Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Dani Nottingham  (Read 2936 times)


6 review(s) for Dani Gold (5 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


I am going to treat that with the contempt it deserves.

Generally in cases like this I would go with the WG not having her shit together, but in the screenshotted email above you sent her on Tuesday, you said "Friday is out" and that Thursday was a possibility. It's not unreasonable from that for Dani to assume that when you messaged her late on Thursday that you didn't mean "tomorrow" as you'd already ruled that day out.

Not a review IMO, put it down to experience and be clearer in your requests in future. I always put the day and the date when requesting, although this does seem to still confuse some WGs :lol:

Offline RedKettle

Generally in cases like this I would go with the WG not having her shit together, but in the screenshotted email above you sent her on Tuesday, you said "Friday is out" and that Thursday was a possibility. It's not unreasonable from that for Dani to assume that when you messaged her late on Thursday that you didn't mean "tomorrow" as you'd already ruled that day out.

Not a review IMO, put it down to experience and be clearer in your requests in future. I always put the day and the date when requesting, although this does seem to still confuse some WGs :lol:

I am not sure how to be clearer than I have been - I assume (because I am not wasting more time reading all the stuff above) that you are seeing a selection of the comms.  However I have always said and I said it in the further post above that I accepted there could have been confusion over the appointment given its last minute nature - which is why I called and texted in the morning to confirm the appointment at 2 that day.  The negative was more driven by the shit attitude and aggression this week.

Offline RedKettle

Is that the sound of horses hooves I hear in the distance?  :rolleyes:

I expected it - however I was very clear in my review of the full circumstances and Dani has been able to give her version of events.  Punters can take accounts of this as additional information in light of the very positive reviews on here for her.  i doubt very much whether this one would stop anyone making a booking, but it (IMO) adds to the overall picture of the woman you are booking. 

I decided in light of the attitude in the responses I was getting (and not because of the booking cock up) to not try and see her again.

Offline GolfNut

No putting prossie interest before punters is not allowed here .   Being a fluffy white knight is why you were banned not for arguing per se. Remember the flunt nonsense.   :dash:

Maybe check with Sir crazy golf

I wasn't involved in the Flunt debacle and don't intend on getting involved here. Far too subjective when comms are involved.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline leicesterdude

I guess it is subjective. but at the same time. theres no reason for something such as a misunderstanding to spill into agression and arguing.

i would assume the WG would have a similar understanding and tact if RK got the dates mixed up and wasted her time.

RK is right. all it would take is a sorry, i mis understoood if thats what you meant. maybe amother time.

but instead its become a huge deal.

unfortunately for dani. no one pays RK for a service. so it doesnt matter to him. but i suspect some people may not see her based on the posts on here since.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Offline RedKettle


unfortunately for dani. no one pays RK for a service.

you have not seen my GayBoy profile then  :D :D

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
That is not what happened - I originally asked for a slot on the Wednesday which she could not do but responded saying she could do Thursday or Friday, which I was then trying to make happen.  On Thursday I said I could do Friday and she responded with 2, however I did not respond until late Thursday evening - might even have been early Friday morning.

Sorry but it was not Thursday it was early hours Friday morning
As for the email chain that explained you were trying to make it Thursday or Friday. That is the first email I posted which states you can't do Friday.  That's the chain you keep referring to saying I knew you meant last Friday. How could I when you had already said it was a no go

I have also shown I did text you Friday evening and I have shown the first email yesterday in reply was not aggressive at all even though you say it was
Even the peed off emails are not aggressive. Blunt yes. Aggressive no

Anyone can read anything as aggressive if they themselves are perhaps already in a bad mood that's why texts often get misinterpreted. However if you read my emails you will see there is no aggression. Getting my point across yes as I don't like being called a liar. Aggressive No.  Anyone who reads them can see that
Your review stated you emailed and I was aggressive in my reply. I'm sorry but no one can say that first email is aggressive. It's why I posted them on here as I know they were not. Yes I wrote a quick response as had already told you Friday via text and I was in rush to get out the door yesterday morning as I had to be somewhere and I didn't want to leave you hanging waiting for a reply

Offline leicesterdude

Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

I wasn't involved in the Flunt debacle and don't intend on getting involved here. Far too subjective when comms are involved.

Ilovewhiteknghting  :D was though, mandy never admitted to lying to cause that frenzy in the end.

Anyway this review should bring them out, like Clarkeonthehorse   :lol:

I don't buy the bit where Dani says she never had her phone on her that day.  You normally have to call her when you arrive at her place. 

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
I don't buy the bit where Dani says she never had her phone on her that day.  You normally have to call her when you arrive at her place. 

Correct but the majority of my bookings come through via my website or the local paper which have a different phone number. As my hours were booked via my website Friday I didn't need my AW phone and only carry it if I'm not fully booked or have bookings via AW. I  have a different number for website/paper than I do for AW

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Again your first email to me yesterday and my first reply (even though had said sorry in text and explained it all)

No aggression from me at all but passive aggressive from you
I will now bow out from this thread now as I hv shown there was no aggression in my contact with you so hv nothing further to add as I have made it clear from all my posts I apologised via text then explained again via email and it just went round and round even though your email Tuesday stated you could NOT do the Friday which I have shown yet you are still insisting you said you might. The fact is not one of the emails I sent was aggressive at all as I have shown



« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 02:58:49 PM by Dani »

Again your first email to me yesterday and my first reply (even though had said sorry in text and explained it all)

No aggression from me at all but passive aggressive from you
I will now bow out from this thread now as I hv shown there was no aggression in my contact with you so hv nothing further to add as I have made it clear from all my posts I apologised via text then explained again via email and it just went round and round even though your email Tuesday stated you could NOT do the Friday which I have shown yet you are still insisting you said you might. The fact is not one of the emails I sent was aggressive
:thumbsdown:
What are you posting kettles punting name or worse on these posts maybe he doesn't want that sharing.

Bottom marks for discretion.    :thumbsdown:

Why I normally avoid forum dwellers not worth the risk
« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 03:17:00 PM by virtualwaster »

He didn't miss much anyway as he didn't really have a good time at his last booking even though on one of my field reports from Manuteam1 he posted he did have a good time and I know what to do. Go figure

Not good form to out who he is on AW, surely??

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
:thumbsdown:
What are you posting kettles punting name or worse on these posts maybe he doesn't want that sharing.

Bottom marks for discretion.    :thumbsdown:

Why I normally avoid forum dwellers not worth the risk

Where have I done that I cropped his AW name off of them

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Not good form to out who he is on AW, surely??

I haven't.  The name I used is the name someone else posted a review under on HERE. No AW name has been used

Thats two people now accusing me of outing his AW name. I haven't. Please show me where I supposedly have ???

I haven't.  The name I used is the name someone else posted a review under on HERE. No AW name has been used

Thats two people now accusing me of outing his AW name. I haven't. Please show me where I supposedly have ???

Dumb to.  Look at pictures there are names within  :coolgirl:them.  Well out of order. :bomb:


Think signature of messages to you.


Lesson to all if you are not using a punting name expect your name to be posted on forum by careless escorts
« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 03:57:35 PM by virtualwaster »

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Dumb to.  Look at pictures there are names within  :coolgirl:them.  Well out of order. :bomb:


Think signature of messages to you.


A false name no different to me signing Dani. No one could work out who a punter is from a false first name. If I had posted his false surname as well then maybe some girls could work it out but not from a first name considering how popular that name is
Now people are just looking to vilify me for the slightest reason after I have shown I was not aggressive in my responses I am now accused of outing his name even though it's a fake name as well as someone else accusing me of outing his AW name which I haven't.
I could easily have not bothered to take the time to crop out his AW name but I wouldn't do that.  However a fake first name wouldn't out anyone especially such a commonly used fake name.  The majority of punters are apparently called Dave, Paul, Martin or John as these are the most common British names amongst the over 35s

And before you say I don't know he uses a fake name. I do as it's totally different to the name he used previously in texts etc
« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 04:04:55 PM by Dani »

Offline leicesterdude

Dani.

Think of it as a punter. someone whos read the reviews. done the research and made a booking, in their mind for a set time and date. all day they keep that window free. optimistic of a good time. the time comes and goes and nothing but radio silence. then messages at 2130 at night. so the oppertunity has now gone to make a plan b or whatever.

thats all it is. no one i dont think is vilfying or ganging up on you. this is a punters forum so people will naturally look at things from the punters view.

i cant speak for rk. but alot of work goes into creating a punting window and having a punt for me. so id be really miffed.

if its a mis understanding then fair enough. but surely yoi see, regardless of the mis communication. that a punter would be disappointed with how the days gone.

I say you rebook RK. and both of you give eachother a little spanking and kiss and make up. x
« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 04:22:48 PM by leicesterdude »
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

A false name no different to me signing Dani. No one could work out who a punter is from a false first name. If I had posted his false surname as well then maybe some girls could work it out but not from a first name considering how popular that name is
Now people are just looking to vilify me for the slightest reason after I have shown I was not aggressive in my responses I am now accused of outing his name even though it's a fake name as well as someone else accusing me of outing his AW name which I haven't.
I could easily have not bothered to take the time to crop out his AW name but I wouldn't do that.  However a fake first name wouldn't out anyone especially such a commonly used fake name.  The majority of punters are apparently called Dave, Paul, Martin or John as these are the most common British names amongst the over 35s

And before you say I don't know he uses a fake name. I do as it's totally different to the name he used previously in texts etc

If you read posts on uke 80% of peogle don't bother so 80% chance you posted his real name on forum.

Horrible assumption after he trusted you with that.  Hopefully he is one of the 20%.


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
Of course I see that but it wasn't the booking itself. He was saying I'm aggressive from the first email and I felt I had to post the majority including the first email, of the emails I sent to show I wasn't aggressive. I was fed up yes. Even annoyed. As he kept insisting his email Tuesday stated he would look and see about Friday. He could have just retread his email to see that was untrue but preferred instead to say I should have known as that email informed me he might want Friday.  That's what annoyed me as either I'm thick and don't get the meaning of 'I can't do Friday' or he was being unreasonable just to cause friction of some sort. Same with the text I sent. He denied it yet I have proven it. I didn't even screen shot it incase accused of editing. I took a photo of it with another phone
I have shown that I was being honest and that I was not aggressive although was getting close at the end I admit.
I do not like to be told that I'm not being truthful over what happened so whilst I understand he was annoyed the booking didn't happen there was no need to try to cause friction and fabricate my reaction
He even wrote a review knowing no booking date had actually been agreed   Admin has left it up so fair enough but I won't be accused of being untruthful, unorganised (I'm analy organised) or of outing someone when I have not. I doubt anyone else would appreciate that either

Now if he accused me of something I had done I would not have even responded on here

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
If you read posts on uke 80% of peogle don't bother so 80% chance you posted his real name on forum.

Horrible assumption after he trusted you with that.  Hopefully he is one of the 20%.

As I said it is one of two names he has used so it's quite obvious it is a fake name. You are just picking in the hope I'll get banned. That's fine but seeing as I knew before I posted that he uses different names I knew I wasn't being trusted with anything and the names he uses are fake. His name changes from text to email so it's not going to be real is it. If you want I'll send admin the texts so he can see that different names were used


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

As I said it is one of two names he has used so it's quite obvious it is a fake name. You are just picking in the hope I'll get banned. That's fine but seeing as I knew before I posted that he uses different names I knew I wasn't being trusted with anything and the names he uses are fake. His name changes from text to email so it's not going to be real is it. If you want I'll send admin the texts so he can see that different names were used

No I don't want you banned.  I just think its cuntish  posting names, you cannot guarantee that it is fake like you assume.


« Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 04:51:53 PM by virtualwaster »

Offline comaminion

Just think the whole thing was a misunderstanding

If someone was making an appointment for anything on the day and said the day I would auto assume it would be the the following week  :unknown:

If I was making a booking for the day I would specifically state 2pm today

I can't see any booking actually confirmed by rk at any point but I'm not devaluing his negative if that's how he feels but as I've said before if I was booking someone who had a negative I would always see how the negative would relate to me and I feel this is an individual negative for rk not a general thing to be wary of as said miscommunication and it wouldn't put me off booking

As for aggressive tone mentioned I don't see it
Waiting for apology , dani pretty clearly apologized,  so what extent do individual sensitivities need to be catered for so it becomes an acceptable apology ?



Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Placebo88

He didn't miss much anyway as he didn't really have a good time at his last booking even though on one of my field reports from Manuteam1 he posted he did have a good time and I know what to do. Go figure

It is for the punter to decide whether they had a good time or not . The comment he made and then trying to book you again shows he we happy . Cannot see any logic to your wanting to dispute him saying he thought you did a good job .

I cannot see a clearly agreed booking , RK's review doesn't sound like he was ever convinced it was on . Last minute confusion on both sides . I see why you assumed he meant the following Friday with his prior message and the time of the text . An answered call or message on Friday morning would have avoided this , giving him a chance at arranging with someone else , I have already read why this did not happen so no need to repeat .





Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)