Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Lydia Amour and Adultwork  (Read 1601 times)


8 review(s) for LydiaWest (8 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Difficult one this. If it wasn't for the good feedback she s had I'd have thought of this as a neutral but then again might be just be me. That said it's as close to a neutral as it can be:

http://www.newcastleescortsagency.co.uk/escort_view.php?esctitle=Busty+Brunette+Lydia and
https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=3092800

Looks - facially 8.5/10, really quite pretty, body bigger than my usual preference
Manner - friendly, bright, articulate
Services - 6/10 [see below]

I'd picked up on the feedback from here and also contacted Lydia via adultwork before booking. Communications via adult work were good - I'd asked for a roleplay which she was fine with.

With the adultwork page and the reviews here I'd expected someone perhaps a little like Victoria or Keeva, pretty adventurous and 'into it' [though obviously with limits]. Adult work says 'kink/fetish friendly and open minded'. The reality was a perfectly average vanilla appointment. The roleplay was OK but pretty half hearted, though in fairness the only time I've had great roleplay was by accident - a result of a 'so what do you enjoy' question from the ladies.

In terms of services she doesn't do CIM so not wanting to have an accident I always have very little owo without with girls who don't do cim, so I'm left with very brief owo, just in case. All the reviews indicated that A levels are an option but early on when I suggested it, it was a definite no. I get that it's at discretion. Later I went for a little anal play which also received a firm no, perhaps less explainable if they lady does a levels.

All in all it was just... ok. An average appointment with pleasant girl but nothing more. It might be disappointment when I anticipated much better from the reviews and adult work page [certainly not just the no a levels, more that it was all just.... ok]. If she'd been a new girl with a vanilla list of services I think I d have been equally uninspired.

If you want a bright, bigger than average girl she's 'OK'. It might have just been a bad day but there was little else to differentiate her from many of the other girls out there.



8 review(s) found for LydiaWest linked to in above post (8 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Online alfie2013

Just because she's had previous good feedback shouldn't stop you from giving a neutral or even a negative. It certainly doesn't sound like a positive to me  :unknown:

She wasn't terrible [in contrast Olivia might as well have read Heat magazine over my shoulder when I was in her] she was just.... average.. just. If she'd been any less pretty, any less bright or 'rougher' it would certainly have tipped into neutral.

Looking at adult work she s taking time out for surgery and I suspect I would have been one of her last appointments so perhaps a bit 'demob' happy'.

Offline LydiaAmour

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 16
Good Evening MagpiesFan

I just wanted mention a few things to give the people reading the review a slightly more balanced understanding. Yes, anal and anal play was off the table for our booking. While I thoroughly enjoy a good anal session, I have to feel comfortable with the person I'm with, if I don't its not on offer. I'm very clear about my mantra of my body my rules.

You mention that you were expecting someone adventurous, and like my profile says, kink and fetish friendly, which I am, and except the role play you didn't mention any kinks or fetishes. It also states on my profile that I do not do kink/fetish/BDSM appointments via adult work and that for that type of appointment I'm bookable via Amours dark side only. You also mention the role play, now this is where we will differ on opinion. In principle, I was okay with the role play, I'm not a big role-play person and I didnt think I would have an issue with it, however, when it came to the booking, and we met, I began to feel more and more uncomfortable about it, I found it all very inappropriate and uncomfortable. What I should have done is paused the session to explain that the role play made me feel uncomfortable, stupidly I didn't, but I didn't have to keep it up for very long so it wasn't too much of an issue.

I am sorry that you found the booking with me somewhat flat and average, I didn't get that impression from the adult work message you sent after the booking discussing booking number 2. I feel like you reap what you sow and people bounce of each other, if theres no connection, for whatever reason, a booking isn't going to be as good as it could be.

Hopefully you find a girl that can provide the services you want.

L xx

Offline Rod trotter

Its your review and she sounds bang average tbh.

You didnt enjoy it clearly, so im struggling to see why the positive?

And to the reply above, well its his perception of the service you provided im afraid, which sounded half hearted. Also her size is advertised as 14 so you should expect a bigger girl, her pics suggest it
« Last Edit: August 19, 2016, 05:38:58 AM by Rod trotter »
Banning reason: Pathetic little shit threatening Admin that he would get himself banned unless his account is deleted

Aa Lydia indicates I didn't 'not' enjoy it, it was for me just all rather flat. I didn't post a negative because again as Lydia suggests people click or they don't. She has enough positives that that was the most likely explanation, though I suppose I also wanted to flag that if gentlemen were expecting a Keeva/Victoria service they might be disappointed.

Offline Rod trotter

Aa Lydia indicates I didn't 'not' enjoy it, it was for me just all rather flat. I didn't post a negative because again as Lydia suggests people click or they don't. She has enough positives that that was the most likely explanation, though I suppose I also wanted to flag that if gentlemen were expecting a Keeva/Victoria service they might be disappointed.


Fair enough dude  :thumbsup:
Banning reason: Pathetic little shit threatening Admin that he would get himself banned unless his account is deleted

Offline Benja73

Good Evening MagpiesFan

I just wanted mention a few things to give the people reading the review a slightly more balanced understanding. Yes, anal and anal play was off the table for our booking. While I thoroughly enjoy a good anal session, I have to feel comfortable with the person I'm with, if I don't its not on offer. I'm very clear about my mantra of my body my rules.

You mention that you were expecting someone adventurous, and like my profile says, kink and fetish friendly, which I am, and except the role play you didn't mention any kinks or fetishes. It also states on my profile that I do not do kink/fetish/BDSM appointments via adult work and that for that type of appointment I'm bookable via Amours dark side only. You also mention the role play, now this is where we will differ on opinion. In principle, I was okay with the role play, I'm not a big role-play person and I didnt think I would have an issue with it, however, when it came to the booking, and we met, I began to feel more and more uncomfortable about it, I found it all very inappropriate and uncomfortable. What I should have done is paused the session to explain that the role play made me feel uncomfortable, stupidly I didn't, but I didn't have to keep it up for very long so it wasn't too much of an issue.

I am sorry that you found the booking with me somewhat flat and average, I didn't get that impression from the adult work message you sent after the booking discussing booking number 2. I feel like you reap what you sow and people bounce of each other, if theres no connection, for whatever reason, a booking isn't going to be as good as it could be.

Hopefully you find a girl that can provide the services you want.

L xx

Can we ask made you feel uncomfortable about the role play if you had agreed to it?

Offline Looking4fun

Good review, my take on it is you had a good time but it didn't meet your expectations, it happens mate.

Offline LydiaAmour

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 16
It was not just the role play subject matter that made me uncomfortable, but also the bigger in which it was kept up. In my experience with role play in the past, its usually broken within the first few minutes, we have a giggle then a jolly good time is had by all. However this booking was not like that at all. 

The role play was virgin school girl. I took that to mean quite a vanilla booking, with me acting coy and shy. What made me uncomfortable, was how he behaved. There was lots of dirty talk surrounding my school girl virginity and how he was going to take it and how I had been keeping it for him ect ect. As I said in my earlier post, I should have stopped it, but  Magpiesfan is physically imposing man, very tall and quite a bit older than me, I felt like I couldn't.

I'm a good actress, but not good enough hide when I'm so uncomfortable. It has played on my mind since the booking (august 8th) and after speaking to a couple of other girls and phone handlers about this client, I felt uncomfortable to the point of speaking to outsiders for advice on monday.

I make it clear that I'm not a fan of this site, due as some of the detail one reviewers go into is a bit gross for me, but i understand why clients would use it and find it useful, but I'm also not scared of a negative or neutral and I want to make clear that I'm not posting this to make myself look better, if someone thinks I'm average, amazing or abysmal, thats their opinion and they are entitled to that, whether I agree with it or not.

Lydia - sorry if you were uncomfortable. Would have stopped immediately if you d said. That you were probably explains why we didn't click. It would have been better if you d just said not for me.

PM ed you also
« Last Edit: August 19, 2016, 11:30:14 AM by magpiesfan »

Online alfie2013

In my opinion Lydia doesn't come across well in this, after all she was given a positive and I think it should have been left at that. Instead she tries to make the op out as some sort of pervert. She could easily have let other girls know her feelings in PRIVATE and allow them to make up there own minds.  Like I said that's the way I see it.  :unknown:

I ought to have realized she was uncomfortable so I get why she s upset and it explains why the appointment felt flat. It was a case of message sent vs message received I guess. It s made me think a lot more from the WG's perspective.

Offline LydiaAmour

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 16
The reason I posted, wasn't to make Magpies look like a pervert at all, everyone is into somethings that may cause others discomfort, my intention was to show that all girls, even girls like myself who are vocal about safety, safeguarding ect can still find themselves in situation that make them feel uncomfortable, and that even we can find it hard to challenge whatever it is that makes us feel that way. I'd also like to point out that aside from the role play, magpies was a nice guy, I didn't feel unsafe with him, just uncomfortable. When I said I felt like I couldn't pause the booking and end the role play, it wasn't because I was scared of him, it was I had agreed to it previously, obviously if i knew it would make me feel uncomfortable I wouldn't have agreed to it and the booking wouldn't have happened.

As I've said before, a review doesn't bother me, positive or otherwise. However, if its suitable to discuss girls in the detail that is often used on this site then the clients need to be able to see the girls side of things as well. The girl who's house you think is a shithole, might be being forced, the girl who is unclean, might not be showering to put people off because she doesn't want to do the job but has no choice, the one thats drunk/smacked of her face might be being fed those things to keep her awake to make more money for someone that doesn't care about their safety or well being. 

Admin has done fantastically with UKE, creating a space which allows girls to have a dialog and engage with clients in a way that isn't arranging a booking. And while this site is aimed at clients, punters, whatever you want to be called, it shouldn't mean that girls don't get to have an input as well.

 This is NOT an attack on Magpies, I'm just a very honest and open person and felt like my side should be available to view too.


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Looking4fun

The reason I posted, wasn't to make Magpies look like a pervert at all, everyone is into somethings that may cause others discomfort, my intention was to show that all girls, even girls like myself who are vocal about safety, safeguarding ect can still find themselves in situation that make them feel uncomfortable, and that even we can find it hard to challenge whatever it is that makes us feel that way. I'd also like to point out that aside from the role play, magpies was a nice guy, I didn't feel unsafe with him, just uncomfortable. When I said I felt like I couldn't pause the booking and end the role play, it wasn't because I was scared of him, it was I had agreed to it previously, obviously if i knew it would make me feel uncomfortable I wouldn't have agreed to it and the booking wouldn't have happened.

As I've said before, a review doesn't bother me, positive or otherwise. However, if its suitable to discuss girls in the detail that is often used on this site then the clients need to be able to see the girls side of things as well. The girl who's house you think is a shithole, might be being forced, the girl who is unclean, might not be showering to put people off because she doesn't want to do the job but has no choice, the one thats drunk/smacked of her face might be being fed those things to keep her awake to make more money for someone that doesn't care about their safety or well being. 

Admin has done fantastically with UKE, creating a space which allows girls to have a dialog and engage with clients in a way that isn't arranging a booking. And while this site is aimed at clients, punters, whatever you want to be called, it shouldn't mean that girls don't get to have an input as well.

 This is NOT an attack on Magpies, I'm just a very honest and open person and felt like my side should be available to view too.
Im with you on most things, but this isn't uke this is a punters review site, which depends on details to help other punters make their minds up, the more details good or bad make a huge difference in a punters decision to make a booking.


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline BrandsHill

Im with you on most things, but this isn't uke this is a punters review site, which depends on details to help other punters make their minds up, the more details good or bad make a huge difference in a punters decision to make a booking.

My own view is that Lydia's responses / comments have been excellent and are not out of place on this site. She's conveyed what she truly felt which,  apart from being brave, has also enlightened Magpiesfan, and I expect others readers also, which can only be positive. That is validated by Magpiesfan own very self reflective and very sensible responses. Well done to him and Lydia for your frankness.
Banning reason: Trolling on UKE


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Seahorse

My view is that she's very choosy (or wary) of the clients that she sees.

Around 2 months ago, I made a booking (confirmed) with her and an hour before, she cancelled because she was unwell and promised she'd do all that she could to accommodate me at a later date.  Fair enough, I thought.

From Monday this week, I have contacted her via text (no response), via email on AW with more detailed reminders of our previous experience (no response) and finally by phone, leaving a message (no response).

I've obviously said something to spook her - reading her first response on here makes some sense to me.  I've seen two Amour girls in between so she could have chatted to them, too.

I'll not be bothering to contact her on her return, especially after this review.



Banning reason: Fluffy demanding other punters not post negatives to avoid prossies losing money

Offline Looking4fun

My own view is that Lydia's responses / comments have been excellent and are not out of place on this site. She's conveyed what she truly felt which,  apart from being brave, has also enlightened Magpiesfan, and I expect others readers also, which can only be positive. That is validated by Magpiesfan own very self reflective and very sensible responses. Well done to him and Lydia for your frankness.
i was alluding to details that we post in reviews, the more detail the better it is for us to make a decision, uke is a level playground for punters & escorts, this is a dedicated punting review site! If the girls don't like reading detailed reviews they shouldn't be on here.


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Rod trotter

i was alluding to details that we post in reviews, the more detail the better it is for us to make a decision, uke is a level playground for punters & escorts, this is a dedicated punting review site! If the girls don't like reading detailed reviews they shouldn't be on here.

They have the right to respond, what gives you the right to say they havent? Your coming accross like billy big bollocks of late.

would you jump on one of the uke darlings as much? Doubt it...



Banning reason: Pathetic little shit threatening Admin that he would get himself banned unless his account is deleted


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Looking4fun

They have the right to respond, what gives you the right to say they havent? Your coming accross like billy big bollocks of late.

would you jump on one of the uke darlings as much? Doubt it...
When did I say they couldn't reply? Read the thread properly.
Don't worry I know you want to go out in a blaze of glory!


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Rod trotter

When did I say they couldn't reply? Read the thread properly.
Don't worry I know you want to go out in a blaze of glory!

 ;)
Banning reason: Pathetic little shit threatening Admin that he would get himself banned unless his account is deleted

Offline coolguy1990

Generally, I think this site would be even better for punters, if the girls felt more comfortable coming on here to discuss things and could chip in more. We are all in danger of becoming deluded by the constant confirmation-bias of our own opinions. To make more informed choices, we need more information, not less.
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline Rod trotter

Generally, I think this site would be even better for punters, if the girls felt more comfortable coming on here to discuss things and could chip in more. We are all in danger of becoming deluded by the constant confirmation-bias of our own opinions. To make more informed choices, we need more information, not less.

i disagree, we have uke for that, this is for punters

yes they can respond to reviews and shit but no i want minimum paticipation
Banning reason: Pathetic little shit threatening Admin that he would get himself banned unless his account is deleted


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Offline Looking4fun

i disagree, we have uke for that, this is for punters

yes they can respond to reviews and shit but no i want minimum paticipation
+1


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)