Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Civvies vs WGs  (Read 4465 times)

What's your experience with ONSs with Civvies vs a WG?

Standing a towering 5'7 I haven't had much luck with civvies, (only kissed a few and had one ONS) - those who have had a fair few civvies, how does it compare? Hygiene wise and performance wise?

Offline ickydicky

at my age the only civvies i could pull would be grannies and i dont fancy that. in fact the thot of it makes me :vomit:
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)

I'm still slightly traumatized by the experience with the last civvie girl I was with, lol.

She just lay on her back and presented herself to be pleasured. She did nothing whatsoever in return - it was absolutely hopeless. I doubt my experience was typical though.




Online cueball

One night stand, I assume.

Oh yeah, makes sense now

Bloody acronyms  :dash:

Offline smiths

What's your experience with ONSs with Civvies vs a WG?

Standing a towering 5'7 I haven't had much luck with civvies, (only kissed a few and had one ONS) - those who have had a fair few civvies, how does it compare? Hygiene wise and performance wise?

I don't do one night stands with WGs so have no experience of them. For me they would be a total waste of money, I prefer overday punts myself either with a good regular for 3-4 hours on the odd occasion or at sex parties.

No comparison between punting with a WG and having sex with a woman I have an emotional connection to, the latter is infinitely better, problem is I want and desire variety which one woman cant offer once the honeymoon period is over. For a one night stand a civvie can be just as good as a punt but more civvies have asked me to fuck them BB than WGs, which isn't my bag with virtual or complete strangers, so that's always a turn off to me.

Being 5 foot 7 inches isn't that short, no reason on its own it would stop you pulling civvies.

Offline Jimmyredcab

at my age the only civvies i could pull would be grannies and i dont fancy that.

Same here ------------- exactly the reason I have zero interest in dating sites.

Women of my age make me want to   :vomit: :vomit:

Offline ickydicky

or as we say in glesga - gimme the boak :vomit:
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)

Same here ------------- exactly the reason I have zero interest in dating sites.

Women of my age make me want to   :vomit: :vomit:

Jim you can meet some really nice younger women on sites like plenty of fish or e harmony you may have to buy them nice things and take them to fancy restaurants but you will get companionship in return  :hi:

Offline Ben4454


I found a lot of civvies are rubbish at giving blowjobs compared to a working girl who has had a lot of practice. Tbh I found 'dating civvies' in the end a completely boring activity. Last year a civvy wanted to go on holiday with me to Spain in Barcelona. I found out she'd be hanging by my side the whole trip so switched her out for a dirty 4 day break in Berlin. There may have been a lot of sex but i can assure you punting would have been cheaper for me.

As well civvies nowadays have attitude problems so fucking a working girl saves me more time, money and resources.
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

Online Zeusthedoc

What's your experience with ONSs with Civvies vs a WG?

Standing a towering 5'7 I haven't had much luck with civvies, (only kissed a few and had one ONS) - those who have had a fair few civvies, how does it compare? Hygiene wise and performance wise?

It's a difficult comparison.
Civvies may require more effort and emotional investment whereas WGs are a direct drain in cash resources.

Chances are a civvie is going to have more of a reason to make it a good experience, thought this is not a hard&fast rule.

I wouldn't say you were missing out on anything by seeing a WG rather than a civvie. If you're looking for a relationship than be clear in your mind why you're seeing a wg. Once you blur the line between paying a wg for sex vs emotional attachment syndrome it's a slippery slope.

I've not used websites like match eHarmony etc I think they're a waste of time. Have used tinder before but I mainly go to a bar/club. Hygiene wise it's all a risk so always use a condom (except for owo).

I had a fuck buddy who I used to arrange to see when she was on her ya home from the gym. Something fucking sensational about fucking a woman in tight Lycra when she is sweaty....double workout

Offline ickydicky

Jim you can meet some really nice younger women on sites like plenty of fish or e harmony you may have to buy them nice things and take them to fancy restaurants but you will get companionship in return  :hi:


i get companionship from my mates in the pub  :drinks: and i get sex from hoors. the perfect balance :cool:
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)

Offline hullad

I am just over six foot and its never been a problem ....

I was in my younger days a dashing RAF apprentice and I never had a problem scoring. As the night wore on my standards used to drop in search of a shag and my god I did shag some right dogs . None of which come close to some, but not all WG a good one will make your toes curl. I have now discovered a small band of WG that hit the spot evety time, you are never going to get close with a lass down the road who works in Boots are you.


i get companionship from my mates in the pub  :drinks: and i get sex from hoors. the perfect balance :cool:


top man  :hi:

Offline DannyJames

Standing a towering 5'7 I haven't had much luck with civvies

Your height is an excuse and is only a problem because, I assume, you make it a problem.

A mate of mine is 5'4" and he doesn't have any problem getting a shag with a civilian. Now, he will be the first to admit that a huge percentage of women aren't going to be into him and he understands why, but there are plenty who are or potentially could be.

Like Smiths said, 5'7" aint even that short.

Offline snaitram99

Oh yeah, makes sense now

Bloody acronyms  :dash:

Yes you have to watch out for the TLA's :hi:

Offline rogercock00

All women are WGs - you either pay up front or you pay over a longer period (drinks, meals, cinema etc) - it is just a route you take that is different.

At least with the WG, you can pick and choose whereas with a civvie, you can pick but you may not get to play and even if you do play, you are not 100% guaranteed some action.

Online OakTree

I don't think you can match the sex with a civvie who's really into you and wants you to fuck her. I've had some really excellent sessions with WGs but it hasn't matched civvie sex. It's come close on occasion.




Online cueball

I don't think you can match the sex with a civvie who's really into you and wants you to fuck her. I've had some really excellent sessions with WGs but it hasn't matched civvie sex. It's come close on occasion.

Agreed, I've had many a great punt with many lasses but I can count on one hand the WG's I've seen that come anywhere near to a civvie podge

Offline AC82

Probably because of the jobs Ive done had a lot of ONS and far more chances I've turned down and the one thing thats always put me off them is the thought of how they are going to be when they find out you arent interested in seeing them regularly.

You can be with a nurse you've just met shagging in a toilet in a hospital or with a hotel receptionist whose sneaked up to your room after her shift and at the end your just thinking  fuck this is going to be awkward next time I have to be here or what do I say when she asks when are we seeing each other again.. its worth handing over the money not to have that conversation every time
Banning reason: Darling_Delilah tout posing as punter

Offline sxman

You can't beat a civvie shag IMHO, much more enthusiasm and if you get a real dirty civvie its the best.

WG's is just less complicated and easier for variety IMO, SugarBabes are the closest you will get to a civvie shag, but that can have its complication.

I don't think you can match the sex with a civvie who's really into you and wants you to fuck her. I've had some really excellent sessions with WGs but it hasn't matched civvie sex. It's come close on occasion.

+1

Theres no match for the intensity of shagging a civvie who really wants you. Sex is both physical and emotional and a horny civvie brings out the best in both these demands, not the empty, mechanical experience from WGs.

Offline AVGscot

Obviously shagging a civvie who actually wants you is better whether a ons or relationship. WGs are good for the lack of relationship hassle and the variety you can pick from. I've also found that WGs can be more adventurous sexually - if they do everything on their likes list, and the WG can be more confident sexually than the average civvie.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)