She has been a member on AW since 2010 and I don't think her photos have changed in that time so she may have changed a bit.
This is a good point well made.
Now Leicesterdude, for those of us who were toying with the idea of going for a punt with Scarlett Redd sometime very soon, its attention to detail that we're really interested in.
Scarlett is not a cheap WG, so one of the big, clinching issues is... Has she fluffed up her boobs a couple of cup sizes with photoshop? ... Has she ironed out the wrinkles a bit? ... Are her photos still an accurate representation of her now?
I apologize for nagging and droning on, but the truth is your post has made me feel a bit grumpy ... because I was set on a punt sometime soon with this WG and you've killed the mood somewhat. It's a case of the truth hurts, I suppose.
You said ...
well, she body isn't as tight as her pictures demonstrate, her boobs are smaller than you'd imagine.
and without being mean, she is rather ordinary.
The whole experience was just plain and very passive.
So to press you on this ... Body isn't as tight ... means size 16/18 Yes??? ... Boobs are smaller than you'd imagine ... means B/C cup as opposed to E/F cup which her pictures show Yes??? ... She is rather ordinary ... Means a Plain Jane Yes??? ... Whole experience was plain and very passive ... means you felt you didn't get a man-eating tigress and VFM at £120ph Yes???
Please can you elaborate as I'm feeling very disappointed after what you've penned, and I'm now grumpy, like a bear with a sore head this morning, having to go back to the drawing board for my planned punt.