WGs who state they will never do bareback

[PussyLover789]

So im just looking at some working girls frequently asked questions on adultwork and the one which always pops up is "Do you offer bareback?" & the WG replies "Never in a million years not even for a Mi££ion pound" well its good to see that  alot of girls wont offer it but how many really would if the price was right?? (& no im not looking for a barebacker i was just wondering) guys what do you think? do you think money talks? 

[Dani]

I think most would have a price but that price may be a small sum or it may be a ludicrous amount that no one could ever afford and if they could would never pay it.  Prices from an extra £50 - 10million.  I imagine any sensible women still wouldn't though as 10mill is not that great if you get HIV and the meds don't work well for you and you die of AIDS or pneumonia or some other HIV related illness. Or perhaps get hepC and die.  No amount of money is worth risking your life for as you can't enjoy money when you are dead

[foxinthebox9]

Topic been covered many times in other threads. WG's bareback all the time with boyfriends/pimps etc etc. You don't know what they are doing away from fucking you. WG's who say they don't with clients, some are telling the truth, some won't be. You will never find out who unless it comes up between you both, in which case you will be told to fuck off or yes. Money talks in every industry as people are not just whores in this game, but in every walk of life. Money makes people do stupid things because of greed. Loads WG's will take extra money to fuck you bareback, Loads will blacklist you. Every punter needs to think with his head not his cock and every self respecting WG needs to do the same (without a cock).

[Happylad]

It may not be the money that talks so much as being a regular customer.  Several years ago it was quite common to see, in response to that question, the reply that a girl would do bareback with a client she had seen a number (usually 10 or more) of times.  Although the dangers of HIV have certainly made most girls very much more careful I have little doubt that there are quite a few girls who, with a long term regular that they know well and are fairly sure of, are prepared to extend the privilege. Certainly I know of a couple of blokes who have been seeing the same girl for some years and have regular bareback, and I very much doubt whether they are simply the exceptions to a rule.

[myothernameis]

I think we would all be surprised at what a escort really thinks about bareback, on paper she may make it known, she wont participate with anyone wanting bareback, but in person, and with someone she trust it might be on

Oasis Sauna parlour Glasgow, there was a escort here, who offered me unprotected sex, I declined, and that was the last time I seen her

[AnthG]

Oasis Sauna parlour Glasgow, there was a escort here, who offered me unprotected sex, I declined, and that was the last time I seen her

Then why didn't you then come on the forums and neg her for it?

This is the thing I truly do not understand. A load of people on the forums go "A girl offered me this, and then I never seen her again". Or on UKE "A punter asked for this and then I refused to accept bookings from him".

Why do you say this long after the fact and not neg him and her to expose what they are doing. As you wont be the special one that has been the only one to be asked by them.

[nervous colin]

I did see one profile recently who said "I do not do bareback, no, no, no, never! But I suppose if you can prove you are clean and thats what you want, I would!"

[myothernameis]

Then why didn't you then come on the forums and neg her for it?

Because it was in the mid 80's, and the escort in question would be in her 70's

[np500]

Brace your self N C !

[ickydicky]

the manky french hoor in glasgow celine findlay-magalie/sexyfrenchgirl does bareback. avoid.

[nervous colin]

Brace your self N C !

I only read the profile, I didnt visit her! I am not that stupid!

[ickydicky]

well nervous if you are ever in glasgow stay well clear of the french hoor celine findlay/magalie/sexyfrenchgirl. your nervous system will collapse when she suddenly rams her finger up your arse and then grabs you bare cock and shoves it into her gaping pussy and rides you all the while crackling wildly as she has so much coke snorted up her massive nose.

[raylondoner]

well nervous if you are ever in glasgow stay well clear of the french hoor celine findlay/magalie/sexyfrenchgirl. your nervous system will collapse when she suddenly rams her finger up your arse and then grabs you bare cock and shoves it into her gaping pussy and rides you all the while crackling wildly as she has so much coke snorted up her massive nose.

Seems like he has had first-hand experience, given level of detail! 

[Nagilum]

Seems like he has had first-hand experience, given level of detail! 

Sounds like a hoot! 

[ickydicky]

Sounds like a hoot! 

more of a hooter. enormous and stuffed with coke.

[HighlyMotivated]

Quite annoying when you spot a good cheap WG and then see that she offers Bareback...

Has anyone on UKP ever reported catching an STD from a prossie? Or know of anyone who has?

There must be loads of punters who see bareback WGs, but are there any prossies blacklisted for actually carrying an STD?

[Nagilum]

Quite annoying when you spot a good cheap WG and then see that she offers Bareback...

Has anyone on UKP ever reported catching an STD from a prossie? Or know of anyone who has?

There must be loads of punters who see bareback WGs, but are there any prossies blacklisted for actually carrying an STD?

Why is it annoying if you are using protection?  The same principle applies and you are assuming they are all STD riddled.  Just be safe and you are OK.

Punters have caught things from working girls before, but not through barebacking. Other punters will tell you how they have punted for years and not caught a single thing.  To catch something from a WG is rare, very rare.

You will never know if she is carrying an STD, therefore you default what what I said previously.

Loads of threads on this topic.

[myothernameis]

Has anyone on UKP ever reported catching an STD from a prossie? Or know of anyone who has?

The only thing I have caught, have had a few cold sores, possibly for going down on the escort, but now take preventative action

Before and after oral, use blistex sold core cream, and find that does the trick, and keeps the cold sore away 

[hullad]

I see bareback in any WG profile and she is passed by....

I do not care if she is drop dead gorgeous, takes in every orrifice, OWO, spit swapping, and all for £1 3 6 if we all did it the bareback would soon vanish.

[AnthG]

Quite annoying when you spot a good cheap WG and then see that she offers Bareback...

Has anyone on UKP ever reported catching an STD from a prossie? Or know of anyone who has?

If she is cheap and offering BB it means one of two things.

1. She is a PG scammer and no girl exists.

2. She is already infected with something and is likely a drug addict with serious mental issues so no longer cares anymore.

Why is it annoying if you are using protection?  The same principle applies and you are assuming they are all STD riddled.  Just be safe and you are OK.

Punters have caught things from working girls before, but not through barebacking. Other punters will tell you how they have punted for years and not caught a single thing.  To catch something from a WG is rare, very rare.

In my eyes, seeing a WG who clearly offers bareback and saying its ok as I will wear a condom when having sex with her is like driving a motorbike down the motorway at full speed with a wheel that is about to fall off saying "it's ok as I have my crash helmet on".

You don't just have sex. You do thinks like OWO or kissing, or reverse oral with girls and if she has HIV, Hepatitis C, Chlamydia or Gonorrhea or god knows whatelse from barebacking. Putting a condom on just for the protection is not safe at all.

[ickydicky]

never go near a barebacker for she is also sure to be a junkie and a mental case

[NIK]

Quite annoying when you spot a good cheap WG and then see that she offers Bareback...

Has anyone on UKP ever reported catching an STD from a prossie? Or know of anyone who has?

There must be loads of punters who see bareback WGs, but are there any prossies blacklisted for actually carrying an STD?

Yes. My cock dropped off, but I had it re-attached.

[Nagilum]

Yes. My cock dropped off, but I had it re-attached.

Don't remind me, it took me ages and lots of scotch tape that night. 

[Nagilum]

In my eyes, seeing a WG who clearly offers bareback and saying its ok as I will wear a condom when having sex with her is like driving a motorbike down the motorway at full speed with a wheel that is about to fall off saying "it's ok as I have my crash helmet on".

You don't just have sex. You do thinks like OWO or kissing, or reverse oral with girls and if she has HIV, Hepatitis C, Chlamydia or Gonorrhea or god knows whatelse from barebacking. Putting a condom on just for the protection is not safe at all.

Your risk of catching those things is exactly the same with a non BB girl, provided you wear a condom you are not at risk of things passing through the latex, especially HIV.  The clap is transmitted through bodily fluids too and the condom will stop it. How can you say it's not safe at all. If that's the case lets just dispense with condoms all together. Come on Anth

The scenario with the bike only works if I was saying go unprotected my circumcision will protect me or lower the risk

You will not catch HIV through oral there are no known cases of that, only in cases where you are infected and you shoot your load in their mouth, not through saliva on you.

External Link/Members Only

Fact sheet above about its effectiveness and what it can stop, including all the STDs you listed. While they are not 100% they are the most effective form of protection.  Of course being absolutely safe means no punting.

So it does not matter, the rules are the same. Be safe because you don't know their history regardless of bareback bring listed or not.

[jawill]

I caught Gonorrhoea once from a blow job with a WG, but always use a condom for penetration and also now for oral.

However even with a condom there are still some risks. Herpes and genital warts, crabs, scabies can be spread even if you use a condom. Many guys get herpes at the base of the penis which is where skin on skin contact takes place during sex.

So it's a calculated risk basically. When i go down on a WG i always have a look to see if there are any blisters, sores, etc.

Nothing in life is 100% safe, it's up to you how much risk your willing to accept. Get your self checked regularly, always use a condom and be as safe as you can be!

[jonko]

Quite annoying when you spot a good cheap WG and then see that she offers Bareback...

Has anyone on UKP ever reported catching an STD from a prossie? Or know of anyone who has?

There must be loads of punters who see bareback WGs, but are there any prossies blacklisted for actually carrying an STD?

Don't do it whatever the temptation. I caught Hepititus (not a STD but a blood born desease) from going with a street girl and regretted it for the rest of my life. I was so ill. She was obviously taking drugs and had it in her blood. after giving me a really rough and long blow job (at the time it was mad - blew my mind) but my cock was sore for days, and she had scrapped the head with her teeth, actually drawn blood. It was the only thing that I could blame for where and how I contracted the disease . I nearly died and ended up with a liver transplant 15 years later.

i can't be sure that it was this girl (back in the 90s) but really, I had been safe before and never done drugs , never shared a needle or a toothbrush and never fucked a girl on her period (apart from when I was a teenager which was a long long time ago.

Not saying that punting is wrong and that all girls are carrying anything or infected, but the realities are there and there are  dangers - particularly if you like rough sex etc. I would never chance it again and I would advise anyone against it.

[Nagilum]

I caught Gonorrhoea once from a blow job with a WG, but always use a condom for penetration and also now for oral.

However even with a condom there are still some risks. Herpes and genital warts, crabs, scabies can be spread even if you use a condom. Many guys get herpes at the base of the penis which is where skin on skin contact takes place during sex.

So it's a calculated risk basically. When i go down on a WG i always have a look to see if there are any blisters, sores, etc.

Nothing in life is 100% safe, it's up to you how much risk your willing to accept. Get your self checked regularly, always use a condom and be as safe as you can be!

Agreed. So use a condom if worried. That's why some punters go with OW.

[smiths]

Why is it annoying if you are using protection?  The same principle applies and you are assuming they are all STD riddled.  Just be safe and you are OK.

Punters have caught things from working girls before, but not through barebacking. Other punters will tell you how they have punted for years and not caught a single thing.  To catch something from a WG is rare, very rare.

You will never know if she is carrying an STD, therefore you default what what I said previously.

Loads of threads on this topic.

The same principle certainly doesn't apply for me as I know they say they offer BB so I wouldn't touch them with a bargepole even using a condom, such WGs are fucking stupid morons at least, at worst they are purposely trying to infect punters, or are mentalists, in either scenario they aren't people I wish to meet let alone fuck. A punter is safer by avoiding such people in my book though that in no way means a WG who doesn't advertise she offers BB isn't infected, that's the risk punting holds.

I assume many infected by BB punters wouldn't wish to admit on here they have barebacked some skank who advertised she offered it, I imagine they wouldn't get too much sympathy, they certainly wouldn't off me.

[smiths]

Your risk of catching those things is exactly the same with a non BB girl, provided you wear a condom you are not at risk of things passing through the latex, especially HIV.  The clap is transmitted through bodily fluids too and the condom will stop it. How can you say it's not safe at all. If that's the case lets just dispense with condoms all together. Come on Anth

The scenario with the bike only works if I was saying go unprotected my circumcision will protect me or lower the risk

You will not catch HIV through oral there are no known cases of that, only in cases where you are infected and you shoot your load in their mouth, not through saliva on you.

External Link/Members Only

Fact sheet above about its effectiveness and what it can stop, including all the STDs you listed. While they are not 100% they are the most effective form of protection.  Of course being absolutely safe means no punting.

So it does not matter, the rules are the same. Be safe because you don't know their history regardless of bareback bring listed or not.

Which doesn't factor in a condom breaking with a WG who advertises she offers BB, why on earth would a punter choose to punt with such a WG if he could punt with one who didn't advertise she offered BB, sure the one who didn't COULD be infected but at least he knew the one who advertised she did offer BB could be avoided. So it DOES matter in my case and the rules aren't the same for me at all. I wish to avoid WGs I know advertise they offer BB as that's the best I can do.

[Nagilum]

No doubt the risk would be higher if the girl does bareback all the time in a scenario where it breaks.  The scenario I'm presenting is safe sex, if you practice safe sex you are not at risk. The article I have pasted above, shows this.

It is illogical to say using a condom properly presents A greater risk. Did the girls STDs suddenly develop a way to bypass the latex? That is my point to AnthG

Now in regards to preference, it's down to the punter. I'm not advocating we all suddenly go seek these providers. However should you punt a girl in this category and have safe sex, then it's important to understand the facts. We must not post non factual things on a forum where people further down the line will come on and read, talking in general here.  Should I ever have the misfortune of seeing one (which I don't plan on, ever) I would insist on OW and not exchange bodily fluids, so no oral from me etc.

POZ is another forum that is brilliant for this stuff by the way.

[Nagilum]

The same principle certainly doesn't apply for me as I know they say they offer BB so I wouldn't touch them with a bargepole even using a condom, such WGs are fucking stupid morons at least, at worst they are purposely trying to infect punters, or are mentalists, in either scenario they aren't people I wish to meet let alone fuck. A punter is safer by avoiding such people in my book though that in no way means a WG who doesn't advertise she offers BB isn't infected, that's the risk punting holds.

I assume many infected by BB punters wouldn't wish to admit on here they have barebacked some skank who advertised she offered it, I imagine they wouldn't get too much sympathy, they certainly wouldn't off me.

Fair enough.

No you wouldn't get much sympathy if you took a risk and got infected.

[AnthG]

It is illogical to say using a condom properly presents A greater risk. Did the girls STDs suddenly develop a way to bypass the latex? That is my point to AnthG

What I am saying is.

Seeing a girl who refuses to do bareback = Probably only a 10-20% chance she has an STD.
Seeing a girl who does bareback              = Probably a 80%-90% chance she has an STD.

You can catch STDs not just from sex but from other stuff. So I have at most a 20% chance of getting it from girl A whereas at most a 90% chance from girl B.

[MJ.spritzen]

I've been with over 120 WG's and only once caught chlamydia. And that was from owo about 3 months ago. It's common to get a sore throat a day or two after giving oral to a girl even if she's clean.

[Nagilum]

What I am saying is.

Seeing a girl who refuses to do bareback = Probably only a 10-20% chance she has an STD.
Seeing a girl who does bareback              = Probably a 80%-90% chance she has an STD.

You can catch STDs not just from sex but from other stuff. So I have at most a 20% chance of getting it from girl A whereas at most a 90% chance from girl B.

Perhaps a little inflated, but yes I would agree there are many ways to catch something.

[Iblisuk]

Yet most WG'so will be bareback in someone or the other....most have partners/husbands /pimps

[Happylad]

And a bloke who doesn`t mind his gf/missus working as a wg probably puts it about a bit himself and is quite as likely to pick up and pass on an STI to the wg.

I take great comfort in the fact that at my age NOTHING is likely to shorten my life by very much.

[smiths]

On the question of the actual risk a punter is taking when he punts with a specific WG he doesn't know what the risk is because the WG is a virtual or complete stranger so he knows nothing about what she may be getting up to and with whom for definite apart from the fact she IS a WG so presumably sucking and fucking any Tom, Dick and Abdul, no so called stats and figures change that FACT. Even a partner/wife COULD be playing around obviously.

This is the risk of punting, it isn't for the squeamish and if smart a punter thinks very carefully about this before he punts.

[mrdiamond77]

I would not go with a WG who offers Bareback as I always like to give the girl oral, just not worth the risk.

[cristot]

I caught crabs off the toilet seat in a male-only-truly-disgusting shared student house in about 1983...does that count?

[Garden69]

I see bareback in any WG profile and she is passed by....

I do not care if she is drop dead gorgeous, takes in every orrifice, OWO, spit swapping, and all for £1 3 6 if we all did it the bareback would soon vanish.

Well said sir  - BB is a No every time. I really should include it in my search parameters so I don't even stumble across such profiles !

[OakTree]

What I am saying is.

Seeing a girl who refuses to do bareback = Probably only a 10-20% chance she has an STD.
Seeing a girl who does bareback              = Probably a 80%-90% chance she has an STD.

You can catch STDs not just from sex but from other stuff. So I have at most a 20% chance of getting it from girl A whereas at most a 90% chance from girl B.

Christ on a bicycle! You honestly believe you have up to 20% chance of catching an STD?

If it truly was as high as that, I doubt many of us would punt. In effect you're saying 2 out of ten girls are infected who don't do BB. Where did you get that statistic from?

[purple_t]

On the question of the actual risk a punter is taking when he punts with a specific WG he doesn't know what the risk is because the WG is a virtual or complete stranger so he knows nothing about what she may be getting up to and with whom for definite apart from the fact she IS a WG so presumably sucking and fucking any Tom, Dick and Abdul, no so called stats and figures change that FACT. Even a partner/wife COULD be playing around obviously.

This is the risk of punting, it isn't for the squeamish and if smart a punter thinks very carefully about this before he punts.

This!
All we can really do is hedge our bets and be cautious. Thankfully no WG has offered me bareback, if she did that would be the last time I saw her

[CoolTiger]

I did see one profile recently who said "I do not do bareback, no, no, no, never! But I suppose if you can prove you are clean and thats what you want, I would!"

Next time list such profiles in the following thread...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14748.msg1256263#new