Really thought provoking questions here mate thanks
The primary function of UKP is to discuss and review punting experiences and not a pro$$ie search database.
Isnt the key question how how do the members get value out of the site instead of what it primarily meant to be?
As the number of reviews contributed has increased so rapidly essentially a review search database is what is becoming because this is what most people use it for, to search for well reviewed girls who meet their requirements
Just that at the moment its not as efficient as it could be for this hence why as i mentioned earlier members make threads for specific niches
In theory there is nothing wrong with your proposal and I believe evolution and progress are good things, as for the practicalities:
What of the thousands of reviews without tags?
It would have to be implemented going forward
But members could be encouraged to tag their reviews retrospectively. The average member does not have that many reviews so could easily do this over a period of time
Going forward, what about date and location for finding a big ass pro$$ie who is willing to provide facials?
Personal opinions will always differ on size and appearance, when does big ass become fat arse?
I cant see how date has an effect? Can you explain?
Where you make a great point is location. Because if you clicked a link for DFK it would bring up all dfk reviews on the board as a whole
I think there is something called geo location tags or something like that where tags can be made location specific so you can click on a tag which would show you tagged review with DFK in North West England
Regarding when does a big ass become a fat ass or what is classed as dfk, yes people have different tastes
But most people generally would come close in their descriptions of a big round ass, or a bbw, or big tits or dfk, or what a latina looks like, or what an asian looks like etc. Etc. Probably about 60-70% of what is tagged i estimate would be seen as falling into any one category by the majority. Its not going to be perfect, but nothing ever is.
Then you come to the biggest stumbling block which is the pro$$ies themselves and their discretionary preferences?
I think I addressed this here??
If Punter A does not get OWO or DFK when he goes to see Bubbliscious Babe123 then he does not tag or put her in either of those categories
If Punter B gets OWO and DFK when he goes to see Bubbliscious Babe123 the he tags or puts her in those categories
If Punter C is after some DFK and clicks on DFK on the categories page he will be shown links/reviews of all the girls that have been tagged/categorised as offering DFK to a Punter.
Bubbliscious Babe123 will be one of these girls. Punter C is now aware of a girl he didnt know about before who offers a service he is after. Punter C can now dig deeper and look at her reviews as a whole where he will find she offered it to Punter B but not to Punter A and he can make up his own mind if he wants to see her
If he decides he does not want to see her he can go back to the list and repeat the process
The key thing is this is not to change review and how they are done but to give them an added feature
An point to think about is why do we categorise reviews by location? Shouldnt they have been left uncategorised so a member has to read through hundred of reviews before they find a review for say Wales?
Why do we categorise reviews, positive, neytral, negative? Whats the point of this if ultimately its the reader that will decide for themself if they view it as pos, neg or neu and if they will decide to see the gilr in question?