence, I was put in the mind set by Heph who seem to be agreeing that my logic didn't make sense to him either.

As for 'fcuk' I have a T Shirt that says 'FCUK You!'  I've kind of carried that into my posts.

[Brazilian Martian]

In my defence, I was put in the mind set by Heph who seem to be agreeing that my logic didn't make sense to him either.

As for 'fcuk' I have a T Shirt that says 'FCUK You!'  I've kind of carried that into my posts.