G_A_B_R_I_E_L_L_A - Aberdeen (Touring)

[Abzfun1]

I've been pondering this review for a while now, whether it should be positive or neutral. I should base it on my experience so neutral it is.

I met with G_A_B_R_I_E_L_L_A while she was on tour n Aberdeen, I liked the look of her profile as I like slim, fit women. Also there had been many positive reviews on here.

She had a cancellation so I managed to get an appointment a couple of hours after I phoned, she was in a city centre hotel that is popular with escorts.

I was a bit surprised when I arrived as she looked a fair bit older than her AW stated 29, that's not too much of a problem as I'm older than that, also I can't be the only one to think that she's had work done? Her cheekbones and lips, her lips seem solid. Almost feline like?

I wasn't after anything kinky just probably a GFE with a little bit of filth.

The whole thing was a bit 'meh' and just couldn't get into it, well the first pop was ok but no DFK and her solid lips were a real put off. OWO was good but she then asked if I wanted to fuck her and I did, asked her to wank me a bit first but was not as I liked so on with the rubber. The sex was good but her 'dirty chat' was a bit crap, don't really need someone saying to me 'you're a dirty boy aren't you' and stuff like that.

After a short chat it was on to round 2, I just couldn't get going and maybe that was me but that's never happened before or since.

Ended up giving up, I've been with more persistent girls who will make sure they do everything they can to get it out of you.

Left feeling a bit shortchanged for my £140
Her age wasn't as specified as must have had a bloody hard paper round to be 29.
Lack of DFK and plastic lips mean I'll not return.

External Link/Members Only

[auldie63]

Suggest you get yer tin hat on. Incoming!!!!!!!!

[sweetcheeks]

  Like a man who's not afraid to tell it as he sees it, but I'm afraid the Glasgow fluffs are about to tear into you, if not the whore  :coolgirl:herself. But again we'll said.

[Happyjose]

Thanks for the review. According to reviews on here she has offered DFK with others.

[Rossco100]

This could get interesting

[Abzfun1]

This is what the forum is about, opinions, some will agree and some won't. I've never been one to walk away from anyone let alone someone at the end of a keyboard. 

Pointless if everyone thought the same.

[Rossco100]

Nobody is doubting your review mate but Gabriella has a big fan club on here and some don't like anyone saying anything bad about her.

[ickydicky]

good review

[ik8133]

Well done for telling us like it is, good honest review.

[Llama32]

Every review should be taken in consideration to the other reviews available. I haven't seen her yet and this review hasn't stated enough to dissuade me. I will however tailor my expectations so I'm not expecting too much of her in light of this review.

So thanks for that. 

[DG]

Right guys, before I start, I'm a 'fanboy', but what I'm reading really has me wondering.

I have seen G many times over the last 8 months or so, the most recently being two days ago. So what I can say with authority is that she has definitely not had any work done on her lips and, for me anyway, DFK is always enthusiastically delivered. Were it not for those comments I wouldn't be in a position to comment on this review. However, now I am highly suspicious

This review has the hallmarks of a previous member's generic type comments. 'A city centre hotel popular with escorts'. Well that narrows it down  Looks older than 29; wouldn't necessarily disagree but hardly novel. I don't doubt the op has met Gaby, but in a different life perhaps?

Guys take from it what you will, but this review has all the hallmarks of someone mischief making at the expense of a decent girl and whereas some things are subjective, things like filled or plastic lips are unmistakeable 

[carlysboy]

I think it's an entirely plausible and very welcome review - perhaps even by the very well reviewed lady herself. A moderate lowering of the somewhat skyhigh expectations many earlier reviews may raise is no bad thing and might allow future customers to be pleasantly surprised. For what it's worth I've met Gabriella and enjoyed myself.

[Abzfun1]

Right guys, before I start, I'm a 'fanboy', but what I'm reading really has me wondering.

I have seen G many times over the last 8 months or so, the most recently being two days ago. So what I can say with authority is that she has definitely not had any work done on her lips and, for me anyway, DFK is always enthusiastically delivered. Were it not for those comments I wouldn't be in a position to comment on this review. However, now I am highly suspicious

This review has the hallmarks of a previous member's generic type comments. 'A city centre hotel popular with escorts'. Well that narrows it down  Looks older than 29; wouldn't necessarily disagree but hardly novel. I don't doubt the op has met Gaby, but in a different life perhaps?o

Guys take from it what you will, but this review has all the hallmarks of someone mischief making at the expense of a decent girl and whereas some things are subjective, things like filled or plastic lips are unmistakeable 

To add a bit more info for you then, there was FK but not what I regard as DFK. Maybe I expected different but like any review this is my opinion.

Without giving the hotel name away, if you were on Union Street facing Holburn Junction the hotel is on the street parallel to the left. Also just at the back of a Weatherspoons. She was on the 4th floor if I remember correctly.

Now again, in my opnion she had hard, full lips and that made me think they had been filled.

What is wrong with me saying she is older than her stated age?

Now, if you think I'm a former forum poster or could really be arsed 'mischief making at the expense of a decent girl' then sadly you are mistaken.

Also it was a Neutral review not Negative.

[AccountSummary]

Thanks for your post,  honest and helpful.   I've seen her before and truely enjoyed the experience,  but each to their own opinion you had a neutral experience i had a positive.  Could have just not been a click, could have jsut been an off moment, could just be she has been over hyped a tad(although still a good visit the hype builds expectations). I would go back but to Gab,  would you go back again?

[auldie63]

Was with Gabs last night, plenty DFK and nothing wrong with her lips that I could find. The usual excellent experience and I thoroughly enjoyed myself.
But whatever floats yer boat if you didn't have a good time that's a pity.

[Redbull4]

Good review. Not everyone will agree. Haven't seen her, but I'd still think about it depending on options.

[S.X. MacHine]

Having seen Gabriella on several occasions, I am surprised that such a minor item as cosmetically enhanced lips (I do not agree that they are) would merit downgrading a universally, and deservedly, well regarded WG  from 'Positive' to 'Neutral'. Still, a chaqun son gout; to each his own.
And yet...and yet, I cannot help but wonder about the authenticity of the OP, if you know what I mean...

[BigLicks]

I smell a rat.

[auldie63]

Yes a fucking great big rat from the Dee perhaps.

[thecrippler]

For £140 the OP can think what he wants, and if that's a neutral review then so be it.

I do laugh, some of the comments here are quite funny, pointing the finger at the OP's legitimacy instead of the possibility that these two people just didn't click, or the fact that the hoor maybe had a fucking off day, nah that can't be possible right?, he fucked a human and not a robot surely!

A lot of the women in "Scotland's friendliest city" are, lets fucking face it, orange in colour, and if she's the same fake tan kind then maybe that's piled the years on?, if not then fuck knows, it's the OP's valid opinion that counts here.

I've disagreed with a few reviews on here myself but chosen not to give a fuck, we're all different and thank fuck that's the case.

 

[DG]

For £140 the OP can think what he wants, and if that's a neutral review then so be it.

I do laugh, some of the comments here are quite funny, pointing the finger at the OP's legitimacy instead of the possibility that these two people just didn't click, or the fact that the hoor maybe had a fucking off day, nah that can't be possible right?, he fucked a human and not a robot surely!

A lot of the women in "Scotland's friendliest city" are, lets fucking face it, orange in colour, and if she's the same fake tan kind then maybe that's piled the years on?, if not then fuck knows, it's the OP's valid opinion that counts here.

I've disagreed with a few reviews on here myself but chosen not to give a fuck, we're all different and thank fuck that's the case.

 

You are of course quite correct as reviews are always personal and subjective. The purpose of my post was to highlight the fact that the OP made certain comments about physical appearance that cannot be mistaken and are just not true, thereby making me doubt the rest of the review. Interestingly you make reference to orange and fake tan, presumably prompted by the OP's assertions that the WG in question uses cosmetic enhancements or treatments. In this case however you couldn't be more wrong, so it kinda supports my position that the OP is giving false representation rather than a personal perspective. I shall say no more and leave you all to ponder what has been presented by all contributors. 

[thecrippler]

Honestly?, my reference to fake tan was purely based off my thoughts on what could possibly make the OP think she was a lot older than 29, it wasn't due to the cosmetic appearance of lip fillers or the like.

Maybe the OP has had the luxury of kissing women with ultra soft lips before, and Gabs' lips whilst still not hard perhaps, maybe appeared hard to him., who knows?

My main point was to suggest that regardless of what you or anyone classes as fact, it's really what the OP thinks that's important here since he's paid his money.

I do get your view though, and to be fair I tend to agree with some of what you say, but let's allow the OP his day in the sun, it's a neutral after all, not good or bad.

If Gab continues to receive glowing reviews then punters who have not seen her will still visit since her overall reflection is a massive positive and generally speaking the voice of the masses are hardly really that wrong....however, we are all different my friend 

[Marmalade]

I thought the Scottish barfing might have calmed down after king prossieboy got banned but it seemed not. Some people seems don't know the difference between a) a couple of lines to say they had a different experience t'other night and b) the wankers that write a fucking eulogy and dumb down a neg or neutral review with some cheap phrase like "they didn't click". Does that mean we should discount every non-glowing bit of feedback??? "Ah ignore that review lads, they didn't 'click'..."

It's not a chat up date to see if you get on. The prossie's being paid to fucking 'click'.
So maybe she doesn't manage it every time. Is that the punter's fault????

 

[DG]

I thought the Scottish barfing might have calmed down after king prossieboy got banned but it seemed not. Some people seems don't know the difference between a) a couple of lines to say they had a different experience t'other night and b) the wankers that write a fucking eulogy and dumb down a neg or neutral review with some cheap phrase like "they didn't click". Does that mean we should discount every non-glowing bit of feedback??? "Ah ignore that review lads, they didn't 'click'..."

It's not a chat up date to see if you get on. The prossie's being paid to fucking 'click'.
So maybe she doesn't manage it every time. Is that the punter's fault????

 

With the greatest respect you're missing the point here; it's not about a subjective review, it's about if it's a real review?

[bushman]

Thanks for the review Pal.Seems like we have the same taste in woman,or have an itch at the same time. I met up with Gabriella at the same venue during her recent Abz tour. I had a fantastic hour. Including Dfk. Most WG's lie about age, no surprise there then.
I can see where the OP got the idea that there is a feline resemblance, as I had the same thought, but mine disappeared in the first minute. I am no make-up artist but I think it is all to do with the eyeliner or whatever woman/crossdressers use to accentuate facial features.

I will see her again tomorrow if she was in town.

[Abzfun1]

I have to laugh at some of the comments on here.

Just because my review isn't positive then it's not true?

[Courtney]

I have to laugh at some of the comments on here.

Just because my review isn't positive then it's not true?

Well....I kinda have to laugh at this:

I've been pondering this review for a while now, whether it should be positive or neutral. I should base it on my experience so neutral it is.

....why ponder on it being a postive?! It reads neutral bordering on negative anyway.
...and you're right, it should be based on your experience. What else would it be based on?

[Marmalade]

With the greatest respect you're missing the point here; it's not about a subjective review, it's about if it's a real review?

With the greatest respect, I think you're full of shit. If you think it's a fake review, or if he's written five fake reviews, why don't you say so and call him out? On what basis is it fake? That he never visited her? That he's not a punter? Is it just that one that's fake and his other reviews are genuine? Or is it that it's fake because it didn't agree with your view??

I realise the sky maybe has to fall in before you give a negative, but some clarification of what you really think might be helpful.

It might well be dodgy. But flapping your chicky licky fluffy feathers gets other punters nowhere. All it says is, "don't write a negative review cos the fanboys will eat you."

[DG]

With the greatest respect, I think you're full of shit. If you think it's a fake review, or if he's written five fake reviews, why don't you say so and call him out? On what basis is it fake? That he never visited her? That he's not a punter? Is it just that one that's fake and his other reviews are genuine? Or is it that it's fake because it didn't agree with your view??

I realise the sky maybe has to fall in before you give a negative, but some clarification of what you really think might be helpful.

It might well be dodgy. But flapping your chicky licky fluffy feathers gets other punters nowhere. All it says is, "don't write a negative review cos the fanboys will eat you."

Just saying. Oh and thanks for being so respectful.

[auldie63]

Right I go and see Gabs often and being from Paisley am not loose with my bawbees. I go because she is a very pleasant girl and always gives me a good time.
As to the veracity of this review, you have to make your own mind up, but suggest you read the girls AW blog and her posts on UKE first to get both sides of it. I make no claims for the accuracy of what she says, but can show this


Hidden Image/Members Only

This was taken by me on Monday night and I see no evidence of 'Thick Hard lips' or fillers in it.

[Marmalade]

Just saying. Oh and thanks for being so respectful.

You're welcome. 

So let's be clear. You are saying, "That he never visited her? That he's not a punter?" Is that correct? Do you have enough to go on to say that or just feel "you will be proved right"? In other words do you think he will be banned?

Because a lot of genuine negs get the same fluffy-attacks.

And when I pointed out a genuinely fake negative, quite recently actually, it barely got noticed. So do you have the balls to stake your opinion or are you just going to carry on with a nudge nudge wink wink of quoting bits in bold? I'm inviting you to say what you mean. Couple of sentences will do.
 

[Marmalade]

Right I go and see Gabs often and being from Paisley am not loose with my bawbees. I go because she is a very pleasant girl and always gives me a good time.

Which is fair enough. On the basis that you and others had a good time I'd probably maybe give her a whirl if I was through that way depending on other factors. But it's a judgment about experiences, not the prossie.

I think this is where people get confused. You can't say what  a girl is like, only your experience of it. You've punted with her on her home territory: the OP says the punt was on tour. Many girls give different service on tour. Also £140 is bloody expensive ('normally' 'worth it' or not).

[ickydicky]

Right I go and see Gabs often and being from Paisley am not loose with my bawbees. I go because she is a very pleasant girl and always gives me a good time.
As to the veracity of this review, you have to make your own mind up, but suggest you read the girls AW blog and her posts on UKE first to get both sides of it. I make no claims for the accuracy of what she says, but can show this


Hidden Image/Members Only

This was taken by me on Monday night and I see no evidence of 'Thick Hard lips' or fillers in it.

nice teeth. and lips i would imagine produce great kisses and bjs. thanks auldie. good work

[bushman]

I prefer to see negative reviews vs postive.
The WG's profile already got my attention.
By the time I search for reviews I am normally already in favour of said girl/not thinking with my brain anymore.I then decide if she's worth the bob.
Positive reviews sometimes spoil my experience with a WG if I don't get the level of service mentioned/imagined that she gives.

[ickydicky]

i am trying to find the logic there. does this mean you prefer to go and see hoors who have had negative reviews

[thecrippler]

No, he's saying that either some girls (with nothing but positive reviews) are overhyped in reviews, or that he overhypes them in his brain....a brain that thinks with his dick, as sadly we all do at times.

Sometimes a neutral or even negative review, in amongst many positives can help lower his expectations and consequently lower his disappointment if the punt is shit.

I used to get this many times before I found this website, instead I used to rely on the crap reviews on AW.

[thecrippler]

This post is published Thursday, and when the shit hits the fan there's suddenly a photo taken just days before of the girl in question, but not only that, a half decent one showing her lips which is displayed as potential evidence.

Now there could be a very reasonable reason for this, but I can't say I've ever had the desire, and if I did it wouldn't be allowed, to take photos of an escort.

I just find it strange!, but hey maybe it's all perfectly plausible.

Auldie, you trying to pose as Columbo? 

[ickydicky]

in my book auldie is  completely legit and shis reviews and comments have helped me. i got no worries about he has done. even if he sometimes winds me up

[ickydicky]

in my book auldie is  completely legit and his reviews and comments have helped me. i got no worries about he has done. even if he sometimes winds me up

[thecrippler]

I completely agree Icky-boy, Auldie is first class, but the photo is fucking strange.

Not that I really give a shit, this shit will all blow over and nobody will care.

Funny thing is that I really wanted to book the girl in question myself but just didn't have the time.

This review, whilst I believe is genuine, hasn't done anything to make me not want to book her in the future.

[ickydicky]

well i would enjoy having those lips on my cock

[auldie63]

I completely agree Icky-boy, Auldie is first class, but the photo is fucking strange.

Not that I really give a shit, this shit will all blow over and nobody will care.

Funny thing is that I really wanted to book the girl in question myself but just didn't have the time.

This review, whilst I believe is genuine, hasn't done anything to make me not want to book her in the future.

So I'm a liar am I?
The girl wanted some decent up to date pics done and I did them for her and if you had done as I said on my post and read her AW blog or UKE posts you would know that, or are you just wanting me to post all the others for your wank bank.

[thecrippler]

Fuck off with that defensive shit, nowhere do I mention you're lying.

Like I said it could all be very plausible.

My wank bank is already full of pictures of the dear departed Mrs Mangle, now she had cracking lips God bless her!

[Marmalade]

I prefer to see negative reviews vs postive.
The WG's profile already got my attention.
By the time I search for reviews I am normally already in favour of said girl/not thinking with my brain anymore.I then decide if she's worth the bob.
Positive reviews sometimes spoil my experience with a WG if I don't get the level of service mentioned/imagined that she gives.

+1

[Marmalade]

I prefer to see negative reviews vs positive.
The WG's profile already got my attention.
By the time I search for reviews I am normally already in favour of said girl/not thinking with my brain anymore.I then decide if she's worth the bob.
Positive reviews sometimes spoil my experience with a WG if I don't get the level of service mentioned/imagined that she gives.

I don't mean the +1 in any way to influence reviews. There should be no influence at all except some encouragement for factuality. People shouldn't feel pressured to write negative reviews for credibility any more than they should feel they want to write positive ones for popularity. But until there's some sort of balance then the rating system falls into a certain degree of disrepute. A genuine negative review means you judged the punt as negative / not worth the money / wouldn't go back or whatever; and a positive one, the opposite. It's never really a judgment on the prossie -- that's a conclusion others reach.

There's too much of "in fairness to the prossie" on here at times in my opinion. Who gives a fuck? Go tell it to saafe.


Similar story if I buy say a semi-expensive electric fan off Amazon. I skip over the 50 good reviews other than to note a lot of people are "happy." What I want to know is why someone posted a crap review in case it is something that affects me. "Took too long to arrive" doesn't bother me if I'm not in a hurry. "Plug needed an adapter" might well do if I can't be arsed to get one separately. So the negs are informative, the positives only occasionally so. If it's reviewed by someone I judge to be an expert, maybe I listen more, positive or negative; otherwise 'reviews' are just 'views'. Some people would neg a whore cos her sheets weren't spotless. I couldn't give a toss if she's clean, looks good and gives good service at a good price. But it may be a bigger deal to someone who feels sensitive to such things.