Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: How about a 'So-So' rating in reviews??  (Read 4181 times)

Offline pokenn

I agree that a black and white, positive or negative doesn't cover a lot of my punts. I would support a "neutral" category.

It's rare that a punt is perfect or completely awful. A lot are somewhere in between.

Re: How about a 'So-So' rating in reviews??

The whole point of Positive or Negative reviews is the help others make up their mind, they may already be on the fence with a decision so it really doesn't help anyone if you give them another fence to sit on as well.

If unsure just ask yourself this:

"Would I pay her again to have exactly the same session?"

If your answer is yes then it's a positive and your review should really emphasise these strengths.
If no then it's negative and again your review should have these concerns at the forefront.

It all boils down to whether you would pay again, if yes then she has done something right, if no she has done something wrong.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 08:46:43 PM by sucky2dollar »

Online Jimmyredcab

The whole point of Positive or Negative reviews is the help others make up their mind, they may already be on the fence with a decision so it really doesn't help anyone if you give them another fence to sit on as well.

If unsure just ask yourself this:

"Would I pay her again to have exactly the same session?"

If your answer is yes then it's a positive and your review should really emphasise these strengths.
If no then it's negative and again your review should have these concerns at the forefront.

It all boils down to whether you would pay again, if yes then she has done something right, if no she has done something wrong.

I think this sums it up pretty well.
Neutral reports are an absolute waste of time.
Either you would pay again or you wouldn't.
Not exactly rocket science is it.  :unknown:

Tony Montana



If unsure just ask yourself this:

"Would I pay her again to have exactly the same session?"


I don't see things as such black and white.  I've had a bad punt but it was mainly my fault as I was too tired to enjoy it but the girl looked great and put in 100% effort.  I've had a bad punt because the girl looked like my sister and it was weird but again, no fault of the girl, so in those cases I wouldn't pay her the same again to have the same punt but in both cases I would recommend the girl and it would be very unfair on them to give them a negative rating.

Offline bestbefore



"Would I pay her again to have exactly the same session?"

If your answer is yes then it's a positive and your review should really emphasise these strengths.
If no then it's negative and again your review should have these concerns at the forefront.

It all boils down to whether you would pay again, if yes then she has done something right, if no she has done something wrong.

I dont agree. A review is absolutely nothing to do with whether you would go back to the same girl again, it is passing on accurate and valid information to fellow punters, so they can make their own decisions. Isnt that what this forum is about?

As I said before, many punters dont want sex, they just want to chat to a gorgeous naked girl for an hour. Don't believe me?? then ask some of the wgs. Many punters dont want to kiss the girls - so FK is not an issue.

Nothing is life is black and white. thankfully there are shades of grey or life would be dull indeed. The girl I saw had a very good credible review on Aw, which is why I saw her, but for me she was neither a good or a bad punt, but there were enough positives for me that suggested another punter might have a good experience.

And she had the best knockers on AW!




Offline yumyum3

Just because one person has a good or bad experience with someone, doesn't mean that another day another person will have the same. I just can't see things as fixed in black and white as that. I would prefer more reviews as I'm interested in reading about people's experiences; they are often entertaining as well as informative and I can make up my own mind whether to take the risk. MY two recent reviews on HOD were put in the positive category although they weren't that brilliant. I tried to be as informative as I could to let people decide for themselves. I would encourage more people to write reviews whether good, bad or indifferent but I sense I'm in the minority on this.

Offline haystacks79

Just because one person has a good or bad experience with someone, doesn't mean that another day another person will have the same. I just can't see things as fixed in black and white as that. I would prefer more reviews as I'm interested in reading about people's experiences; they are often entertaining as well as informative and I can make up my own mind whether to take the risk. MY two recent reviews on HOD were put in the positive category although they weren't that brilliant. I tried to be as informative as I could to let people decide for themselves. I would encourage more people to write reviews whether good, bad or indifferent but I sense I'm in the minority on this.

I agree with this - each punting experience is different, and the dynamics between punter and wg will play a huge part of it, and it's very subjective. Sometimes you just won't be compatible (for whatever reason), but if the girl was genuine, tried her best and was willing to offer all you were looking for, it doesn't mean that she deserves a negative rating - it just didn't work for you at that time.
I've never written a full report on anyone after a single meeting, only when I've been back to see them again, so then I have a better idea of what they are really like. Having said that, there isn't a wg that I've seen that I wouldn't go back to - but I know my likes are simple, and I'm happy with seeing just a couple of girls; these are the ones that I immediately felt that additional elusive and indefinable spark with.

Offline jackdaw

Just because one person has a good or bad experience with someone, doesn't mean that another day another person will have the same. I just can't see things as fixed in black and white as that. I would prefer more reviews as I'm interested in reading about people's experiences; they are often entertaining as well as informative and I can make up my own mind whether to take the risk. MY two recent reviews on HOD were put in the positive category although they weren't that brilliant. I tried to be as informative as I could to let people decide for themselves. I would encourage more people to write reviews whether good, bad or indifferent but I sense I'm in the minority on this.

Agree completely, even though I'm way too lazy to write reviews.

Any honest review has value in my eyes. Even the ones we tend to knock from time to time ("too much of a gentleman to disclose...")

I think you have to read the whole review to get the most from it. We've all see positive reviews where we thought "not for me", or neg reviews that made us think "I'll gladly put up with that".

Offline Melb

I'm in favour of a neutral review.
There can be circumstances which make the punt less than positive beyond the control of the prossie.
Having a neutral means someone can try her, armed with the facts, and make his oen mind up.

I have had great and mediocre punts with the same girl on different days.

Online Jimmyredcab

I agree with this - each punting experience is different, and the dynamics between punter and wg will play a huge part of it, and it's very subjective. Sometimes you just won't be compatible (for whatever reason), but if the girl was genuine, tried her best and was willing to offer all you were looking for, it doesn't mean that she deserves a negative rating - it just didn't work for you at that time.

You are correct.
My policy over the years has always been to only do FR's when the punt is either good or bad ------------ if I felt that the punt was another mediocre experience then it would not warrant a report.
I remember one guy on auto-censored saying that you shouldn't give a girl a bad FR because you could ruin her business, that is total cobblers and shows the difference between the two forums.

Offline yumyum3

Quote
I remember one guy on auto-censored saying that you shouldn't give a girl a bad FR because you could ruin her business, that is total cobblers and shows the difference between the two forums.
I'm glad there's a difference between the two forums and I barely read PN FRs because of the large amount of long-winded fluffery involved and the ubiquitous "treat her well gents and you will be rewarded ...  :vomit:".  However, what I'm suggesting is that written in a more robust UKP style, even a review with a neutral rating could be both entertaining and informative to read  :)

Offline Ali Katt

Quote
As I said before, many punters dont want sex, they just want to chat to a gorgeous naked girl for an hour. Don't believe me?? then ask some of the wgs. Many punters dont want to kiss the girls - so FK is not an issue.
I haven't heard from any WGs on this forum on this subject. TBH I think the majority of men on this forum see an escort for sex, even if it could be for oral only. If I wanted to chat and see a girl naked, I'd use webcams, or visit Spearmint Rhinos - paying just to chat or just for a massage is a total waste of money, the punter in question may enjoy it, but it's not for me; likewise the escort may love it because she has to do very little.

As I have said before you have decided a neutral rating is appropriate for the girl, if I had the same experience it would be negative. For me just because the girl has a big pair of tits or a nice body doesn't mean she can get away with being lazy. You said you prefer FK so the fact she didn't offer DFK could be an issue for you; it is your experiences no-one elses. If I see an indie and she doesn't offer RO, some men may not do it, but I would want it, hence that would be a negative point.

Someone mentioned a neutral rating because of incompatibly or because the punter is tired; to me these would be good ratings, depending on the circumstances. I wouldn't give a girl a negative or neutral because I came too quick, if everything else was how it should be.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2013, 02:01:07 PM by Ali Katt »

Online Jimmyredcab

I haven't heard from any WGs on this forum on this subject. TBH I think the majority of men on this forum see an escort for sex, even if it could be for oral only.

I would very much hope so but you will always get some guys who seek company, personally I find that quite sad.   :thumbsdown:

The girl I saw had a very good credible review on Aw, which is why I saw her, but for me she was neither a good or a bad punt, but there were enough positives for me that suggested another punter might have a good experience.

And she had the best knockers on AW!

Then that is a positive.

The problem with having a "so so" or "neutral" rating is I think you would soon find the review section overrun with these. It would be too easy for someone to pick one negative in an overall good punt or vice versa and put it in the "so so" catergory.


Online Jimmyredcab



Any honest review has value in my eyes.

It may be honest in the eyes of the author but sometimes I see positive reviews where the girl has refused to kiss, spoke very little English and rushed things along --------------------- in my mind that is a negative.   :thumbsdown:

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,593
I dont think you can have a so so review tbh.  You either enjoyed it or you didnt so for you it was either positive or negative.  In the review you can put why it was negative/positive for you and others can then make up their minds if it would be a different experience for them.  For instance if you put negative as we did not click or negative because no DFK but other services were good then someone else might want to see her because DFK is not important for them and clicking is down to the individual.
As long as you state clearly why it was negative or positive then everyone else is capable of making up their own minds.
As long as the girl did offer all the services stated and looked like her pictures and was polite and happy then a negative saying we did not click or I was just not in the mood so did not enjoy it will not affect her business.  If she did not offer services agreed on then it is her own bloody fault and she might then realise she cannot lie to people


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)