Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Amadea Linda - Paddington  (Read 4203 times)


32 review(s) for amadea.linda (29 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline iwtc

External Link/Members Only

Incall - £130 / 1 hour

I had a great time, but not 100% sure I would repeat...

I took the opportunity to have a visit with the well-reviewed Linda on a rainy Saturday afternoon.  She is located a few minutes walk from Paddington station, very easy to get to.  She is very strict on giving out her location details.

Linda is a very pretty girl - tall (probably 5'8" or 5'9" plus heels) and a nice, hot body (wow, that ass!).  I don't know if she's always like that, but she's not one for a lot of chit chat - I went into her flat, sorted the paperwork and had a quick discussion of what I wanted (mainly, I think to figure out if there were going to be any extras).  And with that, I went to take a shower with not a lot of idle talk, very business-like.  Following the shower, it was on.  She led me into the bedroom, dropped my towel and took me into her mouth.

Overall, I would have to say that it's hard to complain about anything - objectively, the session was very good - multiple positions (some repeated) and multiple pops, just great almost non-stop sex, it was like an amusement park ride.  As others have said, she is very energetic and has a great attitude.  What I wasn't expecting was how vocal she was, kind of like porn video loud in sounds and talking.  This is the PSE side of the GFE experience?  I couldn't decide if I liked it or if it was just distracting.

So then, why would I *not* go back?  It's hard for me to say, but something didn't quite click between us.  There was almost no conversation, and maybe I'm too much the GFE-seeker type where I feel like intimacy needs to be more than just physical. Bottom line, I wouldn't object to seeing her again, although I probably wouldn't rush to go back and there are many other girls in my HL that I'd like to see as well - but I certainly wouldn't throw her out of bed if I found her there.


Offline zulu-lance

Thanks for your review  :hi: Apart from her extras and other reservations as stated in profile I think I shall give her a pass, plenty of other fish out there :D

Offline Tony_Red

Yes, thanks for the review. I'm more gfe seeker too. I get the feeling there was no warmth/connection...perhaps a bit mechanical/clinical/professional...

What's with her lips? did they feel rubbery/injected?

I've had her on my HL but something has stopped me visiting her.

How would you rate her looks (body and face)  compared to Naughty Natt and Hazel Kitty?
« Last Edit: September 23, 2016, 11:03:32 am by Tony_Red »

Online The_Don

Thanks for the sharing and the review  :thumbsup:


External Link/Members Only

Incall - £130 / 1 hour




Please note her old profiles for linking reviews

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Price: £80 per hour

£100 after (P/H) next punts




RACHEL WEISS GIVES DT AND GREAT SERVICE IN KINGS CROSS

£110 (+ £20 CIM)


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+  < New profile
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only < Old profile for linking reviews.


Long may these two beautiful women stay alongside Monique in easy reach of the Angel

Dave

she's back.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only





Update

(Positive:thumbsup:


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+  < New profile

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only < Old profile for linking reviews.


Price: £110 per hour


Below is a current pictureExternal Link/Members Only and profile:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only




https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=58118.msg976868#msg976868



Still around


Hidden Image/Members Only

Click above image for one of the few face shots (not full, BTW)

Yes, thanks for the review. I'm more gfe seeker too. I get the feeling there was no warmth/connection...perhaps a bit mechanical/clinical/professional...

What's with her lips? did they feel rubbery/injected?

I've had her on my HL but something has stopped me visiting her.



I first punted her in Golders Green at £80 P/H (no extra's) and then a number of times after that at different locations.

I found her attitude and service good in Golders Green (GG), not really sure it could be called a good GFE, more raw sex and fun, IMO.
But after she left GG the service was still good (in most respects). But over time her attitude changed as she moved along. Kings Cross, Queensburys, Canary Wharf and other parts of London she worked in.

At her current rates (with all the extra's), I have no plans to return. IMO there is, much better VFM out there.


How would you rate her looks (body and face)  compared to Naughty Natt and Hazel Kitty?

I rank attitude and service above looks/body type and beauty is very subjective IMO. 


I've not punted Hazel Kitty.

I last punted Nat in 2015 and I remembered her, from her Enfield days, in 2014.
(Off topic; that was a good Polish flat  with different W/G that offered VFM in 2014 :thumbsup:


But I think Vivien is better looking and has a nicer body compared to Nat (from my last punts with them). But that just IMO, another punter who punted both, may see it differently  :hi:

You can check out the +(albums) I posted above, if you wish.



« Last Edit: September 23, 2016, 12:29:18 pm by The_Don »

Offline Tony_Red

Thanks Don. Will keep her on plan B list. Her location is quite eady for me to get to, which is always a bonus.

Mendra

  • Guest
I think Linda and Hazel on the same par facially they both have that "come and get me" face also Hungarian genes in common. Body-wise Linda is taller which gives her the edge with more artistic tattoos. The only decision maker fore would how close I am to either of them. Their services are similar if you "click". You must be a "fast paced" guy to keep up with them.

Tip: try both that's the only way you will find out.

Offline iwtc

You must be a "fast paced" guy to keep up with them.
Yes, this is a great way to look at it.

Offline iwtc

How would you rate her looks (body and face)  compared to Naughty Natt and Hazel Kitty?

Overall I would prefer Natt to either Linda or Kitty.  In my experience, Kitty was the warmest of the 3.  Linda is the most porn-starry of them.

Offline Strikar

I would rate Natt as very slightly better looking than Linda. Only by 0.5 points on a looks scale.

Both great girls to punt imo I'd return to see both. Never punted Hazel though.

Offline Strikar

Yes, thanks for the review. I'm more gfe seeker too. I get the feeling there was no warmth/connection...perhaps a bit mechanical/clinical/professional...

What's with her lips? did they feel rubbery/injected?

I've had her on my HL but something has stopped me visiting her.

How would you rate her looks (body and face)  compared to Naughty Natt and Hazel Kitty?


I found the pic of her lips misleading, not fake and pumped up in reality which was a big plus for me.

Kinda looked like Emily Mortimer to me which was also a plus. Fresh faced, girl next door and very pretty.

Didn't click in a very GFE way but it was a great punt. She really worked to give a top service and s great body.

Offline Strikar

Trying to add a photo of Emily Mortimer



Offline Tony_Red

Here you go. I probs wouldn't pay 130 for this...

But I am hoping Linda looks better. At the mo, linda edges it iver hazel simply cos Hazel doesn't work late on weekends (afaik) and she costs more.



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 23, 2016, 07:19:46 pm by Tony_Red »

Offline Malvolio

If you wouldn't pay £130 for that because a pretty face is important for you, you definitely won't want to pay £150 for Hazel.

Offline Tony_Red

If you wouldn't pay £130 for that because a pretty face is important for you, you definitely won't want to pay £150 for Hazel.

Thanks Malvolio. Still searching for a girl who can replace Olivia (tall polish brunette who was in Colindale, Queensbury). She was gorgeous. I think she was about 100/hr, then 120 and 130 towards the end. For me, she was great all rounder.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2016, 11:09:52 pm by Tony_Red »

Offline claretandblue

Personally she looks facially way better than that picture of Emily mortimer and is easily one of the fittest girls I have punted, maybe she just brings out the fluffy side in me  :D

Offline Popperpumppunt

Her phone always goes straight to voicemail??

Online The_Don

« Last Edit: September 24, 2016, 11:24:42 am by The_Don »

Offline Strikar

Personally she looks facially way better than that picture of Emily mortimer and is easily one of the fittest girls I have punted, maybe she just brings out the fluffy side in me  :D

Agree, the photo I tried to put up was of a younger hotter looking EM.

stevejacobs1980

  • Guest
i tired booking her on monday and got no reply . Hoping to see her next week, thanks for the review

Offline iwtc

i tired booking her on monday and got no reply . Hoping to see her next week, thanks for the review

For what it's worth, my comms were arranged via AW email in advance with an AW booking request made in advance and finally by text on the day of.

stevejacobs1980

  • Guest
For what it's worth, my comms were arranged via AW email in advance with an AW booking request made in advance and finally by text on the day of.

i called twice and it rang both times, said she was available.
also text.
Bit of a mission , but ill drop her an email . thanks .


Offline paul_2407

Always very keen to see her so hopeful I'll get round to it one of these days