Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Indigo Candykiss (Southampton)  (Read 1012 times)


6 review(s) for Indigo Independent x (3 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline purple_t

https://www.adultwork.com/2723475 or https://www.adultwork.com/Indigo+CandyKiss

The Candykiss girls have been on my radar for a while; I probably wouldn't have seen any of them for their usual rate of £160 an hour, but I saw that Indigo (and presumably the others) had an offer on that was £100 for 45 mins, so decided to take the plunge, as she looked to be the youngest and most attractive of the lot.

Comms were good. I described the services I wanted and all were agreed on for no extra charges. Booking made and postcode given.

Turned up exactly on time, texted Indigo, she replied saying she needed 10 more minutes to get ready. Fine, I can wait. 20 minutes later(!), as I was about to walk, I get a text saying she is ready.

Indigo opens the front door and takes me to her room (I could hear other voices talking, both male and female, including 2 blokes talking to each other at one point... so it seemed obvious that this was Candykiss HQ).

I had to remind her of the booking length, and the services I wanted... she was fine with everything except for swallow ("I don't do swallow"). I mentioned that this is listed as a 'like' on her AW profile, and she had previously agreed to it when we were messaging on AW. Her reply: "I'm not in charge of my AW profile". I considered walking again at this point, but I was already there, and horny... "OK, as long as you do CIM" I replied, which she said is fine. I have to wonder which other services are listed that she doesn't do... I didn't ask for anal, but wonder if this on the cards at all.

I had a quick shower while she went upstairs to give the money to 'management' and get ready. Went back into the room after shower.

Indigo was dressed as requested, and for the most part looked decent. Not nearly as good as her photos, but then I'm sure that's true for many girls. Definitely looked a few years older than 20. I would have placed her around 23/24 maybe, and closer to size 10 than size 8. The bed had what looked like sweat patches on it... so I'm guessing she hadn't changed the sheets between the previous punter and myself. But she had showered shortly before I arrived, which is always good.

Kissing was OK at first, but then she kept turning her head away. I would not put this down to bad breath on my part, as I am quite meticulous about my oral hygiene, and had a breath mint prior to entering the house, so it was a bit unexpected. Never had this happen before with a WG.

Got her naked and asked her to suck me off. Her BJ was pretty good but she didn't go that deep until I asked her to. Good amount of eye contact.

On with the condom and had sex with her in a few different positions. She declined reverse cowgirl because she said she is still learning how to do it! Indigo was very nice and friendly throughout the punt, but also reasonably unenthusiastic and mechanical.

I was actually starting to get a bit bored, which isn't a good sign... after a bit of shagging I asked her how long we had left. She checked her phone and told me 10 minutes. I decided to finish off. Wanked myself off into her mouth. Now what I have come to expect from CIM is that the girl will let you fill her mouth with your cum, and perhaps even suck your cock dry. Well, Indigo kind of knelt up and angled her mouth downwards, so that I had to aim upwards into her mouth. Her mouth was not really near my cock at all. So some of it shot out into her mouth, but most of it missed and went on the floor. Not really what I was hoping for, she was clearly very reluctant to do it.

She ran to the bathroom to spit the cum out, I checked the time on my phone and there were actually 15 minutes left of the booking... not 10 as she told me, plus a few minutes had elapsed since then anyway.

Anyway, I decided I'd had enough by that point. Got dressed, kiss on the cheek goodbye and got out of there.

Would I return? No. I'm just glad I hadn't paid £160 for an hour! She was a nice girl, it was just a lacklustre service all-round (except for the BJ), not what you expect for those prices. The negative is primarily because swallow was advertised and agreed upon prior to the booking, and then when I get there she tells me that she doesn't do it (this wasn't an 'at discretion' issue, she flat out told me she doesn't do it at all, before I had even removed a stitch of clothing). Otherwise, I may have given her a neutral, but as you can see from my review there were a few other areas where I was less than satisfied.


6 review(s) found for Indigo Independent x linked to in above post (3 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline LookNoHands

Unfortunate you didn't get what you wanted there, when I saw her I got CIM with her on her back and me over her face while I fingered her arse, and on that occasion at least anal was ok. I didn't ask for swallow, but she did mention another service that she said she doesn't do and ought to be removed from likes. I agree, that where they are 'discretionary' Likes should be clearly indicated or if that isn't an option the Like shouldn't be mentioned at all - better a pleasant surprise than a disappointment right?!

She clearly doesn't live at the venue, so I think she had been called in for you... which might explain some of that confusion and waiting around. I had assumed that when 'available' they would be on site - but as my journey is over 30 mins I guess thats enough time to get there before me.

As a side note, I noticed one of the girls at CandyKiss has gone offline so maybe they are not happy with the arrangements there. It does seem she wasn't 'in the zone' on this occasion. Thanks for the review anyway and better luck on your next adventure.

Offline purple_t

She clearly doesn't live at the venue, so I think she had been called in for you... which might explain some of that confusion and waiting around. I had assumed that when 'available' they would be on site - but as my journey is over 30 mins I guess thats enough time to get there before me.

Yes obviously she doesn't live there, but I booked days in advance so it wasn't a case of her rushing to the venue to meet me moments after the booking was made. I highly doubt I was first punt of the day either as it was mid-afternoon when I saw her. Plus I was stood near to the venue when I was waiting, and didn't see anyone enter or leave during that time.

And re: her likes list being inaccurate, that was the main reason for the negative. Services should not be on there if girls will not perform them under any circumstance, and definitely should not be agreed on prior to the booking! Though it was obvious she had never read my messages personally, so I guess she was unaware of what I had asked for, but that's no excuse.

Offline LookNoHands

OK - if you booked days in advance then keeping you waiting, it is not fair at all - you may have been trying to make the most of a short window of time... For me I sometimes have just 1-2 hours in a week where I can play and having someone waste it would def piss me off and shows no respect.

I also agree with selecting the negative for the 'Like' issue...  I don't mind if a girl has things at discretion, as I literally do not expect them to happen and don't mind if they don't. But if you went for a Like that is listed that will not be delivered... that is deceptive. In those circumstances it is not honest. She may not have listed that Like herself, but whoever you were texting and agreeing to it has misled you. In fact she needs to make a point of telling the Agency to remove it as it will lead to her dealing with angry punters which is ultimately not fair on her either actually.

I have tried to tell escorts before that listing Likes they don't do is not smart and eventually gets them more bad reviews than offering a straightforward vanilla suck and fuck. I explained that dishonesty is NOT SEXY...  and breaches trust - so they have to get new clients every time rather then build up a base of regulars. Better to under promise and over deliver, etc...

...needless to say this advice was not acted on, I don't think the feedback gets to Sergei or whoever. Some silly escorts/agencies out there.

Offline LookNoHands

It wouldn't be the first case of meeting sweet and honest girl, with a dishonest agency... I am sure guys here will understand you were fair on that issue. It doesn't have to be personal against the girls if the overall service is poor, including dishonest comms. Agency needs to see the feedback here and realise the harm a little fib can do.

Offline purple_t

It wouldn't be the first case of meeting sweet and honest girl, with a dishonest agency... I am sure guys here will understand you were fair on that issue. It doesn't have to be personal against the girls if the overall service is poor, including dishonest comms. Agency needs to see the feedback here and realise the harm a little fib can do.

Yeah it wasn't an attack on her, I think the blame lies with the agency for this issue, but I wonder if she even mentioned it to them, as 'swallow' is still on her profile.

That aside, review still would have been a neutral at best. Her rates are at the higher end of the spectrum and I did not get a service which reflected that. In fact it made appreciate how good some of the other girls I have seen are in comparison. She did seem like a nice girl but I came away from the punt feeling like I had wasted my money

Offline purple_t

One other thing I'd like to point out... both 'swallow' and 'swallow (at discretion)' were listed on her likes list before this review... now only 'swallow (at discretion)' remains... same with CIM. Good they've cleared it up a bit but still misleading as she made it clear to me that she doesn't swallow, at all, ever with a punter

Offline oring123

Thats the candy kiss pimps
Dishonest !!
Banning reason: Previously banned (306)

Offline LookNoHands

I always think when both the full and 'at discretion' likes have been selected that this is because someone else is managing the account and she DOESN'T like it... not one little bit! :-)

The reason it is done is because of search filtering... if you want Anal and you select that - unless the profile has it, it won't appear in the results... so they add it and ALSO the 'at discretion' option too (But WHO would ever search for a girl who may or may not do it?!?!)

So it is a purely commercial decision to get the profile higher visibility - but obviously it is more likely to lead to disappointed punters and bad experiences for the girls... but by then the money has been handed over.

Romanian profiles that have every available like ticked are doing it for the same reason - just to be sure that someone who wants to take a shit on a girl doesn't overlook their girls! Idiots.
« Last Edit: August 04, 2016, 10:06:04 PM by LookNoHands »

I have been to Indigo but was not happy. She was not as attractive as her pictures on the site and looked worse in real. She was friendly but I did not enjoy the session. I suppose it was a turn off to see that she was not as glamorous as her pics and her body looked bad and not as neat as the pics.

There was another girl Scarlett there and originally I wanted to see her but could not find her on AW anymore. 

Offline purple_t

I have been to Indigo but was not happy. She was not as attractive as her pictures on the site and looked worse in real. She was friendly but I did not enjoy the session. I suppose it was a turn off to see that she was not as glamorous as her pics and her body looked bad and not as neat as the pics.

Yes that was more or less the experience I had. She was wearing little to no makeup when I saw her so looked different from her pics. Skin not great, very underwhelming boobs... most civvies I've been with have had better bodies tbh. Had her attitude and enthusiasm been 10/10 it could have made up for it, but, while she was friendly, she was lazy and reluctant with her services. Not a good WG and definitely not worth 80/160 for 30mins/1 hour - not even close! I wouldn't even pay £20 to fuck her again.

Something I forgot to mention when I wrote my original review, when I had her bent over to do doggy, a very faint but distinct whiff of poo entered my nostrils... not sure she wipes her arse very thoroughly :vomit:

Would be appreciated by myself and others if you would write a review of your experience. The more, the better (for all girls, I'm not just picking on Indigo here).
« Last Edit: August 08, 2016, 08:28:24 PM by purple_t »

Lol, that sounds even more terrible.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)