You seriously want to defend the robust nature of this punters reviews and at the same time suggest he posted a review two years or more after seeing her but failed to mention that fact? Again, you seem to want it both ways. One of us has crazy logic, but it ain't me!
Can't remember the exact timescale but do recall that R was asked to post reviews on previous punts, so the context was there at the time although (for good reasons) his non-review posts have now been removed. So there was no subterfuge or any other accusation you may wish to level at a well-respected punter.
Yes, we've established that thanks Einstein, but its not really the point.
This was uncalled for, and you're terrible at picking your targets! Dani is again well-respected on here, and has survived on UKP far longer than most WGs because of the balanced and measured nature of her posting.
If I'm honest I'm not sure why you're so angry. You had a disappointing and uncomfortable experience and you posted a review; thanks for doing so. You sought to discredit another punter's review, which generally isn't accepted unless there's substantiated grounds for doing so. You were understandably challenged on this by punters who knew him better, and that's when the matter deteriorated. So please (and not necessarily in this order):
1/ Write reviews of a couple of your better punts
2/ Apologise to Dani
3/ Put this behind you and contribute more to get a better feel for the forum