Lisa.23 - Kenton

[MrSmiley]

Lisa.23

Kenton

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Comms: slow but does respond with address.

Punctuality: on one visit she was busy with a client so not good. So waited with another prossie in the next room. Even heard the bed squeak which is a first for me and almost made me leave due to disgust, but didn’t! gave her time after and heard her have a shower. other two times was ready upon arrival.

Cost: £40/30mins and now £50/30mins  VFM

Location: Kenton. Good parking. Careful not to knock on the neighbours doors which I did on my first visit. Luckily no one was in. the rooms are tiny. One is just enough for the bed. It’s so small they must have put the stud wall up after the bed was in.

Services: owo, sex, cim

Looks: Is a funny one facially. Looks much better with her hair down. Not the best skin but not offputting. Teeth not perfect but not terrible. nice eyes. Body wise for me she’s almost perfect! Tall, curvy, great bum and those tits of hers are the best I’ve seen and felt.

Personality: very friendly, smiles, is relaxed and talks a lot after, although I barely understand what she is talking about we seem to have a conversation. She does most of the talking.

The meet: owo is always very good and sloppy. No dt but the technique makes up for it. good cowgirl and dfk in mish. She says she’ll be doing stints in Wembley and then Croydon before going back to hungary. Lisa is a young woman totally at ease in her job. does it at home too. this is her job and she's good at it.

[LL]

25% price rise? Boo. I'm out

[Mr Farkyhars]

Punctuality: on one visit she was busy with a client so not good. So waited with another prossie in the next room. Even heard the bed squeak which is a first for me and almost made me leave due to disgust, but didn’t! gave her time after and heard her have a shower. other two times was ready upon arrival

You seem to be reviewing about three punts here?

From the rules:
- Reviews
Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread..

Apologies if I have the wrong impression..

[SamLP]

You seem to be reviewing about three punts here?

From the rules:
- Reviews
Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread..

Apologies if I have the wrong impression..

I believe that rule refers to multiple single punts with different girls. It's ok to review multiple punts with the same wg in one one review.

[The_Don]

Thanks for sharing MrSmiley 

 

I believe that rule refers to multiple single punts with different girls. It's ok to review multiple punts with the same wg in one one review.

External Link/Members Only that's my understanding, as well.

If I've reviewed a W/G before, I some times add or update that existing review. Currently, I would only post a new review. If my rating for that W/G changed.  ie Positive > Neutral > Negative 

[romeomustdie]

Does she kiss or French kiss???

[Mr Farkyhars]

I believe that rule refers to multiple single punts with different girls. It's ok to review multiple punts with the same wg in one one review.

If it referred to that, I'm sure it would say so. I'll ask Admin to drop by and tell us.

[Cunning Punt]

If it referred to that, I'm sure it would say so. I'll ask Admin to drop by and tell us.

I think some members get a bit too obsessed about quoting site rules. It really is all commonsense.

But as they have been quoted...

The rules on the link below don't seem to be explicit on one review of several girls, but the reference to "WG", "her" and asking punters not to include links of other escorts makes it very clear - commonsense.

And they don't prohibit a single review made up of more than one meeting of the same WG.

It would be ridiculous to have several reviews of the same escort by the same punter, charting every meeting with her - and is ridiculous on the (fortunately) very, very rare occasions a punter does it.

Like others, I've included information from a couple of meetings in a single review. It's actually helps give a more rounded and detailed review with the benefit of perspective, but, yes, the reviewer should make it clear he has seen the escort more than once, particularly if he got a better service as a repeat customer.

[webpunter]

If it referred to that, I'm sure it would say so. I'll ask Admin to drop by and tell us.

I'm sure Admin be under-whelmed to get your PM.  Maybe include NIK so you can bore him @ the same time

Don't forget your weekend jobs - being part of community tossers at the side of the road with speed guns working 'with' the police / sending pictures of badly parked cars to the local council
>
>
>
Nearly forgot - taking books back to the library

[GreyDave]

If it referred to that, I'm sure it would say so. I'll ask Admin to drop by and tell us.

You need to pop over to the Soho walk up pages and then go and shag a few first to put things in to perspective

[MrSmiley]

Currently, I would only post a new review. If my rating for that W/G changed.  ie Positive > Neutral > Negative 

thanks Don. this is what i have done in the past too. my two reviews of monique moretti being an example.

[MP778]

This girl's verification picture is still up, a bit different to the main pictures probably worth checking out before going to see her

[Mr Farkyhars]

It really is all commonsense.

Ain't no such thing as commonsense - it's all personal opinion and rules. I'm certain Tejano thought it was "commonsense" to include all his experiences of the Phoenix Club in one review. Admin pulled him up on it.

I'm sure Admin be under-whelmed to get your PM.  Maybe include NIK so you can bore him @ the same time

Don't forget your weekend jobs - being part of community tossers at the side of the road with speed guns working 'with' the police / sending pictures of badly parked cars to the local council
>
>
>
Nearly forgot - taking books back to the library

Thanks for revealing yourself as a troll

[Cunning Punt]

Ain't no such thing as commonsense - it's all personal opinion and rules.

You were questioning putting multiple meetings of one girl and as four of us regular reviewers have mentioned now, we do this unless the quality of service changes.

In fact, as a regular reader of other reviews, this is what all bar a couple of members do.

So I guess it is 'commonsense' to most of us...

I believe that rule refers to multiple single punts with different girls. It's ok to review multiple punts with the same wg in one one review.

External Link/Members Only that's my understanding, as well.

If I've reviewed a W/G before, I some times add or update that existing review. Currently, I would only post a new review. If my rating for that W/G changed.  ie Positive > Neutral > Negative 

thanks Don. this is what i have done in the past too. my two reviews of monique moretti being an example.

Like others, I've included information from a couple of meetings in a single review. It's actually helps give a more rounded and detailed review with the benefit of perspective

[Mr Farkyhars]

In fact, as a regular reader of other reviews, this is what all bar a couple of members do

As a regular reader of reviews, I hadn't seen it before yesterday (except in the instance of the Phoenix parties). Plainly we've been reading very different reviews.