Have to agree, looks ok but obviously a few years older than the stated age, and at £170 an hour you shouldn't have to make compromises. 
I don't know about a "few" James. Certainly if you look at the bottom of her profile, Adultwork has auto-clocked her age to 19, rather than the 18 she still states. But I saw her in the days not much more than a year ago when her price for a half hour wasn't in excess of her chest measurements in centimetres.
In the original photos she looked pretty terrible, or at least a lot older than she clearly is. The current set includes some that give a slightly better impression if you ignore rather crap photography and awful face-blurring. Nothing that you could actually recognise her by. I'd say the photo in her free gallery called, "Love my legs open" is maybe about the closest you get to what she loooks like. (I've not brought myself to pay 3 quid to nosey at her current PG).
At the time I saw her, I'd say she looked her stated age and was easily one of the classically prettiest WGs working at the time. I'd put her at under 20, and combining a teenage blemish-free skin with such a large chest it could make a topshelf magazine overbalance and fall into your lap. When I saw her, her technique was good but not perfect - it was shortly after she started. She has had time to improve that now and I would see her again if she could offer me a half hour at a more digestible fee. Since that's over a year ago, I can't swear what she looks like now, but from experience I would challenge any suggestion that she is seriously into her twenties. She also, much to her credit, spoke very nicely, the way you might expect an intelligent young woman from a good family to speak, quite quiet, precise and well-enunciated. I realise by saying this that it might get around so she pushes her prices up even further but I suppose I couldn't give a toss if I can't afford her anyway, and not many people on here will pay £170 an hour.
I've just looked up my original review and then, in a critical if in some cases slightly generous comparison of some good Edinburgh prossies, I see she was the only one I gave an unqualified "A" rating for looks.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14091.0 (edit: I did also give a high looks rating to a Russian scalper who was quite stunning looks-wise but so lacking in attitude that I wouldn't return.) I also notice that although you can often rely on an AW number-link for a profile when a prossie changes her name, Lizzie x has kept her name even when she took out a brand new profile.
