Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Does anyone have experience of Scarlet Redd?  (Read 1910 times)

Offline Nigel57

https://www.adultwork.com/936513

I have had Scarlet Redd on my HL for some time but there is only one old review on here, which is a couple of years old. Her AW profile looks good with good feedback and her profile is consistent with her website. She appears to offer a professional service and she has been around for a while. I just wondered if any of our members had recent experience with her. I realise the services she offers may be a bit vanilla for a lot of tastes, but I like a busty red headed milf.


1 review(s) found for SCARLET REDD linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline leicesterdude

Ive met her.

She was very very vanilla. Very talkative (in a timewasting sense as opposed to friendly).

Her pictures are flattering. And wasnt what i was expecting.

I wouldve gave a neutral/negative.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Online Turtle Z

Ive met her.

She was very very vanilla. Very talkative (in a timewasting sense as opposed to friendly).

Her pictures are flattering. And wasnt what i was expecting.

I wouldve gave a neutral/negative.

Interesting comments because despite recommendations I have never been 100% sure enough to book her. I probably won't now.

Ive met her.

She was very very vanilla. Very talkative (in a timewasting sense as opposed to friendly).

Her pictures are flattering. And wasnt what i was expecting.

I wouldve gave a neutral/negative.

Please can you expand on that. She's on my HL but now I'm think maybe she's one to avoid.

Offline leicesterdude

well, she body isn't as tight as her pictures demonstrate, her boobs are smaller than you'd imagine.
and without being mean, she is rather ordinary.

The whole experience was just plain and very passive.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Offline robbybox

She joined UKP last week, and thought highly of this site. Read her blog.
Hmmm... interesting topic and observations.  I've no experience of Scarlett Redd but she is on my AW HL and I've exchanged a couple of emails with her in the past to ask if her planned tours involved coming down Northampton way as it's a lot closer for me than Leicester. She's at M1/J18 Rugby this week which would've been convenient had my working hours this week not have been so awkward.
My own thoughts and observations ... (1) her frequent blogs about her week-by-week experiences and on the gentlemen she has recently met would suggest that her phone is far from dusty (2) her current 77 AW feedback would suggest her tours are well received and always busy (3) a search on Scarlett Redd on this site brings up lots of posts about her and several contributors who are members of UKP and who are staying strangely silent ... perhaps they're afraid of being called white knights ... or for whatever reason, who knows?
With regard to CT's observation in an earlier post I could find no reference to Scarlett's blog or musings about the UKP site in her blog which suggests she removed it sharpish several months ago and erased all history of it ... and a search through the UKP members list of names beginning Scarlett does not show any member joining at and around the time frame specified ... which again suggests that she knocked that idea on the head.
Would I still go and see her? Perhaps. I'm still tempted ...
What I find strange is that even on this site, there are some reviews that I cannot trust, where it's plain and clear that the reviewer had a personal issue with the WG and posted downright lies.
I'm not saying for a moment that Leicester dude is one such, but strange that no-one else is coming to her defence, or at least providing some balance.
 :hi:
Banning reason: White-knight

Online Turtle Z

I know it's slightly irrational but her overuse of the word 'gentlemen' is one of the things that put me off her.

Offline CoolTiger

With regard to CT's observation in an earlier post I could find no reference to Scarlett's blog or musings about the UKP site in her blog which suggests she removed it sharpish several months ago and erased all history of it ... and a search through the UKP members list of names beginning Scarlett does not show any member joining at and around the time frame specified ... which again suggests that she knocked that idea on the head.
Would I still go and see her? Perhaps. I'm still tempted ...
What I find strange is that even on this site, there are some reviews that I cannot trust, where it's plain and clear that the reviewer had a personal issue with the WG and posted downright lies.
I'm not saying for a moment that Leicester dude is one such, but strange that no-one else is coming to her defence, or at least providing some balance.
 :hi:


This bugged me as well, so tried to find her on members list.... I struggled. Admin usually requires WGs who join UKP to use their working names, so this one must have slipped through the net.
I must have quoted her blog to say that she joined UKP, cos I can't find any similar name UKP member who joined on or around 27-Jan-2014.

However, I did find the blog I was referring to. Even though she removed it from her AW Prrofile, it is still on her website, dated 27-Jan-2014:

http://www.scarletredd-leicester-escort.com/east-midlands-fun?start=22

Offline leicesterdude

Hmmm... interesting topic and observations.  I've no experience of Scarlett Redd but she is on my AW HL and I've exchanged a couple of emails with her in the past to ask if her planned tours involved coming down Northampton way as it's a lot closer for me than Leicester. She's at M1/J18 Rugby this week which would've been convenient had my working hours this week not have been so awkward.
My own thoughts and observations ... (1) her frequent blogs about her week-by-week experiences and on the gentlemen she has recently met would suggest that her phone is far from dusty (2) her current 77 AW feedback would suggest her tours are well received and always busy (3) a search on Scarlett Redd on this site brings up lots of posts about her and several contributors who are members of UKP and who are staying strangely silent ... perhaps they're afraid of being called white knights ... or for whatever reason, who knows?
With regard to CT's observation in an earlier post I could find no reference to Scarlett's blog or musings about the UKP site in her blog which suggests she removed it sharpish several months ago and erased all history of it ... and a search through the UKP members list of names beginning Scarlett does not show any member joining at and around the time frame specified ... which again suggests that she knocked that idea on the head.
Would I still go and see her? Perhaps. I'm still tempted ...
What I find strange is that even on this site, there are some reviews that I cannot trust, where it's plain and clear that the reviewer had a personal issue with the WG and posted downright lies.
I'm not saying for a moment that Leicester dude is one such, but strange that no-one else is coming to her defence, or at least providing some balance.
 :hi:

Let me help you.

(1) no one said her phone is dusty.
(2) no one has queried or is really fussed about her aw feedback.
(3) the op specifically mentions hes read whats on here. And wants something current.

I dont care what an escort thinks of this site on her blog. What matters on this forum is what punters who are honest and paid good money to see an escort think of the service.

You and anyone else are welcome to see her and make your own mind up.

Im providing my experience to the OP.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Offline Nigel57

She has been a member on AW since 2010 and I don't think her photos have changed in that time so she may have changed a bit.

Online Turtle Z


What I find strange is that even on this site, there are some reviews that I cannot trust, where it's plain and clear that the reviewer had a personal issue with the WG and posted downright lies.


Care to elaborate on which reviews are "downright lies?"

Offline leicesterdude

She has been a member on AW since 2010 and I don't think her photos have changed in that time so she may have changed a bit.

Its true the photos have largely stayed the same.

Not sure about now. But she used to (about once a year) put a normal photo in her gallery. But it would be a close up of something and not giving anything away. But its a point well made.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Damn I was planning on seeing here this week whilst she's closeish to me, something about the crazy red hair, she looks like shed be a bit more than vanilla. Bit gutting to find out the opposite.

Offline robbybox

Care to elaborate on which reviews are "downright lies?"
I can't speak for the EM board as I've not seen myself many of the girls reviewed here ... but on the Scotland board David1970's review and description of a WG I knew and have punted with several times was just a big fat lie, malicious and untrue vitriol and bollocks.
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline leicesterdude

I can't speak for the EM board as I've not seen myself many of the girls reviewed here ... but on the Scotland board David1970's review and description of a WG I knew and have punted with several times was just a big fat lie, malicious and untrue vitriol and bollocks.

And what does that, along sith anything you've questioned  have to do with this thread and this WG?

if youve got a problem with scottish reviews take it up there. But dont come here and rubbish peoples opinions about a girl you havent seen.

Im not sure youve added any value whatso ever on this thread.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Offline robbybox

She has been a member on AW since 2010 and I don't think her photos have changed in that time so she may have changed a bit.
This is a good point well made.
Now Leicesterdude, for those of us who were toying with the idea of going for a punt with Scarlett Redd sometime very soon, its attention to detail that we're really interested in.
Scarlett is not a cheap WG, so one of the big, clinching issues is... Has she fluffed up her boobs a couple of cup sizes with photoshop? ... Has she ironed out the wrinkles a bit? ... Are her photos still an accurate representation of her now?
I apologize for nagging and droning on, but the truth is your post has made me feel a bit grumpy ... because I was set on a punt sometime soon with this WG and you've killed the mood somewhat. It's a case of the truth hurts, I suppose.
You said ...
well, she body isn't as tight as her pictures demonstrate, her boobs are smaller than you'd imagine.
and without being mean, she is rather ordinary.
The whole experience was just plain and very passive.
So to press you on this ... Body isn't as tight ... means size 16/18 Yes??? ... Boobs are smaller than you'd imagine ... means B/C cup as opposed to E/F cup which her pictures show Yes??? ... She is rather ordinary ... Means a Plain Jane Yes???  ... Whole experience was plain and very passive ... means you felt you didn't get a man-eating tigress and VFM at £120ph Yes???
Please can you elaborate as I'm feeling very disappointed after what you've penned, and I'm now grumpy, like a bear with a sore head this morning, having to go back to the drawing board for my planned punt.
 :dash:

Banning reason: White-knight

Offline leicesterdude

This is a good point well made.
Now Leicesterdude, for those of us who were toying with the idea of going for a punt with Scarlett Redd sometime very soon, its attention to detail that we're really interested in.
Scarlett is not a cheap WG, so one of the big, clinching issues is... Has she fluffed up her boobs a couple of cup sizes with photoshop? ... Has she ironed out the wrinkles a bit? ... Are her photos still an accurate representation of her now?
I apologize for nagging and droning on, but the truth is your post has made me feel a bit grumpy ... because I was set on a punt sometime soon with this WG and you've killed the mood somewhat. It's a case of the truth hurts, I suppose.
You said ...So to press you on this ... Body isn't as tight ... means size 16/18 Yes??? ... Boobs are smaller than you'd imagine ... means B/C cup as opposed to E/F cup which her pictures show Yes??? ... She is rather ordinary ... Means a Plain Jane Yes???  ... Whole experience was plain and very passive ... means you felt you didn't get a man-eating tigress and VFM at £120ph Yes???
Please can you elaborate as I'm feeling very disappointed after what you've penned, and I'm now grumpy, like a bear with a sore head this morning, having to go back to the drawing board for my planned punt.
 :dash:

I think you need to engage your brain a little bit.

your point was. Theres liars on here making up reviews and that because no one is rushing to "balance" out my views that im one of them.

Dont you dare throw around accusations based on nothing. And then have the nerve to ask me further detail.

I really couldnt care less how grumpy or emotionally unblanaced you are.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Online Knny

Ffs she is a whore who has been around the block (and cock) for years.  Maybe she could get away securing punters in the past with her high prices and teasing photoshops before, but now there is much more choice with more reasonable prices and fresher twats.  I've had her on radar for ages and may have seen her, but there has always been better offerings around in the EM.

Punting by definition means to take a chance.   For the price she charges, I think I'd leave disappointedly. 

There has been a lot of slating of Romanians etc.  But frankly, I'm glad there is more competition now and that girls and hagards have had to up their game. 

Still, your money, your choice. 

Offline leicesterdude

Ffs she is a whore who has been around the block (and cock) for years.  Maybe she could get away securing punters in the past with her high prices and teasing photoshops before, but now there is much more choice with more reasonable prices and fresher twats.  I've had her on radar for ages and may have seen her, but there has always been better offerings around in the EM.

Punting by definition means to take a chance.   For the price she charges, I think I'd leave disappointedly. 

There has been a lot of slating of Romanians etc.  But frankly, I'm glad there is more competition now and that girls and hagards have had to up their game. 

Still, your money, your choice.

Spot on
 
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Offline robbybox

your point was. Theres liars on here making up reviews and that because no one is rushing to "balance" out my views that im one of them.
Dont you dare throw around accusations based on nothing. And then have the nerve to ask me further detail...
OK thank you for your input, it's appreciated. We went a little bit round the houses but got there in the end. Scarlett Redd is not the tigress and voluptuous man-eater that her AW profile purports her to be. And I'll now be spending my money on better value elsewhere.
Just to clarify. Yes I believe there are liars on this site who deliberately lie about WGs because she's not their cup of tea or she's upset them because she's spoken her mind when they've been stingy or dirty or whatever. That is a fact.
About you I actually said "I'm not saying for a moment that Leicesterdude is one such". I was simply probing for more detail because here was a man rubbishing Scarlett Redd that had not reviewed her on here. Though she had positive reviews and posts on here and I found it strange that here was a man rubbishing her that had never reviewed her. Though she had already 1 positive.
But anyway clearly I've upset you and others are annoyed too with FFS language coming into it so this will be my last note on the subject. I'll say no more but I was  not banding around any specific accusations or implications.
Banning reason: White-knight


Online Knny

Robbybox...I understand your last post and would like to add the importance of members doing lots of reviews.  Some members seem to think it is not worth doing reviews of well reported lasses.  But it still helps and I will tell you why.....if you have seen three girls another punter has seen and reflect the same rating/experience, then you know that his others reviews will be more relevant to you.  If your experiences are different but the punter is more or less deviant than you, you can still judge the girl.

I always follow leicesterdudes responses because I feel I share the same pragmatism as he does.

Good luck!  And try the variety.  I still have to snog a ginger lass...its on the fucket list.  I recently tried a girl recommended to me by Bon Scott of acdc himself ...she was 16 stone and she stole the show!   Will review in due course.

Nigel, go bang that ginger twat and tell us about it.

Online Turtle Z

I was simply probing for more detail because here was a man rubbishing Scarlett Redd that had not reviewed her on here. Though she had positive reviews and posts on here and I found it strange that here was a man rubbishing her that had never reviewed her.

You clearly don't understand how this site works. There are many punters on this site who choose not to review girls but will comment later in other peoples posts. If they're a new punter then chances are that their comments will be viewed with some scepticism and perhaps even challenged, and all that's fine as things generally come out in the wash. However, there is no context to your comments because we don't understand who has "rubbished" Scarlett, what was said and if that punter is a trusted regular or a newbie. It's fine to challenge that view if you don't agree but you seem to be back tracking now. You want to moan about this unidentified punter but refuse to name him or be specific about the comment that you took particular issue with. If you want to moan about punters alleged comments then at least have the courage of conviction to challenge the specifics when they're posted. Personally, I think you were making reference to leicesterdude and have now started back tracking. Happy to be proved wrong though.  :hi:

Offline leicesterdude

FYI,

i don't review every WG i meet. I'm happy to provide as much as i can, but I've seen how its gone for some people who have been found out, and having a written record of every single detail perhaps isnt the best idea in the world.

but im happy to provide what i can, how i can, and contribute.
Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight

Offline robbybox

I wrote that I'd say no more on this topic .. but I just wanted to add for CT's benefit that he was quite right all along ... and not imagining things or starting to doubt himself. Scarlet Redd was indeed a previous member here ... as proved by this post of hers.
Dirty talk is something that has to be learned and practised a lot to get good at it. I enjoy dirty talk during sex (both giving and receiving) and love watching porn stars who are good at it too (Gianna Michaels is very good if you want to check her out.)
If Scarlet's service and dirty talk is being modelled on Gianna Michaels then it would certainly be worth experiencing at least once. Gianna is one sexy, dirty, horny slut and for sure a man-eater.
I'm still rather tempted .. but I've got another Leicester WG on my radar at the moment, and I've been aching to see her for some time so will likely try to arrange this first.
But I'm gonna be dreaming of Gianna before I can get to sleep tonight.
Banning reason: White-knight




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)