To me, the pics look 10 or more years old and, therefore, suspect at best. If you read the comment from CitySlicker501 he left her feedback in which he called her "plump". If you then look at the feedback she left him and his disputed reply he says she asked him not to comment on the fake pics (he claims to have an email from her) and that she's really a size 16. In both the comment and his rebuttal to her unflattering comment he was very complimentary of her service but just pointing out she's actually quite large. His feedback certainly looks credible.