A timely reminder...
Here are two examples - names witheld, obvs - that provide little incentive to investigate the review any further; thereby defeating its purpose.
"Avoid, Back to Back sessions, Extreme Clock watching, Very unprofessional" - er, Great... No name, no area, not going to bother reading.
"Peneloppe Ferre - Yeah, she was in porn" - at least we get a name. But the mention of porn is ego-massaging blah.
Now that embedding images is easier, can I suggest that this, too, is adopted in the review format. We all know how pics can help identify if a profile has been subject to B&S further down the line, etc.
For any newbies reading this - please refer to the Punting Wiki, which has a dedicated section on Reviews
Some goon the other week posted an enquiry as to the whereabouts of a WG on the London review board as a Positive. I asked him why he'd done that and the response was, "I didn't know where else to post it."